First published November 25, 2021, by Miles Mathis
This is by request. I have already touched on the Jesuits many times, and my readers should already know my overall opinion on the subject, which will not change here.
We have already seen Disraeli admitting the Jesuits were Jews, so I have read that as a simple infiltration, going way back—even before the Jesuits.
Benjamin Disraeli, 1st Earl of Beaconsfield, KG, PC, DL, JP, FRS[1] (21 December 1804 – 19 April 1881) was a British statesman, Conservative politician and writer who twice served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. He played a central role in the creation of the modern Conservative Party, defining its policies and its broad outreach. Disraeli is remembered for his influential voice in world affairs, his political battles with the Liberal Party leader William Ewart Gladstone, and his one-nation conservatism or “Tory democracy”. He made the Conservatives the party most identified with the British Empire and military action to expand it, both of which were popular among British voters. He is the only British Prime Minister to have been born Jewish.
We have seen the Papacy already infiltrated before Loyola, by the:
- Medicis
- Borgias
and other Jewish popes.
Kabbalah, Hermeticism & the Occult – Library of Rickandria
In that light, the Jesuits were just these noble families cementing their hold on Rome and Europe by establishing their own specialized monks and monasteries.
I often get angry emails from people screaming that the Jesuits are behind the Jews, but of course that is upside down, I assume on purpose.
The Jews have tried to deflect blame onto the Jesuits, but as you will see, that doesn’t fly.
The Jews were around and running their projects long before anyone had heard of the Jesuits.
According to my extensive research, no one is crouching behind the Jews, except maybe the Phoenicians.
But since I use the two terms pretty much interchangeably, that also doesn’t deflect blame.
It is two names for the same people, so in pointing at the Phoenicians I am not pointing away from the Jews.
The Jews are just neo-Phoenicians.
Where did ALL the Phoenicians Go? – Library of Rickandria
In researching this latest paper, I ran across a book I didn’t previously know about, entitled The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews.
Review: The Jesuit Order as a Synagogue of Jews – Part One | VT Foreign Policy (veteranstoday.com)
It was published in 2010 by Robert Aleksander Maryks.
At first you might think this is a bold outing of the Jesuits, but it isn’t.
Like When Scotland was Jewish, it only seems to be spilling the beans.
Both are actually opposition control, released by the Jews themselves.
We already saw that with the latter book, which was written by two authors who admit they are Jewish.
And it is the same with Robert Maryks.
Did he fool you with that name?
Try spelling it Marx.
Reading the Signs – Today’s Lesson: Karl Marx – Library of Rickandria
Maryks is an assistant professor at Boston College, so you can be sure he isn’t doing anything revolutionary here.
If he did any real research, they would fire him immediately.
The book was published under the auspices of The Studies in Medieval and Reformation Traditions, which appears to be:
- founded
- edited
- overseen
by Jews.
The Jesuit Order As A Synagogue Of Jews – Robert Aleksander Maryks : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
Maryks actually thanks a Borja in his acknowledgments.
We see what they are up to very fast in the long introduction, where they admit what is already known:
the first Jesuits, including Loyola, were conversos or crypto-Jews, from noble and wealthy families.
Ignatius of Loyola SJ (/ɪɡˈneɪʃəs/ ig-NAY-shəss; Basque: Ignazio Loiolakoa; Spanish: Ignacio de Loyola; Latin: Ignatius de Loyola; born Íñigo López de Oñaz y Loyola; c. 23 October 1491[3] – 31 July 1556), venerated as Saint Ignatius of Loyola, was a Spanish Catholic priest and theologian, who, with six companions, founded the religious order of the Society of Jesus (Jesuits), and became its first Superior General, in Paris in 1541.
But then Maryks tries to convince us that although it was OK to be a Jesuit Jew from 1540 to 1593, after 1593 (see p. 117) the Jesuits were cleansed of Jewish blood from within, by new rules forbidding it.
That isn’t believable on the face of it, so we should look closely at Maryks’ evidence.
Does he prove it or even indicate it? No, he just says it.
But let’s back up. In order to build street cred in the run up to that argument, Maryks admits the first Jesuits were Jews.
Disraeli and many others, including other prominent Jews and rabbis, have already admitted it, so Maryks isn’t telling us anything we don’t already know.
But as part of building his cred, he does go into a bit more deeply than others before him, showing a lot of evidence they were Jewish.
So, this should interest us and does.
It probably explains why the book—although prepared as controlled opposition by the Jews themselves—was soon pulled from the shelves.
It is almost impossible to buy, being out of print and going for hundreds of dollars online.
My link above goes to Veteran’s Today from 2018, where Gordon Duff is recommending the book.
Also, for street cred, I assume.
And also, to sell you the idea the Jesuits were only Jews before 1593.
So, let’s look at the first Jesuits.
The first one I will look at is very easy, that being Alfonso Salmeron.
Alfonso Nicolás (Alphonsus) Salmerón, SJ (8 September 1515 – 13 February 1585) was a Spanish biblical scholar, a Catholic priest, and one of the first Jesuits.
You can tell he is Jewish just from the name.
Salermon=Salmon=Salomon=Solomon.
Also see his picture, which is easy to read.
A preternaturally long hook nose and no cross around his neck.
But if that kind of evidence offends you, I send you to Maryks, who gives you much more.
Salmeron was from Toledo, where his family were known Jews of longstanding and huge wealth.
If you search for him in Maryks’ book online, good luck.
