By Allan Cornford
Copyright © 2022 Allan Cornford. (Standard Copyright License.) All rights reserved. Independently Publishe through KDP. The images which are included for informative purposes only, are Screenshots, courtesy of Ewaranon’s YouTube documentary; ‘The Lost History of the Flat Earth’. All external links to images in the public domain, are courtesy from Wikimedia Commons and where possible, credits are given to each source. This I believe, comes under the term of Fair Use.
It has been said that:
No branch of world history has been suppressed as energetically or effectively as the history of the Americas before the nineteenth-century.
CIVILIZATION: Was there a RESET for HUMANITY in the 19th Century? – Library of Rickandria
In fact, the familiar story of Columbus and his dealings with Ferdinand and Isabella, the “Catholic Monarchs,” which is the supposed cornerstone of American history, is mostly a product of the early nineteenth-century.
CIVILIZATION: RICHEST in 19th Century – Library of Rickandria
In vain will you search for records bearing on such events or personalities before that time.
On January 6, 1858, ‘The Raftsman Journal’ published an intriguing article called ‘Antiquities in America’, discussing:
”many of the ruins and structures around this continent that have not been discussed by official history.”
The article reads in part; How few reflect on the fact that America is an old dominion the seat of an ancient, mighty empire.
These facts are opening themselves every day to the eyes of the astonished world, and it is to be hoped that the spirit of inquiry, which seems at present to animate all classes of learned men, may throw light on the early history of this remarkable region.
America was once the seat of an ancient, mighty empire?
What on earth is that supposed to mean?
If it were true, then surely, we would have been taught about this ”mighty empire” long ago.
Wouldn’t we?
John Bach McMaster (June 29, 1852 – May 24, 1932) was an American historian.
John Bach McMaster’s ‘A Brief History of the United States’ was originally published in 1871.
A bestseller when it was first published in 1883, this first volume of historian John Bach McMaster’s magnum opus is a lively history of the United States that is as entertaining as it is informative. Eventually stretching to eight volumes, McMaster’s epic was original in its emphasis on social and economic conditions as deciding factors in shaping a nation’s culture: in addition to the words and actions of great men and the outcomes of significant skirmishes and battles, McMaster indulges his obsession with fascinating trivia, from which fruits and vegetables were to be found in the markets of 18th-century Boston to the cost of books in Pennsylvania before the Revolution. American historian JOHN BACH McMASTER (1852-1932) taught at the Wharton School of Finance and Economy at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, from 1883 to 1919. He also wrote Benjamin Franklin as a Man of Letters (1887) and A School History of the United States (1897), which became a definitive textbook.
A Brief History of the United States – Anna’s Archive
In the Preface it reads:
Before the task (of preparing this book) was undertaken, it was known that there was misapprehension or misrepresentation in regard to the earlier periods, and that details were often discolored or disguised by:
- political
- sectional
- local
prejudices.
Many grave questions, too, are still in dispute without the possibility of reaching secure conclusions.
We are left to wonder on the nature of the grave questions
”still in dispute”
and how they might relate to the
”misrepresentation of earlier periods.”
Neither are we told which particular details were disguised for political reasons etc.
The historical record of a bygone age maybe?
One which by and large has been covered up, skewed or redesignated to fit with a fabricated mainstream narrative?
On the face of it, any theory which suggests that an entire period of history has been covered up or disguised for political reasons etc.
effectively erases millions of people who lived in the area during that period.
Indeed, perhaps this has been the case.
Hypothetically speaking then, if indeed an entire block or era of history has been hidden from the public record, we are left to wonder what justification the controllers thought they might have for doing so?
For the benefit of the public at large?
I very much doubt it. I think it far more likely to be for reasons of power and financial gain of exceeding wealth.
Or possibly their motive was born out of fear?
The New World
The “New World” (as opposed to the old world) is a term used specifically for the Americas.
The term gained prominence in the early 16th century.
The arrival of the Spanish Conquistadors in Yucatán in the 1520’s, signaled the beginning of the end for Mayan civilization.
Under the banner of the Cross (Papal Catholicism) it is estimated that during the initial Spanish conquest of the Americas, up to eight million indigenous people died, primarily through the spread of diseases.
Simultaneously, the eighteenth and nineteenth century wars and atrocities waged by the Europeans against Native Americans also resulted in hundreds of thousands, or more likely, millions of deaths.
The mistreatment, enslavement and killing of Native Americans continued for centuries, in every area of the Americas, including the areas that would become:
- Canada
- the United States
- Mexico
- Brazil
and countries such as:
- Paraguay
- Chile
- Argentina
Could the true reason for this deliberate, prolonged and barbaric act of mass genocide that lasted for centuries, have been to eradicate the last generation of humanity in the Americas, who still retained a collective memory of a cataclysmic event, that brought about an abrupt change in social conditions, and even to history itself?
A Great Reset of sorts, in the historical timeline, but one not recorded as such, in the mainstream narrative?
