BOOK: Monsters of Babylon: How the Jews Betrayed Mankind (1200 BC to 1000 AD) – Volume II – Chapter 10: BEFORE JESUS – the Greeks, Persians, Romans & Jews

Certainly, it can be argued that war is a natural part of Nature.

SPIRITUALITY: CONSCIOUSNESS: NATURE – Library of Rickandria

Plants will fight it out for the sunlight, crowding and pushing each other aside to ruthlessly stand above their less hardy neighbors to exploit the life-giving rays or shoving their roots against each other for the water.

Animals, either as lone individuals or as family gangs, will fight to the death over so many square feet or square miles of territory in which to hunt and gather food for their survival.

Monkeys will battle it out with other monkeys over a favorite fig tree for their clan.

Among social animals, whether dogs or monkeys, there is always a top dog and a chief monkey.

SPIRITUALITY: FAMILIARS – Library of Rickandria

This is true of Mankind, too.

CIVILIZATION: Origin of Life & Man – Library of Rickandria

But regardless of what the lying

• Jews
• Communists
• scientists

say, Man is not an animal.

Unlike the animals, we have the power to change our world, to make it better or worse.

And we have the power to change ourselves, also for the better or worse.

And we have transcendental powers, as well, beyond this physical plane.

SPIRITUALITY: ASTRAL PLANE: FOURTH DIMENSION – Library of Rickandria

Man is somewhere between Heaven and Earth, but where that is, is a subject for philosophy and religion.

EDUCATION: ANCIENT TEXT: Why Are We Still Talking About Plato 2,100 Years Later? – Library of Rickandria

Science is of little help in such cogitations.

SCIENCE: ROYAL SCIENCE – Library of Rickandria

In ancient times, warfare was very much like that of the animals.

With survival at stake, cavemen would fight each other over hunting grounds.

Too many people living in one area scares away the mastodons and deer and reduced their number, making it hard to catch a meal.

A field of grass seeds can support a large family, but if too many people depend on the same field, all will starve.

So, people went to war to protect their food supply or to steal that supply from other, weaker tribes.

These reasons were not much different than why animals fight.

However, a certain kind of warfare arose in the ancient Near East where people did not go to war for survival or for food or for land; they went to war for money.

NEW WORLD ORDER: JEWISH BANKSTERS’ WAR ON AMERICA & THE WORLD – Library of Rickandria

Even when they had plenty of food and more land that they could ever farm, they still went to war because the top dogs and the head monkeys told them that it was necessary to do so.

They did not need to go to war, but because the top dogs and head monkeys greedily wanted more than they needed, they sacrificed their own people to fill their own pockets with silver and gold.

The people were human, but their leaders were devils.

To catch a monkey, you can tie a small-mouthed jug with to a tree with a rope.

The mouth of the jug should be just small enough for a monkey to slip his hand in.

Then, put a piece of fruit into the jug.

When the monkey reaches into the jug to get the fruit and wraps his fist around his prize, his fist wrapped around the piece of fruit is now too big for him to pull it out of the jug.

If he would let go of the fruit, his open hand could easily slip back out of the jug.

But in his greed for the fruit, he refuses to let go his grasp and thus cannot get his fist out of the jug.

His fist is stuck in the jug and the jug is tied to the tree and you can catch the monkey because in his greed for the fruit, he is too stupid to let go of it and slip his hand out of the jug and run away.

You can catch Jews in the same way that you catch monkeys.

Only instead of fruit, you can bait your trap with gold or silver or wealth of any kind.

Once they grab onto it, they are too greedy to let go of it and are stuck.

Throughout history, you can see the greedy Jews like flies on flypaper being no smarter than monkeys as they wrap their fists around the wealth of the world and show themselves for what they are, mere animals.

Though history is often clouded with dust and smoke, if you follow the money, you can catch the Jews.

As shown in Volume One, The Sumerian Swindle, with the development of civilization, large groups of people found a way of farming fields even in such inhospitable places as Sumer and Babylonia (Iraq) and Egypt, but only because of an abundance of water supplied by the rivers running through those arid and desert lands.

BOOK: The Sumerian Swindle: How the Jews Betrayed Mankind – (5000 BC to 1500 BC) – Vol. I – Library of Rickandria

The irrigated lands supplied enough food for everybody.

The natural building materials of mud bricks supplied enough housing for everybody.

The natural child rearing practice of nursing babies for two to three years, kept populations in balance with natural food supplies.

But then the thieving and greedy Semites upset civilization at every level.

Multiple wives and concubines produced huge families and tribes, all requiring more food and land than Nature could supply in one place.

Living on meat from their wandering herds of goats and sheep, they were like locusts shearing the grasses down to the root and denuding the earth of ground cover.

Cutting down trees for firewood, goats even climbing into trees to eat the leaves, over-grazing the hillsides and burning down their neighbor’s property in warfare, the Semites left the lands desiccated and bare, unfit for farming or habitation and prone to erosion.

After destroying their own land, they looked to seize the land of others.

The Semites, hailing from the empty deserts of Arabia, brought a certain desperate aggressiveness to the mindset of the ancient Near East.

As these wild and wooly, carnivorous:

• Amorites
• Aramaeans
• Arabs
• Hebrews

and similar types infiltrated the grain-producing regions of the civilized lands, they learned from them and acquired a type of civilization, themselves.

They learned to farm and settle into towns and cities.

They learned how to buy and sell using broken lumps of silver and gold as a medium of exchange.

And they learned how to use the Sumerian Swindle for enriching themselves without working, by defrauding their neighbors and acquiring their neighbors’ property through the larceny of lending-at interest.

In Volume One, you saw how the natural system of bartering grain gave way to a system where silver and gold became a medium of exchange.

The civilizations of Sumeria and Egypt developed without the use of money.

Barter and the payment in grain, which could be eaten, sufficed for their needs.

But once barter became standardized with silver and gold, the benefits of these money-like commodities for business efficiency became obvious.

With silver and gold as a medium of exchange, business and larceny accelerated and vast fortunes were made.

But the fortunes were made by the few through the suffering and impoverishment of the many. 

With silver and gold as a type of money, these fortunes also became inheritable.

The wealth represented by the unchanging metal could be transferred over both space and time.

Sons could inherit the wealth of parents and could pass that inheritance along to their own sons, sons who were bred and trained in all of the methods of acquisition and swindling.

So, wealth became something that could persist and be augmented within families and tribes for centuries, being passed along by fathers proud that their sons were even more clever and greedy than themselves.

Fortunes were inherited by sons who had been specially selected by their fathers for the very traits that they so admired in themselves – 

• greedy
• cruel
• ruthless

and acquisitive.

Thus, the various family dynasties were based upon the ownership of silver and gold, which was controlled by an ever more inbred tribe of avaricious scoundrels.

The sons became more ruthlessly acquisitive than their fathers and so on through the ages as a race of

• liars
• thieves
• murderers

evolved whose overriding attribute was the insane ability to wrap their monkey fists around gold and silver even though it meant that they would be caught and punished for their crimes and the people around them destroyed.

Gold and silver often meant more to them than Life, itself.

While grain was eaten by people or spoiled by rats or moisture; while buildings collapsed or washed away in floods; while entire cities were demolished in earthquakes and fire, the wealth and power inherited in the ownership of silver and gold endured.

Family members whose faces were blackened with soot, hair singed and barely clothed, could scramble through the remains of their houses and farms, dig up their hoard of silver and gold and start again in amassing their fortunes.

Thus, the ownership of silver and gold became a survival strategy.

But it also became a focal point of their greed whereby the hearts of men betrayed them to a much, much darker entity than mere death.

There are many kinds of power in the universe – 

• sunlight
• wind
• water
• electricity
• magnetism
• nuclear energy
• levers and pulleys
• gravity
• lightning
• fire
• hail stones

and the list goes on.

All of these things have causes and they have effects.

We can know the cause of sunlight by knowing something about nuclear reactions, photons and gravity.

And we can see the effects of sunlight on

growing plants
waterless deserts
rainstorms

and the blisters on your sunburned nose.

All physical things have causes and effects.

Wealth is also one of the powers of the universe that has causes and effects.

Volume One, The Sumerian Swindle, explored some of the causes and effects of wealth such as commerce and war and the tricks of arithmetic.

But there is another power engendered by wealth which is called greed.

Greed is also one of the powers in the universe.

But it is a power that arises only in the heart and mind.

It is a power that blinds the eye while filling the belly.

It is a dark pitfall in Life, but one into which many people gladly jump, while others merely fall. 

One peculiarity of great wealth is that it also gives great power to the wealthy.

When the dark attributes of greed are added to wealth and power, monsters arise from the seething mix.

With full bellies, blind eyes and clutching fists, the Monsters of Babylon – lending silver and enslaving their debtors, causing warfare and looting their victims – schemed within the black pit of greed.

They were determined, with limitless wealth and power at their command, to make the entire world their own.

Yes, the world is very big, but that didn’t prevent the moneylenders from greedily attempting to wrap their greedy, animal hands around all of it.

By 950 BC, the moneylenders of Mesopotamia had two empires between which they transferred their profits.

Assyria and Babylonia both controlled large land areas within the Fertile Crescent which produced all the:

• food
• wool
• flax for clothing

that they needed.

Yet, both areas were short of the natural resources for building an infrastructure.

All metals and lumber had to be imported as well as stone and all other necessities.

This led to a huge import-export web that extended throughout the known world – from India to the British Isles, from the icy north to the interior of Africa.

Wealth and the power that wealth could buy, allowed the rich to get richer, of course.

With their wealth and power, the rich began to not only control the lives of the poor but also to control the actions of the kings.

As mere men, they controlled the kings through the various applications of power such as influencing them with:

• money
• women
• luxury goods
• bribery

and blackmail as well as with the threat of war.

Every king could only keep what he had, either by being stronger than other kings or by having better allies.

From a very early era, the kings and administrators became neither the servants of their gods nor the protectors of their people, but rather the pawns of the wealthy merchant-moneylenders.

In this way, these Monsters began to control society, always for their own benefit and even unto the death of the very people over whom they were the parasites.

As long as they had the Sumerian Swindle to generate profits, and the safety of temples in which to deposit and protect those enormous profits weighing in many tons, they could control the wealth of the world and the people of the world who depended upon that wealth. 

But wealth was not the silver and gold, itself.

Wealth was the labor and property of the people which the silver and gold was equated to. 

When the labor, land and goods of society are equated to certain amounts of silver and gold, then that silver and gold can be used to leverage and manipulate the labor and material goods of the world.

The bigger the lever, the more power one has to move boulders.

The more gold and silver one has, the more power one has to move society.

This could be beneficial to Mankind if those who gained their silver and gold had worked for it, because honest work builds honest character.

But the Monsters did not work for their wealth, they swindled it.

Using every foul means, they acquired what was not theirs to possess and gloried in their own criminal cunning:

“… great and prosperous cities not of your building, houses full of good things not furnished by you, wells you did not dig, vineyards and olives you did not plant, when you have eaten these and had your f ill, then take care that you do not forget Yahweh who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery.” (Dt 6: 10-12)

Yes, eating their fill of what other people had built and obliterating the religious people around them, was “walking in the ways” of their god.

This was obvious – everywhere they went, the lands were ravished, the people were murdered, the women and children enslaved.

This was obvious.

The Jews had grasped the lives and properties of the world with their cadaverous fists and called it their own.

But what was not obvious was that their god and their religion and their piety was all a fake and a fraud and a ruse, nothing more than camouflage for the voraciousness of their malicious greed and depraved criminality.

The Type-A personality psychopaths who seem to always be over-represented among political leaders, were the kings of the various countries.

These selfishly egotistical bullies were easily duped into buying expensive imports and rarities from afar.

As kings and ministers, they relished the admiration of their underlings and were very concerned with their own “majesty.”

For example, on the Prism of Sennacherib (701 BC), this Assyrian king wrote of himself describing

“…gifts for my majesty… the terrifying splendor of my majesty.”

to advertise their “greatness,” not unlike the wealthy people in modern times, they commissioned building projects for:

• temples
• canal systems
• palaces

and city walls – mostly built of mud bricks and paid for with plunder.

What the kings could accomplish and brag about, was their greatest pride.

So, they easily fell into debt to the tamkarum [merchant-moneylenders] who – strangely and mysteriously – always seemed to have plenty of silver ready to loan.

These mere traders and merchants could supply from distant lands all varieties of:

• rare spices
• gems
• exotic animals
• strange feathers and pelts
• perfumes and incense

and finely crafted trinkets and curiosities.

Yes, their prices were expensive but that meant that only the very richest could afford to buy them and show them off.

It was not that these trade goods were valuable, in themselves, but since they were imported and only the merchants could supply them, then it was the merchants alone who could set their price.

A mere pinch of black pepper corns, picked from the trees in distant India and costing the merchant almost nothing for many large baskets full of them, could be sold for many shekels of silver for a mere pinch – or traded for a favor from a servant.

“Tell me what the king was discussing last night at dinner, O Serving Girl, and I will reward you with a pinch of precious black pepper,”

might have been an ancient, whispered bribe.

Great secrets worth many times their weight in gold, were traded for paltry things because those paltry things had cost very little to the importers but were very expensive to anyone who wished to buy them from those same cunning merchants.

This has always been one of the great attractions about import-export.

Add smuggling to this and not only are the goods tax-free and therefore even cheaper for the merchant but generally they are extremely cheap at their foreign source.

Smuggling has always been a part of the import-export mix.

A pearl traded from an Indian fisherman for a couple of fishhooks could be sold in the Middle East or Europe for many ounces of gold.

When it was smuggled among other goods and duty free, it still had cost the merchant only a couple of fishhooks.

But it could be traded to kings and ministers for great political favors and special commercial advantages.

A merchant might gain a lucrative political office for his son or have a law declared giving him some commercial advantage over his competitors.

Huge fortunes were made in bribing kings and ministers using nothing more than a few fishhooks.

Entire people were betrayed by these same kings and ministers who exchanged the welfare of their people to the merchants and moneylenders for paltry presents.

Great profits in commerce and military espionage could be exchanged for next to nothing.

And so, the international trade channels of the merchant moneylenders gave them great wealth and power and political leverage far in excess of what honest work could bring.

The history of the Assyrian Empire is touched on in Volume One, so only a few additional details need mention here.

The Assyrians made it a habit of incorporating conquered peoples into their army.

So, at a very early date, the general Assyrian population was racially mixed.

As a method of quelling rebellion and controlling populations, the Assyrians deported large populations from one country to another.

Bible readers know this in regard to the Jews alone, but it was a standard policy in all of the territories that these cruel Assyrians invaded.

As shown in Volume One, this particular strain of Semites had shown a ruthless nature from its earliest days when the moneylenders had financed into power Sargon the Great (2334-2279 BC).

These greedy lenders of silver and grain were still scheming in their extended family groups and from their guild halls more than a thousand years later when the Neo-Assyrian Empire (950-612 BC) stepped onto the stage of history.

Assyria based its economy on warfare, the seizing of other peoples’ goods and the forced payment of tribute and a militarily enforced monopoly over trade.

Assyrian merchants were protected by the Assyrian army.

But there was nothing that protected the sons of these merchants from being conscripted to serve in the army.

But now, with sly pretense, one particular moneylender guild – with main offices in the Assyrian city of Harran, the Babylonian city of Ur and the Canaanite city of Jerusalem – could profit from the wars while remaining safely excluded from military service.

It didn’t matter to them if the wars became increasingly vicious and destructive.

These particular moneylenders were safe and serene, drinking their wine, eating their fill, and telling each other lies about how their God of Armies (“Lord of Hosts”) parted the seas for them so that they could loot Egypt and steal Canaan.

These bankers and merchants were extremely wealthy.

But unlike all of the other extremely wealthy clans and guilds of the civilized world, they claimed that it was not their own avaricious greed and cunning that had made them so.

No, their wealth did not come from that; it came from their mighty god giving it to them because of their great “wisdom” and “virtue.”

While the people and the kings might demand a refund from greedy and cunning moneylenders, what king or peoples could demand a refund from a mighty god who had bestowed his grace upon a people who actually deserved to have everything that they:

• stole
• swindled
• defrauded

because they were so “holy”?

The lingua franca, spoken in the entire Near East extending through Elam and into Iran (Persia) was Aramaic.

That the great, conquering kings also spoke and wrote Aramaic does not mean that this language was spread through warfare

Aramaic was spread through trade and commerce.

Any country or any empire that wanted to do international business between:

Egypt
the Middle East
India

had to speak and write the language of the merchants, Aramaic.

Today, so that you can appreciate the antiquity of the moneylenders’ conspiracy, know that the Aramaic lettering that you see when you look at the typeface of a Hebrew Bible or the Babylonian Talmud or almost anything else written in the demons’ own “holy scriptures,” is printed in the square Aramaic Assyrian script.

Assyria was not merely a military empire ruled by the usual self-glorifying and psychopathic kings, it was an economic machine designed to make its operators wealthy.

Those countries which fell to the Assyrian military engine, were incorporated into its monopolistic economy.

Slavery was, of course, one result.

But mutual business cooperation between the Assyrian Empire and the client kings, was its primary goal, sweetened with the tribute that the client kings offered.

This tribute was taxed and confiscated from their people and meekly offered to the Assyrian kings in exchange for not being brutally murdered and their country ravaged by the standing Assyrian army.

Assyria practiced the ordinary gangster protection racket – 

“pay us to protect you from us, so that we don’t burn down your house and kill you.”

In the land of Canaan, where the moneylenders of Babylon had established their main bank and temple at Jerusalem, both Assyria and Egypt were the two international powers of note.

The merchant moneylenders of Assyria were able to force the Phoenicians to provide shipping and trade in the Mediterranean Basin.

Miles Williams Mathis: Phoenicians – Where did they ALL Go? – Library of Rickandria

The trade routes from Arabia provided them with incense and pearls.

Besides the grain of Canaan, the Assyrians also monopolized and developed Levantine olive oil production which was transported to both Assyria and Egypt – the two lands with a climate not suited to growing olive orchards. [234]

Also, of equal importance or even of more importance to a war-based empire such as Assyria, was horses.\

As noted previously, the expansions and contractions of the Assyrian Empire from its very beginnings depended upon how much silver was in the treasury, silver which the international moneylenders could siphon into or out of the country at will and deposit in the temples of foreign lands.

No silver meant no army or the provisions for an army.

Without its army, Assyria was merely a society of wheat farmers and violent gangsters.

Thus, silver and gold became the lifeblood of Assyria, controlled – not by the great kings whose martial prowess they advertised with great statues of themselves – but by the scampering merchant-moneylenders who controlled the international trade routes and who could smuggle bullion from one temple treasury into another in the foreign lands.

These scuttling grabbers of gold, these acquisitive bean-counters, preferred to stay hidden like rats and cockroaches in the shadows where they couldn’t be robbed.

Abracadabra!

First there is plenty of silver circulating in a vibrant Assyrian economy and then, poof, there was none.

And no one knew where it went because even if the king rummaged through a moneylender’s possessions, he would find nothing except the moneylender shrugging his shoulders with empty palms held open to the sky and complaining about a slow “business cycle.”

No matter how mighty the kings of antiquity were, they did not understand the Sumerian Swindle.

And so, instead of executing the bankers and merchants for treason and larceny, they allowed those slinking loan-sharks and accountants to control society through interest-bearing loans because

“that’s how it had always been.”

The Assyrian merchant-moneylenders were experts at squeezing silver and gold out of their neighbors.

After surrounding the capital city with their armies and shouting threats to the people inside, failed to make them surrender, the Assyrians’ next tactic was to select one or more small cities to attack, usually ones that could be easily conquered.

After taking numerous prisoners, they then committed extreme acts of cruelty to show how the entire region would be treated if the inhabitants refused to surrender peacefully.

Houses were looted and burned to the ground, and the people were:

• murdered
• raped
• mutilated

and enslaved.

As practitioners of psychological warfare, the Assyrians publicized their atrocities in reports and illustrations for propaganda purposes, atrocities all vividly portrayed in the Assyrian stone reliefs and royal inscriptions in the Assyrian palaces unearthed by archaeologists.

In the tenth and ninth centuries BC, official inscriptions told of extreme cruelty to those captured.

Most were killed or blinded; others were impaled on stakes around city walls, or they were flayed alive, the shrieks of the victims penetrating far into a besieged city as a warning.

The bodies were mutilated:

heads
hands, and even lower lips were cut off and piled up so that counting the thousands of dead would be easier.

The annals of Assur-nasir-pal II vividly described such tactics:

“In strife and conflict I besieged and conquered the city.

I felled 3,000 of their fighting men with the sword.

I carried off prisoners, possessions, oxen, and cattle from them.

I burnt many captives from them.

I captured many troops alive: I cut off of some their arms and hands; I cut off of others their noses, ears, and extremities.

I gouged out the eyes of many troops.

I made one pile of the living and one of the heads.

I hung their heads on trees around the city.

I burnt their adolescent boys and girls.

I razed, destroyed, burned, and consumed the city.” [235]

With social graces such as these, the Assyrians were not popular among the peoples of the ancient Near East.

Add to this their heavy demands for tribute, and so rebellion was common.

Tiglath-Pileser, king of Assyria, captured the northern valleys and Galilee in 732 BC.

Israelian king Hoshea (732-724 BC) offered tribute and his “Jewish loyalty” to the new Assyrian king, Shalmaneser V (727-722 BC).

But that scheming Jew secretly sought an alliance with the king of Egypt for an open revolt. 

When Shalmaneser learned of the conspiracy, he took Hoshea captive and invaded what was left of the kingdom of the Israelians.

For three years the Assyrian king laid siege to the capital of Samaria, eventually capturing it in 720 BC.

“… and he carried the Israelites away to Assyria and placed them in Halah, and on the Habor, the river of Gozan, and in the cities of Medes.” (2K 17:6)

… and the king of Assyria brought people from:

• Babylon
• Cuthah
• Avva
• Hamath

and Sepharvaim and placed them in the cities of Samaria instead of the people of Israel; and they took possession of Samaria, and dwelt in its cities.” (2K 17:24)

Only the kingdom of Judah, its impregnable walls of Jerusalem protecting its secret Temple treasury, and the counterfeited fables about its origins, now survived. [236]

The new immigrants from Mesopotamia took possession of the land.

Scattered archaeological evidence confirms this.

A papyrus written in Aramaic mentions immigrants settled at the ancient Israelian cult center of Bethel.

Seventh century cuneiform texts found in the Israelian border town of Gezer and at a nearby site bear Babylonian names.

With the Israelians destroyed, rural Judah could step forward into wealth as an autonomous state in the highlands. [237]

With the Israelians destroyed, the wicked priests of Judah could now tell their lies about “Lost Ten Tribes” with absolutely no one, except in modern times, knowing the truth behind this fable.

Archaeology proves that there were no Lost Ten Tribes.

Only the Israelian Ruling Elite were deported, leaving the common people on the land.

The gross number given in Assyrian sources for both deportations – by Tiglath-Pileser III for Galilee and by Sargon II for Samaria – is about 40,000 Hebrews.

Archaeological evidence shows that this was no more than a fifth of the estimated population of the northern kingdom in the eighth century BC.

Tiglath-Pileser III seems to have deported troublesome villagers from the hills of Galilee and the population of the main centers.

Sargon II deported mainly the aristocracy of Samaria, possibly:

• soldiers
• merchants
• landlords

and artisans with skills needed in Assyria.

But most of the peasants were left on the land.

The Assyrians wanted to preserve this olive oil-producing area.

They needed the peasants to continue to produce grain and oil.

Only the Israelian leadership was deported.

The rural population was left intact. [238]

There were no “Lost Ten Tribes.”

Ask yourself, Dear Reader, what does that make Judaism and the Jews when everything they claim to be true, is nothing but lies? [see Figure 107 – Map (722-586) BC Near East Diaspora]

After the destruction of the Israelian kingdom, Judah underwent a huge increase in population and wealth.

From a population of a few tens of thousands, Judah grew to around 120,000.

Jerusalem was transformed from a highland town of ten or twelve acres to an urban area of 150 acres of closely packed:

• houses
• workshops
• public buildings

with population increasing from one thousand to fifteen thousand inhabitants. [239]

Again, archaeology proves that the “great kingdom of Judah” was another lie of the rabbis.

Judah had always been just a small town boasting a fortified temple.

The fleeing Israelians now needed a safe place to transfer their wealth out of Assyrian-occupied territory in the north.

But for such a small town and such a small temple, where did all of the wealth come from that was deposited inside the temple?

Abracadabra!

By claiming that the only wealth on deposit in the temple had already been there because it came from the mythological king Solomon, they could conceal its true source.

Both their Babylonian and Israelian depositors would be protected by the pretense that the Temple in Jerusalem was only a poor, rural Temple unworthy of being attacked by the “great kings” of Assyria.

Now, the great and wise and wonderful “King Solomon’s Temple” protected the merchant-moneylender’s loot.

With the Assyrian destruction of the Northern Kingdom of the Israelians, the wicked priests of Judah were able to simplify their bookkeeping.

In the first place, the new depositors from the Northern Kingdom gave the temple priests increased power and wealth because it freed them from relying only on tithes from their Babylonian members.

The never before-realized priestly goal of luring the Israelians to become members of the Temple Penis Cult through the preaching of the various Prophets, was now achieved through self-preservation and running away from Assyria’s army.

The luring of Israelian depositors as new members of the Jewish Penis Cult, was accomplished through Assyria’s attack on the Northern Kingdom, not through the religious appeal of the prophets.

In the second place, the Lost Ten Tribes Myth was a way for the rabbis and bankers to consolidate their fraud into a manageable two tribes, Judah and Benjamin.

These two tribes were, after all, the only two tribes that had originated in Babylonia as a part of Terah’s scheme to establish a temple treasury in Jerusalem.

And later, these two were the only two tribes, with some sprinkling of Levites, that came back out of Babylon after king Cyrus had been deceived into letting the Jews return.

What better way to keep all of the wealth in the merchant-moneylender families than to claim that all of the other relatives except Judah and Benjamin had been deported by Assyria and then had disappeared?

The Israelians had not shared their profits with Judah, so now in typical vindictive Jewishness, the Judean priests would not share the safety of their treasury with anyone who did not adhere to the Contract and become practicing Jews.

For the Jewish priests, keeping the treasury all for themselves by claiming that all of the other heirs to the “Promise” had been deported and “lost,” was almost as good as marrying their sisters.

But now, after more than 2,500 years of silver and gold swindles by the merchants and moneylenders, a new invention appeared in the world of ancient finance.

Between the time that Shalmaneser had deported the upper crust of the Israelians in 720 BC and Nebuchadnezzar had deported the rich Judeans in 598 BC, a new invention completely changed the balance of power and wealth between both kings and moneylenders.

Coins and coinage were invented.

Before the invention of coins, silver and other metals were weighed on a balance to determine the amount, and if smaller amounts were needed, the metal block or wire was broken into smaller pieces which were then re-weighed.

The process of breaking metals and weighing each item was widely attested before and after coinage was introduced.

So, you can easily see the great time savings that coins of a standardized weight and fineness insured.

Since Old Babylonian times (2000 – 1750 BC), legal documents did not specify the quality and fineness of the silver used in payment because pure silver was the assumed standard.

But the merchant moneylenders, cunning in thievery as they had always been, had learned to debase the pure metal, doubling or tripling their wealth by passing off alloyed silver for the pure item.

Counterfeiting with false alloys became so common that by the Neo-Babylonian (Chaldean) period (625-539 BC), the legal texts had a rich vocabulary for describing the quality of silver given or expected.

With such wily and dishonest merchant moneylenders defrauding the entire society, the kings recognized the danger to the State of such great wealth hoarded into private hands.

Restrictive laws were decreed.

Accumulations of silver as treasure were restricted by the king’s law to the palace and the temple.

In these restrictions, you can see that the political power of the kings perceived the danger to the state from the private hoarding of silver.

Private accumulation of silver allowed the synthetic creation of economic depressions by withdrawing from circulation the one thing that allowed business to prosper.

As the history of those times proved, those individuals with large accumulations of silver had the wealth and power to hire mercenaries, bribe kings and challenge the very power of the state.

Upsetting and destroying entire countries through the accumulation of silver, was a power in the hands, not of the kings, but of the private interests of merchants and moneylenders.

And so, since 2000 BC, kings had been aware of this money power as a threat to the state and had tried to restrict that power as a prerogative of kings and priests.

Coinage was invented at Lydia, a Greek colony on the western coast of present-day Turkey.

The earliest Lydian coins are dated to about 650 BC.

Greek coins were not found before 575 BC and did not become popular until 550 BC.

The Lydian coins were made of electrum, a natural alloy of gold and silver. [240]

The invention of coinage was not merely a method of guaranteeing a standard weight and fineness of silver and gold or as a time-saver in commerce, although coinage did both.

Mainly, what coinage did was to take the power of silver and gold bullion ownership away from the International Bankers and give it to the king without any force other than the force of law. 

You must understand that silver and gold, as an international medium of exchange, crossed all state boundaries and therefore allowed the penetration of foreign commercial interests into every kingdom.

The International Money Power of merchant-moneylender guilds and combines that had been developing since the earliest days of the Sumerian Swindle, could influence every kingdom at will – merely by walking in and buying and selling whatever they wanted using the international standard of silver and gold as:

• ingots
• rings
• coils

or lumps of the metal.

Silver and gold bullion, thanks to the Sumerian Swindle, was what the merchant-moneylenders had in abundance.

With that abundance of bullion, foreigners and international investors could literally buy up the state while enslaving the people, sidestepping the power of the king with the power that gold and silver bullion had over the kingdom.

However, a coin, stamped with an official logo and declared by law to be the only legal tender in the kingdom, restricted the free flow of silver and gold across state borders and gave the king the power to control the economy and not the international merchants.

The silver and gold metal still had its same commodity value.

But only when it was in the shape of a coin and stamped with the official design, could that silver and gold be used to buy and sell within the kingdom.

Like most great inventions, there was considerable resistance to it by those who had benefited through the old ways.

Also, like most inventions in ancient times, the spread of this new invention was very slow at first as the old ways continued to be practiced.

The merchant moneylenders resisted using coins because coins lost them the great profits they made through the robbery of counterfeited and debased alloys, but most especially through the power over the citizens of every kingdom that they had with unregulated bullion across international borders.

Coinage spread slowly as various kings saw the advantages to themselves.

Coins put some of the money power back into the hands of kings.

Foreign merchants could still bring their bullion into a country, but by law could not buy or sell anything because only the coins of the country were legal for commercial transactions.

So, they would have to exchange their bullion for legal coins-of-the-realm at the official mint. 

This allowed the king to charge a minting fee and to tax the wealth of the merchants.

After all, when the government knew how much wealth they had, it could be taxed or confiscated.

For this reason, the International Money Power resisted this new invention until every realm used coinage.

Then they had no choice but to see how they could use coinage to their benefit.

However, regardless of whether silver and gold were in the shape of coins or candle sticks, the bullion metal, itself, was still the basis of commerce.

Although coins, themselves, had been invented, money had not been invented, yet.

That particular understanding of what money is, can again be credited to Greek genius.

Coins were only a kind of money, but they were not True Money.

The logic and perceptive powers of the Aryan Greeks proved to be an impediment to the cunning and deceit of the Semites.

Coinage was introduced under the political authority of each city-state in response to their needs.

It brought obvious advantages over bullion as the uniformity of the coin’s metal was assured by the minting authority and need not be tested.

Instead of weighing a pile of silver and gold lumps with the necessary assay for purity, standardized coins of known weight and purity accelerated businesses both great and small. 

But more importantly, coinage was a way to limit or define the total amount of money legally authorized to circulate in a particular jurisdiction.

By limiting total amount of money in circulation, governments could control the prosperity of society and thereby control political power.

Thus, the governments, who theoretically served the gods and the people, could control prosperity rather than leaving that power in the greedy hands of the merchants and moneylenders, who, in fact, served only themselves.

Coinage in the Greek cities was the monopoly of the city, and the use of the local coins was compulsory in the territory of a given city.

Coins from other cities could circulate only if counter-stamped by the city authorities.

The Athenian decree of 420 BC lays down that

“… if any man in the allied cities coin silver money, or does not employ the Athenian coins, weights and measures, but foreign coins, weights and measures, he shall be punished according to the earlier decree of Clearchus.

Private persons shall…hand over their foreign money; the city shall change it…they shall pay it into the mint where the superintendent shall receive it.”

The issuer of the coins was, in all identifiable cases, the supreme political power in each city or state.

There is no evidence in the Greek world for the private issue of coins by bankers or merchants. 

In all cases in the ancient world, the coinage power was in hands of the city-state.

All deposits were in the temples which were guarded by the gods and priests.

But while each city was the home territory of a particular god, the Greek god-cults operated internationally, often as bankers. [241]

So, you see, the temples throughout the ancient world – not just in the Near East – were also the banks.

And if you look at a modern bank, you will see that it resembles a modern temple – 

• solidly built
• austere
• impenetrable
• mysterious
• well protected

its inner sanctum (“Holy of Holies”) unavailable to all but the initiated.

Coinage gave much, much more power to the kings and to the city-states while taking much power out of the hands of the international merchant moneylenders.

But something didn’t change at all.

Whether a moneylender loaned shekel weights of silver or standardized coins of the same metal, charging interest on the loan automatically created:

• inflation
• poverty
• slavery

in exactly the same ratio while the moneylenders walked away with the money, the property and the enslaved farmer and his children – just as it had always been.

The Sumerian Swindle, the charging of interest on this new coinage, led to the same severe problems – just as it always does – between the swindlers who loan and the victims who borrow.

And yet, with coinage, the cunning merchants and ruthless lenders had devised another way to increase their wealth – not by working for it – but by manipulating its arithmetic!

How modern, the ancient moneylenders were!

Almost as big of crooks as found on Wall Street!

In Athens by about 600 BC, the class of free small farmers was vanishing, with land becoming concentrated into the hands of the few wealthy men who also thereby controlled the government.

Through their monopolistic cartels, the lenders controlled the exchange rates of silver between Athens and the Island of Aegina, at that time the source of Athens’s silver coinage.

The small farmers got coins from the lenders which were valued at the Aeginaten rates and then had to pay the interest on the loan by means of his produce which he sold at the Athenian rates:

with the result that the rate of interest was in effect increased by something like 50%.

Unable to get out of debt, eventually bad weather or a poor harvest would bring foreclosure on their land and even bind them into slavery – the Sumerian Swindle, as practiced in Greece by using different valuations of Greek coins and the hocus-pocus of business math.

All business math is based on fraud, the fraud of the Sumerian Swindle.

It is not scientific math but is a type of financial legerdemain.

So, of course, the bankers and financiers grow rich while the people of entire countries become impoverished – just as it has always been.

This enslavement grew to crisis proportions as vast numbers of citizens were being enslaved by the wealthy.

When Solon came to Athens’ rescue with his “shaking off” of burdens, personal slavery was no longer allowed as security for debts. [242]

But his methods have not been popular among moneylenders.

Using their ancient method of destroying the documents and histories of the people around them and especially destroying any evidence of their own criminal schemes, Jewish “scholars” and academics both modern and ancient have heavily censored all monetary history of Greece.

For example, in the Athenian Constitution that comes down to us, we can find all manner of details about ancient Greece, even down to how the garbage was collected.

But we will search in vain to learn how the Athens state coinage system operated.

The Minister of Finance is veiled in obscurity.

Solon’s great monetary reforms can be barely pieced together from his poetry. [243]

He canceled existing debt contracts and gave back land that had been seized.

Farmers who had been sold into slavery abroad by those to whom they owed money, were bought back and returned to Athens by Solon.

In addition, Solon used the ancient Near Eastern method to alleviate the high cost that the merchants added in their monopoly of goods.

He declared a definite minimum monetary equivalent for each agricultural product, in effect setting floor prices for them.

Like any government that serves the people rather than foreign bankers and merchants, 
Solon’s reforms were essentially protectionist.

He forbade export of all agricultural produce (except olive oil).

This brought lower food prices and better-quality foods to the home market.

Foreigners had to pay special fees to sell in Athenian markets.

Solon’s laws against female luxuries reduced imports of such items into Attica.

Such imports as:

• perfumes
• silks
• jewelry
• cosmetics

and other non-essentials were the monopoly of the merchant-moneylenders of Babylonia and Phoenicia and tended to suck the silver out of Greece.

In effect, Solon was not deceived by the so-called “free market” ideas with which the merchant-moneylenders and their paid “professional economists” betray modern people today.

In his travels as a youth, Solon had functioned as a merchant and understood commerce.

Yet, he blamed Athens’ problems mainly on the rich Oligarchy.

This is also true today wherever this Treasonous Class are allowed to betray their countrymen for personal profit.

He became known as one of the seven great wise men and presented the Oracle of Delphi with the “wisdom gift” which became inscribed on the temple entrance there:

“Know thyself ”

and

“Nothing too much”

Solon’s reforms achieved such international recognition that 145 years later, in 454 BC, a small settlement on the western Italian Peninsula sent a delegation to Athens to study his legislation, parts of which became incorporated into their legal code when they returned home to Rome. [244]

As you will see, once the Romans understood money, they became the prime targets for destruction by the Monsters of Babylon.

And these monsters were already distributed throughout the ancient Near East where for over 2500 years the Sumerian Swindle had concentrated the world’s gold and silver supplies into their hands. [see Figure 108 – Map 60 0BC-1000 AD Iraq Diaspora]

This aspect of money and how money affected history, is not given enough consideration by most historians who have been lied to by the economists.

Oy Veh!

Speaking of a Jew’s favorite subject, who could be richer than the

• great
• wonderful
• wise

and lecherous King Solomon?

But like everything else that the Jews hold so dear and claim to be so true, archaeology proves that Solomon never existed except in the rabid rabbis’ imaginations and then falsified with Assyrian characters with soot ink on goat skins in the Big Book of Jewish Lies.

Solomon, the Assyrian Banker’s Hero

As you know, King Solomon was a great Jewish hero, descended from yet another great and wonderful Jewish hero, King David.

Both of these Jewish midgets were “mighty kings” ruling over great and powerful kingdoms – to hear the Jews lie about it.

As we know from archaeological surveys of the repeated cycles of occupation throughout the millennia, Judah’s primitive society was determined in large measure by its:

• remote geographical position
• unpredictable rainfall
• rugged terrain

In contrast to the northern hill country of Israel with its broad valleys and natural overland routes to the neighboring regions, Judah was always marginal agriculturally, and isolated from the main trade routes, offering any would-be ruler only meager opportunities for wealth.

Its economy was concentrated around the self-sufficient production of the individual farming community or pastoral group. [245]

Any “temples” in the region could only have received sacrifices and offerings of goat meat and cheese with bread from the poor rural populace.

The region had no natural resources or opportunities to develop any wealth that was not based in simple agriculture.

The entire population of all of those Judean hill country villages around 1000 BC, could not have been much more than forty-five thousand. [246]

So, what kind of “mighty” kings could David and Solomon have been?

There was nothing much to be a king over other than tiny villages and herds of goats and sheep.

The built-up area of Jerusalem in the seventh century BC covered an area of no more than one hundred and fifty acres.

Its population of around fifteen thousand would have made it seem hardly more than a small Middle Eastern market town [247] with a solidly built stone temple at its center, surrounded by defensive walls and steep ravines on three sides.

People tend to mimic their heroes.

The Jews are no different than other people in this respect, except for the fact that all of their heroes are:

• bandits
• murderers
• sex maniacs

From reading the story of king Solomon, the murdering Jewish lecher with 700 wives and 300 concubines, we can gain an even greater understanding of the Jewish fondness for:

• murder
• lust
• adultery

and fraud.

With Solomon held up as the epitome of Jewish morality and wisdom, is it any wonder that Jews are the foremost:

• usurers
• panderers
• pimps
• pornography pushers

and sexual perverts in the modern world?

After all, they follow their heroes.

Bathsheba (/bæθˈʃiːbə, ˈbæθʃɪbə/; Hebrew: בַּת־שֶׁבַע Baṯ-šeḇaʿ, lit. ‘Daughter of Sheba’ or ‘Daughter of the Oath’) was an Israelite queen consort. According to the Hebrew Bible, she was the wife of Uriah the Hittite and later of David, with whom she had all of her five children. Her status as the mother of Solomon, who succeeded David as monarch, made her the Gebirah (גְּבִירָה) of the Kingdom of Israel. She is best known for her appearance in the Book of Samuel, which recounts how she was summoned by David’s royal messengers after he witnessed her bathing and lusted after her; David has Uriah killed and then marries Bathsheba, incurring the wrath of God, who strikes down the couple’s first child in infancy before plunging the House of David into chaos and anguish.

This Jewish hero’s tale begins when that great Jewish Superhero, the old whore-mongering bandit chief, King David, had an adulterous affair with Bathsheba, the wife of Uriah.

Uriah the Hittite (Hebrew: אוּרִיָּה הַחִתִּי‎ ʾŪrīyyā haḤīttī) is a minor figure in the Hebrew Bible, mentioned in the Books of Samuel, an elite soldier in the army of David, king of Israel and Judah, and the husband of Bathsheba, the daughter of Eliam. While Uriah was serving in David’s army abroad, David, from the roof of his palace, looked down on his city and spied upon Bathsheba bathing in the privacy of her courtyard. Moved by lust at the sight of her, David called for Bathsheba to be brought to him and slept with her, impregnating her. In an effort to hide his misdeeds, David called Uriah home from war, hoping that he and Bathsheba would sleep with each other and that he would be able to pass the child off as belonging to Uriah. However, Uriah, being a disciplined soldier, refused to visit his wife. So David murdered him by proxy by ordering all of Uriah’s comrades to abandon him in the midst of battle, so that he ended up getting killed by an opposing army. Following Uriah’s death, David took Bathsheba as his eighth wife.

He got her pregnant and sent Uriah – who had been tremendously faithful to King David – into the thick of battle to be killed so that David could screw his wife.

This is a great and wonderful Jewish teaching because the rabbis claim that the Ten Commandments only apply to themselves and were not meant to be applied to non-Jews.

Jews are not allowed to commit adultery with another Jew’s wife.

But Uriah was a Hittite, so it was perfectly kosher for David to screw his wife.

Even though Uriah was a totally devoted soldier, faithfully trusting David’s “Jewish Loyalty,” that doesn’t matter to a Jew because he was a goy (non-Jewish, lowly insect, stupid cattle) created by the Jewish god to serve the Jews.

As the Holy Self-Chosen Ones, the Jews are encouraged by the rabbis to commit adultery with the wives of any non-Jew.

According to the rabbis, seducing the wife of a non-Jew is not adultery at all (the penalty for such is to be stoned to death) because since goyim are merely two-legged animals, how can they have wives? [Babylonian Talmud, Baba Mezia 114a & 114b]

But David got Bathsheba pregnant.

So, in the holiness of Judaism, this meant that if David and Bathsheba couldn’t conceal their adultery from Uriah, then Uriah would have to be killed.

These are true Jewish heroes, worshipped and mimicked by every Jew today!

Then, because he was a holy Jew, David got an additional bonus from his Yahweh-god.

After he had gotten Uriah killed, the child of his adultery conveniently died under suspicious circumstances, probably poisoned by David who hypocritically pretended to mourn for it like a pious Jew should mourn for his murder victims so as to avoid suspicion. (And like the rabbis mourned for Gedaliah after they had had him murdered.)

To show how much he regrated cuckolding a goy like Uriah, David got Bathsheba pregnant again with a son named Solomon.

The unholy Jews have a talent for making the illegitimate and the lurid come to life in their “holy” scriptures to exemplify the wonderfulness of their criminal race.