The important things don’t come up either on an internal search (cntl+F) or in the index.
So, I will just give you the hint: go to the footnote of page 55, where Maryks admits many Jewish historians have admitted Salermon is Jewish, including:
- Friedman
- Gomez Menor
- Salvador
Toledo had been a Jewish stronghold for many centuries, being run by Phoenicians back to Roman times.
Back then they were known as Carpetians, and by the 1st century AD Toledo already had the largest Roman circus in Spain.
By the third century it was already a favored town of the wealthiest in that region, due to its use as a trade and banking center (and being on a pretty hill surrounded by rivers*).
We are supposed to believe these people running Toledo in those years were Goths, i.e. wild men of the north, but there is no evidence of that.
Like the Vikings, they have been sold as something they weren’t.
Most likely they were northern Phoenicians battling with their southern cousins.
If they had been wild men, they couldn’t have competed with the Romans.
It is admitted that the Jews were in Toledo from the beginning, but we are supposed to believe they were oppressed by the Goths and then the Moors and all along by the Christians.
Christian Program & Purpose – Library of Rickandria
The usual story.
The usual flip of history.
The truth seeped through in the 7th century under Archbishop Julian of Toledo, supposedly a Goth ruler who legislated against the Jews.
Julian of Toledo (642–690) was born in Toledo, Hispania. He was well educated at the cathedral school, was a monk and later abbot at Agali, a spiritual student of Saint Eugene II, and archbishop of Toledo. He was the first bishop to have primacy over the entire Iberian Peninsula—a position he has been accused of securing by being complicit in 680 in the supposed poisoning of Wamba, king of the Visigoths—and he helped centralize the Iberian Church in Toledo. His elevation to the position of primate of the Visigothic church was a source of great unhappiness among the kingdom’s clergy. And his views regarding the doctrine of the Trinity proved distressing to the Vatican.
Except that they admit he was Jewish.
Amazing, isn’t it, that these Jew-hating Goths had a Jewish primate?
Although the Goths were sold to us as wild men, they also admit that Toledo in the 7th century was a center of literacy and writing.
Was this writing in the Gothic language, in the Gothic alphabet?
No, again as with the Vikings, you are supposed to believe the Goths had no written language.
They were barbarians you know, and just spoke in grunts and waves of their hands.
Once the Romans arrived the Goths borrowed their alphabet and language.
So, convenient.
And here’s a strange fact, right from Julian’s Wiki page:
a lost work of this Julian is said to be on the subject of Jews owning Christian slaves.
Exposing Christianity – Library of Rickandria
That’s pretty hard to spin, isn’t it?
Just think about it:
if what we are told about Jews being third class citizens were true, with edicts constantly being passed against them and so on, how could they ever have Christian slaves?
The Real Tetragrammaton: Further Exposing Christianity – Library of Rickandria
It makes no sense, because slaveowners are never from a repressed class themselves.
You would expect the Jews to be slaves in that time and place, not to own them, so this story makes no sense. Just to be sure you are getting it; I am not saying Julian didn’t write a book on that. I am saying the Jews weren’t repressed.
They were the upper-class there, as they always were and still are.
This early Spanish Renaissance was presided over by Isidore of Seville, the most scholarly man of his time and the Archbishop of Seville.
Isidore of Seville (Latin: Isidorus Hispalensis; c. 560 – 4 April 636) was a Hispano-Roman scholar, theologian, and archbishop of Seville. He is widely regarded, in the words of 19th-century historian Montalembert, as “the last scholar of the ancient world”.
If you want to know who he really was, they give you clue:
he is always depicted surrounded by bees.
See Gerry’s papers on the Phoenicians to see what that means.
Phoenicians: ANCIENT SPOOKS – Library of Rickandria
This indicates that his edicts against Jews were the usual smokescreens.
Compare it to the more recent stories about Jews being kept out of country clubs in the US up until a few decades ago.
A joke, since it isn’t true.
But it allowed the Jews to hide, because if you saw someone at a country club back then, you just assumed they had been vetted and weren’t Jewish.
They looked like that because they were Syrian or Lebanese or something, I guess.
In the same way, Isidore’s edicts against the Jews made it look like something was being done against usury or venality, when nothing was.
Just like now.
I pause to point out that on the Wiki page for Toledo, they skip ahead from 1085, when the Castilians drove the Moors out, to 1525.
That’s kind of curious, isn’t it?
Nothing happened in Toledo for over 400 years?
Except that they do quickly list the Jewish persecutions of:
- 1368
- 1391
- 1449
and 1486.
Indicating Jewish authors of this page.
Why would we get many paragraphs on the late 600s, but not a word on the first real “Spanish” period in Spain?
We may hit that another time.
But just to give you some idea, Charles V became King of Toledo and Holy Roman Emperor in the 1500s, and he was of course a Habsburg.
Charles V[c] (Ghent, 24 February 1500 – 21 September 1558) was Holy Roman Emperor and Archduke of Austria from 1519 to 1556, King of Spain from 1516 to 1556, and Lord of the Netherlands as titular Duke of Burgundy from 1506 to 1555. He was heir to and then head of the rising House of Habsburg. His dominions in Europe included the Holy Roman Empire, extending from Germany to northern Italy with rule over the Austrian hereditary lands and Burgundian Low Countries, and Spain with its possessions of the southern Italian kingdoms of Naples, Sicily and Sardinia. In the Americas, he oversaw the continuation of Spanish colonization and a short-lived German colonization. The personal union of the European and American territories he ruled was the first collection of realms labelled “the empire on which the sun never sets”.