Since the early 1900’s, there has been a major cover-up, especially by organizations such as the Smithsonian Institution, to make us believe that America was first colonized by Asian peoples migrating through the Bering Strait around 15,000 years ago.
From a Biblical perspective of course, there were no Asian people, nor any other race of modern-day man (created in the image of God) on Earth 15,000 years ago.
The controllers had to introduce such a concept, in an attempt to give credence to the theory of Evolution and the theoretical Big Bang.
There are however, thousands of burial mounds all over America which the Natives claim were there a long time before them.
Many of these burial mounds show traces of a developed civilization, and giant human skeletal remains have frequently been found, that have not been reported in the media and news outlets.
As I understand, when these giant skeletons have been discovered, they have promptly been confiscated by the authorities and placed under lock and key by the Smithsonian Institution.
These burial mounds and skeletal remains have their origins in the antediluvian age, and just like the ancient stone monuments, have been inherited by the inhabitants of the post-flood world.
Some might say:
“hmm, that’s quite fascinating and maybe it’s true.
Some relics from the ancient past could well have been inherited by a later civilization or society.
But how is that relevant for us today?”
Maybe it’s time to take a closer look at certain aspects of the official record, and see what is hidden in plain sight, then to reconsider and re-educate ourselves.
For we tend not to see the vast amount of evidence
”hidden in plain sight”
in the environment around us.
Not because it is not there, but because we tend to overlook any evidence that is not supposed to be there.
That evidence is visible in the infrastructure and architecture across the entire realm we call Earth.
We have been indoctrinated to believe that those who created this glorious architecture, done so during the days of the horse and cart, a period that official history refers to as the Middle Ages aka the Dark Age.
Time and again when comparing the visual evidence around us with the official narrative, we find glaring inconsistencies and at times, even impossibilities which just don’t add up.
For the controllers of history seem to have compressed the construction of the visual evidence into a timeline which has been shortened or manipulated.
For several years I’ve spent a lot of time as an amateur researcher of history and learned to my dismay that the official narrative of many historical events relies heavily on guesswork and is usually a little suspect, to say the very least.
Or as Napoleon so succinctly put it:
“History is a set of lies that certain people have agreed upon.”
Miles Williams Mathis: Was Napoleon Jewish? – Library of Rickandria
It’s reached a point in fact, where over the last year or so, I’ve experienced a major shift in my understanding of history.
History has been grossly misrepresented, and in some cases never happened at all.
At least, not in the manner we are told.
From time-to-time certain individuals suddenly appear on the scene, and much like phantoms, haunt the pages of history for a while.
It would seem that the controllers have used such individuals to disguise and discredit much of the evidence for the old world.
It’s fairly widely accepted now, that much of world history has been hidden, falsified, or at the very best sanitized, to fit an official narrative, especially over the last 400 years or so.
Some folks have long had the sense that things have never been quite what they seem, or what they were taught, whilst others appear to have minds that are closed off completely to anything outside of the controlled narrative.
To the latter, I would ask:
Is there anyone who has not gazed in awe at the intricate detail of the sculpted masonry, and the beautiful architecture of our old:
- churches
- cathedrals
- palaces
- town halls
and government buildings?
Have you never paused for a moment to wonder who built them?
And why such marvels are never built in similar style today?
Like the early Egyptians who gazed in awe at the Great Pyramid, have you not gazed in awe at a Grand Cathedral and said:
”They just don’t build them like this anymore, do they?”
For I certainly have. In fact, for most of my life, I’ve been amazed by the resplendent architecture of the grand old buildings we see in our towns and cities, but have always believed the narrative, that most were built within the last 300 years or so.
Nevertheless, I always remained puzzled as to how they managed to achieve such marvels back in the olden days of the horse and cart.
Don’t get me wrong, I have no doubt in man’s ability to design and build incredible structures, but certainly not of the magnificent style I’m referring to, and not during the time period we are told.
Revised Timeline?
Anatoly Timofeevich Fomenko (Russian: Анато́лий Тимофе́евич Фоме́нко; born 13 March 1945 in Stalino, USSR, now the city of Donetsk) is a Soviet and Russian professor of Mathematics at Moscow State University. He is well-known as a topologist and member of the Russian Academy of Sciences. He is a painter and illustrator of original artworks inspired by topological objects and structures. Fomenko is also widely known as a conspiracy theorist. He originated a fictitious and pseudoscientific history called New Chronology, based on works of Russian-Soviet writer Nikolai Alexandrovich Morozov.
The concept of a revised timeline or a ”new chronology” is most fully explained by Anatoly Fomenko in his 2002 book; History: Fiction or Science? originally published in Russian.