According to the rabbis, the very lowest of Jewish:

• thieves
• murderers
• adulterers
• pimps
• prostitutes
• deceivers
• liars
• hypocrites
• bandits
• traitors

and warmongers are always presented in the Hebrew Bible as the most beloved of their special god and, of course, superior to any Gentile.

And so, it was with Solomon.

Adonijah, the eldest son of one of David’s wives and the rightful heir to the throne, began to prepare for becoming the next king.

According to 2 Samuel, Adonijah (Hebrew: אֲדֹנִיָּה‎, ’Ǎḏōnīyyā; “my lord is Yah”) was the fourth son of King David. His mother was Haggith as recorded in the book of 2 Samuel 3:4. Adonijah was born at Hebron during the long conflict between David and the House of Saul. In 1 Kings, he briefly proclaimed himself king of Israel during the terminal illness of his father David, before peacefully ceding the throne to his brother Solomon.

But Nathan the prophet was not invited to a barbeque that Adonijah had set up.

Nathan (Hebrew: נָתָן Nāṯān, “Given”; fl. c. 1000 BC) is a prophet in the Hebrew Bible. His actions are described in the Books of Samuel, Kings, and Chronicles (especially 2 Samuel 7:2–17, 12:1–25).

So, following holy Jewish piety, this evil Jewish priest went to Bathsheba and had her lie to the aging King David.

A pious priest like Nathan knew the Eternal Jewish Secret – two Jewish lies add up to one Jewish truth.

So, he conspired with Bathsheba to claim that David had promised to make her son, Solomon, king.

David, old and decrepit as he was, couldn’t remember ever making such a promise to the woman whose husband he had cuckolded and murdered.

Why would he not want to pass down the inheritance of the throne to a son who had been loyal and beyond reproach from a less sullied wife?

But Nathan knew that the rightful heir to the throne hated him.

But being a pious Jewish priest who was confident that he would be well-rewarded by the new queen mother, Nathan had all the reason in the world to claim that David really had made such a promise.

By this time, David was a doddering old fool who kept himself warm at night by having a virgin girl sleep with him.

All of his wives were obviously not warm enough.

Only a virgin girl of twelve would do.

David’s greatest pride and joy, his much-flaunted giant circumcised dong, no doubt much to his chagrin, didn’t work anymore.

So, he couldn’t have sex with the girl.

Bathsheba went into the King’s chamber and told the old codger that he had promised that her son, Solomon, would reign as king.

Then, Nathan came in and confirmed the lie. It was a lie based upon the word of a rabbi and not a promise recorded anywhere else in the Hebrew Bible.

The lies of a rabbi are, of course, the word of God!

So, of course, it was true!

David, being half out of his mind with feebleness and old age and believing the two lying Jews bowing at his feet with sincere “Jewish Loyalty,” assured Bathsheba that her son, Solomon, would reign after him.

Thus, it was, that Solomon, this great hero of the Jews, sat upon the throne of his father, the bandit chief, David.

To secure his throne, his first act was to murder his half-brother, Adonijah.

Then he murdered a few others who were an embarrassment to him. [248]

The next “wise” thing that Solomon did was to take the daughter of the Pharaoh of Egypt for his wife.

Archaeology proves this as another lie of the Jews.

Although the pharaohs would accept foreign women as concubines, they never, ever gave any Egyptian women as concubines to foreign kings; and certainly not to the son of a grubby, murdering Hebrew bandit living in a goat farm like Jerusalem!

But Solomon was supposed to be wise.

After all, the thieving rabbis needed to have someone whom they could claim was the originator of all the:

• stolen
• plagiarized
• counterfeited

“wise sayings” that they had pilfered from the libraries of the ancient Near East and then stuffed them into the Hebrew Bible as their own.

So, a mythical king Solomon as the source of their plagiarisms, was the answer.

“The wisdom of Solomon surpassed the wisdom of all the sons of the East [that is, wiser that the Babylonians and Sumerians], and all the wisdom of Egypt.

He was wiser than any other, wiser than Ethan the Ezrahite, wiser than Heman and Calcol and Darda, the cantors. [that is, wiser that the native Canaanites].” (1Kings 5: 10-12)

Here we have another Super Jew joining the long list of Super Jews who are the best, the smartest, the cleverest, the strongest, the prettiest and handsomest of all people – to hear these horse-faced liars tell it. Next,

Solomon, the Super Jew, built a temple for the Yahweh-god to live in.

Of course, it’s all a coincidence that the Temple of Solomon was designed like the front lobby of a bank. (see Figure 109 – Solomons Temple)

The two pillars of bronze and the bronze wash tub at the front, were an extravagance of Bronze Age wealth. (see Figure 110 – Solomons temple 2)

Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop advertised its wealth with bronze pillars (to symbolize strength) and a wash tub (to symbolize money-laundering) on the outside, while keeping the silver and gold safely in its strong rooms on the inside, concealed behind trap doors.

And for decoration,

“He plated the whole temple with gold, the whole temple entirely.” (1Kings 6:22)

In basic construction, the ancient temples were not much different than modern banks, since they served the same purposes of protecting the “sacred gold” from the hands of “sinners” who might want to take it. (Figure 110b – temple like bank 1937 AD)

The earliest Israelite (not Canaanite) temple is found at Arad.

It was in use from 900 to 600 BC.

It conformed to the regulations laid down in Exodus.

Two column bases were found, one on each side of the entrance to the main room, recalling the pillars in Solomon’s Temple.

Finds of ostraca (messages scratched on fragments of pottery) show unmistakably that this was an Israelite temple: in one letter there is a reference to the “House of Yhwh.”

The Hebrew Bible claims that there were other Israelite shrines or temples in Palestine in addition to the main Temple of Jerusalem. [249]

The plan of the Temple followed the tradition of the long-room temple types, excavated in several Middle and Late Bronze Age sites in northern Syria. [250]

But building upon pre-existing floor plans, is not something that a god would have done who was as unique as the Jews claim.

But Yahweh was a Canaanite god.

• Terah
• Abraham
• Isaac

and Jacob were Babylonians.

So, their design reflected the Canaanite and Babylonian floor plans that had already existed, not the unique plans in the great mind of a mighty god who wanted to be a special god to his special tribes of con artists.

The modern Jews claim that Solomon’s Temple was built upon the exact spot where God stood when he created the earth.

That the Jews are telling another lie is easily proven with this photo [251] of the exact spot where the First Temple stood. (see Figure 111 – Al-Aqsa)

It is presently roofed over by the Al-Aqsa Mosque which the Muslims built to protect their own Semitic fraud known as Islam.

This photo clearly shows that the bedstone is sandstone or limestone.

The entire highlands of Judea and Samaria are primarily underlain by sedimentary limestone, dolomite and dolomitic limestone.

Jerusalem in its entirety is built on sandstone and limestone, geologically among the youngest of all rocks.

Thus, geologically speaking, even the very stones of the earth cry out and say,

“The Jews are liars!”

As for the stories about how rich and wise Solomon was – with the opulence of his court, his 1,400 chariots and his stables of 12,000 horses – archaeology proves that these are more impossibilities foisted upon gullible Mankind.

In the first place, any king who was as wealthy and internationally successful as Solomon is supposed to have been, would certainly have left some record of his existence among the kings of:

• Egypt
• Assyria
• Babylonia

and Syria.

But there is absolutely zero mention of Solomon, or anyone else even resembling him, in the records anywhere in the ancient Near East.

We know this because of modern archaeology, while for the past 2,500 years the rest of Mankind have had nothing but the word of the Jews to depend upon.

In that long time span, such Jewish lies have penetrated every level of Western culture simply because the Jews have offered their lies as the

“holy word of God,”

betraying our trust and subverting our religiosity for their own benefit.

Always and everywhere throughout Western history, the People would stand up and denounce the criminality and the hypocrisy of the Jews.

And always and everywhere, the Jews had already bribed and blackmailed the kings and ministers into protecting the Jews from their outraged victims.

Yes, it is criminal what the Jews have done to the People of the world.

But they have only been able to succeed because of the treason committed by the:

• kings
• administrators
• presidents

and various leaders of the People by protecting the Jews from paying for their crimes against Mankind.

Jerusalem has been excavated time and again but has failed to provide significant evidence for a tenth century occupation.

Not only was any sign of monumental architecture missing, such as would be found if the stories of king Solomon were true, but so were even simple pottery sherds!

Some scholars have argued that later massive building activities in Jerusalem wiped out all signs of the earlier city.

Yet excavations in the City of David revealed impressive finds from the Middle Bronze Age and from the later centuries of the Iron Age – just not from the tenth century BC when David and Solomon were supposed to have been active.

It is highly unlikely that this sparsely inhabited region of Judah and the small village of Jerusalem could have become the center of a great empire stretching from the Red Sea to Syria [252] with all the world offering homage and tribute.

Quite simply, Solomon and his empire never existed.

There is no way a great king with vast wealth stretching from the Euphrates River to the Nile and from Anatolia to the Red Sea and with an international trading network with fleets of ships and thousands of horses and camels, could have lived in such a tiny town as Jerusalem without leaving any trace there or anywhere else, or to be entirely unknown to the great empires surrounding him. same later period. [256]

In the 1920s, archaeologists mistakenly believed that the actual remains of “Solomon’s stables” had been found at the northern city of Megiddo. [253]

But this wishful thinking proved to have belonged to king Omri of the Israelian northern kingdom.

The inflated numbers of:

• horses
• stalls
• chariots

mentioned in the biblical verses, can now be seen as legendary elements of a literary creation aimed to impress the reader or listener, rather than provide an accurate historical account, even though the lying Jews claim it to be an accurate history.

“King Solomon’s Mines”

is another Jewish lie.

Archaeology shows that the only ancient locations of copper mines in the entire area, are dated at least two centuries before Solomon and others are dated to two centuries after Solomon.

And these were all Egyptian and Assyrian mines! [254]

King Hiram of Tyre and his timber and fleet of ships is another point where the word of the Jews cannot be substantiated.

Though he is mentioned several times in the book of Kings as the supplier of cedars of Lebanon and a trade partner of Solomon in various overseas expeditions, the existence of an historical figure by that name in the tenth century BC cannot be verified from any contemporary or even later text. [255]

Hiram was no more a great king than was Solomon.

Both were literary fictions of the lying rabbis and priests who would hold up the dried goatskin scrolls of their “holy scriptures” and exclaim, just as modern Christian priests do today,

“This is the word of God.”

And if any Jew did not say

“Amen”

(I believe) then the rabbis would have him stoned to death!

Such holy people!

Preaching the Devil’s Truth:

“Believe what we say, or we will kill you.”

Despite the long-standing contention that the opulent Solomonic court was the scene of a: 

• flourishing literary
• religious thought
• history writing

evidence for widespread literacy is utterly lacking in Judah during the time of the divided monarchy.

Not a single trace of supposed tenth century Judahite literary activity has been found.

Monumental inscriptions and personal seals – essential signs of a fully developed state – appear in Judah only two hundred years after the alleged time of Solomon, in the late eighth century BC.

Most of the known ostraca and inscribed weight stones – further evidence of bureaucratic record keeping and regularized trade standards – appear only in the seventh century.

Hazael (/ˈheɪziəl/; Biblical Hebrew: חֲזָאֵל or חֲזָהאֵל, romanized: Ḥăzāʾēl) was a king of Aram-Damascus mentioned in the Bible. Under his reign, Aram-Damascus became an empire that ruled over large parts of contemporary Syria and Israel-Samaria. While he was likely born in the greater Damascus region of today, his place of birth is unknown, with both Bashan and the Beqaa Valley being favoured by different historians.

The so-called “cities of Solomon” have been proven by science (using ceramic evidence, architectural parallels, and carbon-14 dates) to have been destroyed by Hazael of Damascus around 835 BC while the Bible claims that these cities were destroyed by Pharaoh Shishak in the late tenth century BC. [257]

However, the biblical narrative is filled with so many specific details about trade transactions, monetary values, and complex royal administration that its authors seem to be describing a reality that they knew from personal experience – not merely dreaming of an invented or imagined utopia.

This is because the scribes of Babylon were quite familiar with the politics and big business of the courts of Assyria and Babylon which they described accurately, but they put Solomon’s name and a much earlier time on the whole fiction. [258]

The identification of forts reportedly built by Solomon’s son Rehoboam throughout Judah and the linking of the massive fortifications undertaken by the Judahite king Asa, proved to be illusory.

Like the Solomonic gates and palaces, these royal building operations are now known to have taken place almost two hundred years after the reigns of those particular kings. [259]

Question:

But why would the rabbis and priests make up such tales?

Answer:

Like everything else Jewish, as a means of hiding their hoaxes.

Behind a “wise” Solomon, they could hide the rabbinical thefts of the Mesopotamian and Egyptian wisdom literature.

Behind a super-wealthy Solomon’s Temple, they could hide the wealth of the Babylonian bankers.

Behind the genealogical swindle claiming that all of the Hebrews were one family, working for a single priestly-directed goal, they could hide the fact that they were actually disassociated tribes all working for themselves. Judah and Israel had never been a single United Kingdom under kings such as Saul or David or Solomon.

The “United Kingdom” hoax was designed to steal an “authority” based solely upon an historical lie.

If the Israelians to the north could be convinced by the lies of the Torah that they were beholden to the Jewish priests, then they could be convinced to pay tithes and donations into the Temple in Jerusalem.

Solomon was invented by the Temple scribes so that they could claim an authority over all the Hebrews while concealing the actual source of the great wealth that was on deposit in the Temple.

Thus, the gold of the Temple didn’t come from a thriving banking business with main investments in Assyria and Babylonia, it came from a great mythological king who left it as “proof” of how rich he was.

Any visible wealth could be claimed to not be there, since it had existed only in the past.

So, what does that make Judaism and the Jews when everything that they claim to be true, is proven to be nothing but lies?

What does that make Judaism when even the great murderers, thieves and perverts whom they claim to be the very basis of their “holy religion,” are proven to be fictional fairy tales? 

Judaism is a hoax, and the Jews are nothing but frauds and liars – each and every one of them without exception.

Archaeology proves Solomon is a total fantasy.

However, strangely enough, it doesn’t really matter to us modern people whether or not Solomon ever existed.

It is enough to know that he is just another Semitic hoax.

As such, not only Judaism but Islam is also proven to be a hoax.

To modern people, the only part of the fables about Solomon and his super-abundance and his celebration of excess that is dear to the heart of every Jew – such as:

• wealth
• property
• women
• fame
• glorification
• praise

– all centers on one and only one passage that modern people need to understand.

And that passage is:

“The weight of gold coming to Solomon in one year was six hundred and sixty-six talents of gold, not counting what came in from merchants’ dues and traders’ profits, and from all the foreign kings and the governors of the country.” (1Kings 10:15)

This is really the only story about Solomon that anyone, especially Christians, needs to know about this Jewish hoax.

I shall explain in Chapter 11 how this number 666 came to be such a terror to the world.

But for now, the days of the kingdom of Judah were ending.

In 597 BC, a Babylonian army laid siege to Jerusalem and carried off King Jehoiachin, along with a cursing and spitting entourage of lice-infested and fly-speckled rabbis and priests.

Eleven years later, Jerusalem and its Temple were put to the torch and the rule of the Davidic dynasty came to an end. [260]

Once again, the “Promises” of their Yahweh-god had turned out to be lies.

But for Jewish priests, why let one good Jewish lie vanish if you can replace it with a Jewish lie that’s even better and which still delivers a tasty barbeque?

While they were captives in Babylon, the scribes of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop completely edited and re-wrote Terah’s moneylenders’ scam into a completely re-organized series of books.

The Torah was completely re-edited to erase most of the Jewish fingerprints.

This collection of fictions and fantasies should have been named The Training Manual for Jewish Criminality and Sociopathy, but we know it today as the Hebrew Bible.

Now, for a quick timeline recap: In 3200 BC, Sumeria was the first civilization, followed by Egypt around 3000 BC.

Then, around 2370 BC, Sargon the Great (2371-2316) founded the Dynasty of Agade (proto-Assyria) in Northern Mesopotamia.

By 2020 BC the city states of Isin and Larsa arose as Sumerian dynasties.

Around 1900 BC Babylonia arose slightly after the first Assyrian states to the north.

Then around 1890 BC Mari became established on the upper Euphrates.

The Hittites in Anatolia arose around 1700 BC, followed by Mitanni in 1500 BC.

The first king of the Israelians was Jeroboam I (931-910 BC).

Jeroboam I (/ˌdʒɛrəˈboʊ.əm/; Hebrew: יָרָבְעָם‎ Yārŏḇʿām; Greek: Ἱεροβοάμ, romanized: Hieroboám), frequently cited Jeroboam son of Nebat, was, according to the Hebrew Bible, the first king of the northern Kingdom of Israel following a revolt of the ten tribes against Rehoboam that put an end to the United Monarchy. According to the book of 1 Kings, he reigned for 22 years and “there was war continually between Rehoboam and Jeroboam”. Jeroboam also fought Abijam son of Rehoboam king of Judah. Jeroboam is often described as doing “evil in the sight of the Lord”, and all the rest of the northern kings were also described in the same way.

And in Judah, there was Rehoboam (931-915 BC).

Both kingdoms allegedly splitting off from one another because of a squabble after the alleged death of the mythological king Solomon.

Thus, the Hebrew kingdoms arrived on the scene more than 2000 years after civilization got its start in Sumeria.

Once again, another lie of the Jews is that they are an “ancient” people.

They are no more ancient than anybody else and as an organized gang of lying rabbis and bandits, not so old after all.

The Northern kingdom of the Israelians was brought to an end by Assyria in 722 BC.

Assyria made itself even more enemies by attacking Elam between 700 and 691 BC and sacking Babylon in 689 BC.

Elam was again overrun by Assyria in 655 and 642-639 BC.

Cyraxares in Persia took control in 630 BC and a military alliance was conceived between the Persians and Babylonians that ended the Assyrian Empire with the capture of Ashur in 614 BC and Nineveh in 612 BC.

Cyaxares[a] was the third king of the Medes. He ascended to the throne in 625 BCE, after his father Phraortes lost his life in a battle against the Assyrians.  Cyaxares collaborated with the Babylonians to destroy the Assyrian Empire, and united most of the Iranian peoples of ancient Iran, thereby transforming Media into a major power.

The last of Assyria was destroyed at the battle of Carchemish along with their Egyptian allies in 605 BC.

This coalition of forces allowed the Chaldean Dynasty of Babylonia under Nabopolassar (626-605 BC) and his son, Nebuchadnezzar II (605-562 BC), to control Mesopotamia and Palestine while the Persian king controlled the Zagros Mountains, Elam and the Iranian Plateau.

Miles Williams Mathis: Iran’s Jewish Rulers – Library of Rickandria

Among all of these great kingdoms, nobody had ever heard of a king David or a king Solomon.

Cutting across all national and international boundaries and linking the various city-states and kingdoms, were the far-reaching trade routes connecting the merchant-moneylenders.

With their extensive spying networks and systems of bribery within every king’s court, they were well situated to know the temper of the times.

From every market and tavern throughout the civilized world as well as penetrating into the uncivilized tribal areas where their network of peddlers and traders penetrated, they could gather the rumors and gauge the opinions of both royalty and commoner alike.

This spy network organized by the merchant-moneylenders of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop was the most extensive intelligence operation in the entire ancient Near East.

As a religion-based conspiracy drawing its financial power from both the Sumerian Swindle and a ruthless Assyrian-style military organization, the priest-moneylenders of the Yahweh “God of Armies” had established a spy system still in operation today which is known as the Kehillah. 

When you understand the power that this secret system gave to the Chief Priest of the Temple, you will better understand why this office was so much sought after by the various rivals throughout history.

The Chief Priest did not merely preside over the gold in the Temple and the people who worshipped there, but he subtly controlled the governments of the entire known world.

While avoiding combat, themselves, these evil moneylender-priests could encourage and profit from the warfare that they induced in others.

Many must suffer and die so that a few Jews and bankers may live in luxury.

Terah’s temple-based system of banking and moneylending had been set up as a religious organization that depended for its operating capital upon donations of the faithful as well as the ten percent tithes and deposits of its membership.

Thus, the Chief Priest, the lower priests, the rabbis, the Levite religious police, as well as the entire Temple staff and all of their ravenous families of multiple wives and many children, numerous as:

“the sands of the sea,”

had an all-encompassing interest in the success of the business enterprises of the merchant-moneylenders who were members of the congregation.

If the businessmen in the congregation were successful, the priests and rabbis also became wealthy.

The priests’ and rabbis’ income of ten percent of all profits depended upon the success of the Jewish businessmen.

The Jewish rabbis and the Jewish businessmen thus formed a symbiotic organism designed to 

• parasitize
• dispossess
• genocide

the Gentiles among whom they were allowed to live.

The rabbis made themselves useful by spy work and by thinking of ways to benefit the businessmen in their congregations.

Of course, all priests in all religions try to help their congregations.

But only in Judaism is such help of a completely criminal nature.

The rabbis are not spiritual guides so much as they are gang bosses and demons-in-residence. 

The great empires knew of the importance of good communications and the fast transfer of armies across their lands.

The Assyrians had built good roads along the major trade and military corridors with inns and fresh horses at every interval of a day’s journey.

Fleets of ships were maintained by the Phoenicians and by the Greeks.

The world was becoming a smaller place with such road-building and maritime technology. 

Messages and letters could travel across the entire known world in weeks and months.

To take advantage of these roads:

“not built by themselves,”

what was needed for their secret system of external subversion and plunder, was an internal system of communication that could quickly spread information – as well as disinformation – and gather spy intelligence radiating like a spider’s web from the Chief Priest and the Prince of the Jews.

As a militarily based system of:

• banking
• trade guilds
• cartels
• transportation combines

and slave labor monopolies, the Jews managed their day-to-day operations through descending ranks of:

“leaders of thousands, hundreds, fifties, tens,” (Exodus 18: 21-26)

And they could manage their business enterprises without recourse to subterfuge since their various unions and guilds were publicly known, although restricted to Jewish members only. 

However, for the truly diabolical machinations of:

• organized crime
• military subversion
• social destruction

something more secretive and ultimately sinister was desired.

The priests of Yahweh’s Temple devised a system of spying and organizational control that did not depend upon written instructions and could wrap together the entire world in a net of manipulation and intrigue with themselves at the controls.

This system is in operation today and is called the Kehillah.

The Kehillah took precedence over all other Jewish organizations and was originally controlled by the high priest in consultation with the richest merchant moneylenders who were members of his inner circle.

This inner circle of priests and bankers determined the policies to be carried out in the Jewish scheme of world ownership.

As proven in Volume One, The Sumerian Swindle, anyone who is allowed to lend money at interest, eventually gains ownership of the entire world and the enslavement of all of Mankind.

BOOK: The Sumerian Swindle: How the Jews Betrayed Mankind – (5000 BC to 1500 BC) – Vol. I – Library of Rickandria

It is simple, though fraudulent, arithmetic.

So, of course, the most evil of all people desired to use such a swindle to own the world.

As long as the people of the world are willing to pay interest on a loan, then they and the entire world could be owned by the moneylenders.

The debtor is the slave of the creditor, but only as long long as the debtor doesn’t know that he is being swindled and robbed and therefore makes his payments on time, like a good slave. The Kehillah was not a religious organization although only those Jews who strictly followed the demonic Laws of Moses were admitted as its members.

Admittance for membership to the Kehillah depends upon a high degree of Oral Law adherence and/ or wealth for access to this rabbinical-capitalistic oligarchy. [261]

These criminals called themselves “pious Jews.”

The religious hoax of Judaism had already been established in the Hebrew Bible.

So, the merchant moneylenders already had a system established for controlling the Jews.

But in the infinite greed of the moneylenders, what they desired was a system for using the Jews as a tool for controlling the non-Jewish people of the entire world.

The Jews made their profits from non-Jews, not from other Jews.

So, controlling the goyim (non-Jewish, lowly insects, stupid cattle) was of extreme importance to their success as parasites.

The leader of the Kehillah was not called the “Chief Priest” because its chief officer did not have to be a priest but rather someone knowledgeable with macroeconomics, military strategy and political intrigue.

Let the priests of the Temple control the religious fantasies of the Jews but he who controlled the wealth and political direction of the Temple, was the Director of the Kehillah.

Whether a priest or a banker, the top director of the Kehillah was called the Director or the “Patriarch.”

His second in command was titled as the “Prince.”

Because Judaism thrives on warfare, and warfare occurs when two or more countries or people’s conflict, the priests and merchant-moneylenders who first organized the Kehillah decided to divide the world into two parts so that the Jews could control both parts through their control of both sides in a conflict.

This division was not absolute but could change as the political tide changed.

At first, the Kehillah operated in Assyria and Babylonia.

At that time, the two empires that controlled the known world were Assyria and Babylonia.

Egypt was also a major power but was not as easily penetrated with Semitic deceit because the Egyptians were not Semites, they were Mediterranean Caucasoids with a culture that honored Truth.

The Egyptians could be defeated through warfare, but they were not so easily defeated through subversion.

The Kehillah was an instrument of subversion.

The Kehillah is organized around the number seven.

Seven is a magic Jewish number representing the seven eyes of Yahweh who can see the whole world; or the seven-branched menorah, or the seven magic goat horns used by Joshua to knock down Jericho; and the seven nations greater than themselves which the Jews destroyed, etc.

SPIRITUALITY: Lucky Number Seven – Library of Rickandria

It is based strictly on the dictatorship principle of the Jewish priests.

The Prince in each of the two regions chooses seven rich and influential Jews under him as his subordinates.

This is the first echelon of leaders and each one of these seven knows each other and, of course, their leader.

The first echelon of seven is known as the 7th Kehillah degree and each one in the first echelon is known as an “Arch Censor.”

Each one of these seven leaders chooses a cell of seven men under him, making 49 in the second echelon or the 6th degree.

Each one of these is called a “Minister.”

They know each other within the cell and the Arch-Censor above them but they do not know any of the other Arch-Censors or the Ministers under the other Arch-Censors.

This cell-like pattern of need-to know secrecy is repeated throughout the organization.

Each one of these 49 Ministers chooses a cell of seven men under him making 343 in the third echelon or the 5th Kehillah degree.

Each one of these men is called a “Herald.”

Each one of these 343 Heralds chooses a cell of seven men under him making 2,401 in the fourth echelon or the 4th degree.

Each one of these men is called a “Courtier.”

Each one of these 2,401 Courtiers chooses a cell of seven men under him making 16,807 in the fifth echelon or in the third degree.

Each one of these is called a “Scrivener.”

Each one of these 16,807 Scriveners chooses a cell of seven men under him, making 117,649 in the sixth echelon or the second degree.

Each one of these is called an “Auditor.”

Each one of these 117,649 Auditors chooses a cell of seven men under him making 824,543 in the seventh echelon or the first degree.

Each one of these is called a “Mute”.

The Mute has no one under him and is the basic operative of this espionage and sabotage organization.

The Mute is a spy who takes orders from above and who gathers and reports information to his Auditor who in turn passes the information up through the seven echelons to the Prince and then to the Patriarch of the Jews.

He knows only the seven members of his Auditor’s cell but no one in the Kehillah other than these.

Each Mute is therefore called a

“seventh son of a seventh son.” [262]

If you add up all the members of the various seven echelons, you find that there are nearly one million members in each region.

Each was chosen by the one above him or recommended by his peers as a substitute for those cell members who died.

Moving up in the cell to a higher level can only be accomplished through the choice of the leader of the cell.

All of these members are chosen from among loyal members of the various synagogues and from among seven trusted friends of the original cell captain.

It is the individual rabbis in the synagogues who recommend the most loyal Jews even if the rabbis, themselves, are not members of the Kehillah because the followers of the Hebrew Bible and the Babylonian Talmud are already vetted for every Jewish criminal conspiracy.

The rabbi merely has to pass along their names as candidates.

As believers in the mythology of the Hebrew Bible and as recipients of a portion of the profits from the Jewish swindles, all are fanatically loyal and dedicated to carry out the Jewish program of subversion and intrigue in order to create the Jewish dictatorship for which the Jews have so ardently striven and connived during the last several thousand years.

The Kehillah is such a secret network, that outside of the very first echelon of the Arch-Censors, none of the rest of the Kehillah members know who the others are outside of his own cell.

Each only knows his own superior and the seven whom he controls.

With a secret, dedicated, fanatically loyal, well-paid organization of diabolical Jews, it is easy to see how orders are communicated and carried out with a minimum of delay.

When the Patriarch of the Kehillah gives orders to his seven, from that moment there are only six steps down the line of command in order to have every one of the eight hundred thousand Kehillah members notified.

All that is necessary is to give seven verbal messages or to send seven encrypted messages down the chain of command.

Remember, each man only has to give seven commands or send seven messages below him and in a matter of days or weeks or months the whole network of nearly one million members has been given their marching orders.

That is how the Jews managed to set in motion rebellions, withdrawals of silver, rumors of war or plague spread among a targeted populace and whatever else that was:

“good for the Jews,”

all across the civilized world at the same time.

Not to mention our own identical problems in modern times, even in the ancient world, spontaneous rebellions were not “spontaneous” nor were inflations and depressions “normal business cycles” – all were planned in advance and directly promoted by nearly one million Kehillah Jews working in unison in each “Principality” under the direction of the Patriarch.

And this number could double every time the Patriarch appointed in some far away region another “Prince of Judah.”

Jews in general but Kehillah members especially are encouraged to infiltrate the management at all levels of Gentile society from the lowest craft guild to the court of the king, depending upon their individual abilities and financial levels.

The scheming rabbis called subversion such as this as:

“blessing the goyim with Jews.”

Whatever Gentile organization did not have any Jews as members, Jews would begin applying for or bribing their way in – indeed, demanding to be admitted!

No Gentile group needs Jews any more than a dog needs fleas, but as a parasitic and subversive culture of bloodsuckers, all Jews need Gentiles.

And if they couldn’t get in because the Gentile group didn’t want them, then they would bribe the king into admitting them against the will of the People.

Once inside a Gentile commercial or social group, they would agitate for becoming leader of the group through their usual methods of glib, friendly talk accompanied with various forms of bribery and blackmail.

Once they became leaders, or even as lower-level assistants, they were positioned to spy for the Kehillah and

“gain possession of the gates of their enemies.” (Genesis 22:17-18)

But who were the enemies of the Jews?

No one, really.

No one had any reason to be an enemy of the Jews, that is, until they discovered how they had been:

• duped
• burglarized
• impoverished
• enslaved

and their families murdered by these grinning monsters pretending to be both “holy” and “oppressed.”

And if the People, in their outrage, rose up to deal with these subterranean crime lords, the officials from the king and the king’s soldiers, would step in to protect the Jews.

Just as in modern times, the people throughout the ancient world also found that their own leaders had been bribed and blackmailed into protecting the very bloodsucking parasites who had been defrauding and betraying them.

The demonic psychopaths of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop had always been a corrosive element wherever they went.

Their surest path had always been easiest by first corrupting the leaders while robbing that leader’s People.

Assyria was a predatory money-making military engine that had profited the Assyrians connected to the royal house as well as the merchant-moneylenders who serviced the Assyrian empire.

But the people of the Near East had finally reached the point where their hatred of the Assyrians was extreme.

Through their spy network, the merchant moneylenders knew that the time had come to betray the Assyrian kings and to strengthen their allies among the Babylonians and Persians.

They could arrange for both the safety of their wealth and their persons by moving their bullion out of Assyria and into safe havens in Babylonia and Elam.

As in all banking, it was done with extreme secrecy so that the bullion disappeared from Assyria gradually and without trace.

By withdrawing silver from circulation in Assyria and putting it out on loan in countries aligned against Assyria, the merchant-moneylenders could weaken Assyria while gaining friends and protectors among the enemies of the Assyrians – the Ancient Secret Frauds of the Sumerian Swindle in action.

Once the Assyrians were defeated and dispossessed, all of their wealth would devolve to the merchant-moneylenders who would be on hand to buy the looted goods cheaply and to service the armies and royal courts of the victors.

And yes, they knew that Assyria would fall because, through bribery and spies, they knew how much silver Assyria had in the treasury.

And so, the bullion hoards of the Jewish-Assyrian merchant moneylenders, whose chief guild hall was in Harran, were secretly transferred out of Assyria to bolster deposits with the Jewish-Babylonian and Jewish Persian bankers.

It was a simple and smooth operation which left Assyria without funds to defend itself.

With their international network of commercial spies and political connections, the moneylenders of the ancient near East, just like the bankers and f financiers of modern times, had much more power over the People and the governments than their criminal occupation warranted.

It was not just the ability to suck the silver out of society through the mechanics of the Sumerian Swindle and thus rob individuals, but they could shift that plundered metal across national borders, causing one entire kingdom to suffer from a depressed economy and another entire kingdom to suffer from an inflated economy, while profiting from both situations – just as they do today.

When their allegiance was to the gold in the temples rather than to the people among whom they did business, all that mattered to them was the safety and increase of their gold.

Let the goyim perish but make the gold secure.

Indeed, genocide all of the Gentiles and pluck the gold from their dead hands is a basic teaching of the Hebrew Bible because many must suffer and die so that a few Jews may live in luxury.

Even as they were betraying Assyria and weakening the Assyrian economy while building up the economic strength of Assyria’s enemies in Babylonia and Persia, the moneylender-priests of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop had devised an ingenious method of increasing the security of their Temple by strengthening the faith of their king and of the Jews through the ingenious use of another of their frauds, which we have already reviewed in Chapter Eight.

BOOK: The Monsters of Babylon: How the Jews Betrayed Mankind (1200 BC to 1000 AD) – Volume II – Chapter 8: The Training Manual for Murderers, Thieves, Loan Sharks & Other Jewish Heroes – Library of Rickandria

This was where the wicked priests of Yahweh pretended to discover the Book of Deuternomy hidden in a wall and used the Operating Instructions in Deuteronomy to “cleanse” Judah of competing priests, competing temple-treasuries and opponents to their priesthood by having Josiah’s army murder everybody whom they didn’t like, which meant everybody who wasn’t Jewish.

In the last days of Assyria, when Josiah came to the throne as an eight-year-old boy in 639 BC, in the wake of his father’s assassination, Assyria was still at the height of its power.

The territory of the former northern kingdom of Israel was still under direct Assyrian administration and the coastal Philistine cities were administered by Assyrian client kings.

Just a few years later, however, by around 630 BC, the Assyrian empire was in a state of rapid disintegration.

Pressures in the north and east severely strained the empire’s resources.

Its military might, though still formidable, had seriously declined, all because the conspiring moneylenders had withdrawn silver and banked it in Persia and Babylon in order to bankrupt the Assyrian economy and create a long-term depression.

No silver, no pay.

No pay, no army.

With no silver, the impoverished people could give no support other than their own lives as soldiers, f fighting and dying for a handful of grain or merely defending their own lives in a battle where no Jews ever participated.

Although the Assyrian chronicles from this period 355 are fragmentary, the general picture is, nonetheless, unmistakable: after a century of unquestioned domination in the region, the power of Assyria began to contract as silver disappeared from circulation.

This economic pattern would be repeated for the next 1,600 years as nations depended upon commodity money made of gold and silver while the merchant moneylenders controlled these same commodities.

Thus, were entire nations controlled not by the kings or by the People, but by craven little accountants, treasonous bankers and goldsmiths.

As Assyria withdrew to its historical borders in the east, it began its final and ultimately unsuccessful fight for survival.

The once unchallenged and unchallengeable superpower that had dominated the economy and political life of the world gradually abandoned its claim to the provinces of the west as its ability to pay its over-extended army lessened.

Does this sound familiar to you modern Readers, as the bankers bleed the wealth out of once mighty nations and transfer that wealth to the deadly enemies of the very people who trusted their “Jewish Loyalty”?

Learn from history; don’t repeat it. Hang the bankers and all of their friends and confiscate by any means what they have stolen from you and from your People and from your country.

And understand the lessons of True Money as explained in this book.

The withdrawal of Assyrian garrisons and officials from the Philistine cities and from the districts of the former kingdom of the Israelians created a power vacuum.

A new, rising dynasty in Egypt emerged as Assyria’s successor along the Mediterranean coast.

During a reign of more than half a century, from 664 to 610 BC, Psamtik I, of the Twenty-sixth Egyptian Dynasty, gradually expanded his power base in the western Nile Delta to unite Upper and Lower Egypt, then he marched north and annexed the prosperous trading cities of the Philistine plain, setting up a buffer zone between Egypt and Mesopotamia.

This takeover seems to have been accomplished with tacit Assyrian agreement.

Egypt owed Assyria a debt of gratitude for ridding Egypt of the cultural disintegration caused by the Negro Pharaohs.

In return for control of the former Assyrian possessions, Egypt became Assyria’s ally, agreeing to lend military support against anti-Assyrian uprisings and the growing influence of Babylonia.

Although the Egyptians were now in control of the Philistine coast and the international highway that led inland past Megiddo and into Syria and Mesopotamia, the peoples and cities of the highlands of Judah were of only marginal concern to them.

As in the earlier era of Egyptian imperialism during the Late Bronze Age, over a half millennium earlier, the Egyptians left affairs in the highlands – in Judah and the former territory of the Israelians – to take their own course, as long as they did not threaten Egyptian control of the international highway along the coast and across the valleys of the north. [263]

Nabopolassar (625-605), founder of the Chaldean Dynasty in Babylonia, destroyed the Assyrian Capital of Nineveh with the help of the Medes.

Assyria disappeared from history, its cities raided, its people enslaved.

Nimrud and Nineveh were sacked.

In 605 BC, the last remnants of the Assyrians with their Egyptian allies were defeated at Carchemish.

Josiah of Judah, an ally of the Babylonians, attempted to intercept the Egyptians at Megiddo and was killed.

His “mighty army” pitted against the Egyptians was swatted like the national insect of Israel. 

Nabopolassar died at this time and his son Nebuchadnezzar became king of the Babylonians.

The relative size of these two, ancient superpowers can be gauged by the size of their capital cities.

Nineveh was the largest city in Middle Eastern history.

It was filled with:

• plazas
• fields
• gardens

and a large botanical and zoological park next to the palace.

The park was irrigated and the excess water from the canal system was fed into an area that created a man-made swamp for:

• canebrakes
• water birds
• wild pigs

Each family in Nineveh was given plots of two acres on which to plant orchards.

Nebuchadnezzar also gave the same benefits to all of the people whom he had forced to immigrate into Babylonia.

So, the Jews were well supplied with all necessities of food and shelter when they arrived.

They were neither starved nor mistreated.

Nebuchadnezzar (Nabu-kudurri-usur, 604–562 BC) needs no introduction as one of the most famous figures in ancient history.

He enhanced his ancient capital of Babylon with his building and renovation projects.

The topography of the ancient capital included the ziggurat, the famous Hanging Gardens (one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World), and the museum next to Nebuchadnezzar’s palace.

Babylon was more or less square, covering approximately 1,000 hectares, and bisected by the Euphrates.

The Euphrates itself could be crossed by a bridge that rested on five piers. [264]

Babylonia was rich and powerful even before its conquest of Assyria.

The fall of the Assyrian empire happened with astonishing speed – from world dominion to extinction within 40 years.

This does not mean extinction of the Assyrian people since they served and were absorbed by later empires.

But the Assyrian Empire, itself, became the dust of history, never to rise again.

CIVILIZATION: ORIGINS OF ASSYRIA & GERMANY – Library of Rickandria

However, the fall of Assyria represented only a political and not a cultural divide.

Of her successor peoples which included the Babylonians and the Medes with the Persians, the first had a common culture and the others had adopted much from Assyria. [265]

So, Mesopotamian society moved along very much as it had always been with mainly a change in leadership.

Five particular factors contributed to the downfall of the Assyrian empire:

(1) a debilitating struggle for succession between two sons of Esarhaddon

(2) a Chaldean chieftain, Nabopolassar, who challenged Assyrian overlordship by assuming the kingship of Babylonia in 626 BC

(3) the Medes who under Cyaxares attacked Assyria

(4) tribal hordes from the north, known as Umman Manda, mainly Cimmerians (biblical Gomer) who overran Assyrian territory.

All of this had to have been staged and organized.

The fifth factor in the downfall of Assyria was:

(5) the money power of the merchant moneylenders with their far-flung communication and trade networks.

Not all of the merchant-moneylenders were Jews, but all were members of the secretive moneylender guilds, so they were all sympathetic to the same commercial goals.

Thus, the merchants and moneylenders, whether Jewish or not, could all act in concert as self-interested, treasonous swindlers – as they are today.

By shifting silver and gold out of Assyrian territory and into the territories of the Babylonians and Medes, the merchant-moneylender guilds not only saved their own fortunes but weakened the entire Assyrian economy.

Without silver, the army could not be maintained.

Over a period of forty years of steady siphoning of bullion out of the country, the Assyrian kings could not have known where the silver was going or how.

The Assyrian merchant-moneylenders still had goods to sell, but they claimed that business was terrible because the silver had disappeared from the market.

Neither kings nor commoners could afford to buy what the merchants had because there was so little silver in circulation.

Meanwhile, the merchant-moneylenders of Babylonia and Elam were doing a very profitable business in arming and supplying Assyria’s enemies, including their trade route customers, the wild Umman Manda tribes.

As the Assyrian economy was depressed, the poorer Jews were sustained by the rabbis and priests.

These Little Jews could draw from the tithes of the wealthy members, the Big Jews.

Handing out the tithe money, kept the priests and rabbis surrounded with the poor, dependant members showing the non-Jews how “pious” they were by attending synagogue regularly.

Only the synagogue members were given food rations and free loans.

So, these were perceived to be “pious Jews” by the Babylonians who could only see the Jews’ back sides as they crowded into the synagogues, but they could not see the Jews’ front sides where their hands were open, palm upward, for the food and silver dispensed by the demons who were dressed as priests and rabbis.

Unlike the other temple-based religions, Judaism does not depend upon local tithes and donations because it is an international banking system disguised as a religious entity.

So, its operating capital comes from sources outside of the borders of even the most war-ravaged state.

Therefore, even in times when the general populace is impoverished, the Jewish system of swindles and pillage provided free loans for the Jews to take advantage of the blighted nation and its suffering people.

If Country-A was being destroyed and plundered by Country-B, the rabbis in Country-B provided the silver for the Jews in Country-A to buy up cheap goods and properties from the desperate Gentiles.

When the war was over, the Jews in Country-A either sell what they bought at a bargain or occupy the cheap businesses and buildings that they bought during the war emergency at a big profit.

Then, they repay the “free” loan and tithe back ten percent into the synagogue banking system.

Thus, through war, the International Jews ship their gold and goods to safety across international borders, profit from supplying the armies of both sides and profit again by buying up the properties and goods from the stressed and desperate non-Jews who must either sell cheap or lose everything entirely.

And because of their Sabbath Military Exemption Fraud, the Jews are not required to fight in any of the wars that they foment and feed off of.

War is the harvest of the Jews.

NEW WORLD ORDER: JEWISH BANKSTERS’ WAR ON AMERICA & THE WORLD – Library of Rickandria

So, they promote it at every opportunity.

Even in modern times, you can see those hook-nosed and name-changing charlatans in the Media and politics demanding “War!”

But they only do the actual fighting with your sons and daughters whom they seek to sacrifice while putting your money in their own pockets.

The pact between Nabopolassar and Cyaxares in 614 BC prepared the way for the orderly dismemberment of the Assyrian empire.

The principle heir was Babylonia, with the Medes taking control of the most northerly areas in Asia Minor and the regions east of the Zagros.

Parts of Syria and Palestine were still under Egyptian influence, so Nebuchadnezzar had to devote several campaigns between 604 and 586 to establishing his authority there.