His father was Philip the Handsome, King of Castile:
Philip the Handsome[b] (22 June/July 1478 – 25 September 1506), also called the Fair, was ruler of the Burgundian Netherlands and titular Duke of Burgundy from 1482 to 1506, as well as the first Habsburg King of Castile (as Philip I) for a brief time in 1506.
Gorgeous, ain’t he?
Here’s his father:
Maximilian I (22 March 1459 – 12 January 1519) was King of the Romans from 1486 and Holy Roman Emperor from 1508 until his death in 1519. He was never crowned by the Pope, as the journey to Rome was blocked by the Venetians. He proclaimed himself elected emperor in 1508 (Pope Julius II later recognized this) at Trent, thus breaking the long tradition of requiring a papal coronation for the adoption of the Imperial title. Maximilian was the only surviving son of Frederick III, Holy Roman Emperor, and Eleanor of Portugal. Since his coronation as King of the Romans in 1486, he ran a double government, or Doppelregierung (with a separate court), with his father until Frederick’s death in 1493.
Note the nose and the red hair.
Not what you expected I bet.
Before that, Toledo and most of the rest of the peninsula was ruled by Burgundians/Ivreans, and they came out of the Carolingians.
That is, the Phoenicians by yet another name.
Next, as one of the first Jesuits we find Peter Faber.
Peter Faber, SJ (French: Pierre Lefevre or Favre, Latin: Petrus Faver) (13 April 1506 – 1 August 1546) was a Savoyard Catholic priest, theologian and co-founder of the Society of Jesus, along with Ignatius of Loyola and Francis Xavier. Pope Francis announced his canonization in 2013.
He is supposedly a shepherd who ended up at the College Saint-Barbe at the University of Paris, which is sort of like the French equivalent of Trinity College, Cambridge.
It would be like being told a bootblack ended up at Oxford or that a little black boy from the slums of Kenya ended up at Harvard.
No wait, we were told that, weren’t we?
I have news for you:
Faber has always been a Jewish name and still is.
See for example the new Jeopardy guest host David Faber, admitted being Jewish.
Also see Swiss investor and famous racist Marc Faber.
Also alleged Holocaust survivor David Faber.
David Faber (25 August 1928 – 28 July 2015) was a Polish Jew who survived nine concentration camps in occupied Poland and Nazi Germany. Faber would be incarcerated within nine different concentration camps, where he would endure witnessing most of his family members killed right in front of him, including his brother Romek who was tortured in front of him. Faber would go on to write about the horrific experiences in his memoir, Because of Romek. He would later dedicate his life to remembering his family through both his memoir and through education. He was also an award-winning educator and lecturer on The Holocaust.
The Holocaust Hoax: The “Six Million” Lie – Library of Rickandria
Also slave trader Mary Faber, whose maiden name is conspicuously scrubbed, probably because it’s Cohen or something.
Jews Have Cursed the Black Race – Library of Rickandria
Strangely, Peter Faber is not mentioned once in Maryks’ book.
Instead, he calls him Pierre Favre, I suppose to keep you from remembering what I just told you.
Best guess is Faber was a wealthy Savoyard hand-picked by the Medicis for this project.
Next, we have Francis Xavier, real name Francisco de Jasso y Azpilicueta, which indicates he was from the Azpilicueta dynasty.
Francis Xavier, SJ (born Francisco de Jasso y Azpilicueta; Latin: Franciscus Xaverius; Basque: Frantzisko Xabierkoa; French: François Xavier; Spanish: Francisco Javier; Portuguese: Francisco Xavier; 7 April 1506 – 3 December 1552), venerated as Saint Francis Xavier, was born in Navarre, Spain. He was a Catholic missionary and saint who co-founded the Society of Jesus and, as a representative of the Portuguese Empire, led the first Christian mission to Japan.
Another from this dynasty, Juan Bautista de Orendain y Azpilicueta, 1st Marquess, was later Prime Minister under Philip V.
Philip II (21 May 1527 – 13 September 1598), sometimes known in Spain as Philip the Prudent (Spanish: Felipe el Prudente), was King of Spain from 1556, King of Portugal from 1580, and King of Naples and Sicily from 1554 until his death in 1598. He was also jure uxoris King of England and Ireland from his marriage to Queen Mary I in 1554 until her death in 1558. He was also Duke of Milan from 1540. From 1555, he was Lord of the Seventeen Provinces of the Netherlands.
He has a page at Wiki, but it also doesn’t come up on a search for that name.
Xavier’s father was Privy Counsellor and Finance Minister to King John III of Navarre.
So, in this case they pretty much admit he was Jewish.
Finance ministers have always been Jewish, since they are bankers.
They also admit his mother, Dona Maria Azpilicueta y Aznarez, was of Navarrese nobility in both lines.
Xavier didn’t even study theology, getting a Master of Arts and teaching Aristotle at Beauvais College, Paris.
He was recruited last minute to replace Bobadilla, and went straight from teaching Aristotle at the University of Paris to a meeting with the King of Spain, Charles I.
Nicholas Bobadilla, SJ (c.1509 – 23 September 1590) was one of the first Jesuits. A native of Spain, he spent most of his career in Germany.
Up to that time, Xavier’s favorite book was De Institutione de bene vivendi (the Institution of living well) by Croatian humanist Marko Marulic.
