This seems to be one of the last steps in exposing Christianity.
Exposing Christianity – Library of Rickandria
Unless we take some serious action in the way of working relentlessly to destroy Christianity and to alert thinking, intelligent people, the future is very grim.
In my many years of research and study, I have found the bible is not the so-called “word of God” but is a man-made book of witchcraft, hence all of the numbers therein.
Who Created God If God Created Everything? – Library of Rickandria
This is used liberally by top Jews in power to enslave the world.
Jewish ritual murder subliminally ties into the Christian mass/service where the Nazarene is the child sacrifice:
“Eat me and drink me” “this is the body of Christ…”
This son of Jehovah, sacrificed by his father…i.e., murdered.
The Truth About “Jesus Christ” – Library of Rickandria
In addition, the entire mass/service focuses upon the Jews, Israel and their fictitious history, creating a further subliminal tie.
Believers are under a very powerful spell.
The Disgusting Truth: Ritual Murder Is the Core of Judaism & Christianity – Library of Rickandria
EXAMINE:
The Bible: A Jewish Conspiracy & Hoax on the Gentiles – Library of Rickandria
The Holy Bible: A Book of Jewish Witchcraft – Library of Rickandria
PROOF: The True Purpose of the Bible is for Jewish Witchcraft – Library of Rickandria
Mind Control Programming & the Bible – Library of Rickandria
Murderers, Thieves & Liars: Christianity has Nothing of its Own – Library of Rickandria
BOOKS:
16 Scriptural Reasons NOT to Take the Bible Literally
FROM TIME TO TIME I get e-mails asking why the Bible shouldn’t be taken literally. One of the reasons is that the scripture itself makes this clear. I’ve decided to provide the scriptural reasons themselves all in one post so I can refer people to it. This is by no means an exhaustive list, but it gets the point across.
Old Testament Scriptures
1) Psalms 78:2: “I will open my mouth in a parable: I will utter dark sayings of old.”
Dark sayings of old are ancient teachings in the forms of riddles and parables. The Biblical writers call them “dark” because the meanings are hidden or concealed. They are meant to figure out through careful meditation, prayer, and contemplation.
Why would the Lord speak to us like this? The answer is provided in the following scripture.
Anointed Standard Testament – Index Introduction
Introduction
THERE are literally hundreds of English translations of the New Testament available today. What then is the need for a new translation, and how does the Anointed Standard Translation (AST) satisfy that need? To begin to answer this question, we must learn something of the history of the English translations that are today popular, and we must learn something of the advances in Biblical sciences that have been made only recently.
The earliest English translations were made from the Latin Vulgate, an early translation of the Greek New Testament made by Jerome. The Vulgate was a poor translation of questionable Greek manuscripts when it was made, and in the more than 1,000 years that passed since the time of Jerome to the time of the first English translation of the Vulgate, the text of the Vulgate suffered both accidental and deliberate tampering. The results were poor English translations filled with additions and omissions from the text which are even less useful today than when they were made due to the antiquated nature of the English they contain.
AST – The General Letter of Jacob
The General Letter of Jacob was written c. 47-48 AD
CHAPTER 1
1.1 Introduction
1) Jacob, a slave of God and of the Master Jesus the Anointed, to the twelve tribes in the dispersion, greetings:
1.2 Trials and Temptation
2) Count it all as joy, my brothers, when you fall into various temptations,
3) knowing that the proving of your persuasion works patience,
4) and let patience have its perfect work, that you may be perfect and complete, having lacked in nothing.
5) But if any of you lack wisdom, let him ask from God Who gives to all in racial purity and Who is not dishonorable, and it will be given to him.
6) But let him ask in persuasion, doubting nothing, for the one doubting is like a wave of the sea, being driven and tossed by wind.
7) For let not that man be ‡{Gr. ѱυхή See Appendix 9} persuaded that he will receive anything from the Master —
8) he is a man with two lives and undependable in all of his ways.
9) But let the humble brother boast in his height;
10) and the rich in his humiliation, because he will pass away as the flower of grass.
11) For the sun rose with hot wind and dried the grass, and its flower fell out, and the beauty of its appearance perished; so also, the rich one in his ways will fade away.