Once Nebuchadnezzar had control of his empire, he could not allow an independent and subversive money power such as the one centered in Jerusalem to continue to subvert his government.

The Jews had sided with Egypt and were therefore an enemy of Babylonia.

This marks the end of what is known as the First Temple Period, ending around 586 BC, as the Babylonians conquered Judah and Jerusalem, and laid waste to Solomon’s Temple, deporting the evil priests and moneylenders from Jerusalem to Babylon.

With the conquest by Nebuchadnezzar, four hundred years of Judah’s fake history came to an end in f ire and blood.

The tiny little goat-herder’s kingdom of Judah with its counterfeited history of “mighty kings,” was utterly devastated, its economy ruined, its society ripped apart.

The last king in a dynasty that had ruled for centuries was tortured and imprisoned in Babylon, as he so much deserved for his Jewish treachery.

His sons were all killed.

Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop – the only legitimate place for the worship of the lying Yahweh-god – was destroyed.

The religion and national existence of the Jews could have ended in this great disaster. [266]

Unfortunately, both survived, thanks to the extreme subversion of Babylonian society by the Directors of the Temple Penis Cult who were already living in Babylon in extreme luxury.

The center of Judaism has never been Jerusalem because that was only the façade of International Jewry.

The center of Judaism is wherever the most money is to be found.

In this case, Babylonia.

And already waiting in Babylonia were the operators of the hoax, when the first deportees from Jerusalem arrived.

As directing members of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop and directors of the Kehillah, the Babylonian Jews had a vested interest in preserving their benefits derived from the Jerusalem Temple Cult.

The religion started by the Babylonian moneylenders (Terah and Abraham), had provided them with independence from the Babylonian gods and therefore independence from the Babylonian kings.

They had a Treasury under their sole ownership and control, a religion-based gold smuggling operation hidden behind the priesthood, and freedom from military duty in all of the armies of the world.

The Babylonian moneylender members of the First National Bank and Pawn Shop of Jerusalem were free to profit from war without actually doing any of the fighting.

These were all benefits that they wanted to keep.

So, as the deportees from Jerusalem began arriving, their fellow Jews in Babylonia found them easy and profitable jobs as well as political appointments.

When Nebuchadnezzar had deported the Jews from Jerusalem into Babylonia, he had not destroyed the enemies of Mankind; he had merely clutched the poisonous serpent to his bosom and carried the wicked priests back to where they could associate with the actual leaders of Judaism, the bankers and merchants of Babylonia.

Nebuchadnezzar died in 562 BC and was succeeded by his son Amel-Marduk (Evil-Merodach), who was unpopular in Babylon.

Berossus says of him that he was restrained neither by law nor by decency.

As a degenerate and pervert, he found a like comrade in the exiled Jehoiachin of Judah, who was released from prison in exchange for a hefty bribe and for the remainder of his life dined at the king’s table, offering this debauched king his “Jewish Loyalty.”

After a brief reign, Amel-Marduk was killed in a revolution that had had foreign inspiration as well as foreign silver behind it.

Amel-Marduk’s successor was Nergal-sharra-usur (559-556 BC) (biblical Neriglissar). [267]

But he was a fool who wasted Babylonian manpower in useless conflicts and the quest for glory.

He was replaced by Nabonidus.

In Volume One, you saw how Nabonidus (Nabu na’id) (555-539 BC) was elected to the kingship of Babylonia because of his trustworthiness among his generals.

He was a religious man whose mother was the chief priestess of Sin, the Moon God.

He was devoted to the Moon God and had had dreams where this god had ordered him to leave Babylon and move his forces to Northern Arabia.

By leaving Babylon, he also escaped from the yearly New Year’s ceremony of the priests, who would take away the king’s authority, slap him on the face until the tears flowed, and then return his authority to him as a demonstration that his authority came from the god, Marduk and from the priests of Marduk.

But Nabonidus’ own god was the Moon God, Sin, not Marduk.

To escape the possibility that the priests of Marduk would use the New Year’s ceremony to rob him of his kingship and give it to another, he moved his capital to the oasis of Taima in Northern Arabia, claiming that he was ordered to do this by his god in a dream.

But there was another reason for the move.

Reacting to the firm Median (Persian) control of the trade routes to the east and north of Mesopotamia, Nabonidus took over control of the trade routes in western Arabia by seizing the principal oasis settlements and establishing his capital at Yathrib (Medina).

Both Taima and the neighboring oasis, Madyan, were famous trade centers for:

• frankincense
• copper
• gold

and silver.

Mecca was also a large trade center where the major trade routes converged.

It was situated along the caravan route linking Yemen in the south with Byzantine Egypt and Syria-Palestine to the northwest and the Persian Sassanian Empire to the northeast. [268]

He stayed in Taima for ten years.

During this time, the New Year’s celebrations in Babylon could not be held, making him very unpopular with the priests of Marduk as well as with the Babylonian people who depended on those celebrations to ensure that Marduk would give them blessings.

In those ten years, depositing themselves into each and every oasis where Nabonidus established a trade center, were members of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop. 

Some had been part of Nebuchadnezzar’s deportees from Jerusalem, and some had been residents of Babylonia from Abraham’s earliest swindles, managing the Babylonian trade channels where their cult of merchant-moneylenders had monopoly advantage in such things as:

• spices
• perfumes
• gemstones
• gold and silver work
• garments
• incense
• moneylending
• slaves
• grain

and whatever else could turn a profit.

The descendants of these Jewish merchant-moneylenders, following on the coattails of Nabonidus’ army, would still be monopolizing trade in these oasis trade centers nearly a thousand years later when Muhammad finally chased them out.

Meanwhile, the Persian king Cyrus had defeated his Median overlord and had become ruler of the Median territories with a vigorous policy of expansion.

The long absence of Nabonidus from Babylon, combined with economic problems and his unpopular attempts at religious reform, produced internal opposition especially among the priests of Marduk, as a result of which Babylon surrendered without resistance to Cyrus in 539 BC.

The surrender of the whole of the Babylonian empire followed. [269]

This marks the end of Babylonian domination of the Near East.

The Babylonians brought the Assyrian Empire to an end with the connivance of the merchant moneylenders.

And now, just seventy years later in 539 BC, the Jews opened the gates of Babylon to Cyrus’ army with singing and dancing and the offering up to him of their undying “Jewish Loyalty.”

The Assyrian Empire was betrayed by the moneylenders and now the Babylonian Empire was also betrayed.

The Babylonian Empire fell to the Aryans of Persia who were now the supreme power in the region.

As can be seen in the fake prophesies of such rascals as Jeremiah and Ezekiel, the Jewish priests along with their system of subversion and espionage known as the Kehillah, had been tempting Cyrus to attack Babylonia.

Aramaic, not Old Persian, was the imperial and commercial language of Cyrus’ Achaemenid Empire. [270]

So, the merchant moneylenders who infested Cyrus’ court all spoke directly to Cyrus in a language that he, himself, spoke.

They spoke Aramaic in terms of huge loans for armies and supplies.

They spoke in terms of espionage services that only they could provide, giving Cyrus immediate intelligence on the morale of the Babylonians and the totals in silver and gold in the Babylonian treasury and the disposition of Babylonian armies.

And they read to him directly from the wet ink “prophesies” that the holy priests of their holy gang of holy liars had counterfeited just for his oh-so-kingly majesty.

These were “prophesies” that they claimed had been made two hundred years previously and miraculously naming him by name as the very most favorite of Yahweh, their very own God of Armies.

The merchant-moneylenders of the Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop of Jerusalem were desperate to regain control of the focal-point of their swindle back into their own hands.

It had been an extraordinarily profitable scam with a “holy” fraud based upon a “holy” Temple Treasury situated in a “holy land” protected by their very own devil-god who commanded them to rob and murder the people of the world – all while giving them a guaranteed military deferment from any actual combat!

The Temple Cult of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop was a banker’s dream come true. It included total protection of assets by a mob of mesmerized goat-rustlers who believed the lies and who were both threatened with death while being paid a percentage of the profits to be Jewish fanatics.

Every member of the Temple Cult benefited from the profits.

Judaism practices “trickle-down” gangsterism.

So, the Biggest Lie Ever Told gave its members both a direct income as well as cushy jobs managing the vast, interconnected business monopolies controlled by the merchant-moneylenders of the Temple hoax.

All individual Jews found a rich reward in perpetuating the lies of Judaism.

Judaism was a classic criminal carrot-or-stick system of gangsterism; believe the lie or we will kill you.

And if you believe the lie, then we will give you a cut of the loot.

Judaism is the Devil’s Truth; and every Jew is a devil.

Coordinated by the machinations and penetrations of the Jews into the Babylonian society, it was not just the fake prophesies of Jeremiah and Ezekiel that were used to deceive Cyrus, it was a conspiracy of priests among the various other temples in Babylon, too.

There was common purpose between the priests of the Cult of Yahweh and the Cult of Marduk to replace Nabonidus with a more pliant king.

In the Babylonian Archives, it was written that in the

“Eleventh Year: Nabonidus, the king, stayed in Taima; the crown prince, the officials and his army were in Akkad.

The king did not come to Babylon for the ceremonies of the month of Nisanu, Nebo did not come to Babylon, Bel did not go out from Esagila in procession, the festival of the New Year was omitted, but the offerings for the gods of Babylon and Borsippa were given according to the complete ritual.” [271]

So, the conspiracy of the Jewish priests to betray Babylon to the Persians was not shared among the priests of Yahweh alone.

For their own purposes, the corrupt priesthood of Marduk’s great temple of Esagila were partners in the betrayal.

Conspiring with the Jewish priests of the Yahweh Cult, they too had fake prophesies of their own with which to tempt Cyrus into attacking their own city so as to free themselves from the secondary place below the control of the Moon God, Sin, and his devotee, king Nabonidus.

The Babylonian priests wrote on a cuneiform clay barrel:

“Marduk…. Scanned and looked through all the countries, searching for a righteous ruler willing to lead him in the annual procession.

Then he pronounced the name of Cyrus, king of Anshan, declared him to become the ruler of all the world…

I am Cyrus, king of the world, great king, legitimate king, king of Babylon, king of Sumer and Akkad…. whose rule Bel and Nebo love, whom they want as king to please their hearts….

When I entered Babylon as a friend and when I established the seat of the government in the palace of the ruler under jubilation and rejoicing, Marduk, the great lord, induced the magnanimous inhabitants of Babylon to love me and I was daily endeavoring to worship him.

My numerous troops walked around in Babylon in peace, I did not allow anybody to terrorize any place of the country of Sumer and Akkad.

I strove for peace in Babylon and in all of Marduk’s other sacred cities.” [272]

While the Jews living within Babylon were spreading sedition against Nabonidus and demoralizing the inhabitants of that city, the Jews of Persia were financing and advising Cyrus and helping him build a mighty army.

But the whispering slanders of the Jews and their secret Kehillah system proved to be as powerful as an army because Babylon fell without a fight.

Cyrus’ armies, informed by the Jews to approach the city during a Babylonian religious ceremony, were allowed to enter the city without of fight.

The Jews had followed the instructions in their Training Manual for Jewish Criminality and Sociopathy and had:

“captured the gates of their enemies.”

The Jews opened the gates of the city to the Persians and thus betrayed Babylonia.

And so, Persian king Cyrus conquered the richest prize in his entire empire using the 

• international connections
• espionage
• financing

of the Jews who wanted Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop in Jerusalem returned to them.

Prince Belshazzar was killed, and King Nabonidus was captured.

Cyrus himself entered Babylon on 30 October 539 BC and brought Babylonian domination of the Near East to an end. [273]

This is the date where these swindling traitors to Mankind can now be called by their modern name, Jews.

With their return to Jerusalem, they brought with them their completely revised and re-written “holy scriptures,” The Biggest Lie Ever Told, with which they would betray and deceive all of Mankind for the next 2,500 years, right up to the present day.

Of all ancient civilizations bordering the former Babylonian Empire, only Egypt remained. 

Babylon itself was the richest prize to fall to Cyrus.

Mesopotamia, with its three thousand years of sophisticated:

• cultural
• mercantile
• scholarly

traditions, now began a centuries-long symbiotic relationship with the Iranian plateau which was, itself, linked to:

• Central Asia
• India
• the Caucasus

The maritime cities of:

• Syria
• Palestine
• Phoenicia

also pledged their loyalty to Cyrus.

The Phoenician subjects of the former Babylonian kingdom were especially vital.

They had what the Persians had not – a fleet of ships.

The entire Phoenician fleet was now incorporated into the Achaemenid Empire.

It was this fleet that Darius the Great used as the basis of the world’s first imperial navy.

The Assyrians had also used Phoenician shipping for their own purposes of empire.

The Persians repeated this economic and military strategy.

But rather than be used as a pawn, the Phoenicians accelerated the move of their center of economic power from Tyre to Carthage.

Cyrus’ conquest of Babylon also ended the one thousand-year-long dominance of Mesopotamia by Semitic peoples.

This Indo-European dominance of Mesopotamia lasted another thousand years before it was once again broken by the thieving and murderous Semitic maniacs of Muslim Arabia. [274]

The history of Mohammad and his half-witted tribal creatures is found in Chapter 13.

The Jewish priests celebrated the re-emergence of their criminal cult by dressing themselves in royal purples (probably bought at a discount from Uncle Moe’s in Phoenicia) and spangled with glittering silver and gold (probably provided at Oy-Such-a-Deal cousin Josh’s Emporium in Elam).

But no matter how much urine they used to “make clean” the bloody robes of their evil rabbis and priests, those Semitic liars could not hide their foul nature from the people among whom they were allowed to live.

Wherever the Jews went, the People hated them not because they were “holy” Jews but because they were criminal, subversive, greedy swindlers and total assholes, animated in their mendacity by The Biggest Lie Ever Told, the Hebrew Bible.

The earlier Assyrian deportations of Israelians and Judeans to Persia (Iran) in the early 700s BC, meant that the Jews of Persia were the earliest Jewish settlers outside of Judea and Mesopotamia, especially in:

• Ecbatana
• Media
• Susa

When Cyrus officially released the Jews from their so-called “Babylonian Captivity” in 538 BC, this marked the first time in history that a world power had guaranteed the survival of the Jewish:

• religion
• customs
• culture

It was a mistake that would be repeated throughout history, always lubricated with generous bribes and gifts to guarantee its continuation.

It was a crooked law that had originally been perpetrated under Hammurabi (1792-1750 BC) with laws protecting the awilum [the Haves] from attack by the poor.

Under Cyrus, the Jews were able to once again place their parasitic selves under the protection of a king and his troops like a cadaverous parasite protected by a thick shell of soldiers.

In exchange for official sanction as creatures of the ruling power, the Jews were to play a vital role in the trades and businesses of ancient Iran, enjoying complete cultural freedom to swindle the wealth out of the Persians.

By offering Cyrus their “Jewish Loyalty,” the Jews became a corrosive buffer between the king and his people, doing the bidding of the king in controlling and taxing the people.

As the Persians grew to hate the Jews for their gross brutality and greed, these ultimate liars claimed that this hatred was directed at them not because of their innate foulness but because of their “holiness.”

That is, they were hated because they were the “Holy Chosen Ones of God.”

Therefore, the goyim (lowly insects, stupid cattle) hated them out of envy.

The great sin of the goyim was that they had not been born as Jews, according to the Jews.

RELIGION: Satan, who is he to the Jews? – Library of Rickandria

And according to the Jews, the victims suffering from Jewish thievery were not victims at all but were actually “sinners” against the god of the Jews who hated all of Mankind and had ordered the Jews to dispossess and genocide them.

So, it was all God’s fault while the holy Jews were innocent of any crime.

As “proof” of their alleged “holiness,” the Jews offered a Contract which they had written themselves and signed God’s name to it, the Hebrew Bible.

This complete Training Manual for Jewish Criminality and Sociopathy contained the basic laws and techniques designed to give them ownership of the entire world with their own god’s blessing.

It was written partly in the Hebrew language of illiterate goat molesters and partly in the Aramaic language of the international bankers and merchants who controlled the governments and wealth of the entire ancient near East.

With “proof” such as this, who needs a god when you have the word of the Jews to rely upon? 

Thus, like everything else that the Jews reverse, the Jews reversed the ancient adage that: 

“Action speaks louder than words.”

For action, the actions of the Jews proved them to be devils.

But for words, the words of the Jews claimed themselves to be saints.

Against all of their criminal actions, they found that if they screamed loud enough, whined and cried, and bribed the kings and officials, then they could silence their critics and have their enemies killed, all under the authority of the reigning king.

The People suffered from their actions, but the kings believed their words while benefiting from Jewish bribes and “Jewish Loyalty.”

Since they controlled the gold and silver hoards accumulated from the Sumerian Swindle, nobody could give bigger bribes than the Jews.

From among the kings and officials of the ancient Near East, no one got their desires more than did the rich and “holy” Jews.

It is claimed that under king Cyrus, up to 40,000 Babylonian Jews returned to Judah.

All of them were intent upon regaining the properties and wealth that their fathers had possessed before deportation by Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BC.

To assure that there would be no objection from the remaining Judeans to the Jews regaining their houses inside the city walls as well as their farm lands, the rabbis had had the appointed governor, Gedaliah, murdered.

Cyrus allowed them to rebuild their Temple, and he even supported that reconstruction with an imperial stipend from the treasury which included building materials.

The Empire continued that support as indicated in a decree by Darius the Great twenty years later in 519-518 BC.

For giving them so much free stuff, Cyrus was hailed as a “messiah” by the Jews and named as Cyrus the Great.

However, because the Jews had put down personal and mercantile roots in Mesopotamia during the sixty years that they were guests of the Babylonians, not all Jews chose to return to Jerusalem.

They were making too much money in Babylonia to want to return to a ruined cow-town like Jerusalem.

Leaving their profitable businesses in Babylonia didn’t appeal to their true sense of Jewish religiosity.

Again, inspect this map of Iraq (See Map Figure 108 – Map 600 BC 1000 AD Iraq Diaspora)

The Jews were doing business all over Babylonia by the time Cyrus arrived.

So, most of them stayed in Babylonia, raising their eight to twelve child families from each of several wives.

With the Hebrew Bible urging them to:

“go forth and multiply as numerous as the sands in the sea,”

and lauding such Jewish heroes as the murdering bandit chief, Abimelech, with his seventy brothers (and an equal number of sisters), it didn’t take the Jews long to out-breed the native population.

Then, they placed all of those greedy and voracious little kikes into the jobs of overseeing the native people who had been dispossessed through the Sumerian Swindle and enslaved under the Jewish moneylenders.

Once the Jews had betrayed Babylonia to the Persians, they were free to either stay in Babylonia and make money, or move back to Jerusalem and make money, or move into Persia and make money.

In this way, they extended their “Jewish Loyalty” to their saviors in the new Persian Empire radiating from Iran. (See Map Figure 112 – Map 500BC – 1960 AD Persia Diaspora)

What changed with the kingship of Cyrus was their freedom to impose their greed and malice unimpeded upon the Babylonian people.

They had betrayed the Babylonians by financing Cyrus and opening the gates of the city to him.

Now with Cyrus as their grateful ally, they had the power to confiscate what properties they coveted and to murder those Babylonians who had objected to Jewish piracy and treason.

Getting rid of the patriotic citizens so that they could steal the lands of both the rich and the poor, became a standard operating procedure for the Jews throughout their entire history.

The descendants of many of those same, treasonous Jews remained in Mesopotamia for over 2,000 years, lending money and working their monopoly trade cartels.

Few people today are aware that nearly one-third of the inhabitants of post-World War One Baghdad were Jewish. [275]

It was in this era, after returning from Babylonia, that the Jews stopped using the name that they had so vociferously claimed to be their great and powerful god, Yahweh – or as the Jews spelled it, YHWH.

The Jews had successfully regained all of their farms and towns in Judea.

They had rebuilt Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop in Jerusalem and named it Zerubbabel’s Temple.

So, you might think that they would be eating gefilte fish and garlic with cheese blitzes while throwing sheep blood all over the place in celebration of how their mighty god had brought them out of Babylon.

But the rabbis were worried.

While in Babylon, with its many religions, they had gotten a much better perspective of Yahweh, the Moon God, and how very well-known and well worshipped he was by all of the people of:

• Canaan
• Syria
• Arabia

Yahweh had been a convenient god to worship during the centuries that Abraham’s First Nation Bank and Pawn Shop had been setting up its offices in Jerusalem.

In those days, everybody in the ancient world believed that the gods resided in specific localities.

When Abraham and his incestuous spawn had first began to penetrate Canaan, praying to the local god was standard practice among all of the ancient people.

And it allowed Abraham to immigrate more easily as a “fellow worshipper” of the god of the Canaanites.

So, Yahweh became the god of the Jews just as he was the god of the Canaanites.

But the Canaanite god, Yahweh, had a goddess consort named Asherah (a.k.a., Astarte or Ishtar).

Their child was another Canaanite god named Baal, a storm god.

‘The ancient rabbis saw the problems that this would cause them in their fraudulent religious teachings of being a special people of a special god.

If the goyim (lowly insects, stupid cattle) learned that the Jews really were not special people at all, then what would happen to their prestige of being:

“the holy, chosen ones of Yahweh,”

the special people who deserved to have special treatment and special respect from the gullible masses?

How could they swindle extra measures of produce, extra servings in the taverns, extra hay for their donkeys, extra work from their slaves, or swindle reverential graciousness from the goyim, if they were not perceived to be special but were seen for what they really were – frauds!

Their god was not unique.

He was merely one of many gods in the Canaanite pantheon.

Yahweh had a goddess-wife, Asherah, who was the love-goddess of prostitutes and tavern keepers.

Such a god was good enough for taking over a small rural land like Canaan while deceiving the natives who also worshipped Yahweh, but while living in sophisticated Babylon, the rabbis realized that they would need a much more mysterious god, one that not only no other people could have, but also one that no other people could even name.

So, ever ready to spin a new lie, the rabbis and priests decided that Yahweh would have to take a back seat to Jewish ambitions.

Yahweh, who was worshipped by:

• Canaanites
• Syrians
• Jews

would have to disappear and be replaced by an even holier god, one who loved only the Jews and also one who only the Jews worshipped and whose name no one who was not Jewish could ever enunciate.

In fact, this god would be so holy and so much better than any other god that even the Jews couldn’t pronounce his name.

And true to the criminality of Judaism, if a Jew pronounced His name, that Jews would be murdered by the rabbis.

Under the Contract of the Hebrew Bible, the Jews could not possess the entire world for their very own without the protection of the special god whom no other people knew.

They could not put themselves above all other people either in their own minds or in the perceptions of their victims, if the god whom they claimed had blessed them above all others, was merely a common god of every goat-molester and bandit in Palestine.

So, it was at this time in Babylon, during the re-writing of the Hebrew Bible, that the scribes and priests decided to stop using the name, Yahweh (YHWH).

They stopped using the very name that they had previously extolled as a name to be made famous (Exodus 3:15), a name under which the Jews had committed hundreds and hundreds of thousands of rapes and murders.

BOOK: The Monsters of Babylon: How the Jews Betrayed Mankind (1200 BC to 1000 AD) – Volume II – Chapter 6: The Devil’s Truth & the Hebrew Bible – Library of Rickandria

The wicked rabbis realized that if YHWH was an ancient Moon God of the Canaanites, then how could He be their own special god who:

“chose them above all other people”?

No other god of any other people could be the Jewish god.

The evil rabbis decided to hide their god behind the Jews.

So, if anybody want to see the god of the Jews, they could look at the Jews and see God.

Oy!

Such a resemblance!

It’s a miracle!

The only known body of writing in classical Hebrew prose, the writing used before they were shipped off to Babylon, is found on shards of pottery from the gate tower of the ancient city of Lachish.

This city was besieged by Nebuchadnezzar’s Chaldeans in 589 or 588 BC.

At this time and for a thousand years previously, the Hebrews freely used the name of their god in their daily speech and writings.

For example, Lachish Ostracon III says:

“May Yahweh cause my lord to hear tidings of peace.”

The Lachish Ostraca – ANET pp 321-322.pdf

Lachish Ostracon IV says:

“May Yahweh cause my lord to hear this very day tidings of good.” [276]

Lachish Letter IV on JSTOR

In those days, they called their god by name and referred to their king as “my lord.”

Thus, archaeology shows that the name “Yahweh” was commonly used by the Hebrews throughout their history right up to the time that they were deported to Babylon.

It was only after the evil priests finalized the Hebrew Bible in Babylonia that the name was forbidden.

This is natural, of course, since a name of God is always exalted and repeated among those who are holy, while a name of God is smeared and forbidden among both the demons and the Jews.

It was in Babylon that the priests stopped using the name YHWH with the clever excuse that it was “too holy” to be pronounced.

The Jewish scribes started writing “Lord” or “Adonai” instead of Yhwh or they called him “the Holy One of Israel.”

And who was Israel?

Israel (a.k.a. Jacob) was he who wrestled with God and defeated Him.

So, “Israel” is those who wrestle with God and defeat God.

The god of the Jews became:

“He Who-Must-Not-Be-Named.”

If any Jew actually spoke the name of Yahweh, the rabbis would murder him by stoning.

Are the Jews “holy” or are they demons who snuff out a name of God and murder anyone who utters a god’s name?

But the rabbinical scribes didn’t merely substitute the word “Lord” (Adonai) for the word “Yhwh.”

They added the vowels of Adonai (a-o-a) under the tetragrammaton (YHVH) to remind the reader that he was not to pronounce Yhvh but instead was to pronounce it as “Adonai” (Lord).

The Christian translators of the Septuagint were consistently swindled by this Jewish fraud.

By being deceived by this particular Jewish lie, the Christians created their very own version of stupidity that persists into modern times.

In place of the name of Yahweh, the stupid Christian translators substituted the title “Lord” for the Hebrew word, Adonai.

Thus, they help the Jews to erase a name of god from the memory of Man.

How’s that for Jewish abracadabra?

First, they stole a common Canaanite god and claimed that YHWH was their own special god, a god who only loved Jews.

Then, the Jews murdered everyone who worshipped Yahweh at any place other than at the Temple.

They:

• murdered
• raped
• pillaged

all of the Canaanites who also worshipped Yahweh because they didn’t worship him in Jerusalem where the priests got their tithes and barbeques.

That way, Yahweh only belonged to the Jews.

Through the mouths of the priests, this god wanted to be the most famous god.

He wanted the entire world on bended knees before the almighty Yahweh.

And then, after killing hundreds of thousands of:

• Canaanites
• Perizzites
• Ammonites

and all other kinds of “-ites” in Palestine, under the banner of:

“make my Name known to the whole world,”

the Jews then refused such an order from their god.

They decided that such an amazing god was too holy to even mention his name.

So, in addition to genociding every non-Jewish worshipper of Yahweh, now they murdered even their fellow Jews who worshipped Yahweh by name!

Instead of the Yahweh-god of Canaan, he became known as “the holy one of Israel.”

If asked who their god is, the Jews reply,

“We do not speak his name.”

In this way, the very god of the Jews became less important than the blustering Jews, themselves, until eventually, the god of the Jews became

“He-Who Must-Not-Be-Named.”

But here’s the odd prt: in every religion in the world,

“He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named”

is none other that the Devil!

Yet, it gets even Jewier.

The Christians, who were unaware of this direct substitution, read the additional vowels as if they actually belonged in the name.

“YHWH” resulted in the English form of adding Adonai (a-o-a) to YHWH to produce “YaHoWaH” or “JeHoVaH.”

The American Standard Version of 1901 idiotically adopted this practice of using the name “Jehovah,” whereas most English versions stupidly continued the Jewish practice of translating YHWH as LORD (capital letters) to distinguish it from “Lord” (Adonai).

What is the result of all of this hocus-pocus?

Nobody, neither Jews nor Christians, knows what they are talking about when they talk about God!

And to further turn the people of the world into imbeciles, the Christian “scholars” consistently mistranslated the word that every Jew uses when talking about every non-Jew.

They mistranslated the Hebrew word “goy” which means:

“a non-Jewish, lowly insect or stupid animal.”

And they substituted for “goy” such words as “people” or “nations” or “Gentiles.”

Thus, the Christians as well as the people of the world, have been led to believe that the Jews are a people for whom you must give prestige and respect because they are the “holy, chosen ones of god,” while under their breath the Jews are calling you “insects” and “stupid cattle” who are:

“not worth a Jewish fingernail.” [277]

When Jews are allowed to live among you, you will always be cheated out of everything – even the Truth because the Jews are liars!

So, it says in the books that the Jews wrote themselves, and this much we are told by the Christians – the Jews are holy and special.

But we are further deceived by the Christian translators into believing that the Jews, in return for the respect and prestige that they demand for themselves, also respect the people of the world.

But in fact, in every page of the Hebrew Bible where non-Jews are referred to, the Jews use the term goyim.

The god of the Jews, “He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named,” demands the death and destruction of all of Mankind with unending malice and pitiless hatred while further demanding that the Jews “walk in his ways” and prove their love of him through their hatred of Mankind.

Such is the malicious hatred and contempt that the Jews have for all of Mankind.

And with their deceptive abracadabra bullshit, the Jews have deceived the Christians into praying to a Canaanite god whom the Christians consistently misspell as “Jehovah,” while giving respect to a demonic people who loathe them.

Ah, Christianity!

Such simple sheep in fools’ clothing!

You believe the lying Jews, but you do not believe what Jesus taught about the Jews!

The Jews today consider themselves as the children of Israel – those who fight against God and win.

As proof of what a mighty god their Canaanite god is and what a mighty people the Jews are, they have to their Jewish credit hundreds and hundreds of millions of people whom they have murdered through:

• warfare
• disease
• famine

They have swindled the possession of the world’s gold and silver into their vaults.

They have fleeced the ownership to the world’s properties.

Through moneylending, they have enslaved the people of the entire world to debt which can only be repaid to the Jews through more warfare and impoverishment and slavery.

All of this was accomplished through:

• fraud
• lies
• deceit

and betrayal.

What better proof can anyone have that these devils are the “Holy, Chosen Ones” of a certain god who is too horrible to even mention?

Either the god of the Jews is too horrible to mention or else the Jews are too evil to be able to utter a name of God.

Either way you look at it, the Jews are devils – all of them!

On this note, it is here necessary to explore those attributes that are “demonic” as defined in two other religions other than:

• Judaism
• Islam
• Christianity

Only from the perspective of non-Semitic religions can we understand what the truth of this matter is. Just these definitions alone are explored here, not a discussion of the various attributes of Hinduism or Buddhism.

Miles Williams Mathis: BUDDHISM – The Stronger Poison – Library of Rickandria

Just these definitions will give you a better perspective on what a Jew really is.

No one knows for sure when that Aryan classic, the Bhagavad-Gita, was written.

Guesses range from between the eighth and fifth centuries BC.

The Gita is often referred to as

“the heart of the Vedic Scriptures.”

During the entire time that the merchant moneylenders and the kings of Assyria were stripping the Near East of silver and gold, enslaving the people and stealing natural resources, the Aryan religion of Vedic Hinduism was being practiced in India.

In this system of worship, the knowledge of God was carefully analyzed.

Yes, Hinduism had its variety of gods and myths but unlike the Semitic religions which had all descended from the Board of Directors of Abraham’s First Nation Bank and Pawn Shop, Hinduism and Buddhism were based on direct observation of the Universe through the lens of one’s own mind.

In Aryan religions such as:

• Hinduism
• Buddhism
• Odinism

direct experience and knowledge were held to be superior to blind belief.

This was also true of the Northern European religions of the Celtic and Druidic and Norse discoveries, as exemplified in Chapter Four.

BOOK: The Monsters of Babylon: How the Jews Betrayed Mankind (1200 BC to 1000 AD) – Volume II – Chapter 4: Secret Powers of the Ancient People – Library of Rickandria

But since the ancient Europeans left little in the way of literary teachings, then just the Aryan Indian definitions of demons are discussed here.

According to the Bhagavad-Gita, the demonic attributes are these:

• hypocrisy
• arrogance
• pride
• anger
• harshness

and ignorance.

Arjuna, in this world there are two types then you can understand these evil creatures for what they really are. 

The divine type has been described at length; hear from Me the demoniacal also.

Men belonging to the demoniac groups know not what is right activity, and what is right cessation of activity.

Hence, they possess neither purity nor good conduct nor truth.

They say:

“The world is without any foundation and altogether false, godless and brought about by mutual union (of man and woman); what else?”

Embracing this view, these lost souls with little understanding, ill-disposed and devoted to cruel actions, are born for the destruction of the world.

Possessed of:

• hypocrisy
• conceit
• arrogance

and given to insatiable passion, and adopting false doctrines due to delusion, they take to action with impure vows.

Giving themselves over to endless cares terminating only with death, and given to the enjoyment of sensuous pleasures, they believe the highest limit of joy to consist only in this. 

Held in bondage by a hundred ties of expectation, given over to passion and anger, they strive to obtain by unlawful means hoards of money for the enjoyment of sensuous pleasures.

“This has been won by me today; that ambition I shall realize now; this wealth is mine already; that will be mine again.

This enemy has been already disposed of by me, and I shall make short work of others also.

I am the lord.

I am the enjoyer.

I am perfect, powerful and happy.

I am wealthy and high-born.

Who else is like unto me?

I shall perform sacrifices, give alms and rejoice.”

Thus, deluded by ignorance, bewildered by numerous thoughts, enmeshed of the web of delusion and addicted of the enjoyment of sensuous pleasures, men of demoniacal nature fall into the foulest hell.

Self-important, unbending, filled with the intoxication of wealth and honor, performing nominal sacrifices for show and contrary to scriptural ordinance.

Given over to:

• egoism
• violence
• insolence
• passion

and anger, these malicious persons hate Me that dwells in the bodies of others as well as in their own.

These haters:

• evil
• cruel
• vilest

among men, I repeatedly throw into demoniacal wombs in the world.

Arjuna, cast into demoniacal wombs, birth after birth, these fools, attaining not to Me, sink into still lower depths.

• Passion
• anger
• greed

these constitute the triple gate to hell leading to the damnations of the soul.

Therefore, one should shake off all these three.

A man released from these three gates to hell, Arjuna, works his own salvation and thereby reaches the highest goal. [278]

Do these attributes remind you of any Jews or Muslims that you know of?

If you see the resemblance, Hinduism fell into mere belief in gods and goddesses as the Aryans intermarried with the dark and ignorant Dravidian races from the south of India.

You can see these turd-colored Hindus today driving their modern cars with an idol of the elephant headed god, Ganish, the god of wealth, sitting on their dashboard.

A reaction to the teachings of Hinduism with its various gods, was made by another blue-eyed, Aryan prince of Northern India known to us as Gautama Buddha (550-480 BC).

Miles Williams Mathis: More on the Buddha – Library of Rickandria

At about this same time that the Buddha was teaching, the Jews were busy betraying the Babylonians to the Persians and deceiving king Cyrus into letting them set up the Second Temple of Solomon.

The word, “Buddha,” means an “Enlightened Teacher.”

He certainly did not make of himself a god.

He taught that all a teacher can do is point the Way.

And the summation of what the Buddha taught is the Triple Treasure:

• the four Noble Truths
• the Noble Eight-Fold Path
• the Three Poisons

The Triple Treasure that allows one to attain Enlightenment is:

• the Buddha
• the Dhamma
• the Sanga

– that is, the Enlightened Teacher, the Truth, and the monastic brotherhood of monks (and sisterhood of nuns).

You can research all of this on your own.

For the subject of this chapter, however, only the Noble Eight-Fold Path and the Three Mental Poisons are relevant.

The Noble Eight-Fold Path is:

1. Right Understanding
2. Right Thought
3. Right Speech
4. Right Action
5. Right Livelihood
6. Right Effort
7. Right Mindfulness
8. Right Concentration

In other words, doing what is right, is basic to Buddhism.

But in discussing the Jews, you must be well aware that everything they do is wrong, not just in comparison with Buddhism but wrong in comparison with all other religions.

The Three Mental Poisons of Buddhism are:

• Greed
• Anger
• Ignorance

– very similar to Hinduism’s Triple Gate to Hell.

These negative traits and fundamental evils are called the Three Poisons because they are dangerous toxins in our lives.

Not only are they the source of our unquenchable thirst for possessions, and the root cause of all of our harmful illusions, but they are painful pollutants, which bring sickness, both physical and mental.

Greed’s companions are desire and lust, and these direct your life. 

Passions and attachments cause us to want to “get hold of” things, and to have more and more of everything.

Anger’s friends are:

• hatred
• animosity
• aversion

which cause us to reject what displeases us or infringes upon our ego.

Ignorance, which is “not knowing,” especially not knowing our true nature, paves the way for delusion or in believing something that is false.

These poisons fill our lives with:

• suffering
• unhappiness
• unsatisfactoriness

They cause us to make unskillful decisions, which affect our future.

They cause us to have self-serving and dishonest intentions, which in turn cause us to act unethically and immorally.

They are the roots of not only our own pain and misery, but those of our loved ones’ and of all of Mankind’s.

Fortunately, there is a way to eradicate this trio of contaminants.

The practice of loving kindness and compassion is the medicine; and Enlightenment is the antidote.

Many of us are apt to be dominated by one of the poisons.

Even when only one dominates, the other two are always lying dormant, like dry seeds that can sprout whenever nourished.

If one is dominated by anger, one tends to be depressed or obsessed over political views, real or imagined enemies, or any of life’s negative realities.

If the dominating poison is greed, then it can be manifested by:

• stinginess
• lack of compassion
• hoarding

or self-indulgence.

One tends to be attached to material things, thinking that more is better and that getting things will bring happiness.

When we are ignorant, we are not realizing our potential for true happiness, which is our true nature, our Buddha nature.

Ignorance causes insecurity and a feeling of:

• weakness
• powerlessness
• apathy

[279]

Do these attributes remind you of any Jews that you know of or any Muslims?

If you see the resemblance, then you can understand the Jews for what they really are.

By the definitions of both Hinduism and Buddhism, a Jew is a demon, a devil.

And he is probably holding the mortgage to your home right now and prescribing your medicines and teaching your children and dominating your mind with foul perversions in his Media Monopoly and leading your country off to another war.

Are you afraid of them, yet?

They want you to be scared even to mention the word “Jew” because:

“fear of the Jews”

is one of their ancient psychological warfare techniques for making themselves look big and mighty, like dwarves steering the ship of state.

They are only dwarfs, but they have control of the gates to your nation, the levers of your government and the Well, the common Jews were certainly scared of the rabbis and priests.

The priests of “He-Who-Must Not-Be-Named” had horrific stories to tell about the Hebrews who did not follow the laws of a terrible and malicious god who had chosen them against their will to either worship him or else be blown to smithereens.

Cursed with leprosy they would be, if they didn’t do what the rabbis and Levitical priests told them to do.

And oh!

Pity the poor Hebrew who inadvertently broke one of the wearisome laws that were a diabolical plague upon his life.

If a rabbi found out that they had done something like wash down some goat gristle with a cup of milk, these despicable frauds, when they heard news from a tattle-tale Levite, would scream at the top of their lungs and tear off their own clothes.

This was standard practice for those ancient rabbis of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop to instill fear in the Hebrews.

Imagine yourself confronting a modern banker and telling him that you have decided that you will not pay any more house or car payments because you have already paid double or more through the interest payments of the Sumerian Swindle.

His eyes bulge in his head, he slobbers and drools, and the spittle showers your shoes as he roars out an ear-shattering scream and begins to rip the buttons off his shirt and then rips his own shirt up the back and down the middle, throws it on the floor and jumps up and down on it.

A modern banker would not do that, of course, but the ancient Jewish priests did, screaming to Heaven and imploring their demon god not to destroy the whole race of thieves because of such a breaker of the Mosaic Laws.

The Jewish priests and rabbis went through a lot of clothes as they impressed upon the gullible Hebrew yokels the enormity of their rage through such priestcraft and street theater.

The Jewish priests and rabbis were possessed, but they were not possessed by a god, rather the reverse.

In 538 BC, to show how religious they were, as soon as the Jews returned from Babylonia to Judah, they claimed the properties that had been lost by their forefathers when Nebuchadnezzar had shipped them off to Babylon.

Since they had been the upper crust of Hebrew society, they immediately stepped back into their former activities.

These Big Jews had had the influence and the money to have Gedalia, the Babylonian-appointed governor, assassinated.

None of the resident Jews dared to contest their “ownership rights” to this prime real estate.

They started making money immediately by renting out and farming out those properties to the locals, even loaning silver to their fellow Jews at interest, which was illegal under Mosaic Law.

These “pious Jews” from Babylonia were so “holy” that repairing the Temple was not a high priority.

They didn’t bother doing any repairs on the Temple because there was no profit in it for them.

They had money to make and what could be holier to a Jew than that?

It was another fifty years before they started work on the Temple and only because they got a visit from a high-ranking member of Abraham’s First National Bank in Babylon named Ezra the Scribe (probably around 458 BC).

Ezra brought along with him two of the holiest things in Judaism – lies and money, the only two powers that the Jews ever had.

These were:

(1) the freshly revised and re-written Hebrew Bible (a.k.a. The Biggest Lie Ever Told) and

(2) he brought along with him a total of 3.7 tons of gold and 24 tons of silver.

In addition, so as to properly awe the Hebrew yokels, he brought 100 of those fancy, super-expensive red and purple priestly frocks with golden bells hanging from the hems and with a golden dice table tied to the lapels. (Ezra 2:68-69 & 8:26-27)

A Jewish priest is absolutely lost without that dice table (Ummin and Thumim) to consult.

How else would he know what his god wanted, other than to throw some dice?

And so, what we call “Judaism” got off to another fine start, aided by Persian kings who didn’t really know what a Jew is and so betrayed their own people those demons.

These Jews were animated by a Hebrew Bible that mesmerized the masses with its lies; financed by 3.7 tons of gold and 24 tons of silver; and led by murderous Jewish clowns dressed like Negro pimps whose Mosaic laws allowed them to kill anyone who didn’t believe their fables or obey their decrees.

It was the ultimate gangster’s organization, the Devil’s Truth upheld by the latest edition of the Biggest Lie Ever Told, written in Babylon by Ezra the Scribe.

One of Ezra’s first acts was to get rid of the “Lost Ten Tribes.”

No, they weren’t actually lost.

They were still living in the north in Samaria.

Ezra had written that they were “lost” and so he made sure that they stayed lost by having the Jews divorce any of the Samaritan women whom they had married since the Jews “Return from Captivity.”

The Jews could only be a “special, holy people” as long as no one knew what liars they actually were.

Keeping the wealth within the Jewish families by committing incest was an ancient tradition with the Jews.

But their frauds and swindles leaking out into the goyim communities from whom they had sucked their wealth, could prove fatal.

The secrets of their financial transactions could not be allowed to be known by anyone who was not a part of the newly reorganized and more lethal system of Judaism.

Ezra had re-edited the complete Training Manual for Jewish Criminality and Sociopathy, himself, and was hawking it as the original “word of God,” the Hebrew Bible.

To keep their schemes, secret and their wealth intact within the Jewish community, Ezra commanded that the Jews “purify” themselves by divorcing all spouses from the Israelian side of the tribes.

BOOK: The Monsters of Babylon: How the Jews Betrayed Mankind (1200 BC to 1000 AD) – Volume II – Chapter 7: The Israelians Were Not Fooled by Jewish Abracadabra – Library of Rickandria

The “Lost Tribes” would have to stay lost because they were not to be considered as fellow Jews.

They were re-branded as “wicked pagans.”

And what had slithered out of Babylon with Ezra was branded as “holy Jews.”

Jews would only be allowed to marry Jews.