Marko Marulić Splićanin (Croatian pronunciation: [mâːrko mǎrulitɕ splîtɕanin];[a] in Latin Marcus Marulus Spalatensis; 18 August 1450 – 5 January 1524), was a Croatian poet, lawyer, judge, and Renaissance humanist who coined the term “psychology”. He is the national poet of Croatia. According to George J. Gutsche, Marulic’s epic poem Judita “is the first long poem in Croatian”, and “gives Marulić a position in his own literature comparable to Dante in Italian literature.” Marulić’s Latin poetry is of such high quality that his contemporaries dubbed him “The Christian Virgil.” He has been called the “crown of the Croatian medieval age”, the “father of the Croatian Renaissance”, and “The Father of Croatian literature.”
Could you ask for a bigger clue?
Marulic’s mother was of the Albertis, Italian/Jewish nobles.
His most famous poem was called Judita.
Do I need to explain that to you?
The fake historians tell us Xavier quit his teaching position at University of Paris in 1534 to study theology, being ordained three years later, but I don’t believe it.
If so, why was he a last-minute alternate for Bobadilla?
Can you imagine turning your whole life over for this idiot Loyola, getting ordained, and then not being chosen as one of the first Jesuits?
We are supposed to believe that if Bobadilla hadn’t gotten sick at the last minute, Xavier would have been lost to history, all due to some pledge in a crypt.
As you may know, Xavier was sent to Goa, India, allegedly to set up a mission, but—as with all prominent missionaries since then—he was actually there for business.
We may assume he was there as an agent of the merchants, and his cousins the Jewish bankers, who were already in India but were anxious to expand at that time.
Global Banking System – Library of Rickandria
Their financial successes in Europe gave them extra capital to spend in expanding their empire in the East, so we can read Xavier’s trips as early East India Company excursions.
The British East India Company, American Revolution, & a Whole Lot More – Library of Rickandria
Remember, this was only 60 years before the official opening of the EIC in England in 1600.
Drake had already been to the East Indies by 1579, and one of the places he visited was the Moluccas (west of New Guinea).
Not coincidentally, Xavier also went there, but thirty years earlier.
The Portuguese had already been there for decades, and they had their own East India Company.
Do you really think Xavier was there preaching?
They admit that Xavier had always wanted to be an important society man, so it is pretty difficult to imagine him walking around barefoot in India, tending to the sick and poor.
My guess is he was there sitting on velvet cushions and being fed grapes by half naked women.
Which reminds us that Goa is also a strange place to be doing missionary work.
It has always been the richest area of India, though they tell you that is now due to tourism.
You have to laugh.
It has always been due to mining.
The Portuguese didn’t capture it in 1510 for tourism, or for coconuts either.
They have been mining iron and gold from the beginning, though there is no mention of gold mining on the Wiki page for Goa.
Gold for Humans & Others… – Library of Rickandria
However, if you do a search on it, many current active gold mines come up.
We are told Xavier built St. Stephen’s Cathedral in Kombutherai in 1542, and they give you a bad picture of it on Wikipedia.
But if you look it up, this comes up:
Does that look like it was built in 1542?
It looks like a Hollywood quick build to me.
The interior may be even worse:
Where did they get those decorations, Dollar Tree?
I love the plastic lawn chairs St. Xavier built in 1542.
As I often say, they really think we are stupid.
I will be told the church was recently rebuilt.
Obviously.
But why don’t we have pictures of the original church?
Or the ruins?
No one had cameras there until after 2010?
No artists ever painted or drew the old famous church of St. Xavier or its ruins?
The very wealthy Roman Catholic Church had no desire to keep this site up as a holy site, due to its historical significance?
We are told the Jesuits abandoned the cathedral soon after they built it.
My guess is they abandoned it even before they built it:
meaning, they didn’t build it at all.
Xavier is supposed to have built 40 churches in India in just three years.
With just one hammer, his own strong arms, and the light of the Lord, I guess.
But that isn’t how the Catholic church worked back then.
When they built cathedrals, they did it right.
They didn’t just throw up a wooden frame like the Amish.
They built with stone and took years to do it.
And they certainly wouldn’t build a church and then immediately abandon it.
See for example the Cathedral at Chennai, first built in 1523 and visited by Xavier.
St. George’s Cathedral is a Church of South India (previously Church of England and Anglican) cathedral in Chennai, India. The cathedral was built in 1815. St. George’s occupies an important place in the history of Christianity in India, as the Church of South India was inaugurated here on 27 September 1947. It marked the breaking down of ecclesiastical barriers between Protestants of various traditions. The architecture of St. George’s Cathedral is remarkable for its tall spire, pillars, marble statues, mural tablets and memorials inside. The cathedral is a piece of architectural grandeur resting on a tier of steps. The governors of Fort St. George and their families worshipped here as also the viceroys when they visited Madras.
It is now a huge awful Neo-Gothic basilica, but the original church existed until 1892, and we have pictures of it.
OK, let’s move on to Diego Laynez, whom everyone admits was Jewish.
Diego Laynez, S.J. (sometimes spelled Laínez) (Spanish: Diego Laynez), born in 1512 (Almazán, Spain) and died on 19 January 1565 (Rome), was a Spanish Jesuit priest and theologian, a New Christian (of converted Jewish descent), and the second Superior General of the Society of Jesus after the founder Ignatius of Loyola.
Everyone but Wikipedia, of course, which skips over his family and early years.
Amazingly, Maryks admits (p. xxvi) that during the converso controversy of the Third General Congregation, those involved used the word “Spanish” to mean “Jew/converso”.