History: Fiction or Science? is the most explosive tractate on history ever written – however, every theory it contains, no matter how unorthodox, is backed by solid scientific data. The book is well-illustrated, contains over 500 graphs, copies of ancient manuscripts, and countless facts attesting to the falsity of the chronology used nowadays, which never cease to amaze the reader. Eminent mathematician proves that: Jesus Christ was born in 1053 and crucified in 1086 The Old Testament refers to mediaeval events. Apocalypse was written after 1486. Does this sound uncanny? This version of events is substantiated by hard facts and logic – validated by new astronomical research and statistical analysis of ancient sources – to a greater extent than everything you may have read and heard about history before. The dominating historical discourse in its current state was essentially crafted in the XVI century from a rather contradictory jumble of sources such as innumerable copies of ancient Latin and Greek manuscripts whose originals had vanished in the Dark Ages and the allegedly irrefutable proof offered by late mediaeval astronomers, resting upon the power of ecclesial authorities. Nearly all of its components are blatantly untrue! For some of us, it shall possibly be quite disturbing to see the magnificent edifice of classical history to turn into an ominous simulacrum brooding over the snake pit of mediaeval politics. Twice so, in fact: the first seeing the legendary millenarian dust on the ancient marble turn into a mere layer of dirt – one that meticulous unprejudiced research can eventually remove. The second, and greater, attack of unease comes with the awareness of just how manyareas of human knowledge still trust the three elephants of the consensual chronology to support them. Nothing can remedy that except for an individual chronological revolution happening in the minds of a large enough number of people.
History: Fiction or Science? – Anna’s Archive
Labelled a crazy, pseudo-historical, conspiracy theorist by many, Fomenko argues that the events of antiquity generally attributed to the civilizations of the:
- Roman empire
- ancient Greece
- ancient Egypt
actually, occurred during the Middle Ages, more than a thousand years later.
Some even propose that the Roman empire fell suddenly, rather than a gradual fall.
Fomenko proposes that, the written history of humankind goes only as far back as 800 AD, how there is almost no information about events between 800 AD and 1000 AD, and most known historical events actually took place from 1000 AD to 1500 AD.
He also presents a reasonable argument, that world history prior to 1600 AD has been widely falsified to suit the interests of a number of different conspirators including the Vatican, the Holy Roman Empire, and the Russian House of Romanov, all working together to obscure the “true” history of the world and centered around a global empire called the “Russian Horde”.
Although I wouldn’t necessarily agree with all he proposes, such as the ”Russian Horde”, I do feel that Fomenko is on the right track.
We have been indoctrinated to accept a timeline which has been falsified to suit an agenda, and to the extent where a possible eight hundred years or more of earlier history has been folded into a more recent timeline.
Consider for a moment, the numerous grand Cathedrals around the world.
It’s true that prior to the Industrial Revolution, the cost of manual labor was relatively low compared with the high cost of wages today.
But this needs to be balanced with the time element involved and the production costs, where automated, mass-produced concrete, steel and glass etc. are relatively cheap.
Not to mention the absolute nightmare of the logistics involved back in the Middle Ages.
Raw materials first had to be mined or quarried, transported by horse and cart to be refined and processed, then manually loaded onto wagons once again, before being harnessed to mules or oxen, and transported to the build site.
In some cases, 100 miles or more.
Never mind the amount of engineering disciplines required to excavate the footings, install the drain work, to erect the scaffolding, and the huge number of skilled and unskilled labor required.
They achieved all of this with primitive roads by today’s standards, without electricity, power tools, diamond cut blades, and no modern-day heavy machinery and lifting equipment.
Wouldn’t it be a far easier task in this modern-day age of hi-tech machinery, power tools, delivery lorries and tower cranes that can reach over 200 feet and lift 18 metric tons?
And yet it rarely happens, if it actually happens at all.
The list of reasons why these majestic constructions were as good as impossible to erect during the time frame we’re told, makes it quite easy to realize there is something very awry with the given timeline.
Who built them?
When did it all stop?
And why?
Such questions are also as good as impossible to find official answers for, and trying to do so, becomes much like playing a game of Charades in the dark.
For there is no photographic evidence for anything prior to the nineteenth century, and of course, nobody can travel back in time, to see for themselves what was going on.
When I first stumbled across this strange enigma, I remember thinking,
”This is ridiculous.”
How is it even possible, for an entire period of history to have been hidden from us?
And even if it were true, which I’m sure it’s not, then what exactly has been hidden?
And why would ”the controllers” consider it to be of such vital importance, and to their advantage to conceal whatever it is they are hiding, from the general public in the first place?
Why invest so much time, money and effort into doing so?
Are they afraid of something?
If so, then what are they afraid of?
And why? Well, it seems quite possible that something major, and of a world changing nature occurred, probably during the period from 1650 to 1815, which culminated in 1816; known as; ‘The Year Without a Summer’.
CONTINUE
BOOK: EXCERPT: Tartarian Rule? Or Millennial Kingdom? – The Art of Repurpose – Library of Rickandria
BOOK: Tartarian Rule? Or Millennial Kingdom? – Library of Rickandria
BOOK: Tartarian Rule? Or Millennial Kingdom? – Hidden History