It was a death sentence to break this rule because the Monsters of Babylon knew the dire penalty that they would suffer if the non-Jewish people of the world learned of their perfidious:

• treason
• hypocrisy
• criminality

Judaism was fully incorporated as an organized, criminal gang by Ezra the Scribe at this time.

The people of Samaria – that is, those “Lost Ten Tribes” who were not lost at all along with all of the people whom the Assyrians had immigrated into Samaria – heard the news about the beginning of construction for the Second Temple.

Remember, during the entire time that the priests of Yahweh in Jerusalem were forging the Hebrew Bible, the Jews never said anything good about the Israelians to the north.

And for one very good reason:

the Hebrew Israelians never believed the lies that the Hebrew priests of Jerusalem wrote.

Do you think that among peoples who kept the genealogy of their fathers alive, along with their own names, that if their forefathers had actually ever seen any of the “miracles” of Moses or any of the other fictions that the Judean priests had written, that there wouldn’t also be some stories among their own Israelian people concerning such?

In fact, the Israelians knew where:

• Abraham
• Isaac
• Jacob
• the Benjaminites

and all of the other swindlers came from.

They came from Babylonia.

And they didn’t want anything to do with paying ten percent of their wealth to a Temple which they knew to be merely a scam.

However, after many hundreds of years of praying to the local god, YHWH, as well as to a variety of other gods such as Yahweh’s son, Baal, and Yahweh’s wife, Asherah, the remaining Israelians (Samaritans) didn’t see anything odd about approaching the returning Judeans and offering to help rebuild the Temple of their mutual god.

Astounded by the incredible new stories that the returning Jews – with themselves at center stage, of course – were telling about Yahweh, they approached Zerubbabel and offered to join the work.

Zerubbabel was a grandson of Jehoiachin.

His name means “Seed of Babylon” in Akkadian. [280]

But Jeshua the priest and Zerubbabel sent the Israelian northerners away, bluntly saying that 

“you have nothing to do with us in building a house to our God”. (Ezra 4:3)

That faction of Jews who had made so much money while in Babylon and had used their cunning and the wealth of their guild to swindle king Cyrus, had no intention of allowing the commercial and military secrets of their Temple-guild to outsiders.

Judaism was strictly a family business and a tribal monopoly.

Keeping their international business secrets as private enterprises, Judaism was totally a closed shop.

Outsiders need not apply, especially the Samaritans – the “Lost” Ten Tribes who refused to get lost.

In resentment,

“the people of the land”

hindered the work, and even wrote to the Persian king, accusing the Jews of:

“rebuilding that rebellious and wicked city”

and predicting that:

“if this city is rebuilt and the walls finished, they will not pay tribute, custom, or toll, and the royal revenue will be impaired, … you will then have no possession in the province Beyond the River.” (Ezra 4:12-16).

These Israelian Hebrews really understood the evil nature of the Jews.

Upon receiving this letter, the Persian king ordered a halt to the construction work in Jerusalem.

But Zerubbabel and Jeshua nevertheless continued the work.

And when the Persian governor of the province learned about it and came to inspect the site, he demanded to know who gave the permission to start rebuilding.

He was referred to the original decree of Cyrus. According to the book of Ezra, the governor then wrote to the new king, Darius the Great, for a royal decision.

But the moneylenders of Persia already had the king’s ear, having bribed their way into his good graces and offering him their “Jewish Loyalty” as advisors, dazzling him with their wealth and advanced knowledge of what other kingdoms had for the taking.

So, Darius, realizing how profitable it was to have such “loyal” Jewish advisors and businessmen working for his greater glory, instructed the governor not only to let the work continue, but also to defray all expenses from the revenue of the state, to supply the Temple with animals for sacrifice, and to punish whoever tried to prevent the implementation of the royal edict.

This was traditional Jewish bribery in action, gaining their goals while parasitically sucking the finances of the State that protected them.

Now, the Persian state was paying all expenses in rebuilding the Temple.

The construction of the Temple was then finished in the year 516 BC.

It was known as Zerubbabel’s Temple. [281]

Thus began the era of Second Temple Judaism when almost all of the lies of the Hebrew Bible had been carefully combed and checked for lice.

The rabbis hadn’t forged the Book of Daniel, yet, but the other lies were certified by Ezra as genuinely Jewish and, of course, one hundred percent true.

If the Jews didn’t believe it, the rabbis would kill them – the honest-to goodness Devil’s Truth.

After his work was done in establishing Judaism on a sound financial and religious footing, Ezra then disappeared from the scene. [282]

He and Zerubbabel went back to Babylon where Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop had its luxurious headquarters, complete with slave girls and bawdy taverns where the bankers could relax after a hard day of making money.

Or they moved to the luxurious new capital of the Persian Empire at Susa where the bankers could offer their “Jewish Loyalty” to the new king of the Persian Empire as his well-paid Jewish servants.

Zerubbabel didn’t stay in Jerusalem because, as a “prince of Judah,” Zerubbabel had a higher echelon job in Babylon running the Kehillah system of espionage.

From this point onward, the Davidic family played no role in the history of Judah.

The priesthood, which rose to a position of leadership in exile, and which had also played an important role among those who had remained in Judah, maintained its prominence because of its ability to preserve group identity.

For this, the usual methods of any criminal gang were resorted to – 

• blackmail
• death threats
• lashings
• extortion
• torture

and murder, you know, the usual methods of the holy Jewish priests.

Their only addition to standard crime family methods was the Jews’ predilection for sexual relations with their close relatives.

In the following decades, the people of Judah were led by a dual system:

politically, by governors who were appointed by the Persian authority and who had no connection to the Davidic royal family; and religiously, by priests and rabbis.

Lacking the institution of kingship, the Temple now became the center of identity for the people Judah.

This was one of the most crucial turning points in Jewish history [283] where their criminality could be given an entirely religious patina.

With the kings gone and only priests visible to outsiders, no one could see their political intrigues through their international Kehillah system of espionage and subversion.

Nehemiah (/ˌniːəˈmaɪə/; Hebrew: נְחֶמְיָה‎ Nəḥemyā, “Yah comforts”) is the central figure of the Book of Nehemiah, which describes his work in rebuilding Jerusalem during the Second Temple period as the governor of Persian Judea under Artaxerxes I of Persia (465–424 BC). The historicity of Nehemiah, his mission, and the Nehemiah Memoir have recently become very controversial in academic scholarship, with maximalists viewing it as a historical account and minimalists doubting whether Nehemiah existed. He is considered a saint in the Eastern Orthodox Church, where he is commemorated on the Sunday of the Holy Forefathers.

At the time of the building of the Second Temple, the Jews had another of their agents in place by the name of Nehemiah, the cupbearer, a high court official of the Persian king, Artaxerxes (465-424 BC).

Artaxerxes I (/ˌɑːrtəˈzɜːrksiːz/, Old Persian: 𐎠𐎼𐎫𐎧𐏁𐏂𐎠 Artaxšaçāʰ; Ancient Greek: Ἀρταξέρξης) was the fifth King of Kings of the Achaemenid Empire, from 465 to December 424 BC. He was the third son of Xerxes I.  In Greek sources he is also surnamed “Long handed” (Ancient Greek: μακρόχειρ Makrókheir; Latin: Longimanus), allegedly because his right hand was longer than his left.  Josephus, and several ancient traditions identify him as King Ahasuerus, from the Book of Esther.

The office of Cup Bearer to the King, is a powerful position in any court.

drink on demand, while certifying that it isn’t poisoned.

For the cupbearer, it is a lucrative position since the pay and prestige are great.

And it is a place to learn all manner of: 

• international
• political
• military

and commercial information.

It is a job usually reserved from among a king’s most trusted countrymen.

What’s more, the work is easy.

All you have to do is lift a flagon of wine and offer some cocktail napkins and snacks.

With excellent pay and not much work and the opportunity to listen in on the private conversations of high officials, it was the perfect job for a Jew!

But why would a Jew have such a high post in the Persian government unless the Jews had given the Persian government some high benefit?

Remember, the Jews – following their Training Manual to

“capture the gates of their enemies”

– had opened the gates of Babylon so that the Persians could take the city without a fight. 

Hypocritically dancing and singing the praises of Persian king Cyrus, the Jews had betrayed the Babylonians at the very time that the Babylonians had been celebrating their religious ceremonies.

As part of the pay for their spying and treachery, they requested Cyrus to execute the richer Babylonians so that the Jews could be awarded their property.

The Babylonian friends and relatives of their victims could do nothing about these crimes because the Jews had the political and military backing of the new Persian king, a tactic that you can see being repeated throughout history up until this very day as the blood sucking fleas would jump from one dog that they had betrayed onto a fresh victim.

As major financiers and international merchants, it was easy for the moneylenders of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop to use a:

“tick behind the ear”

technique and install a Jew as cupbearer to each Persian king, cupbearers who were reputed to have the knowledge of “dream interpretation” – such 370 as the mythical Joseph, the Hyksos crime lord of Egypt.

This influence lasted from 539 BC when Cyrus captured Babylon up to and through the kingships of Artaxerxes in 445 BC, nearly one hundred years after Cyrus.

During this time, the Jews were major landowners and political confidants of the Persian kings. 

And because of their extreme cruelty toward the goyim (non-Jewish, lowly insects, stupid cattle) whom their Yahweh-god had commanded them to exterminate, the Jews excelled as the king’s tax farmers by squeezing the maximum of taxes from the People while skimming off a hefty commission for themselves.

Even in ancient Babylonia, the Jews were hated because they deserved it.

Nehemiah, cupbearer to king Artaxerxes of Persia, in the city of Susa, in the king’s twentieth year, wrote:

“… the wine being my concern, I took up the wine and offered it to the king.

Now I had never been downcast before, So the king said,

“Why is your face so sad?” (Ne 1 & 2)

Because

“the kindly favor of my god was with me,” (Ne 2:8)

Nehemiah was successful in his whining and crying.

Whining and crying – something that they practice even in front of mirrors to perfect their brazen hypocrisy – has gotten the Jews a lot of free stuff over the centuries from people who are deceived by this ruse.

This Jewish technique (conceived by Abraham’s father) is that if they can make you feel pity or sympathy for them, they can more easily swindle you out of something that they want because for a Jew, hypocrisy is not a character flaw, it is a weapon.

And the technique worked perfectly on the kindly king Artaxerxes.

By whining and crying and complaining, Nehemiah was given the king’s permission to rebuild the gates and walls of Jerusalem.

Not only permission, but he even asked for and got building supplies! – 

“timbers to rebuild the gates of the citadel of the Temple, for the city walls”

as well as enough free lumber and beams to build himself a house! (Nehemiah 1:8)

When Nehemiah arrived in Jerusalem, he found the divine and blessed Jews practicing the Sumerian Swindle on each other, stealing each other’s property and enslaving each other for debt, which he put a stop to.

By the laws of Moses, the Jews are only allowed to swindle non-Jews.

So, they had to release their Jewish slaves and give back the defrauded properties.

These were the very same “holy” Jews who allegedly, along with Ezra the Scribe, had returned to rebuild their “holy” Temple.

Nehemiah was so personally wealthy as the Cup Bearer of the Persian king that neither he nor his relatives drew any money from the local Judean governor’s stipend.

He was governor of Judah for twelve years and in all of that time, he paid for all daily meals. 

“Leaders and officials to the number of a hundred and fifty ate at my table, not to mention those who came to us from the surrounding nations.

Every day, one ox, six fine sheep, and poultry, were prepared at my expense; every ten days skins of wine were brought in bulk.

But even so, I never claimed the governor’s subsistence allowance, since the people already had burden enough to bear.

In my favor, my God, remember all I have done for this people.” (Nehemiah 5)

In this, can be seen some of the levels of wealth that even a Cup Bearer to the king would have as a personal possession.

But also, this shows that even though the Hebrew Bible was a complete fraud, and The Biggest Lie Ever Told, that there were Jews who actually believed it.

Archaeology hadn’t been invented yet, so the lies of the rabbis had no opposition.

Nehemiah was also active in implementing social legislation, condemning those who had extracted interest from fellow Jews, and urging restitution of land to the poor Jews who had been swindled by the rich Jews.

Like Ezra, he too prohibited Jewish inter marriage with foreign wives. Jewish wealth could only remain in Jewish hands, if they did not marry outside of the tribe or the family.

These rulings by Ezra and Nehemiah in Jerusalem in the fifth century BC, laid the foundations for Second Temple Judaism in the establishment of clear boundaries between the Jewish monsters and their neighbors and in the strict enforcement of the Deuteronomic Law.

Their efforts – and the efforts of other Jewish priests and scribes which took place over the one hundred and fifty years of scheming, bribery, soul-searching, and political blackmail – led to the final version of the Hebrew Bible as a completely fraudulent and counterfeit document, claimed by the Jews to be the “word of God” simply because they wrote it. [284]

Only the Book of Daniel had not yet been written and added to the collection of Jewish fantasies.

With belief that the lies of the priests were true and that the whole Jewish mythology had actually happened in the distant past, Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop became a self-financed illusion.

With its ten percent tithes and system of “penalties for sin” and “offerings for sin” and “fees of redemption,” and so forth, the Temple was once again a money-making machine that supported huge numbers of con artists and:

• moneylenders
• slave drivers
• merchants

The Temple offered free loans and commercial espionage to all Jews who played by the rabbinical rules.

Certainly, the tithes of the super-rich Jewish bankers added much to its coffers, but The Biggest Lie Ever Told had a built-in money source flowing from the pockets and the genuine beliefs of the common Jews.

With the establishment of the Second Temple, the Monsters of Babylon had a machine that would supply them with volunteer soldiers to protect the vault and with a religious sheen for making these conspiring sheenies safe from the wars that they, themselves, created.

With the Kehillah system of social subversion, the Jewish merchant-moneylender-priests could cause rebellions and turmoils throughout the known world with just seven letters sent and/or seven verbal orders given, all within a few days or at most a few weeks across the entire civilized world.

With the Sumerian Swindle supplying them unlimited wealth, they could bribe officials simultaneously in all parts of everybody else’s empire.

Now, it was the Persian Empire’s turn to be “blessed” by the Jews.

This particular Achaemenid Persian Empire lasted only a couple of hundred years, between 538 BC when Cyrus captured Babylon until 331 BC when Alexander the Great conquered the entire empire and beyond.

Cyrus was killed in battle in 530 BC, and his body brought back to Pasargadae near Persepolis for burial in the tomb still to be seen there.

Just as it is today, it must be remembered that in the ancient world, the kings and temples kept an iron grip on their treasuries of gold and silver bullion.

When kings fell, the winning kings seized the treasuries of both the palace and the temples.

So, if they could accomplish it, winning in warfare was not only a gain in territory but an instant increase in the size of the winning king’s treasure which meant an increase in his power to pay armies and buy supplies.

But unlike the Assyrians or the Babylonians whose kings were content with Mesopotamia and the Levant, the huge treasuries that the Persians seized from Babylonia gave them the wealth and power to greedily look to a bigger empire than what the kings of:

• Assyria
• Babylonia
• Egypt

had attained.

The ambition of kings cannot be measured by a common yardstick; limitless greed backed by limitless power in the hands of one man, bodes ill for Mankind.

And no one – absolutely no one – had more greed than the circumcised, Aramaic-speaking moneylenders who were advisors to the king.

Greed and cunning ruthlessness were taught to them by their fathers and was a trait they prized in the sons who inherited their businesses.

So, while the centuries wore on, the kings were not much better or worse than any of their predecessors since their lineages were cut off with each successive coup.

But the descendants of the moneylenders, chosen by their fathers to carry on the family business, evolved into ever more:

• greedy
• ruthless
• pitiless

and murderous fiends with each passing generation.

The main, outstanding requirement for the job was to pay ten percent of their profits to the Temple and to keep the Sabbath so that they didn’t get drafted into the army.

But outside of the usual rules for treating their fellow Temple guild brothers with equanimity, they were actually commanded to treat all of Mankind (the goyim, those lowly insects and stupid cattle) with malicious hostility and deadly intent.

These were the Jews, increasingly more callous and criminal as the centuries wore on and protected in their criminality by the kings they had serviced and bribed.

Cambyses II (529-522 BC), who succeeded his father, added Egypt to the Persian Empire, which now surpassed any the world had yet seen.

Cambyses II (Old Persian: 𐎣𐎲𐎢𐎪𐎡𐎹, romanized: Kaᵐbūjiya) was the second King of Kings of the Achaemenid Empire from 530 to 522 BC. He was the son and successor of Cyrus the Great (r. 550 – 530 BC) and his mother was Cassandane. His relatively brief reign was marked by his conquests in North Africa, notably Egypt, which he conquered after his victory over the Egyptian pharaoh Psamtik III (r. 526–525 BC) at the battle of Pelusium in 525 BC. After having established himself in Egypt, he expanded the empire’s holdings in Africa, including the conquest of Cyrenaica. In the spring of 522 BC, Cambyses hurriedly left Egypt to deal with a rebellion in Persia.

The next Persian king was Darius the Great (521-486 BC).

Darius I (Old Persian: 𐎭𐎠𐎼𐎹𐎺𐎢𐏁 Dārayavaʰuš; c. 550 – 486 BCE), commonly known as Darius the Great, was the third King of Kings of the Achaemenid Empire, reigning from 522 BCE until his death in 486 BCE. He ruled the empire at its territorial peak, when it included much of West Asia, parts of the Balkans (Thrace–Macedonia and Paeonia) and the Caucasus, most of the Black Sea’s coastal regions, Central Asia, the Indus Valley in the far east, and portions of North Africa and Northeast Africa including Egypt (Mudrâya), eastern Libya, and coastal Sudan.

With his court filled with Aramaic-speaking merchants and moneylenders whose business activities had been greatly impeded by the Greek invention of coins, Darius had plenty of advice as to why he should direct his armies against the kingdoms of Lydia and Greece.

As the Jewish moneylenders pointed out, all of the gold in the Achaemenid Persian Empire would not by a loaf of bread in Greece because only officially minted Greek coins were legal tender there by law.

This is why Darius was advised to destroy the kingdom of Croesus so that only coins that Darius minted would be legal tender across his entire empire, prospectively to also include Greece.

Croesus (/ˈkriːsəs/ KREE-səs; Phrygian: Akriaewais; Ancient Greek: Κροῖσος, romanized: Kroisos; Latin: Croesus; reigned: c. 585 – c. 546 BC) was the king of Lydia, who reigned from 585 BC until his defeat by the Persian king Cyrus the Great in 547 or 546 BC. According to Herodotus, he reigned 14 years. Croesus was renowned for his wealth; Herodotus and Pausanias noted that his gifts were preserved at Delphi. The fall of Croesus had a profound effect on the Greeks, providing a fixed point in their calendar. “By the fifth century at least”, J. A. S. Evans has remarked, “Croesus had become a figure of myth, who stood outside the conventional restraints of chronology.

His “loyal” masters of the mint, speaking Aramaic and wearing their traditional sidelocks and beanies, assured him that the coins that they provided would give Darius even more wealth and power because with his own coins, all other peoples in his empire would turn in their gold to be minted into coins.

What they didn’t tell Darius was that their international cartel of:

• moneychangers
• jewelers
• gold and silver smiths

would also make a fortune by charging a fee every time anyone wanted to trade their bullion for the coins in their inventory.

Dealing in bullion had been a secretive, closed shop for the past three thousand years.

The moneylenders saw no reason to change their ownership but only to change some of the methods they used for defrauding both kings and people.

With coinage, the moneylenders had a new and more efficient method of fraud.

Just so long as they controlled the gold bullion, it didn’t matter which kings minted it into coins.

Darius had the cleverest international bankers and richest merchants in his court, all speaking Aramaic and advising him on the best ways of making money and helping him to collect taxes and regulate commerce.

By this time, with their international experience in import-export methods and the fleecing of nations, these Aramaic-speaking merchant moneylenders had recognized the efficiency to them that the invention of coinage gave – as long as they controlled the coinage.

So, it should come as no surprise that one of the most enduring aspects of Darius’ reign was his introduction of a universal coin known as the Daric.

Making a profit by controlling the distribution of bullion in the form of coins, was one of the tips provided by his loyal, grinning advisors wearing their hair in sidelocks while keeping their holy, circumcised penises hidden under their robes.

Herodotus described Darius as a king who endeavored at

“making a gain in everything.”

EDUCATION: ANCIENT TEXT: Why Is Herodotus Called Both the Father of History & the Father of Lies? – Library of Rickandria

Although lumps of silver and gold had been a standard medium of exchange for nearly three thousand years, coinage made business move faster.

If:

“time is money,”

then the savings in time that coinage induced, allowed for a faster accumulation of money.

As a government enforced standard, coinage gave increased power to the issuing kings over the economy of their kingdoms.

But to the dismay of the Monsters of Babylon, coinage prevented them from using their bullion to directly buy up the goods and services of victim countries with their bullion.

Only with

“coins of the realm,”

could they do business.

And that meant a restriction upon their power and wealth unless they controlled the bullion of which the coins were made as well as the kings who decreed the coinage.

With the invention of coinage, the Greeks issued gold coins as well as silver coinage minted in large pieces close in value to the small gold coins as well as coins at 1/10 the value of the electrum coins and less.

These readily available small coins became indispensable for everyday use, making it possible for small measures of agricultural and industrial products to be easily bought and sold.

Small farmers and craftsmen were able to establish savings which broadened the economic infrastructure.

And this was an essential precondition for Periclean democracy. [285]

When the little man gains wealth and grows into a middle class, bridging the gap between rich and poor, democracy thrives as class distinctions become less severe.

But to “He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named” and his priests in Jerusalem, democracy and freedom from slavery are against the Laws of Moses.

Around 505 BC, Darius first officially applied the coinage system as a standard trans-national currency.

Darius’ Persian Daric at 130 grains of gold, was a major boost to international business traffic.

International networks for this had already been established by the royal highway, the postal system, and Phoenician based commercial shipping.

The complex Persian tax system soon necessitated the organization of formal state banking.

The Babylonians had had such a system in place, and Darius now applied this concept to manage the fiscal affairs of the entire Empire.

And guess who was so happy to offer their “Jewish Loyalty” to the great king in his banking and investment endeavors?

A famous banking firm was that of Murashu and Sons, based in ancient Nippur, Babylonia. 

This firm and many others like it reveal that Darius’ banks were engaged in the very modern practices of providing loans and credits to clients.

A standard system of weights and measures was also introduced throughout the Empire. 

Darius the Great improved upon the empire that he had inherited.

The Assyrians and Babylonians had developed some well-maintained major highways within their empires.

Recognizing their strategic and economic value, the Persians from Cyrus onwards improved the road system even more.

The enormous size of Darius’ empire now necessitated the introduction of a more advanced system of communications.

This was one of the major reasons why the royal highway and postal service were introduced. 

The royal highway stretched about 1,678 miles (2,700 km) between Susa in southwest Persia and Sardis in western Anatolia.

The building of this road facilitated the:

• commercial
• cultural
• military

links between the Aegean Sea and the Iranian plateau.

Although the Persians had political control over this vast area, the actual commerce was controlled by Aramaic-speaking merchant-moneylenders.

Because they were international in scope, they were in a position to “bless” or “ban” whatever other merchants tried to do business in their own spheres of economic monopoly.

By selling at a higher wholesale price to those merchants who were not circumcised members of their cartel, they insured that fellow members of their secret society of merchant-moneylenders in distant lands always had goods to sell at lower retail prices wherever they did business.

Distant Jewish merchants could order goods on credit from Jewish wholesalers for which Gentile merchants would have to pay cash in advance.

So, little by little, those conspiring Jewish merchant-moneylenders began to gain the advantage in whatever trade they specialized in.

In every country, the Jews had the lowest prices – that is, until they had driven the non-Jews out of business and then their prices suddenly became predatorily high.

In every country, the Jews had the rarest gems and spices, silks and odd trinkets merely because their international trade channels and monopoly cartels conspired it.

You might think that this was good, for a people with:

• circumcised penises
• stinky clothes
• fishy breaths

to work together for mutual benefit.

After all, that’s just honest business, right?

But a major problem was that the Jews never played fair.

There was no “level playing field” with the Jews where every businessman would have the same chance of making a profit in fair competition.

Built into Judaism was the undying malice and hatred for all of Mankind.

The Jews did not merely “compete” in business so as to win a fair profit, but they endeavored to bring harm to their non-Jewish competitors so as to lead them into bankruptcy and personal destruction, culminating in a slave’s collar for themselves and their children.

This Jewish animosity brought much violence to their door, but not as much as the lying modern Jews claim nor as much as they deserved.

The reasons why, are in later chapters.

Herodotus rated the royal road as “Excellent.”

By the end of Darius’ reign, the Empire had built inns at 15-mile (24 km) intervals.

The inns served wine and beer and were owned by innkeepers who made additional profits with:

• gambling
• moneylending
• prostitution

These lodgings were provided for dignitaries involved in:

• trade
• government
• military

affairs as well as for ordinary travelers, so the innkeepers were always in a position to overhear important gossip that they could pass along through the Kehillah system of espionage.

All of them spoke Aramaic, the lengua franca of the Persian Empire.

The imperial highway system allowed the Persian Empire to deploy troops rapidly to crucial theaters.

During wartime, the Achaemenid army would (in addition to its baggage train) be logistically supported by an organized system of storehouses that were placed along major highways.

These military storehouses were supplied by more Aramaic-speaking jobbers who didn’t have to go to war because of their once-a-week malingering and loud, orchestrated moaning.

Perhaps one of the greatest Achaemenid achievements was the creation of an empire-wide “Pony Express” for delivering mail.

The imperial administration devoted considerable resources towards the training of riders.

Its horses were bred especially for speed.

The Empire provided stations at the interval of a day’s ride on horseback.

The mail would be carried between stations by a fresh rider and mount each day.

This system allowed for an amazing improvement in the transmission of messages.

For the previous three thousand years, letters sent between Susa and Sardis would have taken three months for delivery.

The new Iranian “Pony Express” could deliver that same letter in seven days.

There was also a system of fire-towers that relayed their own version of morse code from station to station.

The efficiency of this system is testified by the longevity of its use; it survived in Iran until the 19th century when the advent of the telegraph finally made it obsolete.

The Greeks adopted crucial elements of Persian techniques of communication into their own civilization, which were then passed on to the Romans.

After his conquest of Persia, Alexander the Great was to adopt the Persian postal system, resulting in its introduction to the Hellenic and later Roman worlds.

The Roman Empire also implemented an imperial mailing service, which was very much modeled on that of the Achaemenids.

The Romans introduced the postal system into Europe, a system that has survived into the electronic age.

The efficiency of the Persian postal system is perhaps best characterized by Herodotus who noted that:

“There is nothing in the world that travels faster than these Persian couriers.

Nothing stops these couriers from covering their allotted stages in the quickest time, neither snow, rain, wind, nor darkness.” [286]

The communication and travel networks established under Darius had many positive cultural consequences, including the promotion and meeting of:

• Greek
• Babylonian
• Egyptian

scholarship.

One scholar to take advantage of the links provided by the Achaemenid Empire was Pythagoras of Samos in Ionia, which was under Achaemenid rule.

Pythagoras (582 – 500 BC), one of the founders of the discipline of geometry, traveled to Egypt, where Plato (4th century BC) and Thales the Lawgiver were also engaged in the study of Egyptian sciences.

EDUCATION: ANCIENT TEXT: Why Are We Still Talking About Plato 2,100 Years Later? – Library of Rickandria

Thales (624 – 546 BC) was another native of Ionia and studied in ancient Egypt and Babylon.

It was he and Lycurgus who developed the first understanding of what money is.

The darics were gold coins and legal tender, but they were not true money.

They were commodity money.

Another famous resident of Achaemenid-ruled Ionia was Democritus of Abdera (460 – 370 BC), well known for his hypothesis of atoms as the building blocks of matter. [287]

And of course, in Greece at this time, Socrates (470-399 BC) was teaching Mankind how to rationally think – something that the Jews sorely needed but which the rabbis feared would show their lies for what they are and so therefore prohibited Greek logic under pain of death.

Darius’ engineers were successful in building a canal, now the Suez Canal, connecting the Red Sea and the Mediterranean by 498 BC.

The canal was wide enough for two ships to pass. [288]

It was quite a feat considering that the ditch was entirely dug by hand.

But slaves were cheap and in endless supply since the Jewish moneylenders had control of the finances and the Jewish slave drivers were always in the van of the armies, following along with chains and shackles loaded on ox carts.

The next Persian king was Xerxes (486-466 BC).

Xerxes I (/ˈzɜːrkˌsiːz/ ZURK-seez c. 518 – August 465 BC), commonly known as Xerxes the Great, was a Persian ruler who served as the fourth King of Kings of the Achaemenid Empire, reigning from 486 BC until his assassination in 465 BC. He was the son of Darius the Great and Atossa, a daughter of Cyrus the Great.

But with the traditionally affable Iranian royal mannerisms, Xerxes I was assassinated by Artabanus (one of his sons) and a eunuch named Spitamenes.

But both of them, along with Crown Prince Darius, were put to death by Artaxerxes (465-424 BC) who became king.

By this time, after 52 years, the Jews had rebuilt their Temple Treasury, but they still needed the walls of Jerusalem rebuilt in order for them to feel that they could safely deposit bullion there. 

That’s when Artaxerxes’ cup bearer, Nehemiah, started whining and moping about to persuade Artaxerxes to give him permission to rebuild the walls and gates. [289]

Even with their complete control over the gold and silver of the ancient world, there was a new invention arising in the West that was a direct threat to the wealth and political power of the Aramaic-speaking moneylenders of the East.

The Greek invention of coinage had increased the power of the kings but also created a temporary loss to the power of the merchant moneylender guilds.

However, the Greeks of Lydia only invented coins, which were world-changing by themselves.

It was the ingenious Greek philosophers who understood that money is a logical construct. 

They understood and expounded upon the difference between commodity money and fiat money.

The problem with commodity money is that because the commodity, itself, is used for money, when the commodity became scarce, so did the money. Individual hoarders could drastically affect entire nations simply by withdrawing bullion and melting down coinages.

Soon, all of society could be stripped of its gold and silver – and therefore, its money, creating a depression.

With gold and silver becoming scarce and society depending upon gold and silver to perform all of the necessities of money in commerce, only the moneylenders and gold smiths could prosper by lending at interest weights of gold and silver from their secret hoards.

With most of the gold and silver in their strong rooms, the rich could buy up depressed properties for a pittance and enslave starving families for next to nothing.

And so, the ruthless moneylenders and bankers, all became even wealthier while impoverishing all of Mankind.

Bankers and moneylenders profited most when the People were desperate from want of food and shelter.

Thus, human suffering was good for the Jews.

And why?

Because they were God’s Chosen People?

No, because they were criminals who knew how to swindle control of society through arithmetic tricks and through monopoly control of silver and gold.

Was their ownership of the silver and gold due to honest business practices?

No, it was acquired through fraud and deceit and bottomless greed.

The moneylenders and bankers were criminals – and are so today.

Oddly enough, the history of warfare in the West revolves around coins.

It was the 6th Century Greeks who discovered what money actually is.

It is nothing more than a device for allowing trade and services to prosper.

It is like the oil that lubricates a machine.

The machine does the actual work.

All that the oil (the money) does, is make it more efficient.

As such, money only has to accomplish that one benefit, to make barter more efficient.

And money does not have to be made out of a commodity metal.

It can be made out of anything.

However, money must be a function of government to give it both a legal and a coercive power.

And its quantity must be limited by the government.

Please keep this definition in mind or write it down for future reference:

True Money is anything that the government declares to be money, and which the government spends into circulation interest-free, and accepts back in taxes in order to regulate its quantity. 

It is simply that.

Thus, the government declares (that is, makes a governmental fiat) of what money is and controls its quantity through spending and receiving it back for taxes.

In this way, governments control their own destinies by issuing their own money; governments are not controlled by the private:

• moneylenders
• bankers
• merchants

who own the bullion.

If you understand this, O Modern Man, you will see that modern people are still being swindled by the bankers today and betrayed by your bribed government – just as it has always been.

But not as it must continue to be! Gold and silver coinage was one way for the kings to limit the negative commodity aspects of the ancient Eastern money systems which were based on bullion metal. Instead of unlimited lumps of metal of various grades of fineness, only official coins of standard weight and fineness, stamped with the official logo, were allowed by law to be used in commerce.

But an even more fundamental approach in harmony with the nature of money is described in Plutarch’s Parallel Lives.

As a member of the Delphic priesthood, Plutarch recounts the first documented attempt to establish a “nomisma” money system by Lycurgus of Sparta in the 8th century BC.

According to Plutarch, Lycurgus had traveled widely, visiting:

• India
• Spain
• Libya

On the island of Crete, he met the lyric poet Thales “the lawgiver.”

Thales of Miletus (/ˈθeɪliːz/ THAY-leez; Ancient Greek: Θαλῆς; c. 626/623  – c. 548/545 BC) was an Ancient Greek pre-Socratic philosopher from Miletus in Ionia, Asia Minor. Thales was one of the Seven Sages, founding figures of Ancient Greece.

They returned to Sparta and Lycurgus, who was of Sparta’s royal house, took control of the government and established a constitution based on the Cretan model, which became one of the longest lasting in the Greek world.

He instituted land reforms and other measures aimed at cleaning up a corrupted society, 

“whose whole wealth had centered upon a very few,” wrote Plutarch.

These ancient historical events need to be understood since the same imbalances in modern society have been sneaked in by the same tribe of lying snakes.

Lycurgus launched his reform by posting twenty-nine armed volunteers to spread fear in the marketplace of Sparta among any who broke the new money laws.

Such militant patriotism was necessary when faced with the destructive greed of the merchant-moneylenders who would not give up their monopolies peacefully.

An important part of these reforms was a new monetary system.

He made it illegal to use gold or silver as money and legislated that a number of elongated iron discs would be used for money instead.

In those days, paper was unknown.

The idea that money was a creation of the state and declared as the only legal tender in the state, had not yet been fully understood by the people.

Money could be made out of anything – 

• leather
• tin
• ceramic disks

etc.

But the people expected money to have some weight to it as did silver and gold.

So, Lycurgus legislated the use of iron disks as money.

Those iron discs were purposely made useless for anything other than as money by dipping them in vinegar while they were hot to make them brittle.

Thus, the “intrinsic” value of the iron was purposely destroyed.

Each iron disc weighed just over 1/2 kilo, and was called a Pelanor, because they were shaped like small cakes (pelanoi). [290]

They did not have to be that big and heavy but the idea that money didn’t require weight like gold and silver, hadn’t been fully understood.

Lycurgus’ money system was based on law, where the value of the money was determined by decree of the state, and by the legal number of units in circulation, not by the commodity metal of which it was made.

Today we can call it a fiat or token money system, where the total amount of money allowed into circulation is regulated by law and where the value of these symbols serving as money depends on limiting the number in circulation.

Limiting their number in circulation, is an important function of a government fiat currency because money is, after all, a method for facilitating the exchange of goods.

Goods are limited, so the amount of money also has to be limited in ratio with available goods and services.

Otherwise, an unlimited issue of money by a government creates an inflated money supply, making the money worth less.

As in modern times, when too much money is purposely printed and becomes worthless, nations once again fall into the bankers’ trap of using silver and gold for money.

Instead of hanging the bankers for treason and grand larceny, the corrupted and bribed government officials betray the People to them.

Just as it has always been, the bankers and financiers are allowed to swindle and dispossess the People while being protected from the rope by the police and military.

In Sparta’s case, the use of iron fiat money seems to have worked well for about 350 years, during which time she became a premier Hellenic power.

It was abandoned about 415 BC, after Sparta embarked on campaigns of foreign conquest and captured large amounts of gold and silver.

Polybius (/pəˈlɪbiəs/; Ancient Greek: Πολύβιος, Polýbios; c. 200 – c. 118 BC) was a Greek historian of the middle Hellenistic period. He is noted for his work The Histories, a universal history documenting the rise of Rome in the Mediterranean in the third and second centuries BC. It covered the period of 264–146 BC, recording in detail events in Italy, Iberia, Greece, Macedonia, Syria, Egypt and Africa, and documented the Punic Wars and Macedonian Wars among many others.

The historian Polybius recounted:

“But once they began to undertake naval expeditions outside the Peloponnese it was evident that neither their iron currency nor the exchange of their crops for commodities which they lacked would suffice for their needs.” [291]

This did not mean that Sparta’s fiat money system was unworkable outside of its domestic boundaries but that for such a system to work internationally, the international trading partners of the nation would also have to be on a similar fiat system.

But in those days, outside of Spartan territory, gold and silver coins were the official monies.

All of the other countries in antiquity were enslaved to the merchant-moneylenders who manipulated the availability of commodity silver and gold.

Outside of Sparta, their iron money didn’t buy anything, so they began minting money from silver and gold for use in the conquered territories and in so doing, the Greeks once again fell into the clutches of the Monsters of Babylon whose enormous stores of gold and silver had been gathered from three thousand years of larceny.

The Monsters of Babylon could afford to make silver and gold scarce so as to starve the People into submission because, as a result of lending at interest, they had plenty of it on hand which they surreptitiously distributed to the rabbis and priests who trickled it down to the “poor, oppressed” Jews who practiced the street theater of pretending to be even more ragged and hungry than the goyim (lowly insects, stupid cattle) whom they were swindling and starving.

The discovery of what True Money is, temporarily freed the civilized world from the power of the Monsters of Babylon.

With their own local coinages, coinages that were the only legal tender allowed within their territories, the city states could “disenfranchise” foreign coins and metal hoards and exercise more control over their destiny. [292]

Such a Greek discovery and knowledge of true money put a direct stop upon the machinations of the Asian moneylenders of:

• Jerusalem
• Babylonia
• Persia

Those robber barons of:

• finance
• usury
• smuggling

had had control of the commodities of gold and silver for three thousand years.

If these commodity metals were minted into coins, the moneylenders could deal with that since the coins were composed of the bullion that they controlled.

The more coins that were minted, the more bullion they could sell at a profit.

After the coins were put into circulation, they could simply gather these gold and silver coins back into their temple treasuries with the larcenous arithmetic of the Sumerian Swindle.

So, commodity money was not a threat to their wealth, but True Money was since its value was controlled by the king and not by the bankers.

However, the swindle of lending money at interest, always allowed the moneylenders to be the middlemen in the circulation of all monies whether commodity or fiat.

As the bankers sucked more money into their vaults than they had lent out, all governments using commodity money fell into a depression while all governments using fiat money fell into inflation.

The bankers could profit under both economic conditions while the People were impoverished.

No government could ever be stable while the Sumerian Swindle was allowed to the moneylenders.

The moneylenders were at war with any government that challenged their larceny.

With their huge hoards of gold and silver, they had the monetary power to bribe and sway high officials.

But only the Jewish moneylenders had the subterranean organization to bring down governments through economic stealth and seditious undermining.

And other than the Sumerian Swindle, their greatest weapon was commodity money because every country that used silver and gold for their coins, were beholden to the bankers who controlled those metals.

With the deceived kings believing them to be “loyal servants” and “truthful advisors,” the international cartel of moneylenders with main offices in:

• Jerusalem
• Babylon
• Susa

conspired war upon every country that dared to use True Money (fiat money).

With the ability to send messages throughout the Persian Empire within seven days, the Kehillah system of circumcised bankers had little difficulty coordinating an assault upon Greece.

Destroying every nation that used fiat currency, was the goal of these monstrous swine who wallowed in their piles of silver and gold.

In Byzantium, before it became Constantinople, iron money was in use in 431–404 BC.

It consisted of discs of thin sheet iron impressed on one side.

It was the best substitute for paper notes which the condition of the mechanic arts permitted at that time.

In other words, they used an advanced fiat money system.

The government had declared the iron money to be money worth a certain amount.

The government spent the money into circulation for goods and services that it needed.

The money was used by society in commercial transaction and then paid back to the government for taxes.

Thus, the entire society went about its daily life with the iron money circulating and performing all of the efficiency of any other kind of money – all without any debt owed by the government or by the people to the merciless moneylenders.

For the Monsters of Babylon, such a money system that did not pay them a profit, had to be destroyed because underneath and behind all commerce and all military conquest was money and those who controlled it.

Athens also briefly used fiat systems, first in a war emergency situation in 407 BC, when she melted the partly copper statue of Victory for coinage.

Then again in 390-350 BC, Timotheus issued a numerary money composed of copper.

Timotheus is a masculine given name. It is a latinized version of the Greek name Τιμόθεος (Timόtheos) meaning “one who honors God”, from τιμή “honor” and θεός “god”. The English version Timothy (and its variations) is a common name in several countries.

These were receivable for all payments, the public taxes included, and were nominally redeemable, at an indefinite time, in silver.

But most importantly to the history of the world, Rome also adopted a nomisma system using copper and making little compromise with the East. [293]

It was in the East, in Babylonia and Persia where the vast hoards of gold and silver were piled up in the temples of the gods.

That is where the moneylenders centered their wealth and their power, a power that had enslaved all of those ancient lands, their kings and peoples, not to superior military might or religious power, but to no one other than mere accountants and loan-sharks – accountants and loan-sharks calling themselves “gentlemen” and the “Haves” and the “Jews.”

These avaricious little monsters with big savings accounts wanted ever more because their god, He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named, had promised them the entire world as long as they followed the Contract as written in the Biggest Lie Ever Told, lending to all of Mankind but borrowing from no one. (Dt 7:16; Dt 15:6; Dt 23:20-21)

Thus, the destruction of Greece and of Rome became a major goal of the Aramaic-speaking international Babylonian and Persian moneylenders with their holy, circumcised cocks, worshipping at the bloody altar of the “god of armies.”

Yet, the scheming and cowardly bankers had no intention of risking their own lives in war when they had the simple expedient of sitting on their fat asses once every Sabbath while refusing to do any work other than to drink wine and tell lies such as:

“A thousand years ago, we were the slaves of Pharaoh.

Pity us!”

The stupefied and corrupted kings then declared their protection of the “holy” moneylenders to the infuriated citizens who were, themselves, marching off to get killed while the king’s “loyal Jews” helped him finance a war for the Peoples’ slaughter.

Being a blood-sucking tick behind the ear of a king, had its advantages – but only for the blood-sucking tick.

If they were going to inherit the world through fraud and larceny, then how could they do so if their gold and silver became worthless, and the people of the world were no longer their slaves?

Keeping the people impoverished and bowing down to them for the mere dribbling out of grains of silver from their coffers, was impossible to accomplish without the money machine of the Sumerian Swindle and difficult to accomplish without their control over bullion.

However, the first war to destroy the coinage of the Greeks was the attack by Darius upon Lydia, the Greek kingdom where coins were invented, a country that had its own gold deposits and placer mines.

Once the moneylenders behind Darius the Great (521-486 BC) had defeated the Lydia, this power of coinage became their own power.

The gold coins of Darius, darics of known weight and purity, became the official money of the Empire, composed of the gold which they now totally controlled and issued by a king who was beholden to their “loyal” advice and their financial support.

Once Lydia had been defeated and their electrum coins replaced with Darius’ gold darics, the next target for destruction was the fiat money of the Greek city-states.

Both Aristotle and Plato had noted the paramount monetary principle – that the nature of money is a fiat of the law, an invention or creation of Mankind and society, rather than a commodity [294] such as silver and gold.

Money in Greece came to be known by the word “nomisma” because it attained its authority by law, which in Greek is “nomos.”

Aristotle (384–322 BC) wrote the culmination of Greek thought and experimentation on money: 

“All goods must therefore be measured by some one thing…now this unit is in truth, demand, which holds all things together…but money has become by convention a sort of representative of demand; and this is why it has the name nomisma – because it exists not by nature, but by law (nomos) and it is in our power to change it and make it useless.” [295]

True Money is anything that is declared to be money by the government, spent into circulation without interest and accepted back by the government for taxes.