The anti-Jewish faction was referred to as anti-Spanish.
Wow.
That tells you how prominent the Jews were in Spain at that time, though Maryks runs right over it without comment.
Lainez was a close friend of Salmeron from childhood, they having grown up in the same Jewish neighborhood.
Maryks admits on p. 57 that many of Lainez’ family had been sentenced for Judaizing.
He also admits that Jeronimo Nadal lied about this, claiming the Lainez were “exemplary Christians”.
Jérôme Nadal, SJ (in Spanish: Jerónimo Nadal) was a Spanish Jesuit priest in the first generation of the companions of St. Ignatius of Loyola. A very close collaborator of St. Ignatius of Loyola, the founder of the Society of Jesus, he was sent to explain to the various Jesuit communities of Europe the first draft of the Constitutions. He is known as the “Ignatian theologian” for having developed the theology behind Ignatian spirituality.
The Italian Jesuit Benedetto Palmio stated for the record that Lainez had admitted to being Jewish.
Sacchini admits Lainez’ Jewishness in his famous biography, and Maryks puts it this way in a footnote on p. 59:
Modern scholarship has established Laínez’s Jewish genealogy, which had been already been known to his contemporaries.
Maryks doesn’t even bother trying to reprove it, taking it as already proven beyond any doubt.
Since Lainez was the second Superior General of the Jesuits, that pretty much settles the question.
Now, what about Ignatius Loyola himself?
See his portrait under title, which settles the question in my eyes.
But, again, if you are offended by that sort of evidence, read Maryks or many other historians, who admit Loyola was surrounded by Jews from the beginning, socializing with almost no one who wasn’t Jewish during his career.
Then we have this on p. 50: Kevin Ingram has hypothesized in his recent Ph.D. dissertation the converso origins of Íñigo’s maternal grandfather, Dr. Martín García de Licona, who,
“Was not just a merchant, [but] a man of letters and a financial advisor at court—that is to say his profile is very much that of a converso merchant professional.”
Consequently, Íñigo too would be considered a converso.
Somehow Maryks, like many others, manages to dismiss these piles of evidence as inconclusive.
But there is another clue all of them have missed.
That is the coat of arms of the Onaz y Loyola family, which was then used by the Jesuits.
Notice that it has two wolves eating from two black kettles.
That doesn’t give you much confidence, does it?
Sort of spooky, no?
The Jesuits are wolves stealing from a pot?
Doesn’t that confirm my reading here?
Compare to the wolf in sheep’s clothing on the coat of arms of the Fabians.
Which means that Onaz may be a corruption or Spanishizing of Cohen.
Don’t believe me?
Well, you may wish to read about the War of the Bands that occurred in the Basque region in the 1400s.
It was between the Onaz and the Gamboinos.
Hmmm.
Is that like Gambino, the famous Italian crime family?
Gambino crime family – Wikipedia
Yep, same people.
We find them still feuding with the same families today, including the Falcones.
There are Falcones in the Jesuit stories of the 1500s.
I tripped across them in my research today.
And I remind you that we also find them in the British peerage, with names like Faulkner.
If we research the name Onaz, we find the variations include:
- Onan
- Honeen
- Oonanw
ith strong ties between Spain and Ireland.
So, you see we are closing in on Cohen/Coen already. \
A search on the genealogy of Loyola pulls up Lorenza de Onaz y Loyola, d. 1575 in Llerena, a great-niece of Ignatius.
Lorenza de Oñaz y Loyola, XI señora de la Casa de Loyola (b. – 1575) – Genealogy (geni.com)
Lorenza married Juan de Borja, Conde di Mayalde.
One of her daughters married the Conde di Oliva, also a Borja, and another married Juan Perez de Vivero y Mercado, Conde di Fuensaldana.
Conde means Count.
So, the Loyolas were closely related to the Borjas, which means Loyola was a close cousin of the recent Borgia Pope (see below).
Since the Borgias were related to the Medicis, Loyola was also a close cousin of the Medici Popes of those years.
You will say the links were made after the time of Ignatius, but he wasn’t that much older than Lorenza.
She married the Borja while he was still alive.
You will say that was due to the fame of Ignatius, but he wasn’t yet very famous; and besides, top nobles don’t normally marry into the families of monks.
So, all this IS proof Ignatius had very high rank.
That is because Lorenza’s husband Juan de Borja was also an Aragon, linking us to the Dukes of Villahermosa.
So those Dukes were more close cousins of Loyola.https://www.youtube.com/embed/6_IjZi024po?feature=oembedPROF – Cousins feat. Cashinova (Official Music Video)
They don’t ever tell you that, do they?
Those dukes came from the illegitimate son of King John II, king of Aragon and Sicily.
Note the Sicily, since that is how we link the Gambino mobsters to the Gamboinos of the century before Loyola.
The same families owned both places, you see.
John ruled until 1479, and his queen was Blanche of Navarre.
She comes from Castilians, including Juana Manuel.
Juana Manuel (1339 – 27 March 1381) was Queen of Castile from 1369 until 1379 by marriage to king Henry II of Castile. She was also the heiress of Escalona, Villena, Peñafiel and Lara, as well as Lady of Biscay.
As in Emmanuel.
They come from the Guzman and Ponce de Leon families, as well as from the Kings of Portugal.
All Phoenicians, of course.
They also take us back to Henry II of England and the Plantagenets as well as to the Dukes of Saxony.