Is God’s Name Jehovah?
Is God’s Name Jehovah?
By Charue H. Campbell
JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES INSIST THAT GOD’S NAME (YHWH in the ancient Hebrew manuscript copies of the Old Testament) is supposed to be pronounced “Jehovah.” So persuaded are they about this, they believe they are the only church (organization) that has God’s favor because they are the only ones who consistently call God by this name. Yet, Jewish and Christian scholars, who are thoroughly familiar with the Old Testament Hebrew language and how to pronounce Hebrew words, make it clear that the Hebrew word YHWH is more accurately pronounced “Yahweh” (Yaw-Way) rather than “Jehovah.”
Richard Abanes, a nationally recognized authority on cults and religions, points out that:
The origin of the word Jehovah can be traced to the late Middle Ages (around the year 1500), when Jewish scribes began inserting the vowels from the Hebrew word Adonai (“my Lord”) into the name YHWH. The insertion resulted in the hybrid term YaHoWaH. Scribes wanted this new word to remind readers that God’s name was too holy to pronounce, so they should substitute adonah for it when reading biblical passages aloud.
Then, when the term YaHoWaH was Latinized, the “Y” and “W” were changed to “J” and “V”—resulting in Jehovah. In other words, Jehovah is a mistransliteration, compounded by the fact that, while “J” has a “Y” sound in Latin, it has a very different sound in English—as in the word jam. Jehovah appears in no literature earlier than about the thirteenth century, and it began to be popularized in the sixteenth century by well-meaning but mistaken Christians. (Richard Abanes, The Truth Behind the Da Vinci Code, p. 19, 83)
The Mistaken J
OFTEN HEARD IN THE CHURCHES OF OUR LAND IS THE REFRAIN SUNG ABOUT THE SAVIOUR, “There’s something about that name–” In our English-speaking world we have been taught that the saving name of the Redeemer of Israel is “Jesus.” So accepted is this name that few stop to consider its authenticity.
But the truth is, there is indeed “something about that Name.” That “something” is the inescapable fact that the Savior’s name is not Jesus, and never was. What’s more, the Name of the Heavenly Father is not Jehovah, a designation that is only five centuries old.
Churchianity has so thoroughly immersed the world in the error of this tradition for the past 500 years that few even think to research the matter or to consider the consequences of calling on the wrong name. As a result, most continue believing that the Hebrew Savior is called by a Latinised Greek name that could not possibly have existed at the time He walked the earth. It’s a name that would have been completely foreign to Him.
Eminent French historian, scholar, and archaeologist Ernest Renan acknowledges that the Savior was never in His lifetime called “Jesus.” In his book, The Life of Jesus, Renan doubts that the Savior even spoke Greek (p. 90). Greek was mostly the language of business and commerce n cosmopolitan circles. As for the Father’s Name, the hybrid “Jehovah” came into existence through the ignorance of Christian writers who did not understand the Old Testament Hebrew. Credit for the error is given to Petrus Galatinus, confessor to Pope Leo X in the 16th century.
Scofield The Pope of Prophecy Perversion
SINCE THE EARLY 1930’S THE SCOFIELD REFERENCE BIBLE HAS BEEN PROMOTED AS THE SOURCE FOR INTERPRETING REVELATION AND THE END TIMES. Almost all the current Dispensationalist theology is derived from his teaching and his Reference Bible. Following is a transcript of a speech about Cyrus I Scofield by Rev. Nord Davis. (Most grammar and spelling errors that may occur are most likely on the part of the transcriber so forgive it’s form.)
The Pope of Prophecy Perversion
I am going to talk about a certain man everybody knows. His name is Cyrus I. Scofield. The man who wrote the Scofield Bible. The Bible that Christian brethren read so frequently and with which they have made up their current doctrine. Which has changed the thrust of America since the middle 1800’s.
This is going to be of controversial content and because it is controversial in content, I will pick one of the Bibles most controversial characters to quote – the prophet Jeremiah. He preached, he warned, he exposed false preaching of his day and all to no avail. And he and his Israel people went right into captivity. The very captivity about which he had been warning.