In this way, the governments of the world did not have to borrow gold and silver at interest from the moneylenders or go to war to capture other peoples’ gold and silver for a money supply.

They could issue their own money without enslaving their people to debt.

This discovery was a direct threat to the wealth and power of an ancient evil that had been growing since the Sumerian Swindle had been invented nearly three thousand years before the Greek city-states.

Darius learned too late that wealth alone and overwhelming numbers of troops, are not enough to defeat men of valor.

The outbreak of the Greco Persian wars, against the fantastic martial prowess of the Greeks, brought the Persians defeat at Marathon (490 BC).

However, in Babylon, trade and commerce continued unimpaired since war is always profitable for those who don’t actually do any of the fighting.

The merchant-moneylenders raised their prices. Increased government interference suggests an unstable economy.

When Darius died, Babylon loyally accepted the new king Xerxes, who had resided in the city as Crown Prince.

Under Xerxes (485-465 BC) the famous repetition of his father’s unsuccessful expedition against Greece culminated in defeat at Thermopylae and Salamis (480 BC).

The Babylonian people had made their contribution in the form of detachments of troops as well as with heavy taxes, while the moneylenders remained safely at their counting houses, sipping iced beverages.

The Jews stayed out of the army but sold whatever the army required.

Now that the military power of the Persians was proven so inferior to that of the Greeks, the Monsters of Babylon transferred their gold to their Temple in Jerusalem, knowing through their Kehillah system which side was the strongest while proving their “loyalty” to Xerxes by informing him of the rebellion’s ringleaders.

The Babylonians, encouraged by the priests of Marduk, rebelled against the king who had led their people to war and death in a faraway land while taxing them into penury.

The Cult of Marduk: Rituals and Worship in Ancient Babylon – Babylonian Mythology

A series of repressive measures directed against Babylon by Xerxes served to inflame the ever-present rebellious elements.

In a series of revolts at least two local usurpers were proclaimed (482 BC).

Classical authors describe Xerxes’ capture of the rebellious city after several months’ siege, and state that it was then sacked, its fortifications demolished; the great temple of Marduk and others were burnt to the ground and the statue of Marduk carried away as a spoil of war.

Xerxes, informed by his “loyal Jews” who the ring leaders were, dealt severely with the Babylonians.

The satrapy was abolished and incorporated with that of Assyria, the portions to the west being made into a separate unit.

Great estates were confiscated and handed over to the Persians and their “loyal Jews,” and henceforth the country was ferociously taxed.

If Xerxes couldn’t beat the Greeks, he could at least show what a “mighty king” he was by beating once again the Babylonians.

But the Babylonian Jews, knowing through their Kehillah spy and subversion network what the balance of forces were, sided with the Persians while depositing their gold and silver in the recently rebuilt Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop where it was relatively safe.

What was then lacking in Jerusalem were the city walls.

In 465 BC, Xerxes was assassinated and succeeded by his younger son, Artaxerxes (464-424 BC), who seems to have held a more sympathetic attitude towards Babylon.

To the priests of Marduk he restored their lands and their position, but it is doubtful whether much of their temple was standing at this time.

After all, the temples of Mesopotamia were built of mud bricks.

So, they were easy to tear down by an enraged “great king” like Xerxes.

However, the detailed descriptions of Herodotus (c. 450 BC) show that despite its harsh treatment, Babylon was far from destroyed.

Herodotus gives some indication of the tax burdens now supported by Babylon, by far the highest of any province in the empire.

Thirty tons of silver a year together with the “gift” of 500 boys to be made eunuchs, are said to have been exacted, over and above the duty of provisioning the Persian army and court for four months each year.

The Jews took the lead in cutting off the penises and testicles of those boys, not only because they controlled the slave trade but also as a means of destroying future generations of goyim. (Dt 33:11)

The daily collection to cover satrapal expenses is said to have been sufficient to fill a 13-gallon jar with silver, while four villages were exempted from taxation in exchange for feeding and looking after the satrap’s large number of hunting dogs.

The result of these policies was an increasing scarcity of silver and severe inflation and some very grumpy taxpayers in Babylonia.

With such huge taxes on the Babylonians, Xerxes’ son, Artaxerxes, could afford to be generous with his “loyal” Jewish cupbearer, Nehemiah, who whined a lot about wanting to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem because it was so “holy” while forgetting to mention that it also housed an immense fortune in the Temple.

Cyrus the Younger (Old Persian: 𐎤𐎢𐎽𐎢𐏁 Kūruš; Ancient Greek: Κῦρος Kyros; died 401 BC) was an Achaemenid prince and general. He ruled as satrap of Lydia and Ionia from 408 to 401 BC. Son of Darius II and Parysatis, he died in 401 BC in battle during a failed attempt to oust his elder brother, Artaxerxes II, from the Persian throne.  The history of Cyrus and of the retreat of his Greek mercenaries is told by Xenophon in his Anabasis. Another account, probably from Sophaenetus of Stymphalus, was used by Ephorus. Further information is contained in the excerpts from Artaxerxes II’s physician, Ctesias, by Photius; Plutarch’s Lives of Artaxerxes II and Lysander; and Thucydides’ History of Peloponnesian War. These are the only early sources of information on Cyrus the Younger.

The period after the death of Artaxerxes I was marked by further contested successions and intrigues in Babylonia, culminating in the march of his grandson Cyrus the Younger with a force of 13,000 of those incredible Greek mercenaries from Asia Minor, where he was satrap, down the Euphrates against his elder brother Artaxerxes II.

The two brothers met at Cunaxa, not far from Babylon (401 BC), but Cyrus was killed at the moment of victory.

The story of the return march of the surviving 10,000 Greeks to the Black Sea is well known from Xenophon’s famous account.

Xenophon of Athens (/ˈzɛnəfən, ˈziːnə-, -ˌfɒn/; Ancient Greek: Ξενοφῶν;[a] c. 430 – probably 355 or 354 BC) was a Greek military leader, philosopher, and historian. At the age of 30, he was elected as one of the leaders of the retreating Greek mercenaries, the Ten Thousand, who had been part of Cyrus the Younger’s attempt to seize control of the Achaemenid Empire. As the military historian Theodore Ayrault Dodge wrote, “the centuries since have devised nothing to surpass the genius of this warrior”. Xenophon established precedents for many logistical operations and was among the first to describe strategic flanking maneuvers and feints in combat.

But just as the world seemed quiet under a Persian-imposed peace, the lands west of the Euphrates again revolted.

At the same time in Macedonia, under Alexander the Great, a new power was emerging that was soon briefly to create an empire even greater than that of the Achaemenid Persians. [296]

Alexander the Great conquered Palestine in 333-331 BC.

Tyre was of strategic importance as it was a major Phoenician center that had provided the Achaemenid Empire’s main naval force.

Gaza and Egypt also fell to Alexander, with the Jews and Egyptians hailing him as a liberator. [297]

In city after city, his army was met by delegations of Jews who brought gifts and information.

The Jews, led by their rabbis and chief businessmen, greeted Alexander as a conqueror and a hero.

They sang joyous songs and fawned upon Alexander and his generals with sweet smiles and happiness and offered him their “Jewish Loyalty.” [298]

They claimed that Alexander was their “messiah.”

Without exception, the fawning Jews went before Alexander as traitors to the towns and the cities in which they lived.

They brought information on the weak points in the city’s defenses and information about the leaders and the military capabilities of their host city, water and food supplies, armaments, numbers of trained soldiers and the morale of the populace.

Thus, they showed Alexander their “Jewish Loyalty” and ingratiated themselves into his service.

With this strategic information, which was all true and accurate, the Jews also brought slanders and lies about the leaders and the peoples of the towns that had given them shelter and sustenance.

The Jews whined and cried about how much they had been “persecuted” and which of the town’s people were prejudiced against them:

“because of their religion,”

as well as which leaders of the goyim (non-Jewish, lowly insects, stupid cattle) that Alexander should execute.

The same Jews who had served the Persian Empire with their “Jewish loyalty” danced and sang before the armies of Alexander and greeted him as a “messiah” come to save them from the “oppression” of the Persians – Persians from whom they had acquired most of the wealth of Babylonia; Persians from whom they had regained their Temple and all of their lands with treasures restored; Persians who had actually paid for the reconstruction of the Temple and the walls of Jerusalem; Persians who had treated them with generosity.

Now these same Persians were slandered and vilified as “oppressors” while to Alexander – the new “great king” – the Jews offered their “Jewish Loyalty.”

It was with Alexander, “loyally” serving as suppliers to his army and “loyally” serving up wine and women to his troops, that the Jews first began to enter Europe via Greece, bringing with them exotic goods from their trade monopolies and the ruthless application of the Sumerian Swindle to Europe’s rich and poor alike.

In 331 BC, Alexander, having made himself master of the entire eastern Mediterranean including Egypt, set forth to do battle with the Persians who were led by Darius III (335-331 BC).

Darius III (Old Persian: 𐎭𐎠𐎼𐎹𐎺𐎢𐏁 Dārayavaʰuš; Ancient Greek: Δαρεῖος Dareios; c. 380– 330 BC) was the thirteenth and last Achaemenid King of Kings of Persia, reigning from 336 BC to his death in 330 BC.

Advancing with 7000 cavalry and 30,000 infantry Alexander crossed the Euphrates at Thapsacus, on two pontoon bridges.

Darius, expecting the Macedonian to follow the obvious course down river to Babylon, stationed his troops beyond the upper Tigris whence he could cut off Alexander’s line of supply.

Alexander outwitted him, however, and moved eastwards, crossing the Tigris unopposed above Nineveh.

Darius now drew his battle lines at Gaugamela, modern Keramlais where the plain had been levelled to permit the Persian chariots to maneuver freely.

The ensuing struggle was Alexander’s and Darius fled ignominiously, thus bringing to an end the greatest and most efficient imperial organization the ancient world had then known. [299] 

Before Darius fought his last battle, he attempted to sue for peace, acknowledging Alexander’s hegemony over all lands west of the Halys River.

Alexander’s rejection of this offer led Darius to offer all lands west of the Euphrates, 30,000 silver talents (900,000 kilos or 992 tons of silver), the hand of his daughter in marriage, and the position as the co-regent under Darius.

These were again rejected as Alexander endeavored to conquer the entire Achaemenid Empire and beyond. [300]

Besides, why take a measly 992 tons of silver when he could have it all?

In 330 BC, Alexander the Great seized from the eastern temples at:

• Susa
• Ecbatana
• Persepolis

an estimated 740,000 talents (22,200,000 kilos or 24,471 tons) of gold including 2,200 metric tons (2,425 tons) of silver.

This was certainly an abundance of the precious metals, although not in circulation.

This great quantity of bullion was purposely kept from circulation by Darius and his “loyal” advisors.

But also in Greece, great quantities were kept from circulation and accumulated in the temples. [301]

When silver and gold freely circulate as coinage, the People are prosperous.

But when the People can be made destitute and enslaved, the moneylenders and bankers are prosperous while the “Haves” have even more.

So, part of the fraud of using the commodity metals of silver and gold for money, is that by removing it from circulation into bank vaults, the People can be impoverished and enslaved from lack of circulating money, leaving all wealth and the very lives of the People in the hands of the private bankers and speculators who gained their advantage through:

• fraud
• bribery
• larceny

No banker has ever been an honest person.

This is an important point to consider and to keep in mind.

Why would so much gold and silver be kept out of circulation by the kings and the merchant moneylenders?

Isn’t it to their benefit to have the gold and silver out on loan and circulating as money for the exchange of goods?

Don’t both of these increase their own profits while enriching a prosperous society?

Yes, of course!

So, why was the gold and silver kept in storage in the temples and not circulating among the people?

The first principle to understand in such a situation is this:

When the bankers get their wealth through their ownership of a money system, then the bankers get richer by taking wealth from everyone.

But how can the bankers get richer by stealing from people who have so very little?

The answer to that is found in the ancient moneylenders’ side business established in ancient Sumeria known as slavery.

You Negro readers should pay careful attention to this because the original slaves were not Negroes, they were debtors, predominantly Caucasians who didn’t understand the Sumerian Swindle and its side-businesses.

Volume I, The Sumerian Swindle, covers the history of this subject.

The huge amounts of gold and silver on deposit in the temples was not there simply as a reserve of the government for a rainy day.

It was there as a means of keeping the People poor.

Poor people are more easily manipulated and governed because they have little financial power and therefore little political power.

So, the poorer the people, the more easily they can be controlled through starvation, and the more cheaply they can be hired for labor or used as soldiers in the army.

In the ancient world, soldiers fought harder when their pay was low and their only chance of gaining wealth was to steal it from those whom they had defeated.

Plunder and rape were considered a part of their pay – if they could fight hard enough to win it.

And if they lost and died, the merchant-moneylenders would hire others whom they had swindled, as cheap soldiers fighting for promises of glory and booty.

Promises were cheap to make and so cost the moneylenders nothing.

By owning slaves and thereby substituting cheap slave labor for the labor of free men whom they would have to pay a living wage, the merchant-moneylenders could reduce the cost of labor on two levels.

A fair wage would have to be enough for a man to support a family and perhaps even make a better life for himself.

But this was not to the advantage of the merchant moneylenders because paying a fair wage to a free man, reduced their profits.

But buying a cheap slave and paying him only in food enough to eat and a few rags to cover his nakedness, was much more profitable.

When the cheap slave labor drove out the labor of free men, the free men had only four options for survival.

1. They could work for a slave’s wages.
2. They could starve to death.
3. They could join the army.
4. They could sell themselves into slavery.

But these people were all goyim (non-Jewish, lowly insects, stupid cattle) so it didn’t matter to the Monsters of Babylon who, while “walking in the ways” of their devil-god, actually relished the destruction of Mankind.

Singing and dancing on the graves of their foes, has a long Jewish tradition.

Finding joy in the death and destruction of the goyim, is Jewish.

A variation of this same system is used by the merchant-moneylenders in modern times, in effect, by allowing cheaply working foreign immigrants into the countries of white Europe, America and Australia in order to impoverish the white people and turn them into the slaves of the Jew bankers and treasonous politicians.

This method of subversion is covered in Volume III, The Bloodsuckers of Judah.

Alexander’s capture of so much gold and silver was not an indication of how wealthy the Achaemenid Persian Empire was, rather it was an indication of how relatively poor people are when they are ruled over by the rich.

It is to the benefit of the rich to make the poor even poorer.

Of all of the people in the world who have understood this, none other than the Jews have done so much to make themselves exclusively rich by causing poverty to all of Mankind because many must starve and die so that a few Jews may live in luxury.

After his victory over the Persians, Alexander’s harsh treatment of Persepolis was duly recorded by Diodorus.

Thousands of pack animals from Babylon and Susa (including 3,000 pack camels) were bought to transport more than 25,000 tons of gold.

This wealth had been accumulated since the days of Cyrus the Great.

The houses and palaces were raided, and all of the women were carried off as slaves.

A large number of prisoners were simply slaughtered.

Persepolis was so utterly destroyed that even the later Parthian and Sassanian empires never rebuilt it.

Only the ruined columns and walls of this giant city remain to bear silent testimony to its glorious past. [302]

Irrespective of its bombastic ceremonial beginnings, Alexander’s vision of unity was never realized.

Prior to his campaign into Arabia, Alexander contracted a fatal fever after having drunk from a cup at a private gathering with his friend Medius of Larisa in Babylon.

Much of modern historiography is of the opinion that Alexander died of this “fever” on June 7, 323 BC, at the age of 32-years old.

Yet there is a theory that he was poisoned for becoming “too Aryan.”

There is certainly Classical verification of Alexander having “gone native” with his adoption of the upright tiara, an Iranian symbol of imperial authority, and his wearing of “barbarian” Iranian clothes.

Alexander also attempted to institute the Achaemenid custom of having persons prostrate themselves before him as king.

This may also be related to Alexander’s belief in his own divinity.

Subsequent events provide strong evidence that his own Macedonians rejected Alexander’s vision of unity.

After his death, the Macedonians divorced their Iranian wives, and Cassander murdered Alexander’s widow Roxanna and her son by 310 BC.

The Iranian satraps were also removed.

Not only were the Macedonians loathe to unite with the Aryans of Persia, but they also failed to maintain unity among themselves.

Alexander’s sudden death led to war among his generals, as no successor had been named.

The great empire of Alexander was soon to be replaced by a number of Hellenic successor states, most notably the Seleucids of Persia [303] and the Ptolemies of Egypt.

Alexander’s takeover of Egypt marks the end of native Egyptian rule of that country.

After three thousand years, Egyptian civilization ended with the 30th Dynasty around 343 BC.

From this time, Hellenistic Greek peoples and cultures ruled this ancient land with its dependable grain supply (thanks to the regular Nile River floods), and its upriver sources of gold, and an extremely valuable trade route linking both the Nile River and the Red Sea.

After Alexander’s death, Ptolemy took over Egypt as Pharaoh, annexing Cyrenaica and then Syria and Phoenicia to improve his access to the Mediterranean and his defense against his rivals Antigonus and Seleucus.

He moved the capital from Memphis to Alexandria, which shifted Egypt’s focus to the Mediterranean.

He occupied Coele-Syria and Judah (301 BC) and established control over Cyprus and the Aegean Sea at Cos.

In 288/7 BC, Ptolemy took Tyre and Sidon.

Thus, he both secured a defensive ring of territory and also created close contacts with the Hellenistic world.

Inevitably this led to collision with his brother Greeks in the Seleucid empire.

Both the Greek Seleucid and Greek Ptolemaic Empires began at the same time and both of them had plenty of those circumcised and sex-crazed Jews promiscuously multiplying everywhere, lending money, dealing in imports and slaves and smuggled goods and stealing the property of their victims at every opportunity – all of this while avoiding like they avoided bathing with soap and water, any civilizing influences of Greek and Roman society.

For after Greek domination of the Near East, Rome entered the fray.

That the Jews could rebel against Greek philosophy was easy for them to do since the rabbis forbad the Jews to study any of it.

The Hebrew Bible had Mosaic Laws against studying anything that wasn’t a rabbinical lie.

The Tradition of the Elders, that body of oral secret frauds that the rabbis also taught the Jews, forbad reading anything that wasn’t rabbi-approved, which meant reading nothing other than the Biggest Lie Ever Told.

If a Jew so much as touched a book of Greek philosophy, they worried that they would be consumed with boils and burned with lightning bolts.

So, knowing only the lies about David and Solomon with Moses crossing the sea dry shod and living for forty years on nothing but grasshoppers and quails, the Jews were quick to take offense at any Greek or Roman who should doubt the word of the Jews.

“We are the Chosen Ones of He-Who-Must-Not Be-Named,”

didn’t really convince anyone other than those gullible pagans who were equally as ignorant as the Jews.

Their entire swindle – their exemption from military duty, their self-created “prestige” as the “Holy Chosen Ones of God,” their Jewish trade unions organized in military fashion, their Kehillah system of espionage and subversion, and the safety of their bullion hoards – all depended upon maintaining a façade of religion.

Even if a Jew didn’t believe the Hebrew Bible, he could benefit from the community larder as a member of the gang.

Being raised from infancy within the all-encompassing brainwashing from circumcision to yeshiva studies, the Jews believed the lies that the rabbis told.

Those who didn’t believe, were killed.

And this was as Terah, the Babylonian moneylender, had planned it more than a thousand years before.

Ignorant, blood-thirsty Jews dedicating their lives toward the protection of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop, is what Judaism produced for those who controlled it – and the emphasis is on those who controlled it.

They were Jews but they preferred to live in more prosperous and luxurious locations than Jerusalem, such as in Babylon or Susa or Alexandria.

The High Priest controlled Judaism. Besides the obvious power and oh-so-important “prestige” that the High Priest had, since his every word was believed to be the word of God, the chief priest had total control over all of the wealth that the banking system of Judaism siphoned into the “holy treasury.”

Power over every Jew and the enormous wealth of a religious system that combined banking with Temple donations, gave the High Priest the power of kings, but it was a hidden power based upon hidden bullion; and not just bullion on deposit in the Temple but bullion out on loan to the Jews who repaid for life, ten percent of their wealth.

But a bank cannot operate with all of its capital secured within vaults.

It has to spread its gold and silver out into society as investments and loans.

It is as a circulating medium of exchange that money makes profits for its controllers.

And where the silver and gold circulate is often far, far away from the bank’s physical location.

And so, it was with Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop located in the fortress city of Jerusalem.

On paper, in its Training Manual for Jewish Criminality and Sociopathy, the Jews claimed that lending at interest to each other was forbidden by God, Himself.

But like everything in Judaism, that was just another lie.

In fact, loans made to the Jews by the priests were returned with the interest hidden in the ten percent lifelong tithe that the borrower paid.

So, it was a great advantage for the Temple to lend to the Jews “interest free” because all profits that the borrower gained from the loan resulted in a lifelong obligation of ten percent yearly tax on the resulting principal and its profits.

Free loans to members turned every Jew, no matter how humble, into a loan-shark with funds available on demand whenever a victim was sighted.

This has been greatly overlooked, especially by historians of Medieval to Modern Europe:

Every Jew was a loan shark.

This so-called “religion” was established by Babylonian merchant-moneylenders and bankers.

Their personal fortunes of ninety percent of their profits derived from a membership in the Temple banking system that they had established to benefit themselves.

They would certainly not place their assets entirely within the Temple, itself, as a mere savings account.

Ninety percent of their wealth was distributed throughout the kingdoms and empires where they did business.

Their ten percent tithe was again loaned out by the High Priests and rabbis to the Little Jews in a constantly working, international swindle of Mankind.

Vast though the hoards of gold and silver (the “sacred funds”) were that was sent to the Temple every year as:

• dues
• taxes
• offerings

and tithes, the sum was very small compared to the personal wealth collected by the Jewish merchant-moneylenders who controlled the trade channels between:

• India
• Persia
• Mesopotamia

and Europe.

In these geographical areas, the real leaders of Judaism resided, not in Jerusalem wearing the pimp suit of the High Priest and sprinkling the blood of innocent sheep on an altar of gold.

The tumultuous history of Palestine is well known, so it will not be overly emphasized here.

It is the overlooked aspect of the history of these Jewish frauds, that requires a more careful inspection.

I will touch on the Greek influence a bit and then move on to the Jews.

But before any historic and chronological discussions, it will be instructive at this juncture to first consider what kinds of people the Romans were.

In this way, some of the events of history make more sense rather than merely writing down a few dates and locations.

This may seem off topic at first, but I am sure you will find that an understanding of the Roman people will be helpful not only in this book but in any other history books covering those eras. 

Such an understanding will allow you to know why it was that the Jews found it so easy to corrupt and subvert Roman society.

Unlike the circumcised, sex-crazed Semites with their eight or ten children from each of many wives so that they could be

“as numerous as the sands in the sea,”

the Romans usually had just one or two children.

Three tended to be the average.

The Roman law accorded special privilege to mothers of three children, who were seen as having done their duty, and this number seems to have been traditional. [304]

However, this should not be taken as any kind of sexual morality or abstinence by the Romans. 

Morality was a very loose term among them and was something that each man determined pretty much for himself.

At age twelve a girl was considered nubile.

Some were even married off at this tender age, and the marriages were consummated.

By age fourteen a girl was considered an adult:

“Men then call them ‘madame’ (domina, kyria), and seeing that there is nothing left for them but to share a man’s bed, they dress themselves up and think of nothing else.”

The philosopher who penned these lines concluded:

“It would be better to persuade them that nothing will make them more estimable than to appear modest and reserved.”

This is all good advice even for modern girls who are under the foul influence of the Jewish Fashion Industry and Media Monopoly.

While the Roman girls prepared themselves to be mothers, the Roman boys (that is, the wealthy Roman boys) attended school.

Why?

In order to become good citizens?

To learn a trade?

To acquire the means to understand their world?

No, Roman education was neither formative nor utilitarian.

Rather, it conferred prestige, primarily through the study of such subjects as rhetoric. [305]

The Romans admired those who were good at talking and giving grand speeches even if they were chowder-heads like our modern politicians.

Roman schooling was an imported, Greek product.

No Roman of good birth could call himself cultivated unless a tutor had taught him the Greek language and literature, whereas the most cultivated Greeks thumbed their noses at the thought of learning Latin and haughtily ignored Cicero and Virgil.

Greek intellectuals who went abroad and sold their talents, naturally spoke Greek when practicing medicine or teaching philosophy, for Greek was the language of those sciences [306] just as Greek and not Latin was the language of international Roman culture and politics.

At age twelve the young Roman of noble birth completed his elementary education.

At age fourteen he shed his child’s clothing and was allowed to do what every young man loves to do.

At age sixteen or seventeen he might choose a public career or join the army.

There was no such thing as a legal age of majority.

In Rome, there were no minors, only prepubescent, who ceased to be so whenever their fathers or tutors judged they were ready to wear a man’s garb and start trimming their mustaches. [307]

It was common knowledge that, as soon as a young man donned his adult garb, his first thought was to buy himself the favors of a servant or hasten to Suburra, Rome’s quarter for mischief.

Or perhaps a woman of good society might take it into her head to initiate the young man in sexual matters.

For boys, the time between puberty and marriage was a time of parental indulgence.

For five or ten years young men chased prostitutes or lived with mistresses.

Gangs of youths were known to break down the doors of a prostitute’s house and rape her. [308]

This was an accepted tradition; they were, after all, pagans.

Christianity had not yet ameliorated the Roman character.

These were spoiled youths of the leading, rich families.

The poor youths had to work for a living and had no time or money for such escapades.

As the upper classes, a privilege always accorded well-born youths in Rome, was the freedom to wander the streets at night in gangs, beating passersby, manhandling women, and smashing shops. [309]

Ah, such fun-loving Roman boys!

There was no police force in Roman cities.

The citizens had to take care of themselves.

The Roman father had authority over his son until the father’s death.

A child had no fortune of his own since whatever he earned or inherited belonged to his father. 

A son could have no career without the consent of his father.

And the father could even have his son executed. [310]

So, there was a strict authoritarian element in the Roman family.

But it was not a family that was based in love, rather it was based in pagan ideas that:

“Might makes Right and Wealth is an enabler of Might.”

Thus, on one hand, Roman society was easily corruptible by materialistic Jews; on the other hand, it was ripe for the message of loving kindness from the followers of Christ.

For children and a family, the Romans did, of course, have marriage ceremonies involving witnesses, useful in case the marriage was contested.

The wedding night took the form of a legal rape from which the woman emerged:

“offended with her husband”

(who, accustomed to using his slave women as he pleased, found it difficult to distinguish between raping a woman and taking the initiative in sexual relations).

It was customary for the Roman groom to forgo deflowering his wife on the first night, out of concern for her timidity; but he made up for his forbearance by raping her. [311]

One of the leading passions in life in the Greco Roman world, was ambition for symbols that represented a man’s wealth and power.

Modern people are little different where a modern wealthy man, instead of a team of horses and chariot, might drive an expensive sports car and live in a mansion.

But for the Romans of social note, a symbol of wealth and power was to have a train of admirers.

There were no cameras, of course, so there were no paparazzi.

But the gaggle of admiring groupies and doting admirers who cheered the wealthy or famous ones and followed them around Rome, served the same purpose of drawing to the attention of the average Roman, these august Gods of Social Climbing.

Miles Williams Mathis: What I Finally Understood about Famous People – Library of Rickandria

Besides senators and landowners, even actors and charioteers had fans and groupies, as did even some physicians, who had become “stars” in their profession. [312]

From all of this, be sure to remember that while Roman nobles had a keen sense of the authority and majesty of their Empire, they had nothing like our modern notion of public service.

They made no clear distinction between public functions and private rank, or between public finances and personal wealth.

The grandeur of Rome was the collective property of the governing class and the ruling group of senators.

Similarly, the thousands of autonomous cities that formed the fabric of the Empire were controlled by local notables with their hands in the public treasury.

Like the modern Republican and Democratic political parties or the modern Torries and Whigs, the Senate was a club, and club members decided whether or not a man had the social profile necessary for membership, which meant whether or not he could add to the prestige of the group.

This is the same reason why modern politicians are so corrupt – the honest ones can never attain power because by the time they run the gauntlet of powerful Party crooks, either they are corrupted, themselves, or they are shunted aside by the power of the Party.

Roman senators did not select new members directly.

This chore was left to innumerable clientage networks. Public offices were treated as though they were private dignities, access to which depended on private:

• contacts
• gifts
• bribes

Too many historians, forgetting that Rome was not a modern state, have mistaken these ancient principles for a perversion of modern ones.

Some historians have protested that Rome was rife with corruption, bribery, and clientage; others have passed over these matters in silence, on the grounds that such “abuses” hold little more than anecdotal interest.

To our modern way of thinking, a man ceases to be a true public servant if he lines his pockets with the spoils of office or if he places personal ambition above the common good.

But the modern state is not the only effective form of rule: organized crime and Judaism, for example, function quite well under different rules. [313

And in identical ways, Rome was governed by some rather ruthless characters who thought nothing of accepting bribes and skimming public funds because they had the power and the right to do so.

The honest public servant is a peculiarity of modern Western nations.

In Rome, every superior stole from his subordinates.

The same was true in the Turkish and Chinese empires, where baksheesh was the general rule.

And the modern crime family of Rothschild bankers, traced much of the source of their wealth to “Our friend baksheesh.” [314]

BLOODLINE: ROTHSCHILD – Library of Rickandria

Yet all of these corrupt and gangster-like empires proved capable of governing effectively for many centuries.

Similarly, the Roman army was quite a capable f ighting machine in spite of some rather curious customs.

“Soldiers traditionally bribed their officers for exemption from service, and nearly a quarter of the personnel of every regiment could be found idling about the countryside or even lounging around the barracks, provided their officer had received his kickback.

Soldiers got the money they needed from theft and banditry or by doing the chores of slaves.

If a soldier happened to be a little richer than the rest, his officer beat him and heaped duties upon him until he paid up and received dispensation.”

It is hard to believe that these are the words of Tacitus.

In the Roman empire, every public function was a racket; those in charge

“put the squeeze”

on their subordinates, and all together exploited the populace.

This was true during the period of Rome’s greatness as well as during the period of its decline.

Even the least important public positions, such as a clerk of the courts, were sold by their incumbents to aspiring candidates, because every position carried with it a guaranteed income in the form of bribes.

A new officeholder was supposed to pay a substantial gratuity to his superior.

In the Late Empire, even the highest dignitaries, appointed by the emperor, paid such a gratuity to the imperial treasury. [315]

Public officials paid themselves.

The troops that patrolled the countryside and were responsible for rural administration, forced the towns and villages under their jurisdiction to vote them gratuities.

Every official had his palm greased before taking the slightest action.

The notion that the government of a province was like a private economic enterprise, persisted as long as the Empire.

It was no secret.

Apart from extortion, moreover, the governor engaged in business.

In the first century BC, Italian traders took over the economy of the Greek Orient with the help of governors sent to the region, who profited from their complicity.

Roman governors backed Roman merchants because of corruption, not because of “economic imperialism.”

Cicero, after a year as governor of a province, was making the equivalent of a million dollars a year and prided himself on his scrupulousness: the sum was considered quite small.

Ancient bureaucracy was nothing like our bureaucracy.

For millennia sovereigns relied on racketeers known as “tax farmers” to extort taxes and control their subjects. [316]

Also keep this in mind:

The Roman Empire had no real police force.

Some imperial soldiers (such as the centurion Cornelius mentioned in the Bible) put down riots and tracked thieves, but they showed little concern about routine security.

Daily life in the Roman Empire resembled daily life in the wild and wooly American West.

There were no police in the streets, no deputies in the countryside, no public prosecutor.

Every man had to defend himself and mete out his own justice, and the only practical solution for the powerless and the not-so-powerful was to place themselves under the protection of a strong patron.

But who would protect these clients from their patrons, and these patrons from one another? 

• Sequestrations
• usurpations
• private prisons

for debtors were commonplace.

Cities lived in fear of local and regional tyrants, sometimes well enough ensconced to defy even so powerful a personage as the provincial governor.

A powerful man did not hesitate to seize the property of one of his poorer neighbors, or even, riding at the head of an army of henchmen and slaves, to attack the “ranch” of another petty potentate.

What could be done against such depredations?

The chance of obtaining justice depended on the good will of a busy provincial governor, who for reasons of state was obliged to go easy on powerful landlords and who in any case would have been tied to them by bonds of friendship, common interest and “gifts.”

His justice, if he chose to mete it out, would have been an episode in inter-familial warfare, an attempt to shift the balance of power among rival clans.

In addition to ordinary violence there was judicial violence.

The Romans are reputed to have been the inventors of law.

True, they wrote many remarkable lawbooks and took glory and pleasure from knowing and using the arcana of civil law.

But Roman Law was a matter of culture, a sport, and a subject of national pride.

It does not follow, however, that law actually governed daily life in Rome.

Legalism merely introduced into the chaos of Roman affairs an additional complication and weapon known by all lawyers: chicanery. [317]

Rome, whatever has been said about it, was a state that obeyed not laws but or that they could extort from petitioners of their “justice.”

The Roman empire, although it was certainly an empire in every sense of the word, was an indirect form of government, a federation of autonomous cities. [319]

In Roman Culture, Old Money was superior to New Money.

That is, commercial wealth belonged to the newly rich, while old wealth was based on land. 

Inherited wealth defended itself against upstart merchants. Land ownership was the basis of what the Romans considered to be true wealth.

In establishing wealth, the census took account only of property in land.

The taxes were paid based upon land ownership, not upon whatever gold and silver you had buried in a jar in the cellar.

A wealthy trader could raise his status in civil society only by acquiring land.

As long as cultivated land remained the principal form of wealth and agriculture the major source of income, to be wealthy meant to own land; it was the universal investment.

Commerce was only a means to an end, a way to become rich.

Commerce was a means of acquiring a desirable thing; land was the thing itself.

This system of values had one peculiar consequence: a man who was already wealthy and who owned land was not disdained as a thieving, swindling merchant if he decided to engage in trade.

The important thing was not to begin in trade. [320]

A high-class Roman who engaged in trade was not classed as a trader but as a high-class Roman, one of the most powerful of men.

To be sure, the law forbade Roman senators to engage in maritime commerce.

But senators violated the law without scruple, because what mattered was that one should not be in business.

Senators did business but were not in business so that appearances were preserved. [321]

And at the beginning the first Punic War, the law against senators engaging in business was revoked so that wealth in war could be realized by the very ones who authorized the war, not so very different from our modern senators who send the boys out to die while they invest in the Military-Industrial-Complex through stocks and bonds.

In antiquity:

• bakers
• butchers
• shoe merchants

were not poor shopkeepers but wealthy men.

A baker, for instance, was also a miller, who owned grain mills, and the slaves or animals needed to operate them.

With no refrigerators to keep meat, a butcher had to be wealthy enough to buy a whole steer, butcher it, cut it up and sell it within a single day or two.

A shoe merchant was not just a cobbler working in a stall, but a man who owned a number of slaves who both produced and sold footwear.

What about the four-fifths of the Roman population who actually worked for a living?

Theirs was a bitter struggle for survival. [322]

This hard-working crowd of:

• peasants
• fishermen
• shepherds

lived on the pittance allowed to them by the wealthy who hogged the wealth for themselves. 

This wealth, they controlled through bribery, social favors among the elite and strong-armed force of soldiers and mobs.

All the while, they paid low wages to the free man based upon the threat of no wages at all through the use of the free labor of slaves.

If the poor would not work for a slave’s wages, then the rich would have a slave do the poor man’s work and let the poor man starve to death or become a slave.

This is very much as we have in modern times where the Treasonous Class gain their wealth by swindling it from the poor through financial scams and cheap immigrant labor.

Any toil, no matter how pleasurable, merited payment.

One pagan aspect of amorous customs among the Romans was that the female partner in a high-society affair was paid for her trouble.

A matron who deceived her husband received a large sum or, in some cases, an annual income from her lover.

Some cads reclaimed these gifts when affairs were broken off, and on occasion the courts became involved.

The practice of accepting gifts from lovers was considered not prostitution but work for hire. 

The woman did not give herself because she was paid, the jurists held; she was rewarded for giving herself of her own free will.

She who loved best was most handsomely paid.

Roman women sought the wages of adultery as eagerly as men sought dowries. [323]

Into such a society, the Jews found ready profits from their prostitution rings while the Christians found eager seekers of spiritual bliss and the quieting of passions.

Usury was a part of daily life.

In Rome, commerce and moneylending were not left exclusively to professionals or to any one class of society.

The usurers of the time were not bankers but social notables and senators.

Every family head kept a strongbox which contained a calendar of due dates on loans along with notes at hand and cash awaiting borrowers.

Every man had his own strategy when it came to moneylending: some lent only a small fraction of their wealth, others a much larger proportion; some lent small sums to many borrowers, others large sums to a few borrowers.

Notes passed easily from creditor to creditor, either by formal dation or, more simply, by outright sale.

They served as a means of liquefying debt and as an object of speculation: an expandable supply of currency.

A man could bequeath his calendar of claims on his debtors and his capital intended for usury to one of his heirs. [324]

From the above, you can see that Rome was, from its earliest times, corrupt enough, venal enough, and such a field of usury and slavery that the Monsters of Babylon, holding the keys to the gold and silver hoards in the Eastern Temples, found it not difficult to:

• infiltrate
• seduce
• subvert

and bribe the Romans in every part of the Empire.

But the merchant-moneylenders of the ancient Near East were not interested in merely using their loot to do business with the Romans.

Not at all!

They were intent upon destroying Rome, enslaving its people and obtaining its wealth because that is what their demon god had promised all those who “walked in his ways,” who practiced the Sumerian Swindle and who followed the rules laid down in The Training Manual for Jewish Criminality and Sociopathy, known as the Hebrew Bible.

Going to war for silver and gold was an ancient method by which the kings of Mesopotamia had enriched themselves and conquered their rivals.

But the destruction of Rome was not planned because Rome had wealth that the bankers coveted as much as the fact that Rome had a bronze fiat money system that the bankers feared.

When Rome began using its fiat copper and bronze coins, this act totally disenfranchised the Eastern gold and silver hoards, and therefore much of the power of the merchant moneylenders of the Near Eastern temples.

This wouldn’t be a total disenfranchisement because their gold and silver could still be traded in Rome as a commodity.

But without its use as a type of money, gold would be limited to jewelry use and to Rome’s needs in foreign trade.

Thus, the ability of the Near Eastern temples and merchants to control or disrupt Rome’s financial structure was greatly reduced.

Instead of the money powers of Asia being in control, Rome controlled her own destiny. [325]

The growth of Rome from a small village in the 8th century BC, to creator and ruler of the World, resulted in large part from her bronze money.

In the Near East, only gold and silver were being coined as money, but Rome chose to base her money on bronze – a mixture of mainly copper, some tin and a bit of lead.

And not just commodity bronze, but monetized pieces called the Nummi, or Nomisma. [326]

This was not an acceptable situation to those circumcised and inbred bankers with the sidelocks dangling from their big ears.

For them, it was a dangerous idea for people to have the idea that money did not have to be made of out gold or silver.

It was a loss of their profits and their power and of their corrupting influence over the people and the governments enslaved to the gold.

If gold and silver lost its usefulness as a money, then its commodity value would also drop, losing them even more wealth through the price decreases of their inventory.

So, from the moment Rome began using True Money in the form of fiat bronze coins, the Jews treated Rome as a mortal enemy.

Because Rome was independent of the gold and silver of the Bankers of Babylon, she would have to be destroyed, and her money returned once again to commodity gold and silver.

With their international trade routes stretching all over the known world and their Kehillah and synagogue system of spies in every kingdom, the circumcised merchant moneylenders knew very well where each kingdom was weakest.

The Roman adoption of a national and exclusive bronze coinage produced a revolution in the monetary systems of all civilized nations; for as the Roman conquests spread, the gold and silver coinages of other countries disappeared and the Roman bronze coins with Roman weights and measures took their place with astonishing speed. [327]

No, this is not an example of “Gresham’s law;” of “bad” money driving “good” money out of circulation.

That process only occurs when two moneys that have the same legal value, contain different commodity values.

The Roman money system was superior to the use of gold and silver as long as it was regulated with quantities of coins balanced with the need for them in society.

Rome had precious metals and could probably have used them for money if she had wanted.

King Numa established a goldsmith’s guild as one of Rome’s early corporations, and later gold and silver bars were cast and stockpiled in her treasury.

But marked bronze coins were the only legal tender in 406 BC Pliny mentions 4th and 3rd century BC laws that forbade precious metals mining in Italy.

Rome purposely discouraged their production.

And why?

Because they had no use for gold or silver for money.

Foreign money of gold and silver circulated in Rome from the earliest period.

But these coins were not money in Rome; they were merely merchandise. [328]

They were not legal tender.

After 225 BC, the Roman bronze coinage system showed it usefulness, and it quickly spread throughout Italy. [329]

Under this bronze money, republican Rome grew powerful, staying independent from the Near Eastern powers and blocking the easy establishment of Eastern financial beachheads on Roman soil.

Under this bronze money, Rome developed and gave the world a system of law that is still consulted after 2300 years – a legal system separated from religion to a higher degree than had been seen before in antiquity.

Rome became an empire while its money system, for the first time in the history of the world, was composed of bronze coins.

Roman power only began to fade once it based its money on gold and silver coinage, a commodity metal that was controlled by the bankers and moneylenders of the ancient Near East, a commodity that was controlled by private interests.

When Rome issued its fiat bronze coins, the Roman government controlled its money and its own government.

But when it issued gold and silver coins, regardless of the official Roman insignias and logos, its money was controlled by those who owned the gold and silver bullion from which it was made – that is, the international speculators and merchant-moneylenders based in Mesopotamia and Persia with main offices in Jerusalem.

Rome’s numerary system lasted 200 years (from 385 BC), during which all that was admirable of Roman civilization saw its origin, its growth and its maturity.

Once this fiat system fell, Rome lost its liberties.

The state was to grow more powerful and dreaded as it became ruled more and more by the rich betraying the poor to the god of gold.

And Rome and its people were no longer one unified whole [330] but became a mixed-race and a mixed-ethnicity society controlled by the super-rich Treasonous Class.

The Roman money worked very well in Roman territory where its value was declared by law.

But when Rome sent her armies into Campania, her generals found themselves in contact with peoples who used silver coins.

In order to buy army equipment from them it was necessary to have silver money; and the soldiers must also have desired their pay in a currency accepted where they were billeted.

Silver was accordingly provided for use in Campania.

But these silver coinages minted by Rome had an important feature in common:

they had no marks of value but were bullion coins valued for their silver content.

As such they were not part of Rome’s regular monetary system but were for use with “foreigners”. [331]

It took until 266 BC for Rome to unify the Italian peninsula into a commonwealth – just in time to face Carthage’s growing power.

Carthage was a 9th century BC Phoenician colony on the north African coast, at present day Tunisia.

She was originally established as a way station for importing metals from the western Mediterranean back to Sidon and Tyre.

Her language was Canaanite Hebrew and as she developed toward empire, dominating parts of nearby Sicily, conflict with Rome became inevitable.

Carthage, like its Hebrew relatives in the Near East, used silver bullion shekels in its system of barter.

Carthage had occupied the African coast and took possession of the hinterland farming areas from the native population from 450 BC, when she instituted a system of slave plantation farming.

These Hebrew speaking Hyksos tradesmen were experts at the Sumerian Swindle and its related business scams such as slavery.

Carthage was a plutocracy.

The prestige of the Carthaginian (Hyksos-Hebrew) nobility was based above all on wealth.

As in modern America and Europe, the richest swine were the most admired and envied by the overwhelming numbers of poor people, and they had the most “prestige.”