In the male line of John, they take us back to the Arpads of Hungary and the Ruriks of Russia.
Yaroslav the Wise was a direct ancestor.
So is Mieszko of Poland of the Piast dynasty.
Through the Premyslids we can take them back even farther, to the first Dukes of Bohemia in the 800s.
Through the Earls of Wessex they take us back to Vikings.
In the Arpad line they go back to Attila the Hun, who was also not who are told.
Not a barbarian.
With more digging, we find where that black kettle comes from in the coat of arms.
It refers to the House of Lara or Larrea, which was the source of the Onaz family back to the 11th century.
The kettle was the coat of arms of the House of Lara.
The House of Lara (Spanish: Casa de Lara) is a noble family from the medieval Kingdom of Castile. Two of its branches, the Duques de Nájera and the Marquesado de Aguilar de Campoo were considered Grandees of Spain. The Lara family gained numerous territories in Castile, León, Andalucía, and Galicia and members of the family moved throughout the former Spanish colonies, establishing branches as far away as the Philippines and Argentina. The House of Lara were most prominent in the history of Castile and León from the 11th to the 14th century. Álvaro Núñez de Lara served as regent for Henry I of Castile. They were dispossessed of much of their land by Peter the Cruel, but most was returned by Henry II.
House of Lara – Wikipedia
Raymond of Burgundy (c. 1070 – 24 May 1107) was the ruler of Galicia as vassal of Alfonso VI of León and Castile, the Emperor of All Spain, from about 1090 until his death. He was the fourth son of Count William I of Burgundy and Stephanie. He married Urraca, future queen of León and heir of Alfonso VI, and was the father of the future Alfonso VII.
This house was closely related to the Kings of Leon and Castile, with one of its early members having children with Queen Urraca.
Urraca (León, 24 June 1081 – Saldaña, 8 March 1126), called “the reckless” (la temeraria),[2] was Queen of León, Castile and Galicia from 1109 until her death. She claimed the imperial title as suo jure Empress of All Spain and Empress of All Galicia. She is considered to be the first European queen to reign in her own right.
In about 1335 a Lara married Juan Manuel, Prince of Villena, of the Castilian royal house.
Their daughter married Henry II of Castile.
Two of the Lara branches became Grandees of Spain when the Emperor Charles V raised them to that level in 1520. . . just before the Jesuits came to prominence.
So, in using the kettle on their flag, the Jesuits were admitting they came from this noble House of Lara.
In the time of Loyola, one of his cousins Juan de Lara was Viceroy of Catalonia under Charles V.
Anyway, we find all that in the ancestry of Ignatius Loyola, in the lines of many kings.
And yet we are told by the current histories that he was of minor nobility, raised by a blacksmith.
You have to laugh.
He moved out of the blacksmith’s house to be a page for the Treasurer of the entire kingdom of Castile, Juan Velazquez de Cuellar.
They admit that as a young man Loyola was a womanizer, a fancy dresser, and a general peacock.
We are supposed to believe he changed after having his leg almost blown off by a cannonball, but that story no longer scans.
That happened to him at age 29, and he didn’t go into a monastery.
Rather, he soon ended up at the University of Alcala, where he allegedly studied theology for an entire decade.
Ten years lollygagging on campus wasn’t enough, so he then went to the University of Paris for more excitement.
By then he was 43, and he didn’t settle into cloisters there, either.
Rather, he began gadding about with Francis Xavier and Peter Faber, two young roustabouts who had no interest in the clergy.
This was 1534, and Xavier had already graduated four years earlier.
He was late twenties and was teaching, but as we have seen he was not teaching theology, or anything related to it.
So, why would he go down into a crypt with Loyola and make a vow of:
- poverty
- chastity
- loyalty
to the Pope?
Also, pause on the word crypt, which is another clue.
There was no reason for these guys to be meeting in a crypt in Paris, except to drop another marker.
Not only does it tie into the crypto-Jewish intrigue going on here, but it is also part of the cryptic nature of the entire story.
The Jesuits were founded in 1540 under the papacy of Pope Paul III, a Farnese, related to and groomed by the Medicis.
Pope Paul III (Latin: Paulus III; Italian: Paolo III; 29 February 1468 – 10 November 1549), born Alessandro Farnese, was head of the Catholic Church and ruler of the Papal States from 13 October 1534 to his death, in November 1549.
Pope Clement VII (Latin: Clemens VII; Italian: Clemente VII; born Giulio de’ Medici; 26 May 1478 – 25 September 1534) was head of the Catholic Church and ruler of the Papal States from 19 November 1523 to his death on 25 September 1534. Deemed “the most unfortunate of the popes”, Clement VII’s reign was marked by a rapid succession of political, military, and religious struggles—many long in the making—which had far-reaching consequences for Christianity and world politics.
His predecessor Pope Clement VII was a Medici, and his predecessor, skipping one, was Leo X, also a Medici.
Pope Leo X (Italian: Leone X; born Giovanni di Lorenzo de’ Medici, 11 December 1475 – 1 December 1521) was head of the Catholic Church and ruler of the Papal States from 9 March 1513 to his death, in December 1521.
Going back a few more years to 1503, we come to the Borgia Pope Alexander VI.