The Phoenicians were:

• tradesmen
• moneylenders
• slavers

They made their profits in the western Mediterranean from a middleman’s trade and from finance – particularly by keeping the price of precious metals in the under-developed regions much lower than the price in the economically more advanced areas.

Like the Jews and the modern bankers who are ethnically related to them, Carthage was parasitic. [332]

Poor people fight in wars and rich people profit from wars.

So, during the First Punic War when the Roman Senate passed a law allowing senators to engage in business, the senators opened for themselves a profitable way to use the armies of Rome for their private enrichment.

Modern countries infested with Jews also allow their politicians to engage in private enterprise, thus allowing bribery and personal gain to color their reason.

But modern societies have more advanced ideas about “public service,” therefore modern politicians who engage in private business are actually traitors who should be either imprisoned or executed.

It was especially during the Second Punic War, with Hannibal and his elephants ravaging the countryside, that Rome was no longer able to insulate her domestic economy from silver coinage.

Carthage’s long-standing sophistication in manipulating gold and silver prices could thus translate into a military danger for Rome.

Rome demonetized and melted down her earlier coinages in about 212 BC, soon after the 2nd Punic war began.

Virtually all coins circulating in Italy and Sicily were replaced with the new silver Denarius.

It didn’t have to be thus, but the senate of Rome by this time was a treasonous body of corrupt legislators whose personal interests were more important to them than the good of their people.

Does this sound familiar to you modern Readers who have elected leaders whose best friends are:

• bankers
• financiers
• Jews

You elect them to office, but who do they actually serve?

You who elected them or the Monsters who bribe them?

Only when one understands that it was not the bronze metal that gave the money its value, but Rome’s legal commitment by the Laws of the State concerning them, does it become clear that she could demonetize the coins in the hands of the enemy or in towns wavering in their allegiance.

Thus, the old coinage could not be used to pay for military operations against her.

In order to obtain new coinage, friends and allies would either have to exchange the old for it within some time limit or perform vital services for Rome and be paid with the new coinage. 

This brings to mind Aristotle’s description of money:

“It has the name nomisma – because it exists not by nature, but by law (nomos) and it is in our power to change it and make it useless.”

The demonetization was a wartime measure to isolate Carthaginian power.

With Carthage’s experience in exploiting monetary weaknesses, Rome was forced to make a monetary response as well as a military one.

But in doing so under desperate pressure, she made grave monetary errors by falling into the automatic limitation trap of commodity bullion coins.

Unlike the previous silver bullion trade coins with no valuation marks but dependant upon their bullion weight alone, the Denarius, minted at 72 to the 12-ounce Roman pound of silver, was made a part of the Roman money system with a marked face value of ten bronze Asses.

This inextricably linked the existing bronze coinage with the fate of the silver denarius.

The word “money” comes from this coinage, which was minted at Rome’s temple of Juno Moneta. [333]

In 168 BC, Rome obtained 75 million denarii worth of silver spoil from her conquest of Macedon.

Significantly, the coining of Victoriates, Rome’s bullion silver coin, was stopped at this point, in favor of the denarius with its X-mark (Roman numeral 10) indicating its value in relation to the bronze coins.

It appears to have taken about 60 years for the Denarii to stabilize with their silver commodity value.

The bronze money could not escape the effects of unlimited silver coinage.

The production of bronze was temporarily stopped in 146 BC.

Very little bronze coinage was issued after 150 BC. [334]

Thus, the destabilization and the Fall of the Roman Empire actually began once they put the control of their money back into the hands of the parasitic bankers and Jews and other moneylenders who controlled the gold and silver bullion that was concentrated in the temples of the Near East.

Although the average Roman believed that now having silver coins in circulation was a good thing because silver allegedly has intrinsic “commodity value,” in fact it was a swindle by the moneylenders and bankers.

They could easily spend millions bribing senators, but they would recover billions in profits once their monopoly of bullion had been made into the “legal tender” of the empire.

While the brass and copper money could be minted in quantities depending on the requirements of society, the amount of silver and gold was intrinsically limited by Nature and strictly manipulated by the ownership of the bankers.

As a fiat money by law, brass coins could be controlled by the government, but silver and gold coins were controlled by those who controlled the silver and gold regardless of the will of the government.

And it was the bankers of Babylon and those further east in Parthia (Persia) who controlled the amount of silver and gold in circulation simply because the Sumerian Swindle and their international trade channels – transcending the boundaries of all countries – allowed them to suck it out of circulation in one country and either hoard it or add it to the circulation of another country at will and for their personal profit, regardless of the needs of society.

Thus, the bronze coins that had given Rome the boost up to greatness and upon which the common Roman needed for trade, was withdrawn from circulation and replaced with silver coins the amount of which the foreign moneylenders controlled.

The main effect of commoditizing Rome’s money system was to destroy the institution of a money based in law.

Over time, the Republic lost control over its money system to the foreign temple establishments and their associated private merchants, those who could control the commodity.

Always, the greedy interests of the private merchant-moneylenders take precedence over the common good.

But a society’s existence depends on protecting the common good.

A growing concentration of wealth and the privatization of power leads only to destructive results.

But destructive results were the goal of the circumcised bankers praying to “He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named” upon that blood-drenched altar of the god of armies because through the destruction and enslavement of Mankind, the moneylenders prosper.

Many must be impoverished and die so that a few may live in luxury.

Commodity money in Rome brought Rome’s monetary independence to an end.

Reduced to using a commodity weight to signify money, Rome – just like the failed empires of the ancient Near East from Sumerian to Assyria and Babylonia – went on a never-ending quest for precious metals.

Since the precious metals were rare to find and difficult to dig up, then Rome followed the course that every great empire in the ancient Near East had followed in attempting to feed the voracious interest rates of the moneylenders and the dwindling supplies of metals from which to mint more coins.

While stamping out coins of bullion for money, Rome filled its need for gold though the age-old Sumerian Swindle of stealing it from its neighbors.

Even worse, since these metals were concentrated in Near Eastern temple hoards, this handed power over to the East to assert its ancient demonic ways upon Rome.

When a country has a True Money system, the average man thrives.

But when the system is dishonest – whether a modern system like the United States Federal Reserve Banking Swindle or an ancient system like gold-and-silver-as-a-money – then the common man is enslaved and only the rich and ruthlessly greedy prosper.

NEW WORLD ORDER: GLOBAL BANKING: The FED – Federal Reserve – Library of Rickandria

The “commoditization” of Rome’s money system dramatically accelerated the emergence of a plutocracy – a ruling order based on wealth, since by definition, commodities tend to be in the hands of the wealthy.

At Rome in 264 BC, this money class was not yet in existence.

But it came into existence in the course of the First Carthaginian war, thanks to the lucrative contracts.

Inefficiencies, graft and bribery in the Roman city-state organizational form, made it easy for the unscrupulous to take advantage of the wartime emergency.

This new money class pushing themselves rapidly to acquire public prestige in an ancient society, needed the enhancement of symbols and titles.

This new business class bought its way into the Equestrian Order, formally composed of 1800 members.

Thus, by the date of the Second Punic war, there were already significant accumulations of capital in the hands, not only of the Roman “Establishment,” but also of the non-Senatorial business class.

This capital may have been the fruits of profits made during the First Punic War, or it may have been the “ready cash” that every Jew in Rome had access to through the Temple treasury of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop.

Whatever its origin was, its existence is proved by the methods of financing of the enormous costs of the second war.

Contractors had sufficient reserves of bullion coins to make deliveries to the Roman Government on credit from 215 BC onwards.

No doubt some of the loans of money and gold jewelry were made in a patriotic spirit, but the overall picture is of a plutocratic class promoting its interests at the expense of Roman society, the rich stealing from the poor, just as it has always been.

For although Rome was hurting financially, the loans were being repaid even before the war was over.

Then immediately upon defeating Hannibal, there was a political thrust to start a new war with Macedon.

Apparently, those benefiting from warfare didn’t want any interruption to their profiteering. 

The move was at first rejected.

But a year later in 200 BC a major war was started with Macedon which lasted till 168 BC, giving no breathing space to Rome’s citizen farmer/soldiers.

Does this system sound familiar to you Readers in modern times?

Of constant wars being fought, with constant demands for more wars by a media and a political system owned solely by the Treasonous Class – the:

• bankers
• financiers
• industrialists

– who never go to war, themselves, but send the People to do the fighting and dying while they “patriotically” stay behind and count their profits and exercise their circumcised dongs? 

The new wealth, amassed through monetary mischief and war contracts, soon entrenched itself into ownership of large plantations, converting the fleeting monetary liquidity into permanent land holdings.

In the same way, modern merchant-moneylenders buy up huge tracts of land and enormous offices and factories with the profits they make by sending their fellow citizens out to die and be maimed in battle. 

They wouldn’t be so keen for profits in warfare if they had to risk their pampered lives in combat, themselves.

As the Roman farmer-soldiers shipped out, the wealthy who were profiting from the wars bought up their farms.

This was the same Sumerian Swindle developed by the merchant-moneylenders in ancient Babylonia.

Italian agriculture, which had consisted mainly of small peasant holdings, soon became a mixed system of large-scale migratory herding between lowland and more mountainous regions, combined with large-scale, capital-intensive plantation farming.

Both the newly wealthy capitalists and the old money aristocracy invested in these activities, which were operated with the slave labor that became available in large numbers from warfare. 

Between 264 and 146 BC, the number of new slaves available can be estimated at over 300,000. Big money bought big acreages.

This left the ordinary citizen farmer unable to compete with the cheaper products of the slave system.

“The new Italy was a paradise for fruit trees and for profiteers and a comfortable berth for oxen, but it was a purgatory for evicted peasants and a hell for imported slaves,” wrote Toynbee.

It was a young aristocrat Tiberius Gracchus, the friend and associate of a group of moderates who read Stoic philosophy, who had the courage and faith to attempt agrarian reforms which seemed to promise social and political amelioration.

Tiberius Gracchus was elected Tribune in 133 BC with the idea of enforcing the old Licinian law which limited the use of public lands to just so many herd animals per person and just so much acreage per person.

The law was being ignored as the wealthy gained control over the land.

Tiberius Gracchus sparked a movement which lasted 100 years, until Augustus’ reign.

Plutarch relayed Tiberius Gracchus’ words:

“The savage beasts in Italy, have their particular dens, their places of refuge; but the men who bear arms and expose their lives for the safety of their country have nothing more than the air and the sunlight, and having no houses or settlements of their own, must wander from place to place with their wives and children.

They fight and are slain to maintain the luxury and wealth of other men.

They are called the masters of the World but have not one foot of ground which they can call their own.”

Does this sound familiar to you modern people, who go to war while the bankers and financiers (who are exempted from military duty) count the profits and then hire you for a slave’s wages upon your return from combat or repossess your home if you are killed?

In 133 BC, Tiberius Gracchus passed a law to take back the illegally occupied lands and distribute them to landless Romans.

The rich landowners bribed the Roman Senators and Tiberius Gracchus was murdered within the year at the instigation of the Senate.

The greed of the Treasonous Class is not bounded even with the murder of those who stand in the way of their profits.

But public pressure continued, and ten years later his brother, Gaius Gracchus, was elected Tribune to carry the program forward.

Once again, the Treasonous Class plotted for his removal.

He was killed in 121 BC in a riot.

The Gracchan Revolt had only limited success, and the process of concentration of land ownership soon resumed. [335]

Gracchi brothers – Wikipedia

The wealthy can afford to hire:

• politicians
• mercenaries
• gangsters

to protect their wealth, but the common man has only his vote, his own fists and his sword as his only defense.

(And what do you do then, O Modern Citizen, when the Treasonous Class swindles your vote with electronic voting machines and takes away your f firearms?

You then become enslaved to the criminals posing as your “superiors.”)

As the merchant-moneylenders of Rome imported slaves and cheap labor, Julius Caesar understood that Italy’s free peoples and native stock had to be saved if the heart of the Empire was to be sound.

But he was already in the clutches of the moneylenders.

He pretended to be patriotic to the free citizens while protecting the wealthy slave owners in declaring that at least a third of the laborers employed on the ranches of Italy had to be free citizens.

This is the first effort at Rome to check the spread of both slavery [336] and illegal aliens.

It shows how, at that time, over two thirds of the work force were foreigners.

Solving social problems is not possible when the money system upon which all of society depends is, itself, corrupt.

The honesty and success of the Roman bronze fiat coins was destroyed by the Caesars and the eastern temples which established a de facto gold standard throughout the Empire in 45 BC.

Oh, yes!

The Jews really loved Julius Caesar for handing them the control of the Roman Empire!

Gold coins didn’t completely replace silver and bronze as the circulating money, but all large sums became expressed in gold, and the relative value of gold against silver, Caesar raised by one-third.

This major destruction of Roman power was centered on Rome’s gold coin, the Aurei, which had weighed 168 grains and was set at a value ratio of 9 silver for 1 gold.

Caesar, in several steps, quickly reduced the Aurei to 125 grains of gold.

This brought the Roman ratio to 12 silvers for 1 gold where it remained for nearly 1,300 years, until the downfall of the Roman/Byzantine Empire in 1204 AD.

And in all of that time, the Gold-Silver Exchange Mechanism which was controlled by the Jews and their wealthy allies, was draining silver (the common man’s money) away to India and bringing back gold (the international moneylender’s money).

It is important to observe that the gold/silver ratio was set by government decree, not by market forces.

Gold, the main holding of the eastern temples from time immemorial, became empowered as money throughout the Roman Empire.

Moreover, by raising the ratio to 12 to 1 (based on the 12-ounce Roman pound), Caesar arbitrarily increased the temple gold’s value in relation to silver and bronze, the more commonly used coinage.

By making all coinage valued in respect to gold, Julius Caesar gave to the Jews power over the money of Rome since the Jews controlled the gold upon which all of the Roman coinages were valued.

Oh, how the Jews wept for him after he was assassinated! Julius Caesar in his campaigns had sought to control the important gold producing regions of the Empire, thereby increasing Rome’s supplies of gold.

Shifting to a gold standard probably worked to his personal advantage and may have been a matter of necessity for him as he was deeply in debt.

Part of his debt to the moneylenders would have been paid off by accepting their rich bribes to make this monetary change for the whole Empire, a change that profited themselves the most.

Caesar’s change to the gold standard put Rome into the corrosive power of the Monsters of Babylon.

It was the Jews and their associated moneylenders who controlled the gold and silver of the Near East and India.

And so, from the time of Julius Caesar onward, it was the Jews who determined the course of Roman history.

By now you should understand the Roman People and the monetary underpinnings of Rome.

So, now let’s step back a few centuries to see how the Monsters of Babylon were doing before the Romans arrived in Palestine.

After Alexander’s death in 323 BC, his generals fought over his conquered territory.

The Seleucids took the eastern portion and the Ptolemies took Egypt and the Western portion.

They continued to fight over these territories through 168 BC when the Maccabean Revolt expelled the Greek Seleucids from Palestine.

It was at about this time that the Book of Daniel was written.

This forgery emphasized the supernatural power that the Jews would have as long as they followed the Contract of the Hebrew Bible and – Abracadabra! – the deluded Jews led by the Maccabees went crazy and fought off the Syrian Greeks.

From that time, however, the Maccabean Jews had to contend with the power of the Ptolemies of Egypt and the growing Roman influence.

For that, they had plenty of help from the international Jews who were already worming their way into:

• Egyptian
• Roman
• Greek

society as well as from the Persian Jews in Parthia and Babylonia.

As an international conspiracy of circumcised crooks, the wealth and power of organized Jewry was always kept carefully concealed from all non-Jews in the same way that all criminal organizations are kept concealed – under pain of death.

In Persia, the conquering armies of Alexander had found communities of Jews already doing business there as well as in Babylonia.

They had moved into Persia as early as 587 BC when Nebuchadnezzar had deported them from Judah.

Even after Cyrus had allowed them to return to Jerusalem, most of them decided to remain permanently in Babylonia and Mesopotamia where they formed the nucleus of what eventually became one of the largest and most important of the communities of the Diaspora (the “Spores-that-Die-Ya”).

During the Roman period, these were the Jews of Parthia.

Parthians – BiblePortal Wikipedia

Likewise, with the Persian annexation of Egypt under Cambyses II in 525 BC, more Jews had flooded into that unhappy country to take advantage of the wrecked economy and to secure for themselves administrative positions as the “loyal” Jews of the Persians.

Cambyses II (Old Persian: 𐎣𐎲𐎢𐎪𐎡𐎹, romanized: Kaᵐbūjiya) was the second King of Kings of the Achaemenid Empire from 530 to 522 BC. He was the son and successor of Cyrus the Great (r. 550 – 530 BC) and his mother was Cassandane. His relatively brief reign was marked by his conquests in North Africa, notably Egypt, which he conquered after his victory over the Egyptian pharaoh Psamtik III (r. 526–525 BC) at the battle of Pelusium in 525 BC. After having established himself in Egypt, he expanded the empire’s holdings in Africa, including the conquest of Cyrenaica. In the spring of 522 BC, Cambyses hurriedly left Egypt to deal with a rebellion in Persia.

But the biggest influx of Jews into Egypt began with the foundation of Alexandria and continued under the Ptolemies.

By the first century AD, the Jews in Egypt could be numbered as a million, a million Jews swindling both Greeks and Egyptians; and all of them connected through the synagogue and Kehillah system to all other Jews between Rome and India.

Cyrenaica was another popular center of Jewish settlement from the early third century BC.

Believing in the “Jewish Loyalty” with which the Jews had greeted him, Ptolemy sent “loyal” Jewish colonists to secure Cyrene and other Libyan cities, and as Cyrenaica remained under Ptolemaic rule until it was bequeathed to Rome in 96 BC, Jewish immigration from Egypt continued.

Combining their quickly multiplying promiscuousness with international immigration of their numerous relatives, Jews formed a significant proportion of the population of the city of Cyrene by the early first century BC. [337]

And so, by this time, the Jews were spread out all over the Mediterranean Basin, having entered the coastal towns of Southern Gaul as early as 200 BC.

The eastern part of Alexander’s former empire was the Seleucid burden.

In 308–303 BC, Seleucus the First campaigned in the Indus valley against Chandragupta, eventually yielding to him Arachosia and Gedrosia in exchange for 300 elephants.

Chandragupta Maurya[d] (reigned c. 320 BCE – c. 298 BCE) was the founder and the first emperor of the Maurya Empire, based in Magadha (present-day Bihar) in the Indian subcontinent.

In 247 BC, the less Hellenized Parthia seized independence under Arsaces and Tiridates.

Arsaces I (/ˈɑːrsəsiːz/; from Ancient Greek: Ἀρσάκης; in Parthian: 𐭀𐭓𐭔𐭊 Aršak) was the first king of Parthia, ruling from 247 BC to 217 BC, as well as the founder and eponym of the Arsacid dynasty of Parthia.

Parthia now controlled overland trade with India and by 87 BC were welcoming ambassadors from China.

The known world was getting smaller.

Antiochus IV’s over-anxiety to secure Judaea as a buffer towards Egypt was probably a major factor in his reaction to the Maccabean rebellion. [338]

Antiochus IV Epiphanes (c. 215 BC–November/December 164 BC) was king of the Seleucid Empire from 175 BC until his death in 164 BC. Notable events during Antiochus’ reign include his near conquest of Ptolemaic Egypt, his persecution of the Jews of Judea and Samaria, and the rebellion of the Jewish Maccabees.

The Hellenism of the Greeks had been exerting an increasing influence on the Jews ever since Palestine came under Seleucid rule.

Hellenism had found favor with a considerable number of them, mainly members of the wealthy aristocracy.

During the reign of Antiochus IV Epiphanes, the Hellenizing party became dominant, securing control of the High Priesthood in 175 BC and carrying through a political reform which converted Jerusalem into a city of the Greek type with its essential features of a gymnasium. 

The Temple-cult and the religious institutions of Judaism, though theoretically inviolate, were inevitably affected indirectly as many Jews could see for themselves the superiority of the Greeks in both mental acuity and physical prowess.

Opposition from the:

• scrofulous
• bearded
• masturbating

Orthodox Jews to these developments led to Jewish riots and provoked Antiochus to replace voluntary by compulsory Hellenization.

In 167 BC, he outdid even the most extreme Hellenizers by dedicating Zerubbabel’s Temple (Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop) in Jerusalem to Olympian Zeus and attempting to suppress Judaism entirely by prohibiting the Jews from maiming their babies and their slaves with circumcision and prohibiting them from studying the Biggest Lie Ever Told, the Hebrew Bible.

To ensure Jewish submission to the changes, Antiochus built and garrisoned a new citadel, the Acra, which dominated the Temple. [339]

The effects of Hellenism were difficult for the rabbis to deny.

Civilization benefited from the Greek methods of logic, something that the rabbis could not contend with since there was nothing logical about their deceitful Laws of Moses and its variety of stupidities, a system which was based on nothing other than self-serving priests inventing regulations for keeping themselves well-supplied with roasted goats and silver offerings.

The sickly Jewish students humping up and down over the goat-skin scrolls of the Torah as they repeated and memorized by rote the lies written therein, could not compare with the well-muscled and healthy Greek youths who learned to use their intelligence to solve problems in arithmetic and geometry, to logically discuss problems of philosophy, to hone their cleverness with rhetoric, and to exercise in gymnastics and wrestling.

The scruffy Jews had nothing to compare with such perfection.

The Greeks actually bathed with soap and hot water.

To the rabbis and priests of:

“He-Who-Must Not-Be-Named,”

this was an abomination.

It was the tradition of the Jews not to make things actually clean but, rather, to make things ritually clean – that is, “clean” as defined by the Laws of Moses and the fishy-breathed rabbis scratching at their lice.

Because the lies of the Torah claimed that the Jews were the Children of God, to the Jews that meant that they were eternally perfect no matter how filthy they actually were.

The Jews were led by priests whose slaughterhouse, which they called a Temple, was thick with the putrid odor of rotting meat and decomposing blood.

To keep from gagging during prayers, the priests filled the fly-swarming air with the fumes of burning tree sap imported from Arabia, using their own special fumigant of myrrh and cinnamon.

This magically made the foul stench “purified and clean” by Jewish standards.

While batting away the swarming flies, the Jewish priests washed the blood of the goats and sheep and the smell of goat and sheep entrails and feces out of their “holy” vestments by first soaking them in three-day old urine. (Babylonian Talmud, Nidah 61b-62a)

That made them ritually “clean” by Jewish law.

But being actually clean by bathing with soap and water, was foreign concept to the filthy Jews.

In later centuries, when Marcus Aurelius was travelling through Palestine to Egypt, he was frequently exasperated by the Jews, who were malodorous and riotous and “very imperfect ablutioners.” [340]

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus (/ɔːˈriːliəs/ or-EE-lee-əs; Latin: [ˈmaːrkʊs au̯ˈreːliʊs antoːˈniːnʊs]; 26 April 121 – 17 March 180) was Roman emperor from 161 to 180 and a Stoic philosopher. He was a member of the Nerva–Antonine dynasty, the last of the rulers later known as the Five Good Emperors and the last emperor of the Pax Romana, an age of relative peace, calm, and stability for the Roman Empire lasting from 27 BC to 180 AD. He served as Roman consul in 140, 145, and 161.

Modern apologists try to claim this as just another “anti-Semitic” slur by an ancient “bigot” who didn’t understand that the Jews must have been absolutely fragrant as flowers since being “clean” is so much a part of their so-called “religion.”

But these apologists misunderstand that the Jews were only ritually clean; they were not actually clean.

Such wild and unholy ideas as taking a bath, along with all of the other Greek challenges to rabbinic superstition, was a serious affront to the dictatorship of the rabbis over the Jews.

The rabbis had no logical defenses against the intellectually superior Greek Culture.

But they did have their Semitic technique of abracadabra.

The rabbis could tell lies that were so clever as to be immune from Greek logic and irrefutable by anyone living at that time.

So, the question arose among the scheming priests of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop of how to keep the Jews obeying them and not straying into the Greek world of logical thinking and good hygiene.

The “holy” rabbis had a traditional Jewish solution to such a problem – they lied.

The rabbis wrote the Book of Daniel and claimed that it was yet another ancient miracle of Jewish “scholarship.”

The rabbis wrote about yet another Super Jew named Daniel and his three friends,

• Shadrach
• Meshach
• Abednego

Of course, these were Super Jews, youths who prayed to the Yahweh-god, who ate only kosher foods blessed by the rabbis’ Splayed-Devil Claw Salute, and who were oh-so-smart and oh-so prescient as to be able to interpret dreams, and oh so-holy that lions refused to eat them, and oh-so-fire proof that flames would not burn them as they prayed to the mighty

“He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named.”

And after vanquishing their enemies through their holiness, they gained immortal Jewish wonderfulness.

The Book of Daniel was propaganda for creating a fanatic zeal among the ignorant Jews to whom it was read with pious melodrama.

The priests who wrote it knew it was a lie.

None of the characters in the book had ever existed in history.

But in the Second Century BC, with the archives and ancient cities buried under tons of rubble and no trace of such earlier times being available for actual scholarly inspection, the lies of the Jewish priests could not be refuted by Greek philosophy or logic.

The famous “Word of the Jews” could stand up against Greek reason simply because the actual facts were unavailable to prove that the “word of the Jews” were nothing but lies.

Such proof of Jewish lies would have to wait another 2,100 years for modern archaeology to develop.

Meanwhile, during all of that time, the lies of the Jews corroded entire civilizations.

Super-animated by the lies of the Hebrew Bible being amplified in the fantasies of the Book of Daniel, the Jews went crazier than usual and rebelled against the Greeks.

With the Book of Daniel claiming that the Jews would have the supernatural powers of “He Who-Must-Not-Be-Named” fighting for them, the Maccabees revolted against the Seleucid Greeks with a ferocity born simply out of fanatic belief in the hoaxes read to them by the rabbis.

This would be a recurring theme throughout the following 2,000 years of history, people committing all manner of crimes and warfare under the demonic delusions of the Hebrew Bible and the Book of Daniel.

To every Greek, it was obvious that there was a real difference between what the Jews claimed to be and what they practiced being.

The Jews claimed to be holier than angels, but they practiced every sort of disgusting and criminal vice.

They claimed to be “virtuous” but their:

• incest
• degenerate sexual proclivities
• dishonest criminality

and arrogant malice that they practiced against the non-Jews around them, could not be understood simply with Greek logic.

The infuriating thing for the Greeks was that they had no way to prove that the Jews were liars and deceivers.

They could see that that is what they were; and logic alone showed it.

But the solid proofs had been buried under the rubble of the destroyed civilizations pulverized by the practitioners of the Sumerian Swindle.

And what few proofs that had survived, were then purposely destroyed by the rabbis as a part of the Jewish system of literary destruction and plagiarism.

It was a basic element of the rabbis to burn and tear up anything that reflected poorly upon the fake “prestige” and phony “high morality” that they had constructed for themselves out of falsehood.

To stand alone as the sole representative of “He Who-Must-Not-Be-Named,” the rabbis taught that all religions, all non-Jewish teachings, all priests of other religions and all non-Jewish religious sanctuaries must be destroyed.

Then, and only then, when no one could offer any other choice, Judaism would shine forth like a bioluminescent mushroom in the dark as the greatest of all religions simply through the fact that the Jews had murdered and destroyed all competition.

Belief in “He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named” would then result in an unending line of depositors and sin offerings from the entire world of Mankind whose gods and temples had been destroyed by the Jews, leaving only Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop in Jerusalem to collect the donations.

Judaism is like the swine who trampled and ate the kittens and puppies so that its own piglets could serve as pets.

But since archaeology had not yet been developed, the Greeks had only their own eyes to see and ears to hear and mind to reason.

And all of Greek observations and logic told them that the Jews were liars. 

But since the Jews kept their weirdest teachings and really, really big lies well concealed behind the Tradition of the Elders — the Oral Law that they only taught to each other – the Greeks really didn’t know how extraordinarily pathological the lying Jews really were (and are).

But one thing was certain, the real power of Judaism was not found in God, it was found in their lies, and their wealth.

Jewish wealth had always been centered in Babylonia and had migrated to Persia.

The Persians of Parthia were under attack by the Greek Selucids.

So, what better way to help the Jews of Parthia than by weakening Greek military power against Persia with a rebellion in Palestine to draw Greek armies away?

Once again, understand that the center of Judaism had never been Jerusalem but, rather, wherever the greatest plexus of commerce and moneylending was centered.

At that time, it was in Persia and Egypt.

And all of it was connected through the Kehillah spy network.

The Maccabean Rebellion (168 BC) began with the forgery of the Book of Daniel.

The Book of Daniel was a masterpiece of Jewish deceit.

It offered everything that any wannabe Super Jew could desire – praise of his Jewishness, honor for his cleverness in making up stuff about someone else’s dreams, kosher food with the blood squeezed out, limitless wealth, power over other people, and complete immunity from lion bites.

It was all written for the wannabee-super-Jew yeshiva student as well as for the dottering old reprobate with Like all of the other books of the Hebrew Bible, the Book of Daniel is totally fictional.

The lying Jewish priests rolled their eyes to heaven and solemnly claimed it to be an ancient history about an ancient Persian king and his famous Super Jew.

“And Oy!

Such a Jew!

Your dear mother should have such a child!”

The scheming rabbis were confident that the stupid Jews believed all of their other lies in the Hebrew Bible, so why not this one, too?

Fired with the fearlessness of those brave and holy Jews whom lions won’t eat (like Daniel) or those mighty, kosher Jews whom fire won’t burn (like Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego), the Jews of Palestine rose up against Seleucid rule, killed as many Greeks as they could and then settled down into an ignorant life of enslavement to the Mosaic Law.

With everybody murdered except themselves, free from Hellenism at last, the Jews could now enjoy their Judaism of ritual “cleanliness” by washing their hands but not their bodies.

And they could continue their ancient, holy, Jewish customs of making something ritually “clean” by spitting on it. (Babylonian Talmud, Nidah 61b-62a)

Without the Greeks to sneer at them, the Jewish women could continue to offer up their menstrual rags for the rabbis to sniff. (Babylonian Talmud, Nidah 20b)

And of course, rabbis and yeshiva students alike could tie leather boxes to their heads and hump up and down like copulating dogs while reading the lies in the Hebrew Bible.

And, of course, eating a cheeseburger with a vanilla milkshake, was a guaranteed death penalty by stoning.

Who needs Greek logic when you can have the blessings of Judaism to rule your life?

Yes, the Greeks found the Jews to be very weird, indeed.

And the Jews, believing themselves to be the Chosen Ones of God, resented people who did not give them the “prestige” and respect that they demanded for their grandiose selves.

The Jews hated the Greeks who did not reverently step backward with bowed head or look upon them with awe when the Holy Chosen Ones of God walked by.

The more the Jews arrogantly and disdainfully treated the people around them as goyim (non-Jewish, lowly insects, stupid cattle), the more the people around them hated the Jews.

And with their Semitic tradition of lex talionis, this hatred was amplified as the Jews practiced their revenge and hatred against the people who failed to praise them enough.

Like filthy water circling around a toilet drain, the hatred and malice of the Jews sucked them into darkness.

Hatred and malice are a powerful and negative spiritual force.

Hatred is more easily engendered in the human heart than is love because it is a primal survival emotion that creates a will to strike out against and destroy the target of this emotion.

Love, too, is a survival emotion but of a positive nature, creating harmony and civilization.

Because hatred and malice is more easily created than is love, hatred and malice are the first goals of political leaders in creating warfare and the will to fight.

And for a “religion” invented and designed by Babylonian bankers and merchants who were hiding their loot in a Temple treasury, everything revolved around protecting and increasing their hoard while directing the hatred of the Jews against any threats to their wealth.

Hellenism was a double threat to the Monsters of Babylon.

So, they tried to destroy it at every level.

It challenged the blind obedience and mindless acceptance of their lies so carefully cobbled together in the Hebrew Bible.

Greek logic threatened their Babylonian money system built upon the ownership of gold and silver bullion.

The Greek idea was that money is a creation of the government to be used for free by the people and not something that should be controlled by the individual bankers or private goldsmiths for their own selfish profit.

For this reason, and not for any alleged and totally fake “higher morality,” was the economic and political machinery of Judaism directed by the rabbis toward the destruction of Greek thought and Greek Culture.

The rabbis weren’t smarter than the Greeks but they could put them under the ban as being “evil” and an “anathema” to their mighty god of:

• blood
• gold
• genocide

Thus, the Monsters of Babylon were secretly at war with all countries that did not depend upon the gold and silver bullion monopoly that they and their crime families had carefully built up over nearly 3,000 years.

The societies that were enslaved to their gold and silver monopoly were those of the

• Near East
• Babylonia
• Persia

and India.

The societies that had evaded their gold and silver money with fiat True Money were the Greeks and Romans.

So, the Greeks and Romans would have to be destroyed through warfare or else their fiat money system subverted to the gold standard.

But to forever hide the real intent of these ancient blood-sucking parasites who stood behind the thrones of the Eastern kings, the target of their machinations could never be declared to be money systems, themselves, because that would expose the actual perpetrators of these secretly manipulated wars.

The target was declared to be something that could be blamed entirely on God.

Hellenism was declared to be a pagan “abomination” that the “Holy One of Israel” and his minions of smelly Jews all hated.

RELIGION: PAGANISM – Library of Rickandria

With the wet ink still dripping from the parchment scrolls of the Book of Daniel, the priests declared this “ancient prophet” to be among their holy books which they added to all of the other frauds and forgeries of the Hebrew Bible.

And thus, the Maccabean Revolt was launched to rid the Jews of the “oppression” of a Greek Culture which did not give the control of all wealth into the clutches of the Jews.

The Ptolemaic Period in Egypt (323–30 BC) began for the first time, a control of the Gold-Silver Exchange Mechanism by a Mediterranean-based culture other than by the Semites of the Near East.

The merchant moneylenders of the Near East hated this change in their fortunes.

By controlling the trade routes up the Nile and through the Red Sea and then onward to India, the Greeks were able to siphon silver from the West, ship it to Indian and exchange it for twice as much gold.

With Alexander’s untimely death, power over the mechanism went to one of his aides, Ptolemy.

To operate the mechanism from Egypt required a high degree of insulation from neighboring states.

This “insulation” was necessary because the Mechanism only works when the two areas being siphoned are strictly separated so that only the wealthy merchants have access to the controlled bullion market.

The distance between India and the ancient Near East and Europe provided such insulation in earlier times.

But to work the Mechanism from Egypt required impervious borders backed by military.

From the outset, the Ptolemies pursued their own monetary policy, regardless of what happened in this regard in the rest of the world.

They separated themselves and their kingdom from the rest of the Hellenized world.

The Ptolemies derived an enormous reserve of gold from the Arabian caravan trade.

Imports from the Ptolemies into Europe were paid for in silver, of which the Ptolemies had such a pressing need.

There was a serious inflation in the value of silver in Egypt in the 2nd and 1st centuries BC, an effect indicated by the siphoning of silver to the East.

Since traders and merchants could arbitrage or translate the existence of the gold/silver dichotomy into the values of other commodities, some control over those merchants was necessary through:

• customs duties
• taxes
• monopoly controls

The Ptolemies maintained effective customs barriers on merchandise which had to be sold to them at officially fixed prices.

Finally, what if a merchant carried goods east to India and returned with gold, presumably twice as much gold as the goods were worth in Egypt?

Therefore, imported foreign coins were required to be reminted at the Ptolemaic western ratio, of 12.5 to 1. [341]

Merely by controlling its own borders and customs barriers, the Greek Ptolemies of Egypt could double the wealth of every trade by trading its silver to India either through direct exchange or through wholesale purchases; and then trade its Indian gold for twice as much European silver and then once again ship that silver to India.

This tended to siphon silver out of Europe and create poverty for the common man since only gold coins and the fiat coins of Greece and Rome were used in those countries.

But the Monsters of Babylon had already decided to destroy both Greece and Rome along with their fiat money systems; and they could do this economically.

Destroy the economy, impoverish the people, and the country is destroyed, all without armies, although armies, too, had their uses.

The little bean counters and grubby accountants and the bankers and financiers, all became the betrayers of nations through their greedy and perfidious scheming.

But among all of these Treasonous Class, only the Jewish financiers added into the mix a special gall of their malice and hatred for all of Mankind.

While the pagan moneylenders were content with a profit, the Jewish moneylenders in all cases demanded both a profit and a “pound of flesh” in the form of some harm given to the pagans, some loss, some destruction in whatever manner they could arrange.

The Jews were hated because they deserved it.

The Greek Buddha, Epicurus (340-271 BC), was teaching at around this time, but few understood his ingenious message.

Epicurus (/ˌɛpɪˈkjʊərəs/, EH-pih-KURE-əs; Ancient Greek: Ἐπίκουρος Epikouros; 341–270 BC) was an ancient Greek philosopher and sage who founded Epicureanism, a highly influential school of philosophy.

The Greek language in those days after Alexander, was the language of all cultivated peoples from Europe to Persia when the whole world was profoundly Hellenized.

Even the Romans made no attempt to impose Latin on its Eastern provinces, for it was also deeply under the influence of that universally admired culture.

Thus, Greek remained the language of the Roman administration even in Rome, itself.

But the language spoken in Judea, throughout the Near East and Persia was Aramaic, a Semitic tongue similar to Hebrew.

This was the language of the Babylonian Empire and the international lingua franca of:

• business
• trade
• finance

[342]

While the civilized world spoke Greek, the merchant-moneylenders of:

• Persia
• Babylonia
• Jerusalem

spoke and wrote in Aramaic.

In India, the Sumerian Swindle was being ruthlessly applied by the various petty kings and Rajas.

Incessant warfare and the impoverishment of the people of India through silver coins and interest payments, were the very same methods of thievery and murder that were used in Mesopotamia for the sake of balancing the impossible-to-balance account books.

After understanding the enormous suffering that war inflicted on all sentient beings, the Indian emperor, Asoka (250 BC) became a Buddhist and spread peace and loving kindness to a people who had not known such things before.

Ashoka, also known as Asoka or Aśoka (/əˈʃoʊkə/ ə-SHOH-kə; Sanskrit: [ɐˈɕoːkɐ], IAST: Aśoka; c. 304 – 232 BCE), and popularly known as Ashoka the Great, was Emperor of Magadha[8] from c. 268 BCE until his death in 232 BCE, and the third ruler from the Mauryan dynasty. His empire covered a large part of the Indian subcontinent, stretching from present-day Afghanistan in the west to present-day Bangladesh in the east, with its capital at Pataliputra. A patron of Buddhism, he is credited with playing an important role in the spread of Buddhism across ancient Asia.

But in the West, the Monsters of Babylon demanded the utmost labor and profits for the tiniest of payments.

It wasn’t until the chances of making large fortunes across the Mediterranean in Africa, that the Roman Senators did what all of our modern politicians do, they voted in laws to benefit themselves even if it meant killing their own people.

It was the applied philosophy of the Treasonous Class:

“Many must suffer and die so that a few may live in luxury.”

In 219 BC, the Senators voted themselves something that a less corrupt Rome had previously denied them.

They passed a law that permitted men of senatorial rank to engage for the first time in overseas trade. [343]

They even formed syndicates to pool their personal resources.

Once they could personally profit in a war, the wealthy men of the Senate declared war on Carthage.

Rome had a standing army.

Roman soldiers each served a term of twenty-five years with low pay, long marches and gory battle.

They were extremely:

• well disciplined
• tough fighters
• patriotic

If they survived to retirement, they were allotted some land in a distant province to farm or starve, depending on how ambitious they were to avoid the latter.

Of course, if they were maimed in battle, they were simply mustered out to fend for themselves.

Punishments for insubordination, malingering or dereliction of duty (not to mention desertion or cowardice) were extremely harsh – certainly not a place for a pious Jew who preferred to avoid work once a week while counting the profits from his wartime investments.

Unlike Rome, Carthage relied on foreign mercenaries to form an army which could be paid off when it had served its purpose. [344]

At first, Carthage possessed more coined bullion money than Rome in 219 BC.

The Carthaginian shekel was standard as far east as Rhodes.

Because Roman fiat brass money was only legal tender within the Roman Empire, international Carthaginian economic power eclipsed that of Rome.

It was not that the brass fiat money of Rome was inferior, far from it, but with their control of the gold and silver bullion, the Carthaginians also had control of the commodity money of every country – as did their Semitic relatives, the moneylenders of Babylon.

Regardless of the various king’s images stamped on the various coins, when those coins were all made out of gold and silver, those who controlled the gold and silver also controlled the kings whose images were stamped on the coins.

Rome possessed greater natural resources than Carthage and toward the end of the Punic Wars her confiscation of precious metals gave her vastly more wealth.

In 157 BC, the Roman treasury held 16,810 pounds (7,625 kilos or 8.4 tons) of gold, and 22,070 pounds (10,010 kilos or 11 tons) of silver, with 61 million pieces of coined silver.

Very little of this had been produced by the mines of Italy.

According to Strabo – almost the only authority – the population of Carthaginian territory in Africa was under 700,000, while that of the peoples under the Roman imperium amounted to some 6,000,000. [345]

Strabo (/ˈstreɪboʊ/; Greek: Στράβων Strábōn; 64 or 63 BC – c. 24 AD) was an ancient Greek geographer who lived in Asia Minor during the transitional period of the Roman Republic into the Roman Empire. He is best known for his work Geographica, which presented a descriptive history of people and places from different regions of the world known during his lifetime. Additionally, Strabo authored historical works, but only fragments and quotations of these survive in the writings of other authors.

So, with such overwhelming depth of resources and manpower, Roman victory seemed certain to the slave dealers and peddlers who followed the Roman camp with empty carts to be loaded with spoil taken from the Carthaginians, as well as with chains to put on the captives. [346]

It was during this opportunity to profit from the pillage of Carthage, that the Jews first began to settle into the coastal towns of southern France (Gaul) around 200 BC.

This total amount of bullion in the treasury of Rome is noteworthy.

Compare this rather large amount of bullion in the treasury of the greatest super power of the ancient world to the amount that the apparently inconsequential, tiny, little, “poor and oppressed” minority of pious and “holy” moneylenders and “honest” and “self-effacing” little merchants had in their humble and inconsequential treasury in the Temple in Jerusalem, and you will see that it is easily comparable.

When Ezra and his minions of hairy-faced midgets pompously swaggered back to Jerusalem, they brought with them 3.7 tons of gold and 24 tons of silver.

So, the Jews had, in just the Temple alone, about half as much gold and more than twice as much silver as in the treasury of the entire Roman Empire.

Oh, such poor, oppressed Jews!

And even that was only a small amount that had been returned to them by Cyrus and donated as “chump change” from the wealthy Jews who had decided to attend to their businesses and remain in Babylonia.

Also, through the Gold/Silver Exchange Mechanism with India, their silver could be traded for twice as much gold.

This should give you an idea of the relative wealth of the entire empire of Rome at this time with what was contained in and controlled by Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop in Jerusalem with its carefully concealed bullion hoard and its dues-paying members scattered throughout:

• Europe
• North Africa
• Arabia
• the Middle East
• Persia

and India, all wearing shabby clothes and going about as if the weight of their “poverty” was just too much to bear – crying and whining when necessary or just for the pity it elicited among the kind-hearted goyim.

Once again, keep in mind that there were no burglar alarms on the banks and there was no police force in the cities.

So, keeping one’s treasures safe from thieves meant concealment and misdirection more than strong-arm guards and thick walls.

If they don’t know that it exists, how can they steal it?

If they don’t know where it is, how can they find it?

Even legions of guards could not protect those treasures from a king’s army, so misdirection and deceit were far more powerful (and cheaper) to a banker than armed guards.

“Oy, we Jews are so poor and oppressed!