Pope Alexander VI (born Rodrigo de Borja; 1 January 1431 – 18 August 1503) (epithet: Valentinus (“The Valencian”)) was head of the Catholic Church and ruler of the Papal States from 11 August 1492 until his death in 1503. Born into the prominent Borgia family in Xàtiva in the Kingdom of Valencia under the Crown of Aragon (now Spain), Rodrigo studied law at the University of Bologna. He was ordained deacon and made a cardinal in 1456 after the election of his uncle as Pope Callixtus III, and a year later he became vice-chancellor of the Catholic Church. He proceeded to serve in the Curia under the next four popes, acquiring significant influence and wealth in the process. In 1492, Rodrigo was elected pope, taking the name Alexander VI.
Well, the third leader of the Jesuits was Francisco de Borja, cousin of Loyola and grandson of that Borgia Pope.
Francis Borgia SJ (Valencian: Francesc de Borja; Spanish: Francisco de Borja; 28 October 1510 – 30 September 1572) was a Spanish Jesuit priest. The great-grandson of both Pope Alexander VI and King Ferdinand II of Aragon, he was Duke of Gandía and a grandee of Spain. After the death of his wife, Borgia renounced his titles and became a priest in the Society of Jesus, later serving as its third superior general. He was canonized on 20 June 1670 by Pope Clement X.
Borgia=Borja.
I remind you what the Borgia Pope looked like:
And what did Francisco de Borja, Superior General of the Jesuits, look like?
So, I now think you understand how things were.
Same as it ever was.
Which is why I know the story about the Jesuits purging themselves of Jews in 1593 is the usual bollocks.
This is what they do and have always done:
they get caught at something and create a fake purge, to make it look like they are mending their ways.
A few scapegoats are rounded up and fed to the pretend wolves, they stage a couple of fake hangings or beheadings, and go on as before, taking a little more care to hide.
Same thing I think we are about to see to get them out of this current Covid/vaccine mess.
Besides, we have to remember who was controlling the Jesuits in 1593.
It wasn’t the Pope, since he was very weak at that time.
The Vatican had just been through a dozen since the founding of the Jesuits 50 years earlier.
They were old and kept dying after about a year.
So, it was Charles V’s son Philip II who was running things in that regard.
I remind you he was a Habsburg, so he had no problem with Jews, being one himself.
He would not have put up with any real pogrom against the Jews, inside the Jesuits or anywhere else.
The Jesuits were created with the express purpose of continuing the infiltration and control of the Vatican by Jewish interests, especially the Medicis and Habsburgs, so there is no way the Jesuits would really be purging themselves of Jews.
It would be like the ADL doing a Jewish purge.
It makes no sense.
I will show you what I mean.
Philip II was closely related to Loyola.
Philip’s paternal grandfather was Manuel I, King of Portugal.
Manuel I (European Portuguese: [mɐnuˈɛl]; 31 May 1469 – 13 December 1521), known as the Fortunate (Portuguese: O Venturoso), was King of Portugal from 1495 to 1521. A member of the House of Aviz, Manuel was Duke of Beja and Viseu prior to succeeding his cousin, John II of Portugal, as monarch. Manuel ruled over a period of intensive expansion of the Portuguese Empire owing to the numerous Portuguese discoveries made during his reign.
Manuel is a Jewish name, of course.
His wife was Maria of Aragon, and we just saw them closely tied to Loyola through the Borjas.
Maria of Aragon (29 June 1482 – 7 March 1517) was Queen of Portugal from 30 October 1500 until her death in 1517 as the second wife of King Manuel I. Manuel was the widower of Maria’s elder sister, Isabella.
The Kings of Portugal take us directly back to Philippa of Lancaster and her father John of Gaunt, who we have seen many times.
Philip III the Bold & the Crusades – Library of Rickandria
He comes up like clockwork in my studies.
Take that link to see how he comes from the Komnenes of Armenia through the Byzantine emperors.
The Komnenes were Jewish/Phoenician, with that name probably being the source of the name Kohen.
So, you see why I say that Philip would not be allowing any real purging of Jewish Jesuits in 1593.
It would go against the entire point of the project.
You will say Maryks provides a lot of evidence for this Jewish purge in his third and last chapter, but I just showed you why I am not buying it.
To be honest, nothing he could say would convince me, since I know before reading it that it is impossible.
No amount of quoting sources can prove the impossible.
I draw your attention to page 117, the first of that chapter, where Maryks admits he will not be trying to prove the purge.
He takes it as given and will only try to show us the reason for it.
Also notice that Maryks tells us on the same page the “Spanish” electors dominated the new Congregation in 1573, when the tide allegedly began to turn against the Jews.
But he previously admitted that “Spanish” was code for “Jewish”, so he is ignoring his own code here.
He also admits they governed all but one of the Italian provinces, with Salmeron running the province of Naples, Domenech running the province of Sicily, and Borja’s man Miro running the province of Portugal.
In the general congregation they still had Bobadilla and Nadal and Guzman, all Jews.
So, while he seems to be implying the non-Jews were coming to the fore, his own lists contradict that.
He is just spinning you to your stupid face, assuming you won’t remember that he just showed you Salmeron and the rest of these people were Jews.
Maryks then expects us to believe Cardinal Henry of Portugal, soon to be King, wrote a letter to the Congregation demanding the Jesuits not elect another converso as head, at the penalty of dissolution.
Henry (Portuguese: Henrique [ẽˈʁikɨ]; 31 January 1512 – 31 January 1580), dubbed the Chaste (Portuguese: o Casto) and the Cardinal-King (Portuguese: o Cardeal-Rei), was king of Portugal and an inquisitor and cardinal of the Catholic Church, who ruled Portugal between 1578 and 1580. As a clergyman, he was bound to celibacy, and as such, had no children to succeed him, and thus put an end to the reigning House of Aviz. His death led to the Portuguese succession crisis of 1580 and ultimately to the 60-year Iberian Union that saw Portugal share a monarch with Habsburg Spain. The next independent monarch of Portugal would be John IV, who restored the throne after 60 years of Spanish rule.
Pope Gregory XIII allegedly agreed with this sentiment.
Pope Gregory XIII (Latin: Gregorius XIII; Italian: Gregorio XIII; 7 January 1502 – 10 April 1585),[b] born Ugo Boncompagni, was head of the Catholic Church and ruler of the Papal States from 13 May 1572 to his death in April 1585. He is best known for commissioning and being the namesake for the Gregorian calendar, which remains the internationally accepted civil calendar to this day.
But that is not believable given that Cardinal Henry was the son of Manuel I and Maria of Aragon, who we just saw.
Not only were they closely related to the Jewish Loyola, but they also came from John of Gaunt and the Komnenes.
All these people were Jewish, including the Pope.
So, the whole story we are being told is the usual fiction.
It was manufactured expressly to cover up the fact that the Jesuits had been caught being conspicuously led by Jews.
The Society of Jesus being founded and led by a group of Jewish nobles was so outrageous, these people could see they needed to cover it with an equally outrageous purge.
Besides, this Cardinal Henry was actually a huge fan and supporter of the Jesuits from the first.
He is the very one that brought the Jesuits to Portugal to use in the colonial empire.
Other than that, Henry was a weak fool who failed to have any heirs, letting his early vows of chastity overrule his need for a son.
He didn’t even appoint a successor, leading to the Succession Crisis where Portugal had to share rule with a Habsburg.
Portugal didn’t get its own kingdom back for 60 years due to Henry’s lack of fortitude, so it is impossible he would be making any demands to this Congregation of Jesuits.
Maryks implies the anti-converso assembly was stronger than the pro, but after listing the pro, fails to list the anti.
We expect him to give a list of those Jesuits strongly opposed to the conversos, or at least a short list of province leaders who were opposed, but we don’t get that.
Instead, we are supposed to believe the Congregation voted for Mercurian simply at the behest of the Pope and Henry, who ordered it.
Everard Mercurian (1514 – 1 August 1580) was the fourth Superior General of the Society of Jesus.
As I say, that isn’t believable.
Maryks then says Mercurian purged the Jesuits of many conversos but fails to give us any examples.
Instead, he starts immediately listing counterexamples, which you have to admit is strange.
On page 123 he admits Polanco was not purged, just being sent to lead the Jesuits in Sicily.
He implies that was a big demotion, but it wasn’t, Sicily being an important province.
Mercurian replaced Polanco as secretary with Possevino, and Maryks admits he was almost certainly a Jew.
Antonio Possevino (Antonius Possevinus) (10 July 1533 – 26 February 1611) was a Jesuit protagonist of Counter Reformation as a papal diplomat and a Jesuit controversialist, polemicist, encyclopedist, and bibliographer. He was the first Jesuit to visit Muscovy, Sweden, Denmark, Livonia, Hungary, Pomerania, and Saxony in amply documented papal missions between 1578 and 1586 where he championed the enterprising policies of Pope Gregory XIII.
The known Jew Ribadeneyra was sent to Toledo but not purged, and again it is implied that was a big demotion.
Pedro de Ribadeneira S.J. (Toledo, 1 November 1527 – Madrid, 10 September or 22 September 1611) was a Spanish hagiographer, Jesuit priest, companion of Ignatius of Loyola, and a Spanish Golden Age ascetic writer.
It wasn’t, since Toledo was the center of the Jewish universe back then.
The Jew Ruiz was sent to Granada, also a paradise for Jews.
Borja’s protege Vazquez was also not purged, being sent to Spain.
Salmeron was not purged, being sent to Madrid.
Maryks then admit that not only were top Jews like:
- Polanco
- Nadal
- Ribadeneyra
not squashed by Mercurian, they actually flourished, being given time to write important tracts.
So, we can see Maryks doing a very poor job of advancing his own thesis.
If you don’t believe me, see p. 129, where he now admits the story against the conversos comes from an unsigned and undated document in the Jesuit Archives in Rome.
That’s convenient, isn’t it? Maryks uses internal information and handwriting analysis to assign the document to the hand of Benedetto Palmio, but that doesn’t explain why it isn’t signed or dated.
That fact tends to support my assertion that Palmio inserted this document into the Archives to make it look like the Jews were finding strong resistance from within.
But Maryks admits Palmio was a protege of the very Jewish Lainez who we saw above, as well as the Jewish Domenech.
He was later a colleague and co-worker with Nadal and Canisius, again both Jewish.
His first major assignment in Lombardy was also due to Lainez.
He later became assistant general under the Jewish Borja.
So why would he later write a scathing anti-converso memorial and insert it into the Archives?
I just told you why.
It was all another fake.
He was on assignment, and this history of 1573 that Maryks is trying to sell us wasn’t written until 1597.
In other words, it was faked and backdated.
I could go through the rest of Maryks’ book but as you see it wouldn’t be worth it.
His argument has already fallen apart in the opening pages of his last chapter, so there is no reason to see it collapse further.
He just proved my point for me, almost as succinctly as I could have done myself.
*
Now polluted and stinking, of course.
CONTINUE:
Vatican Jesuits – Library of Rickandria