It’s such a shame!

So, have pity on us for our shabby clothes and humble houses.

And forget about looking inside the holy vault or we will kill you.”

Once Carthage had been defeated, Rome began its eastward expansion toward the Parthians of Persia.

What the Romans were not aware of, however, was a Jewish Fifth Column that had been in Persia since the Jews had been deported there by Nebuchadnezzar in 598 BC.

The Jews had already been in Persia for more than 500 years when the Romans took over Palestine in 63 BC.

They were the “Loyal Jews” who served the Persian kings as advisors and finance ministers.

And Parthia followed the same advice that Persian kings since Darius had always followed:

Mint the coins in gold and silver and fight against Rome’s fiat bronze coins.

Scattered throughout the Hellenized world, all connected by the synagogue and Kehillah spy system and with Jews advising the Parthians and f financing their operations, the Selucid Greeks and the Roman successes against Parthia were never final.

Traveling between Parthia and Palestine were the “sacred envoys,” those holy and oh-so-pious rabbis carrying the Temple tax and letters of credit from the Jews of Parthia as well as Parthian Jewish greetings to the rabbis of:

• Rome
• Egypt
• Babylonia

along with military and commercial intelligence.

All were members of the Jewish Kehillah spy ring whose Ethnarch resided not in Jerusalem but in Persia!

The Jewish Ethnarch was head of state and king of the Jews in all but name.

He had the wealth and almost had the power of a king, but because the Persians would not tolerate another king living in their country, with typical Jewish name-changing, he was called the Ethnarch or leader of the Jews.

When the Seleucid Greek Antiochus III was crushed by the Romans at Thermopylae in 191 BC and again at Magnesia in Anatolia in 189 BC, he was forced to abandon territories, surrender his battle elephants and navy, and annually pay 15,000 talents to the Romans.

Antiochus III the Great (/ænˈtaɪəkəs/; Ancient Greek: Ἀντίοχος ὁ Μέγας, Antíokhos ho Mégas; c. 241 – 3 July 187 BC) was the sixth ruler of the Seleucid Empire, reigning from 223 to 187 BC.

But where would he find so much gold?

What a silly question!

In a temple, of course.

So, Antiochus launched an attack against the temple of Elam in southwest Iran.

But he lost his life in the campaign.

When Antiochus IV (175-163 BC) became king, he also tried but failed to storm the temple of Elam and was soon expelled from Persepolis after a successful uprising by the populace. [347]

And Oy Gevalt!

Another a coincidence!

The Jews of Palestine just happened to be rebelling, too!

Pulling his precious troops away from Persia where they were desperately needed.

During those times, the world was getting smaller through the organizing influence of civilization.

Link together the roads built under the Persian empire and those built by the Romans and you have a road network that stretched from Britain to Africa, from what is now Russia to France, from India to Spain. [348]

These were all-weather main roads usually paved with stone.

Ships were better designed to withstand the seas but were still very dependant upon the seasonal wind directions.

The most favorable period for the crossing from the Italian coast to Alexandria was in July-August, when the summer winds blew north northwest.

The fastest crossing reported from Sicily to Egypt was six days while the average was eighteen or nineteen days. [349]

Trade between Rome and Alexandria, which included all the products of the Far East in addition to grain and Egyptian papyrus, was extremely active.

Thus, the traveler arriving in Alexandria could be sure of quickly finding a boat to take him to Italy.

To gain time, military leaders or governors often took the same commercial boats used by private persons. [350]

In 142 BC, under Simon and until the arrival of the Romans, the Jews were free to develop their own independent state, which like everything else Jewish was based on lies.

Simon Thassi (Hebrew: שִׁמְעוֹן הַתַּסִּי‎ Šīməʿōn haTassī; died 135 BC) was the second son of Mattathias and thus a member of the Hasmonean family.

In fact, the Maccabees and Hasmonaeans had no hereditary high-priestly rights or any other hereditary rights in Judaism.

They just believed that they did because they followed the Laws of Moses.

And they had their circumcised penises to prove that they were as holy as a Jew can get.

Meanwhile, the Romans under Pompey had taken over Seleucid Syria.

Pompey left Hyrcanus as high priest. [351]

So that once again, the Jews found themselves under the non-Jewish rule of Rome, by people who were better than themselves.

Regardless of what the lying Jews claim, there was never a Jewish majority in Palestine.

Archaeology proves that the Hebrews never conquered Canaan as the Hebrew Bible claims.

Samaria had been demographically mixed since the fall of the Israelian monarchy, and the records from the Wadi Daliyeh cave in that area (late 4th Century BC) refer not only to Samaritans but also to:

• Idumaeans
• Arabs
• Moabites
• Phoenicians

and Babylonians.

The populations of the maritime cities were no less cosmopolitan, and their more permanent elements were derived from:

• Philistine
• Phoenician
• Greek

as well as Jewish communities. [352]

The Idumaeans, from whom Simon and the Hasmoneans were descended as well as the later king Herod, were all forcibly circumcised and Judaized.

The all-important “holy race” of Jews who Ezra and the prophets claimed were so wonderful, were not present among the Idumaeans.

The Idumaeans were viewed as foreigners by race and only dubious Jews by religion.

Herod the Great was later to be dubbed a “half-Jew,” a smear directed as much at his Idumaean father as at his Nabataean mother, and he regarded this as a sufficiently serious slur to get his court chronicler to falsify the story that his family was a prominent Jewish one from Babylonia which had returned to Palestine. [353]

This same sort of abracadabra would be used two thousand years later when the totally unrelated Khazar-Turkish-Ashkenazi Jews of Russia founded the modern state of Israel while deceiving the world with the claim that they also were surrounded by Abraham’s big, flaming asl.

CIVILIZATION: KHAZAR: The 13th Tribe – Library of Rickandria

By the time that the Romans annexed Palestine, the Jewish Kehillah system had connections through the synagogues to the entire civilized world.

Based on the intelligence from this communications and spy network and knowing that the Romans had more military power than the Greeks of either Seleucia or Ptolemaic Egypt, Simon and his Jews decided to betray the Greeks and offer their “Jewish Loyalty” to the Romans, instead.

In 141 BC, Simon the Hasmonean Ethnarch (head of state and king in all but name) expelled the Seleucidan garrison from the Acra; and in 140 BC he was confirmed to the High Priesthood and at the same time elected general of the army (of the God of Armies) by a national assembly [354] of rabbis.

Simon’s ambassadors then presented a golden shield to the Romans as a bribe while offering their “Jewish Loyalty” to Rome.

They secured the desired renewal of a treaty with Rome which issued injunctions by the Roman Empire to the peoples in the East not to attack the Jews themselves or to assist their attackers. 

Letters to this effect are said to have been sent to no less than five eastern rulers and to nearly twenty cities with large Diaspora (Spores-that-Die-Ya) communities in:

• Greece
• the Aegean islands
• Asia Minor
• Crete
• Cyprus

and Cyrene.

These were all places where the Jews were ruthlessly practicing the Sumerian Swindle, monopolizing markets and enslaving their debtors while pretending to be “holy.”

These were all places where the Jews were hated, not because of their weird “religion” but because they were such predatory assholes.

So, through the bribery of a solid gold shield, the Jews got the protection of Rome as early as 142 BC, a protection for all of the Jews in the entire Roman empire!

The Jews could still swindle the people around them, but now the might of Roman troops protected them from retribution. [355]

This was very upsetting to the Greeks (now under Roman rule) who had been putting up with these very arrogant and hypocritical swindlers for over two hundred years in both Egypt and Syria.

Syria inevitably attracted large numbers of Jewish settlers by its proximity to Palestine and its geographical bridge on the trade routes linking Mesopotamia and the Mediterranean.

The Jewish community in Antioch was established at the foundation of the city by Seleucus the First at the beginning of the third century.

The origins of the communities in the coastal cities of:

• Aradus
• Tyre
• Sidon
• Ptolemais
• Dora

and Ascalon, and in the inland cities of

• Apamea on the Orontes
• Damascus
• Gerasa
• Gadara
• Hippos

and Scythopolis, all attested in the first century AD, are not recorded, but some probably date from the period of Hasmonaean expansion, when Jews settled also in the coastal cities under their rule.

In Asia Minor the Jews settled thickly and early.

Josephus puts the foundation of the community in Ephesus (the largest in the area) and those in “the rest of Ionia” in the mid-third century; between 210 and 205 BC.

Because the Jews had betrayed the Persians and offered their “Jewish Loyalty” to the Greeks, to combat rebellion in Lydia and Phrygia, Antiochus III trusted them and transported two thousand Jewish families [~20,000 Jews] from Parthia and established them as military colonies in the fortresses and most important places in the troubled areas.

Therefore, the Jews from Rome’s greatest enemy in later years were already in place to betray Rome to the Parthians by the Second Century BC.

Jewish communities were found in:

• Sardis
• Halicarnassus
• Miletus
• Laodicea
• Apamea
• Pergamum
• Adramyttium

and Ancyra in the first century BC, and groups at:

• Pisidia
• Antioch
• Iconium

and Tarsus in southern Asia Minor in the following century.

• Crete
• Cyprus
• Rhodes

and some of the Aegean islands had Jewish settlers by the mid-second century BC, and there were substantial communities on:

• Crete
• Delos
• Cos

and Melos a century later.

For mainland Greece the evidence is scantier, but Philo speaks of Jews living on all parts of the country in his day and communities are recorded in Macedonia at that time. [356]

Philo of Alexandria (/ˈfaɪloʊ/; Ancient Greek: Φίλων, romanized: Phílōn; Hebrew: יְדִידְיָה, romanized: Yəḏīḏyāh; c. 20 BCE – c. 50 CE), also called Philō Judæus, was a Hellenistic Jewish philosopher who lived in Alexandria, in the Roman province of Egypt.

And so, you can see that the subversion of Western Culture began during these early times as the Monsters of Babylon were sprinkled like mold spores (the Spores that-Die-Ya) throughout the Mediterranean and Near East regions, from Gaul to Persia.

The center of Jewish power had never been Jerusalem.

The Temple was merely the focal point for the misdirection methods of the moneylenders where they could hide their crimes behind a façade of religion.

Escape from punishment was more easily accomplished when their larceny and murders could be blamed on a mighty god who forgave them for any crime other than breaking the Contract. 

The Temple never had more than ten percent of all Jewish wealth, and very much less than that, since it was always out on loan rather than on deposit.

All tithes supported huge numbers of:

• priests
• rabbis
• Levites

and their always huge families.

And all of the entire scam was financed by the international moneylenders and merchants who were protected by the Biggest Lie Ever Told.

The Temple ploy lead potential thieves or kings (often embodied in the same person) away from the actual source of all Jewish wealth – the international trade route plexus originally centered in Sumeria, then in Babylonia under Hammurabi, then in Assyria under various kings, then back to Babylonia under Nebuchadrezzar, then to Persia, then Egypt and then to Rome.

The center of economic power shifted with the times and the masses of voracious Jews followed, all the while sending their Temple taxes and tithes to Jerusalem to be redistributed as free loans or eaten up by the Temple Jews.

The profits were so high under this criminal racket that the Jews paid their tithes and Temple taxes gladly

And all the while proclaiming to the puzzled Gentiles that even though they were just poor Jews, barely making a living, that they still paid their Temple taxes out of “piety” and “religious duty.”

And so, the Monsters kept growing bigger, stashing their loot in bags of rags while whining and complaining about how poor they were and how hated they were by the Gentiles because they were the Chosen Ones of God.

The Jews were like street magicians and con artists who point one way as a misdirection while slipping the coin up their opposite sleeve.

Babylonia was the most prosperous center of trade for two thousand years, situated as it was between India and Europe and fructified by the Two Rivers.

Besides trade, its only natural resources were reliable grain crops and the manufacturing labor of its workers.

When king Cyrus was deceived by the moneylenders into letting their louse-infested relatives return to Jerusalem to rebuild Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop, only a few of the Jews actually returned.

The majority of them remained in Babylonia to direct and oversee their investments and businesses and land possessions.

This is clearly stated in the Hebrew Bible and verified through historical documents and archaeology.

Why would the Jews not want to go back to the “holy land,” the land “overflowing with milk and honey” where so many wonderful miracles allegedly had occurred?

Because that was just a Jewish lie, and they knew it.

The real money was to be made in Babylonia, but they could still benefit from membership in the Temple scam by following the Mosaic rules of Judaism, paying their tithe and refusing to do any work once a week.

In this way, all Jews worldwide could benefit from the:

• international trade monopolies
• moneylending
• military exemption

and commercial spy information that were the building blocks of Judaism.

By 115 BC, the Parthians of Iran had signed trade agreements with Han China.

Goods arriving to Ctesiphon were ferried across the Tigris to Seleucia on the western bank, moving between the vast trade routes of east and west.

With the Iranian plateau and Mesopotamia finally secure, Parthia was now in control of major overland trade routes linking India and Persia, and from there to the west.

With this control, the Persians and their “loyal Jews” who controlled the trade channels, could profit from the overland Gold-Silver Exchange Mechanism as well.

This Parthian trade with China was the beginnings of the “Silk Road” through Central Asia.

Persia became the intermediary of trade between the “East” (China) and the “West” (Rome).

Through this network, Rome exported a variety of:

• oils
• wines
• gold
• silver

and manufactured goods, while importing:

Indian:

• ivory
• steel

Chinese:

• perfumes
• spices
• silks

A king of Parthia cited by Chinese sources as “Manchu” is reported to have dispatched gifts to the Emperor of China, notably lions and ostriches.

From where else could the Chinese make a lion into one of their cultural totems other than from where lions originate, the Near East and Africa?

The Silk Route had a profound influence on Chinese culinary arts.

Parthia began to export to China a variety of culinary items employed in Iranian cuisine, such as: 

• onions
• cucumbers
• saffron

The Chinese introduced the apricot to Persia.

The Silk Route led to the rise of an economically prosperous empire, which soon attracted the martial attentions [357] of the financiers and moneylenders of Rome and the greedy senators and ambitious generals who controlled the Empire.

And indication of the vast wealth of the “poor, innocent” Jews during those times is found on the Greek island of Cos.

The earliest reference to the collection of the Temple tax by the Diaspora (Spores that-Die-Ya) comes from 88 BC, when Mithridates raided Cos and seized the money which Cleopatra III had deposited there for safety in 102 BC.

Cleopatra III (Ancient Greek: Κλεοπάτρα; c.160–101 BC) was a queen of Egypt. She ruled at first with her mother Cleopatra II and husband Ptolemy VIII from 142 to 131 BC and again from 127 to 116 BC. She then ruled with her sons Ptolemy IX and Ptolemy X from 116 to 101 BC.

This treasure included eight hundred talents (or 24,000 kilos or 26.5 tons) of gold belonging to the Jews.

The lying Pharisee Josephus in his incessant efforts to make the Jews appear in a good light, claims that this quantity was transferred there by the Jews of the province of Asia operate the Sumerian Swindle. for fear of Mithridates, who was then over-running the mainland.

He claims that the Jews’ only public funds were “God’s money,” that is, the Temple tax.

Of course, all Jewish money is “God’s money,” according to those who claim to be holy-beyond-description.

But in this case, the sum is surprisingly large, since the Temple tax was normally sent to Jerusalem annually and not accumulated locally for years. [358]

Even if you are to believe Josephus, this was obviously only a very small part of what the Jews in the province of Asia possessed – either as a percentage of their total wealth as a ten percent tithe and/or their yearly Temple tax of two silver shekels per Jew – the sum indicates that the Jews in just the province of Asia had a corporate wealth equal to or greater than any of the kingdoms in existence during those times, including Rome, itself.

Flavius Josephus (/dʒoʊˈsiːfəs/;[4] Ancient Greek: Ἰώσηπος, Iṓsēpos; c. AD 37 – c. 100), born Yosef ben Mattityahu[a] (Hebrew: יוֹסֵף בֵּן מַתִּתְיָהוּ), was a Roman–Jewish historian and military leader. Best known for writing The Jewish War, he was born in Jerusalem—then part of the Roman province of Judea—to a father of priestly descent and a mother who claimed Hasmonean royal ancestry.

But that is not all.

Josephus the Pharisee has been caught in countless lies and deceits by various historians.

He fails to mention that the island of Cos, being so close to the Near East, gave the island first access to imported silk thread where it was woven into garments in large factories by women slaves.

(Negro Readers please note that these were all white slaves.)

Cos was at the zenith of its prosperity at that time and was used by the Ptolemaic Greek pharaohs of Egypt as a naval outpost to oversee the Aegean.

Add to this the fact that the Jews never deposited their “sacred gold” with anyone who was not a Jew or anywhere that was not controlled by the Jews, then it can be seen that the 26.5 tons of gold seized by Mithridates was the sum of the Jewish profits on the island of Cos in a single year.

It wasn’t shipped there for safety; it was normally accumulated there in the course of Jewish commercial monopolies in silk and garments.

So, when you start seeing some of the influence that the Jews had on the kings and senators in the antique histories, know well that that influence was not exerted because they were a:

“holy people whom their god loved”

but because they were:

• cunning merchants
• fraudulent financiers
• swindling bankers

and treacherous politicians with plenty of money to bribe their way to the top, just as they are today.

Through their perfidy and hypocrisy, they acquired wealth which they called “God’s money” so as to protect it from everyone else.

Who was more forbidden to spend “Gods’ money” than the non-Jews?

And who was more entitled to spend “Gods’ money” than the “Children of God”?

So, according to the rabbis, all money is God’s money, and it is all destined for the Jews, according to the fraudulent arithmetic of the Jewish bankers who operate the Sumerian Swindle.

What we are actually seeing when we study the Jews and Judaism is the covert manipulations of gold and silver and the hiding of business profits.

The so called “religion” of Judaism is a façade to hide this subterranean enterprise.

This trait of the Jews and of Judaism is not purely as they pretend to be as:

“pious and-holy-humble-little-people-who-want-nothing more-in-life-than-to-praise-the-only-god-who-ever loved-them.”

This trait is seen on an international scale of banking and finance which attempts to conceal its actual wealth at all times, misdirecting the Gentiles’ attention to the poor Jews who dress in rags (or are kept in rags) so that the rich Jews can hide behind them.

The poor Jews are a part of the scam because they are all dependant upon the rabbis who distribute the tithe money provided by the wealthy Jews.

In this way, the rich Jews benefit from the Judaism scam and the poor Jews enjoy their membership in this Cult through the trickle-down wealth paid into the system by the rich Jews.

Judaism is the world’s oldest and most successful organized criminal conspiracy.

The success of concealing a bank behind a Temple, is exemplified in the abracadabra of calling the Jewish bankers’ gold by the name of “sacred” gold and thus deceiving the non-Jews by using God and a patina of “holiness.”

Under Roman rule, greased with Jewish bribes, the Jews in Asia were free to evade Roman tax collectors and hide their actual profits from Roman taxation.

At an unknown date (possibly even before 88 BC) the senate had prohibited the export of gold and silver from the empire to foreign countries, and the prohibition had been re-enacted several times, most recently in 63 BC.

But an exception had been made in the case of the Jews both in Italy and in the provinces, to enable them to continue to pay their Temple tax.

And the Temple tax was whatever amount the “word of the Jews” said that it was.

With the power of sending gold and silver outside of Roman jurisdiction, the international power of the Jews grew right under the noses of the Romans.

With this power, the Jews were able to profit from doing business inside the Roman Empire while using those very profits to undermine Rome from without – all while making gold transfers to Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop.

Of all peoples in the Roman Empire, only the Jews were allowed to ship bullion unimpeded and unrestricted.

In granting this exemption from the general rule, the senate acted in the spirit which official Roman policy was always to follow towards the Jews, and which set a precedent for Julius Caesar’s comprehensive legislation to ensure their so-called “religious liberty.”

One of the charges brought against Valerius Flaccus at his trial for maladministration in 59 BC, was that as proconsul of Asia in 62 BC he had issued an edict rescinding this favor and banning the export of the Temple tax from his province, and he had confiscated the money already collected in four cities, nearly a hundred pounds weight in gold in one case. [359]

As a nation of lawyers rabbinically following the Mosaic Law, the Jews have always practiced the deception of using the laws of the victim nations against anyone who opposed them so as to put a stamp of “criminality” upon their enemies.

In this way, they could eliminate their enemies by using the power of a government that was not even their own.

Because bribery was a standard Roman method of business and politics, those with plenty of gold and silver could actually bribe everybody in Rome who had any sort of power.

For the International Jews, Rome was an easily corruptible victim of their subversion.

Serving as defense counsel at the trial of Flaccus, was the great Roman statesman and writer, Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 BC).

Marcus Tullius Cicero[a] (/ˈsɪsəroʊ/ SISS-ə-roh; Latin: [ˈmaːrkʊs ˈtʊlli.ʊs ˈkɪkɛroː]; 3 January 106 BC – 7 December 43 BC) was a Roman statesman, lawyer, scholar, philosopher, orator, writer and Academic skeptic, who tried to uphold optimate principles during the political crises that led to the establishment of the Roman Empire.

Through those two bribed and subverted emperors, Gaius and Claudius, the Jews had been able to have Flaccus brought to trial for interfering with Jewish gold shipments to Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop in Jerusalem.

Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus[b] (/ˈklɔːdiəs/ KLAW-dee-əs; Classical Latin: [tɪˈbɛri.ʊs ˈkɫau̯di.ʊs ˈkae̯sar au̯ˈɡʊstʊs ɡɛrˈmaːnɪkʊs]; 1 August 10 BC – 13 October AD 54), or Claudius, was a Roman emperor, ruling from AD 41 to 54. A member of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, Claudius was born to Drusus and Antonia Minor at Lugdunum in Roman Gaul, where his father was stationed as a military legate. He was the first Roman emperor to be born outside Italy.

Flaccus had been removed from office and brought back to Rome to face trial after trying to enforce the Roman law banning the exportation of gold.

He was actually doing his job of serving Rome by upholding Roman Law.

Cicero himself was already quite famous, influential and powerful, certainly capable of defending Flaccus against the lying Jews.

And yet he expressed his

“fear of the Jews”

during his Oration in Defense of Flaccus,

“Softly! Softly!

I want none but the judges to hear me.

The Jews have already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many other gentleman.

I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills.”

For one of his stature, to have to “speak softly” shows – in 59 BC, in Rome – that he was in the presence of a dangerously wealthy and powerful sphere of influence.

On another occasion, Cicero wrote:

“The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force.

One knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions.

They are a nation of rascals and deceivers.”

Cicero was speaking not only from firsthand experience with the Jews in Rome but also from the information he had learned from the Greeks in Alexandria.

So, it was not just some built-in “anti-Semitism” as the Jews would like you to believe but actual observation of what the Jews were like in his time. In his famous oration on behalf of Flaccus, Cicero said:

“We come now to the libel involving the gold, the Jewish gold.

This is obviously why the present case is being tried close to the Aurelian Steps.

It is because of this particular charge that you have sought out this location, Laelius and that mob.

You know how large a group they are, and how influential they are in politics.

I will lower my voice and speak just loudly enough for the jury to hear me; for there are plenty of individuals to stir up those Jews against me and against every good Roman, and I don’t intend to make it any easier for them to do this.

Since gold was regularly exported each year in the name of the Jews from Italy and all our provinces to Jerusalem, Flaccus issued an edict forbidding its exportation from Asia.

Who is there, gentlemen of the jury, who cannot sincerely commend this action?

The Senate had forbidden the exportation of gold on many previous occasions, and most strictly of all during my consulship.

Further, that Flaccus was opposed to this barbarous Jewish superstition was proof of his strong character.

That he defended the Republic by frequently denying the aggressiveness of the Jewish mobs at political gatherings, was evidence of his high sense of responsibility.”

After the trial, Flaccus’ ban on the shipping of gold was removed.

Only the Jews were allowed to ship gold throughout the Roman Empire.

It was an unrestricted stream of metal and only the Jews were allowed to export it even against Roman Law!

While Rome was expanding, the Jewish population in Egypt under the Greek Ptolemies began to increase.

Jews had settled in Egypt after the fall of Jerusalem in 587 BC, and the Elephantine Papyri reveal a Jewish colony near Aswan allegedly acting as a frontier garrison for the Persians.

But it was strategically placed on that trade route along the Nile. [360]

As an indication of their true priorities, the Jews offered their “Jewish Loyalty” to the Greek Ptolemies rather than to the Greek Seleucids because the Seleucids only controlled Jerusalem while the Ptolemies controlled the wealth that flowed down the Nile.

And the Seleucids were at war with their Jewish relatives in Persia.

In Alexandria, Jewish settlements were to be found throughout the whole length of the country during the Ptolemaic as well as the Roman periods.

The Jews were always very numerous.

The Jews in all ages and in all countries have been like a smothering template over human society.

In the ancient days as well as modern days,

“the butcher, the baker, the candlestick maker”

were found in every society and were necessary in every society.

When the Jews would move into an area, they did not just want to have their own “butcher and baker and candlestick maker” to serve the Jews, but they wanted to replace the non-Jewish “butcher and baker and candlestick maker” with a Jewish one by driving the non-Jews out of business.

This way, the Jewish “butcher and baker and candlestick maker” profited by selling to the Jews and then profited even more by selling to the non-Jews at a higher price.

Since the non-Jews had nowhere else to buy their goods because their own merchants had been put out-of-business by the conspiring Jews, they had no other choice but to buy from the Jews at inflated prices.

The Jews always tried for a monopoly advantage.

With no competition, they could set their own prices even if it meant selling low until the competition had gone bankrupt.

And they could always do this because of their international import-export connections as well as by the vast amounts of free loans that they could get from the synagogue until their competition had been starved into bankruptcy.

Thus, the parasite killed its host and then laid the template of Jewish society over the corpse while hypocritically praising “He-Who-Must-Not-Be Named” as the “reason” for them being so “blessed” with the wealth of the Gentiles – eating the food they did not grow, living in the houses they did not build.

On the social side, the Jews formed a cross section of the Egyptian population, of all grades of wealth and social position.

They bribed their way into the government service and held posts ranging from high administrative offices to minor local positions as clerks and policemen, and a number of them bought the authority of the unpopular but very lucrative office of tax-farmers.

All of those posts were obtained through bribery, which was the standard method for obtaining official position in the ancient world.

Those with the biggest bribes got the highest offices.

But the lying, modern, Jewish historians who write of the period always imply that the Jews gained their political and commercial advantages over the Greeks from “merit” and “intelligence” and “excellence.”

On the political side, relations between the Jews and the Ptolemies seem to have been harmonious.

The Jews were always willing to offer their undying “Jewish Loyalty” to whoever had the most power and the most gold.

The security of the Jews as a parasitic, foreign minority depended on the maintenance of a stable, authoritarian government who protected their depredations on the common citizens.

For example, the Jew Onias fought in support of Philometor’s widow in 145 BC, and his sons fought in support of Cleopatra III in 108-107 BC in civil wars against the rebellious patriotic Greeks of Alexandria. [361]

The Jews were offering their “Jewish Loyalty” to governments that gave them favors by fighting against the Greeks who hated both the corrupt governments and the Jews who supported those corrupt governments.

Backing tyrannical governments that gave them protection and unfair advantage over the non-Jews, did not make the Jews popular with the People, yet it was a basic tactic of these parasites for the next two thousand years because Judaism can only thrive under tyrannical governments that “legalize” their crimes against humanity and protect the Jews from the reprisals of their victims.

And if one government is not tyrannical enough to protect Jewish interests, then the Jews betray it to a more totalitarian government that will enable their crimes while they stand behind the despots like:

“ticks behind the ear.”

Their unpopularity with the non-Jews, the rabbis falsely explained away as a result of the Gentiles’ “hatred of God,” but never for the Jews:

• defrauding
• dispossessing
• betraying

the people around them.

Oh, no!

The Jews were “God’s Chosen People.”

So, of course, whatever evil that they did was “good,” according to the “holy” scriptures that they had written, themselves, while placing their adorable magnificence onto the star position high on the pedestal of their own imaginations, right there next to God.

But their delusions of grandeur didn’t fool the Greeks who witnessed firsthand the Jews’ diabolical:

• cunning
• treachery
• greed

The Greeks often rioted in Alexandria, beating and killing some of the Jews, because they knew the proper way to deal with the Jews.

But they were always stopped before finishing the job by the king’s soldiers.

With their control of Palestine resulting from the Maccabean Revolt, by about 69 BC the Jews appear to have again acquired some share in the Gold-Silver Exchange Mechanism.

The principle channel of this trade was then by the Nile and Red Sea and was in the hands of the Ptolemaic rulers of Egypt who sold the Office of Customs Inspector to the Jews.

A portion of it went overland by Palmyra; and from this portion Jerusalem derived important commercial advantages which were lost to the Jews and acquired by Rome when, in 63 BC, Pompey snatched Judea from the contentious Maccabees. [362]

Like taking food away from a dog, taking money away from a Jew is a dangerous task.

Pompey gained the eternal hatred of the Jews from that day onward forever.

And no one hates like a Jew hates, a diabolical hatred that spans the ages and seeks to destroy: 

• grandparents
• parents
• children

and grandchildren until Jewish genocide obliterates entire gene pools of those whom they have targeted as their enemies.

But taking away their portion of the international Gold-Silver Exchange Mechanism wasn’t all that he did.

Pompey’s invasion of Palestine and his siege of Jerusalem in 63 BC brought the Jews under indirect Roman rule as a client kingdom.

The campaign also gave him many thousands of Jewish prisoners-of-war, who were transported to Rome as slaves where, in the course of time, many were manumitted to augment the first Jewish community of any significant size there.

Then, thirty years later, the annexation of Egypt after Actium brought the numerous and important Diaspora (Spores-that-Die-Ya) communities of Egypt into the Roman Empire.

Thus, except for the large and ancient settlements in Parthia dating from the Exile in 587 BC, within a single generation virtually all of the Jews in the known world came directly or indirectly under Roman rule. [363]

Rome now had a Jewish Problem – but they didn’t know what a severe infestation that it was. 

With most of the Jews in the world living in the Roman Empire, this meant that all of the Jews in the Empire were connected through both the system of synagogues as well as the spy-system of the Kehillah.

Rome had more of a Jewish Problem than it ever knew, which meant that Rome never knew how to solve its problems.

Philo would later describe the Jewish community under Augustus, saying that the large district of Rome beyond the Tiber (modern Trastevere) was owned and inhabited by Jews.

The majority of them were Roman freedmen, who had been brought to Rome as prisoners-of-war and manumitted by their owners. [364]

From the moment that they were set loose, these manumitted Jews automatically had membership in a privately controlled,

• international
• commercial
• financial

monopoly which allowed them to borrow interest-free money and connected them to the lowest cost import-export wholesale goods, all of which they could obtain on credit.

So, they immediately began making money among the astounded Romans who were denied even the slightest peek into the sources of these ex-slaves’ instant prosperity.

In midsummer 63 BC, Pompey and some of his staff, out of curiosity, entered the Temple.

Entering the building, itself, was a death sentence to any Gentile who set foot inside.

But Pompey even entered the Holy of Holies, which the High Priest alone might enter only on the Day of Atonement.

Pompey treated the Temple with respect.

Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus (Latin: [ˈŋnae̯ʊs pɔmˈpɛjjʊs ˈmaŋnʊs]; 29 September 106 BC – 28 September 48 BC), known in English as Pompey (/ˈpɒmpi/ POM-pee) or Pompey the Great, was a general and statesman of the Roman Republic. He played a significant role in the transformation of Rome from republic to empire. Early in his career, he was a partisan and protégé of the Roman general and dictator Sulla; later, he became the political ally, and finally the enemy, of Julius Caesar.

He did not loot either the gold furniture or the two thousand talents (60,000 kilograms or 66 tons) of gold coins deposited there.

Aristobulus II (/ˌærɪstəˈbjuːləs/, Ancient Greek: Ἀριστόβουλος Aristóboulos) was the Jewish High Priest and King of Judea, 66 BCE to 63 BCE, from the Hasmonean dynasty.

Pompey then deposed Aristobulus II (67-63 BC) in favor of his elder brother Hyrcanus II (63-40 BC) who received the title High Priest and Ethnarch (head of state and king in all but name).

John Hyrcanus II (/hərˈkeɪnəs/, Hebrew: יוחנן הרקנוס Yohanan Hurqanos; died 30 BCE), a member of the Hasmonean dynasty, was for a long time the Jewish High Priest in the 1st century BCE. He was also briefly King of Judea 67–66 BCE and then the ethnarch (ruler) of Judea, probably over the period 47–40 BCE

Around this time, Rome was troubled by the inadequacies of the old republican system of government and by the political factions and contests of power between Pompey and Julius Caesar.

During the time of unrest, the “friends” of Rome had to be politically agile.

The Hasmonaean ruler, Hyrcanus, had as his adviser an ambitious Idumaean, Antipater.

Antipater (/ænˈtɪpətər/; Ancient Greek: Ἀντίπατρος, romanized: Antipatros, lit. ‘like the father’; c. 400 BC – 319 BC) was a Macedonian general, regent and statesman under the successive kingships of Philip II of Macedon and his son, Alexander the Great. In the wake of the collapse of the Argead house, his son Cassander eventually ruled Macedonia as a king in his own right.

They switched their “Jewish Loyalty” from Pompey to Julius Caesar at the right time to survive.

Marcus Antonius (14 January 83 BC – 1 August 30 BC), commonly known in English as Mark Antony, was a Roman politician and general who played a critical role in the transformation of the Roman Republic from a constitutional republic into the autocratic Roman Empire.

When Antipater died, Mark Antony, friend of Caesar, nominated Antipater’s sons Herod and Phasael as tetrarchs of the Jewish state.

There followed clashes in Syria and at Jerusalem between Parthian and Roman troops supporting different Jewish factions.

In 40 BC, the Roman senate declared Herod to be King of Judaea.

In 37 BC, Roman legions drove the Parthians out of Jerusalem and Herod became king.

In 31 BC, Herod was confirmed by Octavian as client-king.

Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus (born Gaius Octavius; 23 September 63 BC – 19 August AD 14), also known as Octavian (Latin: Octavianus), was the founder of the Roman Empire. He reigned as the first Roman emperor from 27 BC until his death in AD 14. The reign of Augustus initiated an imperial cult, as well as an era of imperial peace (the Pax Romana or Pax Augusta) in which the Roman world was largely free of armed conflict. The Principate system of government was established during his reign and lasted until the Crisis of the Third Century.

He held in 31 BC the same areas he had governed since 37 BC: Judaea (with Idumaea),

• Samaria
• Galilee
• Peraea

In 30 BC, he was also granted rule over the Greek cities of:

• Samaria
• Hippus
• Gadara

and all the coastal cities except for the free city-state of Ascalon.

From this time, the areas of Jewish settlement were governed either by the House of Herod or by Roman officials directly. [365]

Through their Kehillah spy system, the rabbis knew in advance who had the most wealth and political power.

So, when Rome annexed Egypt, the Jews betrayed the Ptolemaic Greeks and gave military help to the Roman invaders in 55 BC, in 48 BC, and also in 30 BC, all of this time claiming the Romans to be their “saviors from oppression” and offering their “Jewish Loyalty” to Rome. 

Their treason did not make them any more popular with the Greeks. [366]

Before the Greeks had ever met any Jews, they had absolutely no prejudice or hatred towards them whatsoever.

It was only after the Greeks had come into contact with the Jews that they had intense feelings of hatred and outrage against them.

As just one example that can be repeated through the ages, doesn’t it seem more likely that anti-Semitism is not something that the Greeks carried around with them but that it was something that the Jews carried and gave to the Greeks?

Modern, lying Jewish psychologists blame the victims and want to make anti-Semitism into a mental disease.

If so, then it is a disease that is carried by Jews and given to the non-Jews through direct contact.

Hatred for Jews is caused by the malicious treachery of Jews, not by any character flaw in the Gentiles.

An example of this phenomenon is exemplified in modern times by The Times of Israel newspaper report of May 28, 2014, where a small town in Guatemala composed of American Indians who had never met any Jews in their entire 4,000 year history, wanted to get rid of the Jews who moved there, as soon as the Jews had moved there.

“BUENOS AIRES – Indigenous residents of San Juan La Laguna, a small town of under 10,000 in the Guatemalan state of Sololá, have asked members of the Jewish community – comprising 10 ultra Orthodox families, most of whom arrived only recently – to identify themselves in a municipal registry and leave within the next few months.

“Residents have filed complaints with the municipality that the community of ultra-religious Jews have used a public body of water as a mikveh (ritual bath), practiced unhygienic rituals like kaparot (where a chicken is swung around a rabbi’s head for sins before being slaughtered), and made disparaging comments about immodesty to tourists.

“According to the mayor, the indigenous population has also been suspicious since a [Jewish] Canadian couple accused of child abuse reportedly moved to San Juan La Laguna with their six children.” [367]

This same “anti-Semitism” has occurred throughout history where people who had never even heard of Jews, began to hate Jews as soon as they met Jews.

And yet the Jews, in their delusions of grandeur, claim that the fault is always everybody else’s except themselves.

If the Jews can’t find a scapegoat for their sins or an innocent chicken to swing around their heads and then murder it for their sins, then for their own sins, they claim to be innocent victims of everybody else’s “anti Semitism.”

Truly, the Jews could be the world’s biggest clowns, except that monsters are not funny.

Even though the moneylenders had sucked as much wealth out of the Assyrian Empire as they possibly could, rather than be grateful to their victims, they transferred their silver to Babylonia and Elam and betrayed Assyria to the Babylonians.

As reward for their treachery to the Assyrians, Nebuchadrezzar had placed them in profitable employment in his empire, trusting in the “Jewish Loyalty” that they offered him.

But the Jews then betrayed the Babylonians to the Achaemenid Persians.

Even though they had been granted and had bribed for themselves good jobs as administrators and gatekeepers under the Babylonians, they opened the gates of Babylon to Cyrus’ armies and danced and sang in the streets to welcome king Cyrus as their “savior” from “persecution.”

As a reward for their treachery, Cyrus obligingly executed their more vocal anti-Jewish critics and gave the confiscated property to the Jews.

To show their “Jewish Loyalty” to Persia, the Jews followed their Persian “savior” and sold supplies to the Persian army and brothels for his soldiers as Darius invaded Egypt.

It was a fine situation, being friends with a king, being a “tick behind the ear” of a king.

And when Alexander invaded Persia, the Jews betrayed the Persians and welcomed Alexander as their “savior” from “oppression,” hailing him as king and a veritable god.

When Alexander was poisoned, the Jews had to choose between which Greek generals gave them the most respect and protection.

They chose Ptolemy of Egypt where they already were in control of the Nile trade and the Gold-Silver Exchange Mechanism with India.

They offered their “Jewish Loyalty” to the Ptolemies and bribed their way into profitable administrative positions as customs inspectors and tax farmers, simultaneously oppressing the Greek citizens while serving the Greek pharaoh at his capital in Alexandria.

Simultaneously in Persia, the Jews there offered their “Jewish Loyalty” to the Persians and supplied military intelligence against Rome through their Kehillah network via the rabbis who were “sacred envoys” carrying the Temple tax and messages back to Jerusalem and Alexandria.

Alexandria was a unique city, founded on Egyptian soil as the capital of a conquering Greek dynasty and wholly Greek in character and municipal organization.

Greeks naturally formed the bulk of the enfranchised citizen body and very few of the exploited native Egyptians were admitted to citizen rights.

The Jews had the right of residence in Alexandria from the time of Ptolemy I, and at an early age one of its five districts was allocated to them.

Under the later Ptolemies the Jewish community expanded steadily in the standard Jewish fashion – with thousands of Jews rushing in from other countries to aid their brothers in looting the Greeks as well as from their extremely high birth rates.

As a result, by the Roman period a second district was also predominantly populated by Jews. [368]

The large Diaspora (Spores-that-Die-Ya) community in Alexandria was formed at least as early as the second century BC. It had at its head an Ethnarch (king of the Jews in all but name), wielding supreme administrative and judicial power.

The Council of Elders of seventy members (the Sanhedrin), which took over from him as chief organ of government late in Augustus’ principate, existed in the Ptolemaic period also, under the presidency of the Ethnarch.

There was a popular assembly, an archive for Jewish official records, and a lawcourt for cases involving matters of purely Jewish law. [369]

In other words, it was a typical Jewish infestation identical with their rabbinic organizational structure in every country.

And this is what the Gentiles were always led to believe was the total “religious” organization of Jewry.

The one difference between what the Gentiles could see and what the Jews practiced in secret, was that the Ethnarch was also the Prince of the 7th Kehillah degree.

He only had to send one message or give one order to each of the seven “Arch Censors” under him to have that message secretly communicated to 824,543 Jews in the First Kehillah degree.

On command, each one of those “Mutes” would simultaneously commit any act of sabotage, rumor mongering, agitation to riot, or any other spy work that they were ordered to do.

With 824,543 spying, whispering or screaming Jews, agitating all of the millions of other Jews (as well as the non-Jews) of a region with their coordinated and subversive antics, any government could quickly find itself with unforeseen troubles and imperceived causes.

So, placating the gangster Jews became an ongoing theme among the kingdoms of the world. 

The center of Judaism at this time was Alexandria, not Jerusalem, because that’s where the Prince of the Jews resided surrounded by his Sanhedrin court of hairy-faced rabbis, all with their grasping hands in the great wealth that flowed through Ptolemaic Egypt.

The Greeks of Egypt hated the Jews.

For a people whose philosopher Democritus (460 – 370 BC) had deduced the existence of atoms more than 2,000 years before modern physics had actually confirmed that discovery, figuring out the true character of the Jews was not much of a problem for the Greeks.

The Greek attainments in every

• art and science
• philosophy and literature
• mathematics
• geometry
• music

and rhetoric, as well as martial prowess and athletics, were world famous by the time that the fly-speckled Jews had managed to bribe their way into Western society.

Merely observing the Jews, themselves, told the Greeks all that they cared to know about those creatures.

The Jews were prone to throwing fits of anger, screaming to the high heavens and tearing their own cloths to shreds for incomprehensible reasons.

They refused to sit at the same table with non-Jews and even paid to have their own private areas cordoned off at the theaters.

If a Greek happened to walk between two Jews in the street, both would utter curses and run off to the all-Jewish bath house to change clothes and bathe, although bathing for the sake of actual cleanliness was never a high priority to the Jews.

The Jews did not bathe for cleanliness like the Greeks did.

So, they were often foul-smelling and filthy.

Yet, they considered themselves immaculately “clean” because they followed the laws of “ritual” purity which were found written in their ancient goatskin scrolls which they worshipped and danced around and paraded about with a king’s crown mounted at one end.

Many of the rabbis advertised their skills at sniffing women’s menstrual rags to ascertain various “virtues” that only the rabbis claimed to know.

Jewish men were circumcised and filled with lust, were constantly rubbing their penises which led to a high rate of masturbation.

The Jews were such manic masturbators that the rabbis ordered them to wrap their penises in a cloth before they urinated so that they didn’t touch themselves with their hands and thus go crazy [371] using the soap for what it was not intended to be used.

If a Greek offered a Jew a plate of food or a cup of wine, the Jew allowed himself to be served like arrogant royalty but then refused to touch the food, claiming that it was now “unclean” because a non-Jew had touched it.

And yet, while the Jews were loath to touch the dead bodies of other Jews for fear of becoming “unclean,” they didn’t mind going through the pockets and purses of dead Gentiles because they considered the goyim to be mere animals which do not transmit “uncleanness.”

Live Gentiles were “unclean” but dead ones were “clean.” [372]

So, a holy Jew endeavored to make the world “clean” by making as many non-Jews as possible, dead.

The Jews were obviously making a lot of money at business but were always complaining about how poor they were and demanding lower prices from the Greeks in everything while charging higher prices for everything – and getting away with it because, for some inexplicable reason that puzzled the Greeks, the Jews had the import monopolies.

The Jews claimed to be the very essence of the highest good beyond any earthly compare.

They claimed to be so high in virtue that they considered all of Mankind to be nothing but insects and cattle and mere animals far below themselves, mere goyim.

The Greeks listened to the tales that the Jews talked about themselves.

The Hebrew Bible had by then been translated into Greek by seventy lying rabbis of the Sanhedrin.

It was known to the Greeks as the Septuagint (the Seventy) version.

It was translated specifically to over-awe the Greeks of Egypt with its lies.

Although the Greeks controlled Egypt and the wealth that flowed through Egypt, it was a basic technique of Judaism to control the leaders of every country.

So, these seventy rabbis were careful to hide the word “goy” and substitute less offensive names for non-Jews.

Thus, from the earliest times, they deceived the Greeks concerning Jewish perfidy and hatred.

With the Septuagint as their wedge into Greek culture, the Jews bragged about their mighty god who had done incredible miracles to Pharaoh and to the kings of Mesopotamia just for their sake.

The pyramids, whose true histories were buried under the sand, was the “proof” that the Jews offered that their lies were true.

“We Jews, ourselves, built those pyramids with the sweat of our brows.

Oy Veh!

It was terrible!

The slavery!

The lack of bagels!

We remember it like yesterday.

So, pity us!”

But with their logical minds and clear vision, the Greeks looked at the Jews and listened to the Jewish fables and considered Cause and Effect.

If a mighty god had blessed the Jews as his “Holy Chosen Ones” as the Jews claimed, then there was something very, very wrong with the equation.

A good god would have chosen a good people; or, at the very least, a people who tried to be good.

But an evil god would have chosen evil people; or, at the very least, a people who could be corrupted into doing even more evil.

Therefore, either the Jews were telling the truth, or they were lying – and it wasn’t difficult for the Greeks to know which.

The proof of the theorem was found in the Jews, themselves.

The Greeks could see with their own eyes that the Jews’ overriding characteristics were extreme: 

• greed
• malice
• vengeance
• lust

and hatred.

They carried personal grudges – in actual, unending fact – forever, in attempts to destroy anyone who spoke against them even across four generations and over hundreds of years!

As moneylenders, they ruthlessly demanded the repayment of the tiniest grain, otherwise, their beseeching victims were sold into slavery.

As slave masters, the Jews branded their slaves by cutting off the foreskins of the men and raping the women and little boys and girls.

In their personal hygiene, the Jews usually smelled horrible since they didn’t bathe except as an empty ritual of “cleanliness” rather than as an actual application of cleanliness.

The list was very long of all the negative characteristics of the Jews.

And no one could think of anything to put on a list of their positive characteristics.

In addition, the Greek sensitivities of:

• bodily beauty
• geometric balance
• artistic harmony

and perfection of form, were all crashed and clattered by the grossness and ugliness of those 

• hook-nosed
• rubbery-lipped
• kinky-haired
• vulgar

monstrosities.

The Greeks concluded that the Jews were obviously lying.

It was impossible for a good god to have chosen the Jews for any reason whatsoever.

If the Jews were the “Chosen Ones” of a god, then that god could only have been an evil god because a good god would never, ever, ever have inflicted the Jews upon anyone.

Obviously, the Greeks of antiquity were a lot smarter than modern people.

But as clear as their reasoning was, the Greeks still had two serious problems.

The first problem was that the modern science of archaeology had not been invented yet.

The Greeks had their own observations and their mental keenness to see that the Jews were liars and frauds.

But they couldn’t prove it with hard evidence like modern archaeology can.

So, the Greeks could only vent their rage at those:

• lying
• malicious
• thieving

criminals dressed up as some weird idea of what a “Holy Chosen People” are supposed to look like with:

• curly sidelocks
• bushy beards
• weird clothes

and little boxes tied to their heads over their beanies.

The second problem was that the Jews had ingratiated themselves with the rulers of Egypt.

Even though they were a tick-behind-the-ear, the Jews were loved by the Greek rulers of Egypt since “Jewish Loyalty” served authoritarianism so well and brought profits to both the royal treasury and to the Jews

The Jews had made themselves useful to the rulers by serving as tax collectors and snitches.

All of the Jews were well practiced in tattling from the skills developed among the Levites whose main job had been spying on the Jews and telling the rabbis of any transgressions of Jewish Law.

Any rumbling of revolt among the Greek citizenry was quickly communicated to the Greek pharaoh through the Jewish grapevine – with its tendrils in every tavern and whorehouse and its vigilance in every shop.

The Jews were very useful to whatever authoritarian power employed them.

And yet, even though the Jews had profited greatly from their swindles of the Greek citizens, from their positions in Customs and Duties, and as officials in the Ptolemaic administration, they betrayed the Greeks and offered their “Jewish Loyalty” to the Romans who were now in the ascent.

It is interesting how small changes in technology can cause such big changes in society.

Little things like wheels or copper or iron, even iron hammers and nails or plows herds, totally change the entire framework of society.

The invention of the horseshoe considerably increased the effectiveness of Parthian cavalry.

Before the horseshoe, cavalry was restricted by the damaging and splitting effects that rough terrain and carrying excess weight had on horses’ hooves.

The horseshoe virtually eliminated those problems and significantly improved cavalry mobility and performance.

The combination of the horseshoe with an efficient road system, originally laid by the Achaemenid Persians, allowed for a fast horseman to travel approximately 350 miles (560km) in a mere three to four days. It is likely that the horseshoe was already in widespread use by the battle of Carrhae (Harran) in 53 BC. [373]

This new technology combined with their compound bows and quick cavalry tactics, gave the Parthians a distinct advantage over the massed Roman legions.

The defeat at Carrhae shattered the vision of Roman military invincibility.

Carrhae symbolized the dramatic end of Alexander’s legacy in Persia.

The Persians destroyed a Roman force three times larger than their own.

Of the 40,000 Roman legionaries, 20,000 had been killed by knights’ lancers and horse archers and 10,000 captured.

The Romans were forced to acknowledge the Euphrates as the fluvial border between the Roman and the Parthian Empires.

The myth of Roman invincibility had also been shattered among the Jews, who were not only friendly with the Parthians, but whose historical relations with Persia are attested to in Biblical sources, not to mention the huge Jewish population offering its “Jewish Loyalty” inside Parthia, itself.

The Romans soon found themselves facing fierce revolts by their Jewish populations behind their lines in their eastern territories.

Carrhae was a rude shock following Rome’s spectacular successes in:

• Spain
• Gaul
• the Balkans
• Greece
• Carthage
• Armenia

and the Pontus. [374]

However, in none of those countries, did the Romans have a Jewish Fifth Column stationed both behind their own lines and in the camp of their enemy, passing along military intelligence aimed at their defeat.

This military and commercial intelligence was carried back and forth between Parthian and Roman territory by the “sacred envoys” of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop who had official sanction from both sides to carry out their “religious duties.” But why would the Jews, who had bribed and swindled such wealth as they had from the Greeks and Romans, betray Greco-Roman civilization to the Asiatics of Parthia?

Basically, it was a matter of who paid them the most for their “Jewish Loyalty.”

Parthia controlled the Gold-Silver Exchange Mechanism with India, but the Jews could access it as well through Egypt.

The main reason that the Jews preferred a secret alliance with the Persians was that the Persians used a money system based in gold while the Romans (and earlier Greeks) used a fiat money system of bronze coins.

The Monsters of Babylon always declared war against any who did not bow down to the gold of their Temple because regardless of what country or what king ruled by whatever means or by whatever political system, the Jews controlled the gold and therefore the fate of every empire who depended upon a money made of gold.

Rome controlled her own fate because she controlled her own money, a fiat coin made of brass.

The Jews in Parthia could benefit from the Gold Silver Exchange Mechanism but Parthia disallowed it to the Romans.

So, with their access to the wealth of India cut off via Parthia, the corrupt and greedy senators and merchants of Rome looked to Egypt and its trade route to India to sustain their gluttony.

And they found the Jews of Egypt only too willing to offer their “Jewish Loyalty” to Rome if only the Romans would save them from the “bigotry” and “anti Semitism” of the Greeks.

The Sumerian Swindle in Egypt was devastating to every class.

Moneylending rates during both Greek and Roman times, averaged 10% per month, more than 200% annually.

Credit could be had by pledging one’s property.

The pawnbrokers of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop accepted for pawn:

• jewelry
• furniture
• metal implements

and utensils, providing such loans to rich and poor alike while swindling both.

During Roman times, when trading was highly regimented, the guilds of the marketplaces prevented merchants from selling their wares at lower prices, which would have increased competition – a prospect not cherished by the monopolists of the merchants’ guilds.

Therefore, traders were not allowed to sell anywhere but in the markets [375] under the watchful eyes of the Jewish customs inspectors.

Between 46-48 BC, the Alabarch (or senior customs official) in Egypt was a Jew named Alexander of Alexandria.

He was the father of the Roman general Tiberius Alexander.

Who appointed the alabarch in Egypt?

No one other than the king, himself.

With the hefty bribes that were required to obtain even small offices and lower-level trade concessions, the bribe that the Jew Alexander paid for such a lucrative office as customs inspector for Egypt, must have been not only a kingly price but too huge for one man to afford.

Thus, the office was purchased through the corporate buying power of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop where any amount of gold could be obtained to the Jew who could prove his ability to make it grow.

Such an office could not only repay in gold but could repay even more in economic power over the wealth flowing through Egypt.

By Roman times, the pharaonic state which had controlled much of the economy, had given way to a colonial administration whose main aim was the exploitation of Egypt in favor of Rome.

Trade was in the hands of private persons who were often organized into monopoly guilds.

One could not get into a guild without personal connections and/or bribes.

Dividing up Egypt, the merchant guilds sold rights and assigned territories and special privileges.

For example, one Orseus paid to the merchant’s guild 66 drachmas (396 grams or 14 ounces of gold) for the monopoly of selling gypsum in the region of Tebtunis.

Prices were fixed and fines imposed on anybody undercutting him.

The same method extended into every commercial product and service, even egg sellers.

There was big money to be made in Egypt by anyone who could buy into a monopoly position. 

Rome gained full control of this crucial Asiatic trade – with its monopoly cartels already in place – when it took Egypt from the Ptolemies in 48 BC.

Rome quickly took steps to maximize control over the gold-silver ratio dichotomy.

With control of Egypt, Rome gained control of the sea trade with India and the overland trade route with Arabia, [376] up the Nile, across the desert to the Red Sea and onward to:

• East Africa
• Yemen
• India

This allowed an end-run around Parthia into India. Cleopatra, a Ptolemy, was crowned in 50 BC and Egypt was annexed by Rome in 30 BC.

Egypt offered Rome many riches.

Most importantly, Egypt produced a steady supply of grain thanks to the reliable Nile floods.

Gold and emeralds and trade goods from the African interior came through Nubia and Kush.

The Eastern Desert was 130 degrees Fahrenheit in the summer and averaged only one-eighth inch of rain per year.

The Romans built wells so that they could mine the gold and emeralds found there.

Egypt was the only source of emeralds in the Roman Empire.

The mines were worked by the debt slaves whom the moneylenders had seized and by the war slaves whom the army had seized.

And they were worked to death because both moneylending and war produced an unlimited supply of slaves.

So, working them to death helped to keep the slave system profitable simply through supply and demand.

Fresh slaves were strong and healthy and could be fed into the mines to replace those who were starved and worn out in a never-ending cycle.

You Negro Readers should understand that these slaves were nearly 100% white people and Caucasian-Mediterranean, not Negroes.

Unlike the Negro slaves whom the Jews exported to the Americas in later centuries, these white slaves were worked to death and none of them survived.

So, count your blessings and beware of the lies of the hypocritical Jews who scapegoat white people for the Jewish enslavement of blacks.

The Romans founded the trading port of Berenike on the Red Sea.

It was connected by road to the Nile at Thebes.

Thebes controlled the north-south trade along the Nile and was situated on the east-west roads into the Western desert and the Eastern trade route to the Red Sea.

The Sinai Peninsula, Arabia, India and East African trade was accessed from its Red Sea Port of Berenike as well as trade with Mesopotamia and the Levant.

From the Nile, goods flowed to Alexandria and on to the Roman Empire.

Berenike traded with India for spices and incense.

Leaving on the Monsoon winds in September, Roman ships could reach India in 45 days.

Oman and Yemen were other trade ports of call.

And waiting for them in the Indian ports, were the Jewish merchant-moneylenders who had been doing 410 business in India since 175 BC.

See Map. [Figure 113 Map – 175 BC – 1795 AD India Diaspora] In the first Century AD, pepper was worth more than its weight in gold.

It has been estimated by archeologists that in one year, the Berenike trade earned more than the total trade of modern-day New York and San Francisco combined.

And it earned this stupendous amount of business every year for the 500 years that the Berenike trade operated. Berenike also grew rich on the duties that they could impose.

In 90 AD, duties paid for one donkey was equal in modern day (2010 AD) money of $25.

The Roman toll collectors also charged $100 for the toll tax on a traveling soldier’s wife, $200 toll for a craftsman, and $2700 for a prostitute to travel on the Berenike to Coptos road from the Nile.

They controlled the road with a series of forts and fortified water wells so everyone had to pay since no one could cross the desert without water.

The Roman merchant class were the richest people in the world if one does not count the concealed wealth of the Monsters of Babylon with their international network of field offices in every synagogue and city in the known world.

And so, the treacherous Roman merchant class had a lot of mutual interests with those sidelock wearing, hook-nosed merchants from the East.

One ship in the second century AD, is recorded as carrying a cargo of:

• spice
• cloth
• ivory

of 3.5 tons having a value of 7 million drachma or 46 tons of gold.

In the second century, Strabo estimated that 120 ships per year at 75 tons each of cargo weight, left Berenike every year for India.

They brought back $59.2 billion dollars in 411 trade goods.

In five and a half centuries, this was $32.6 trillion dollars in imports.

The Roman government charged 25% duties on this amount.

And this did not even include the even larger number of smaller merchant vessels that sailed from Berenike every year for over five hundred years. [377]

These kinds of profits did not go unnoticed by the Jews who had both hands deeply clutching at all sources and destinations of trade and profits. With increased profits, the Jews could afford the many wives and many scores of children which they tried to raise:

“as numerous as the sands of the sea,”

so as to dispossess and destroy the Gentiles and replace them with more Jews, very much as cancer cells replace healthy cells by first pushing them out and then killing them.

When Rome annexed Egypt, the Jews were already well-entrenched in Rome to bribe the senators and offer their “Jewish Loyalty” to the Roman Empire.

All they wanted in return for their lavish bribes was a written legal protection by Rome against the outraged victims of their many crimes; and an official recognition that the Jews had special privileges that insulated them from personal harm while protecting their phony Hebrew Bible from ridicule and abuse.

The Jews, hypocritically rolling their eyes to the heavens and making a show of prayer, wanted to continue their subversion while being protected by Roman armies.

Thus, the Roman Senate and the Roman emperors took the Jewish bribes and betrayed the Roman people to the World’s Oldest Organized Criminal Conspiracy.

With their new Roman friends firmly in control of that river of money that was Egypt, the Jews lost no time in spreading as bribes some of the profits from their swindles.

Drawing upon a Temple membership list that stretched from India, through Persia, across Mesopotamia and now into Europe, the priests of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop had the monetary resources to bribe both local governors and emperors.

In this case, the new dictator of the Roman Empire, Julius Caesar, was in need of gold and the Jews were in need of a high ranking “friend” who would protect them from the vengeance of their victims.

So, they both found a mutual “love” of power.

By the time of Julius Caesar (60 BC – 44 BC), the Jewish community and its system of moneylenders and wholesale-retail merchants was a factor to be reckoned with in Rome.

Through bribery of senators, the legal status of the synagogues – as protected organizations – had already been defined.

To protect his political power from any sort of influence from religious organizations, Caesar had disbanded all political and religious organizations except for the ancient foundations.

Those which were exempted from closure explicitly included the synagogues.

The ban, probably applying only to Italy in 64 BC, was now made empire wide by Caesar.

In decrees of Roman officials and cities in the East implementing Caesar’s ruling, the privileges of the Jewish associations were spelled out in detail.

They were granted the right of assembly for worship and common meals, the right to observe their Sabbath and their festivals and to follow the other requirements of their Contract.

They were given the right to hold funds.

And they were authorized to build synagogues.

The Jews’ communal property was safeguarded by a ruling that made theft by a Gentile from a synagogue of either the Temple tax or the goatskin scrolls of the Hebrew Bible, to be a sacrilege punished by the confiscation of his property.

Also, the rabbis (those “sacred envoys”) carrying gold to Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop in Jerusalem should not be molested.

The Jews’ religious liberty as individuals was protected by exemption from summonses to law on the Sabbath, when they would not attend and would lose their cases by default.

All of these special privileges were enjoyed by the Jews and by no other people or institute throughout the entire Roman Empire.

The favor which Caesar showed for the Diaspora (Spores-that-Die-Ya) in his legislation was not unconnected with the help which he had received from Antipater during his Alexandrian campaign and with his generally friendly relations with Hyrcanus II and the other Jews of Palestine.

These relations in turn may have stemmed partially from the fact that Caesar’s enemy was Pompey, the Roman who walked past the sign on the Temple that read:

“Gentiles found past this point will be killed.”

Also, Caesar had already been deeply in debt to the moneylenders before he became emperor. 

Not seeing that within the Temple Scam was concealed an international banking and mercantile federation of:

• financial parasites
• social subverters
• political betrayers

Caesar was deceived by the Jews into believing that the Diaspora (Spores-that Die-Ya) communities were politically innocuous and therefore could safely be treated with toleration.

If he had known what the Jews really are, he would have hunted down and executed every Jew within the Roman Empire.

Caesar’s charter of “Jewish Rights” formalized and legalized what had apparently been an unwritten convention that the Jews in the empire should have religious liberty to swindle whomever they could and sabotage the religious organizations of other people.

Caesar’s empire-wide ruling replaced the regional rulings by local administrators who were trying to protect their people from the swindling Jews.

Caesar made Jewish privilege a permanent, universal legislation.

This had the effect throughout the Roman Empire of establishing Judaism, with all of its sociopathic and maliciously predatory people, as a recognized legitimate religion having an incorporated body with an authorized cult.

So, once again, the Monsters of Babylon had obtained laws that protected their criminality from justice.

They had been organizing these kinds of social and political frauds since the days of Hammurabi (1792 – 1750 BC).

And they were well-practiced at the technique of passing laws to legalize their illegalities by following that ancient Secret Fraud #17 of the Sumerian Swindle:

“Kings are required to legitimatize a swindle but once the fraud is legalized, those very kings must be sacrificed.”

Caesar restored to Hyrcanus his tenure of the High Priesthood and Ethnarch of the Jews (that is, king in all but name), and declared his position to be hereditary, not understanding that the real king of the Jews was living in Alexandria where the money was.

Antipater received from Caesar, Roman citizenship.

This brought his son Herod to the throne later as a Roman citizen.

Caesar granted him personal exemption from taxation and an administrative post under Hyrcanus.

Antipater was to act as resident representative of Rome, safeguarding Roman financial interests [378] from Jerusalem.

To stress the fact that Palestine, though tributary, was a client kingdom and not a province, Caesar decreed that no military demands were to be made upon the country, no auxiliary troops were to be levied there, and no requisitions made for winter quarters or other services. [379]

Once again, the Jews as individuals were exempted from serving in the army or even supporting the Roman army in any way, other than by what they could sell to it.

Only this time, the privilege was extended to the entire geographical region of this so-called “holy land.”

The sanctions which Julius Caesar laid down and Augustus later confirmed against Gentile molestation of the Jews and infringement of their religious fraud, had the effect of making anti-Semitic actions illegal throughout the Roman Empire.

But their victims who had suffered under the swindles and depredations of the Jews could not have felt anything but rage to see these piratical cowards receiving protection and preferential treatment from Rome. [380]

The Jews claimed to be blessed by their God and were very boisterous in letting everybody know it.

However, they never mentioned that they had obtained special treatment because they had bribed the senators and even Caesar, himself, for the advantage.

As a worldwide banking and loan shark operation, the members of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop always had the available gold enough to bribe Senators and Emperors.

Even the heftiest bribe would always have a guaranteed repayment from these corrupted politicians by allowing the Jews to suck the lifeblood of that king’s people.

Selling these special privileges to the Jews was an official act of treason on the part of Julius Caesar toward every Roman citizen and every slave in the empire.

Except for a brief period of restriction under Hadrian, it was a privileged status which Judaism was to hold in the Roman Empire for over three centuries.

Small wonder that Jews were conspicuous among the international crowd of mourners around Caesar’s funeral pyre in the Forum.

With the Sumerian Swindle and their international monopoly of trade sources as their prime monetary engine, the Jews had unlimited wealth with which to bribe even the emperor of the Roman Empire.

With Caesar’s official ruling, they were free to practice all of their clever frauds upon the People with the backing of Roman troops to protect them from justice at the hands of their victims.

Only a month or so before his murder, Caesar recommended to the senate that “Jewish Loyalty” deserved “a token of gratitude” and with senatorial approval Caesar issued a decree authorizing the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem.

His final act of trusting the “word of the Jews” was to cost Rome another long siege. [381] 

Philo records an additional favor later granted to the Jews in Rome by Caesar Augustus when he wrote,

“Moreover, at the monthly distributions in Rome, when all the people in turn receive money or food, he never deprived the Jews of this bounty, but if the distribution happened to be made on the Sabbath, he instructed the distributors to reserve the Jews’ share of the universal largesse until the next day.”

Rome kept its populace fed with a monthly distribution of grain.

This grain was set aside so that the scheming Jews would have it waiting for them after they had celebrated their victories over the goyim (lowly insects, stupid cattle) and Sumerian Swindle.

The hypocritical, lying Jews obtained all of the privileges and wealth that Rome had to offer, while at the same time the rabbis were teaching these malicious fiends with the little boxes tied to their heads, that Rome must be destroyed.

Since war was so profitable to them and since the Jews did not have to fight in the wars, why not foment warfare and rebellion against Rome on every side?

What’s more, the Jews’ privileges were extended.

The temporary exemption from military service granted in 43 BC to the Jews in Asia was made permanent, and extended to cover all other Jewish communities, so that, if conscription were applied, neither legionary nor auxiliary service would be demanded of them.

Thus, every Jew in the Roman Empire could avoid military duty while profiting from wars and the billeting of troops.

No other people had this privilege.

Enlistment in the Roman army, was a 25-year service under brutal discipline, relentless labor and a near certainty of being maimed or killed.

Small wonder that the Jews were so enthusiastic about not working on Saturdays, feasting, drinking wine, hearing fables such as:

“we were slaves in Egypt”

and generally remaining safe behind closed doors while all of their Gentile neighbors were being butchered in the wars that the Jews had fomented and financed.

The Jews were also exempted from participation in the imperial cult now being established universally. [382]

And yet, with all of their special privileges enjoyed by no other people, the Jews still betrayed Rome.

Think about it a little bit.

You know what huge amounts of bullion that the Jews accumulated just in their yearly Temple contributions alone.

You know what huge bribes that the Jews gave to various government leaders – gold and silver actually weighing in the tons.

With the unlimited resources available to them through the Sumerian Swindle; the Gold-Silver Exchange Mechanism; the Jew-only moneylending and tithing system through the Temple and synagogues; as well as the yearly Temple Tax that every Jew had to pay, the priests of the Temple and the Prince of the Jews who was operating the Kehillah spy operation, had as much gold and silver as they needed even to bribe the emperor of Rome, Julius Caesar, himself.

The bribe must have been enormous, judging from the incredible advantages that Caesar sold to the Jews.

And it was money that they knew would come back to them for free through their money machine of the Temple Scam during their weekly party and their readings from the Biggest Lie Ever Told.  

Therefore, with a bribe to Caesar for his personal political ambitions, the rabbis used the community funds of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop to obtain for the Jews an advantage over everybody else in the entire Roman Empire.

This was an advantage that, naturally, the insatiable Jews used to leverage even more from the suffering goyim (lowly insects, stupid cattle) around them.

Whenever the people would rise up in protest at how the Jews were:

• defrauding
• swindling
• betraying

them, the Jews had only to whine in chorus and to cry pitifully with tear-streaked eyes to their protectors, the consuls and governors of the region who were required by Roman Law to follow the pro-Jewish decrees by the Jew-corrupted and deceived emperors.

Whining and crying was an ancient trick, but the Jews were well practiced in its implementation.

Whining and crying in unison was a special skill of God’s Chosen People because it brought them pity from those who had not experienced their depredations firsthand.

Pity was the solution to Problem #14 of the Fifteen Secret Problems of Babylonian Moneylenders:

“Moneylenders are despised.

Yet, how can we have honor and prestige? How else? By having our victims pity us!”

But even as the Jews were gaining so many great advantages from Caesar, they were simultaneously betraying the Romans to the Parthians.

By 40 or 39 BC, a powerful Parthian cavalry force crossed the Euphrates.

The Parthians always seemed to know where the Romans were weakest as the “sacred envoys” of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop carried their Temple taxes and the Hebrew encrypted messages between the synagogues of:

• Persia
• Syria
• Palestine
• Egypt

and Rome.

The Parthian cavalry forces rapidly overran much of Syria and Palestine.

Tyre remained outside the grasp of the Parthians, as they lacked the naval forces necessary to capture it.

In Palestine, the Parthian cavalry was welcomed as “liberators” by the Jewish populace as the Jews danced in the streets and sang songs of welcome and thanksgiving, offering their undying “Jewish Loyalty” to the invading troops.

A certain rich Jew named Antigonus even offered a thousand talents (30,000 kilograms or 33 tons) of silver to the Parthians in order to be installed as a Parthian client in Palestine.

Note that this amount was from his private funds, not from the Temple hoard.

The Jews had enjoyed a long tradition of acceptance and settlement in Persia as far back as the Mede and Achaemenid empires five hundred years previously because they controlled the gold and international trade channels upon which the Persian kingdoms maintained their money and slavery system.

The Romans, however, had never won many friends among the Jews no matter how many special privileges they gave to them simply because the Jewish bankers were determined to destroy Rome and her fiat money system.

Although not widely known, the Jews of Babylonia were the actual source of Jewish orthodoxy.

Did the Jews live in Babylonia because they were “holy” Jews yearning for the “holy Land” where the Temple was?

No, they lived in Babylonia because that’s where the most money was being made at that time. 

From its very beginnings, Judaism had always been a Babylonian religion starting with its Babylonian founders – 

• Terah
• Abraham
• Isaac

and Jacob – and extending through its Babylonian production of its scriptures through Ezra and into its Babylonian rabbinical schools that later produced that ultimate demonic book of the Jews known as the Babylonian Talmud.

The Parthian success in entering Palestine meant that Iranian, Mesopotamian and Judean Jews were once again (albeit very briefly) united within a new Iranian Empire.

The Parthians also had the support of the Pharisees, a sect with which Rome had had cool relations in general.

The Pharisees became loyal adherents of the pro-Parthian party [383] because, unlike the Sadducee sect of Jews who wanted to adhere to the teachings of the Biggest Lie Ever Told as their only guide for betraying Mankind, the Pharisee sect of Jews thought that they could betray Mankind even more horribly by inventing new and more diabolical methods which they called the “Tradition of the Elders” or the “Oral Law.”

However, since the Jews considered all of Mankind as both their enemies as well as their potential victims, it didn’t matter to them which people they betrayed and swindled first, since all were targeted for subversion, impoverishment and destruction eventually.

The Jews had only two actual powers – lies and money.

Both of these they protected with devilish ferocity.

Josephus reports that the Egyptian Jews betrayed the Greeks to the Romans during their campaign in Egypt.

Given that the Greek and Egyptian population were extremely anti-Roman, it is likely that Jewish aid to the Romans was a factor in the later tensions at Alexandria. [384]

The Jews danced in the streets and sang greetings to the Roman legions as “saviors” and “liberators” from “oppression” and offered the Romans their “Jewish Loyalty.”

Overt hostility between the Jews and the Greeks began with the Roman annexation of Egypt in 30 BC, though it did not take active form for over sixty years as the Greeks became aware of the losses caused to them by the Jews’ special privileges under the Romans.

On the one side, the Greeks bitterly resented the reduction in their city’s prestige consequent to the annexation.

The greatest city in the eastern Mediterranean, the former capital of an independent Greek Ptolemaic monarchy, was now under the eye of occupying legions as the Roman administrative headquarters.

It was in the Jews’ best interests to support the Roman administration, since their security depended on a strong central government which they could bribe to protect them against local retribution for their swindles and betrayal of the Greeks.

At the same time the Jews benefited from the annexation by coming automatically under the protection which it was by then Roman policy to afford to all Jews in the empire. [385]

So, betraying the Greeks to the Romans, gained major advantages for the Jews.

Like evil little children who are caught doing bad things, the Jews had learned to whine and cry and complain not because they were sorry for what they had done but because, if they pretended to be oh, we-are-so-oppressed-and-worthy-of-pity, then their accusers might be deceived into letting them escape justice for their crimes.

There was no such thing as “repentance” for crimes against non-Jews because Judaism teaches that only Jews are human, and that non-Jews are goyim (lowly insects, stupid cattle).

So, how can a Jew be guilty of crimes against mere animals whom their god commanded them to destroy?

Jewish angels with leather wings! In Judaism, the stories of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden taught the Jews that there was no Good or Evil but merely punishment if they got caught.

So, when Jews are caught swindling and betraying the people around them, repentance for their evil deeds never cross their deluded, criminal minds.

Repentance was not a Jewish cultural trait, although escape from punishment was a well-honed art among these most sinister and subversive of Rome’s denizens.

Escape, evasion, and return to their wicked Jewish ways, was the one and only goal of the rabbi’s teachings.

Thus, the Jews did not improve their “holiness” with age, rather the reverse.

Doing evil and repenting, was not what Judaism taught.

Doing evil and getting away with it, now that was Jewish!

And if an individual Jew actually had any qualms about swindling or killing a Gentile, the rabbis taught them to – Abracadabra! – put their sins on a live chicken, swing the squawking bird around their head and then kill it along with the Jewish sins that the chicken had magically absorbed.

Or if all of the Jews felt that they had been sinful in betraying the country or the people among whom they lived, all they had to do was – Abracadabra! – put their sins on the head of a live goat and then push the scapegoat off of a cliff so that their sins died with the goat.

And abracadabra!

They would be free of sin and could start all over again swindling, betraying and causing the death of the people of the entire world whom their god of the moneylenders hated, people to whom the Jews were admonished to

“show them no pity” (Dt 7:16)

Under the protection of Roman Law, which they had purchased through bribes and had certainly not earned by a non-existent “virtue,” the wealthy moneylenders, merchants and con artists of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop with branch offices (synagogues) in every city in the Roman Empire, as well as in the major cities of:

• Parthia
• Arabia
• India

began to expand their covert empire.

To all prying eyes, they were humble bankers and import-export tycoons eking out a bare living while dressing in shabby clothes and keeping their gold carefully concealed.

But keeping their wealth hidden did not give them the “prestige” that they sought.

As they expanded into the world dictatorship which their Hebrew Bible (their Training Manual for Jewish Criminality and Sociopathy) had promised them, the Jewish merchants and moneylenders wanted to expand the size and impressiveness of Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop in Jerusalem.

A great, new Temple could represent their corporate wealth and power without endangering their personal wealth by flaunting it.

To increase their own “prestige” and to impress the kings of the world with their wealth and influence, something more striking was deemed necessary than the nearly five hundred year-old Temple that had been rebuilt in Ezra’s day.

To match their great advantage and the prestige that they had acquired by selling their “Jewish loyalty” to Caesar, they wanted something grand and new and stylish, something to impress the world with their “holy” wealth.

They could hide their private gold in their private strong rooms and under the floorboards.

But to impress the kings of the goyim (lowly insects, stupid cattle) with their wealth and power, those bankers wanted something that represented their enormous wealth and power, a new Temple in Jerusalem that didn’t have five hundred years’ worth of bird poop on it.

The Monsters of Babylon found their man for the job in one whom they called Herod the Great (37 – 4 BC).

The Roman senate had appointed Herod, the son of Antipater, as king, in 37 BC.

Herod was an Idumaean – a people long antagonistic to the Jews for forcibly Judaizing and circumcising them under the Hasmonaeans.

He is called the Great, chiefly because of his administrative ability, the extent of his kingdom and the vast building programs he initiated. [386]

And especially for such a small kingdom as was Herod’s to rule, these projects could not possibly have been supported by the taxes that he collected from the:

• Palestinians
• Idumaeans
• Syrians

under his subjection.

The money for them had to have come from some other source.

Herod made one great bid to win the popularity which would be his best guarantee of security among his Jewish subjects.

In 23/22 BC he undertook the elaborate and costly project of replacing the poor, post-Exilic Temple by a new one on a lavish scale.

His proposal was greeted, not with the anticipated enthusiasm, but with the suspicion that it was a covert attack on Judaism, a ruse to demolish the existing Temple and leave the city without one.

But Herod was looking to win eternal fame for himself as a builder and perhaps to enlisting divine support for his reign by an expensive dedication.

The project was carried through during the following eight or ten years.

He would no doubt have liked to re-design the Temple on Greek architectural lines, but this he dared not do.

The traditional plan and dimensions of Solomon’s Temple had to be followed as far as was practicable to make the new Temple acceptable to the Jews.

The figures given in the Old Testament probably contained a fair number of corruptions, for they produced a building of by no means graceful and harmonious proportions, a tall T-shaped structure, with the sanctuary and the Holy of Holies running east-west to form the upright, and an enormous flat porch with a façade 150 feet square across the eastern end as the horizontal. 

But Herod did his best to distract attention from its peculiarities by individual features of breath-taking size and magnificence – huge doors surmounted by a golden vine with grape clusters as big as a man (replacing the vine given to Pompey by Aristobulus in 64 BC), a vast Babylonian tapestry, and, in addition to the dazzling white marble of the exterior walls, a liberal amount of gold plating. [387]

For the inner courts, the complex immediately surrounding the Temple, was reserved for Jews alone, with Greek and Latin inscriptions on the stone balustrade marking off the sacred precinct forbidding Gentiles to pass through on pain of death.

But the outer court was open to Jew and Gentile alike. [388]

Herod had priests trained as masons and carpenters for the rebuilding of the Temple (as distinct from the surrounding courts), so that no non-Jewish foot should defile the sacred area where the gold was kept and where the bloody, fly-swarming altar was to be.

He made sure that his abstinence from pork was known.

Because Herod had executioned members of his own family in his rise to power, on this technical point of his character, Caesar Augustus cynically joked, 

“I would rather be Herod’s pig than his son.”

And Herod gave up a politically valuable marriage alliance out of deference to Jewish views on circumcision. [389]

In the case of the building of Masada, excavation has corroborated and supplemented Josephus’ description of the defenses of the fortress and the amenities provided, regardless of expense, to enable not only Herod and his family but the garrison also to enjoy the same standard of living in the desert as in Jerusalem.

The small, isolated plateau rising 1300 feet sheer from the plain between the Dead Sea and the Judaean mountains, was fortified, except at its wholly impregnable northern end, by a casemate wall and towers, and furnished with two palaces sumptuously decorated with mosaic floors and walls frescoed to resemble marble.

An official residence on the summit and a smaller private palace built in three tiers on natural rock terraces of the precipitous cliffs at the northern tip, commanded a superb view.

Five smaller residences of similar high standard were perhaps for members of Herod’s family. 

Huge cisterns filled by aqueducts from neighboring wadis served Roman-style baths in the palaces, in a public bath-block, and in a swimming pool.

A range of large storehouses was stocked with weapons, metal ingots, and vast quantities of food against a possible siege, and inscriptions on amphora sherds show that in 19 BC Herod went to the trouble of importing wine from Italy.

For his army officers and court there were residential and administrative buildings, and very probably a small synagogue, witnessing to Herod’s lip service to Judaism. [390]

Although for some of Judaism’s great and wonderful traditions, Herod proved to be an enthusiastic practitioner with his harem of nine women, including one cousin and a niece. [391] 

Herod had more scope for self-expression outside his kingdom than within it.

His interest in Hellenism was shown as much in his relations with Greek cities as in his attempts to import the Greek way of life into Palestine.

But self-interest played a part also: foreign goodwill was a useful counterpoise to Jewish hostility.

The list of his benefactions to Gentile cities is long and imposing he provided gymnasia at 

• Tripolis
• Damascus
• Ptolemais

fortifications at Byblos;

• halls
• porticoes
• temples

and marketplaces at Berytus and Tyre; theatres at Sidon and Damascus; an aqueduct at Laodicea; and:

• baths
• fountains
• colonnades

at Ascalon.

He financed the paving of the main road two miles long through Antioch and the erection of covered colonnades along it.

During a journey in Asia Minor in 14 BC, he restored a stoa on Chios destroyed by Mithridates and gave unspecified gifts to Samos and many mainland cities (his only dated benefactions). 

He rebuilt the temple of Apollo on Rhodes after a fire and made cash donations towards the maintenance of the island’s fleet.

He provided endowments for Cos and other cities to meet the expenses of the gymnasiarchy. 

And his generosity reached across the Aegean to Sparta and Athens, whose gratitude was recorded on statue bases.

Last but by no means least, Herod gave:

“a gift not only to Greece but to the whole world”

when, in 16 BC, he presided over the Olympic Games, which had gotten into low financial water and had lost much of their former glory.

This honor entailed defraying much of the cost himself, but he went further by making a permanent endowment for the upkeep of the festival, an act of generosity for which Herod was rewarded with the title of perpetual president. [392]

Not bad for a Jew with nothing but money as his only claim to personal merit.

But where did the money come from?

Herod’s liberality to foreign cities reveals one of his main ambitions, to win “prestige” in the eyes of the outside world.

None of the cities which enjoyed his bounty is known to have rendered him any particular service for which he might be making a return, except possibly Rhodes in 40 BC.

But many of them contained large Jewish communities, notably:

• Damascus
• Tyre
• Sidon
• Ptolemais
• Ascalon

and Antioch.

If this was the criterion for Herod’s choice of recipients, his gifts can probably be taken as evidence for Jewish settlements in cities where they are otherwise unattested.

The conspicuous omission is Alexandria with the largest of all Diaspora (Spores-that-Die-Ya) communities.

By singling out cities with Jewish communities that he could compensate, indeed lavishly over compensate, for the export of money in the form of the Temple tax paid annually to Jerusalem, he could counter any complaints by his subjects at the drain of money out of Palestine by pointing out that fellow Jews were benefiting, and he could impress the Diaspora (Spores-that-Die-Ya) with the glory and prosperity of the king of their homeland.

Herod’s other main ambition – since he was a Jew neither by race nor by religious conviction – was to Hellenize his kingdom as far as possible, though he was prepared to pay lip service to Judaism in the interests of internal peace.

But Hellenization was his duty also.

A client king’s function was to prepare his subjects for assimilation as a province of the Roman empire by introducing features of Greco-Roman culture; and to pave the way for his own supersession by accustoming them to Roman forms of administration.

The Greek language, in which Herod himself was fluent, had been widely used in Palestine since Seleucid days and could readily become the official language of the court and the administration.

In contrast to the Hasmonaean bilingual coins, his coins have legends in Greek only and bear tangible witness to his hope that Greek would be adopted by his subjects at large. [393]

In 12 BC, Caesar Augustus sold to Herod the control and the revenues of half the copper-mines in Cyprus in return for three hundred talents (9000 kilos or 9.9 tons) of gold to help pay for the dole then being distributed [394] in Rome.

How did Herod afford all this building?

How did a man who began his reign with empty coffers and was compelled to find huge sums in order to placate Antony and Cleopatra, to be followed by lavish expenditure on presents and entertainments, find means to finance this orgy of construction, which was by no means confined to his own dominions?

Whence came the gold to provide not only his building projects but entertainments and prizes, perpetual feasts and merry meetings, year after year at one festival or another?

Where did the money come from?

Do Jew know?

Here is Herod’s answer to that question.

Herod claimed that his predecessor Hyrcanus had entered the tomb of David and had removed from it, silver worth millions.

So, Herod also entered the tomb in strict secrecy to try his own luck. He found that all the silver was gone but there was abundance of gold and other precious things, and he took the lot. [395]

But as you know from previous chapters, there was no fabulously wealthy king David nor a super wealthy king Solomon.

It was an invention of the priests and rabbis trying to make their inconsequential little scam appear to be mighty.

That the Temple had always been designed as a repository for bullion and as a façade for the World’s Oldest Organized Criminal Conspiracy, had been the only reason for inventing those fictions about David and Solomon.

The wealth on deposit in the Temple could always be credited to the mythical David and Solomon while concealing its real source from the international bankers and moneylenders.

If the inconsequential goat-rustling bandit named David had a tomb anywhere, no one knew where it was.

And if a Jew like Hyrcanus had found a tomb full of silver and gold, he certainly would not have merely taken the silver and left the gold.

So, Herod’s story of where he got the money to build his projects, is obviously a lie.

It was a good enough lie in his day when the Jews believed that a mighty king David had actually existed even though no one knew where his tomb was.

Under the proofs of modern archaeology, Herod’s lie is seen for what it is.

But why lie, unless the source of the money did not want to be revealed?

Remember once again that the ancient bankers did not have the technological protections as do modern bankers.

Even with massive stone walls and fanatical priests guarding their hoards, the ancient bankers’ and moneylenders’ greatest protection was deceit and concealment and misdirection.

If no one knew it was there, it couldn’t be stolen.

Because of its smaller volume to value ratio, gold was easier to smuggle and more valuable than silver.

So, gold was the preferred international method of payment for large sums.

And gold is what Herod claimed that he “found” because gold is what the merchant-moneylenders paid him.

NEW WORLD ORDER: GLOBAL BANKING: GOLD: For Humans & Others… – Library of Rickandria

And the international Jewish merchant-moneylenders would have kept the silver for themselves because they could trade it for twice as much gold in India.

That the international Jewish merchant moneylenders operating Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop had given Herod the funds, had to be concealed, otherwise, their lies and wealth would be revealed to the world.

While everyone could see with their own eyes that the Jews were making money in every line of trade including moneylending, the Jews were always crying and complaining that their “poverty” and “oppression” was keeping them in shabby clothes and living in “depressed” neighborhoods.

Concealing their gold in a bag of rags would not be a tactic that protected that gold, if the farce were divulged for what it was.

So, Herod claimed that all of the gold that he suddenly had for his building projects, he had “found” in a non-existent tomb of an ancient, mythological, Judaean goat-rustler.

Therefore, the source of the gold was blamed on an ancient myth instead of being divulged that it came from the enormously wealthy Jews.

Of course, Herod also taxed his subjects ferociously, but the tax-base of his kingdom could not support the building projects and largess that Herod expended.

Herod died in the spring of 4 BC.

After considerable wrangling, his kingdom was divided between three of his sons. [396]

And true-to-form, more than seventy years later, after no one alive had ever even met king Herod, when the Jews of Jerusalem rose up against Rome in 69 AD, one of the first things that they did was to desecrate Herod’s tomb and break up his skeleton so as to satisfy their eternal, never-ending, diabolical, Jewish vengeance, a Semitic hatred that the Jews carry along through the ages and visit even upon the corpses of those whom the Jews hate.

However, in Rome, itself, the general picture of the Jews was of a large, well-organized community, content with its lot; for in 4 BC, they gave a spontaneous testimonial to the security and protection which they were enjoying by their massive support for the visiting Palestine delegation requesting direct Roman rule for their country. [397]

Yet, why should the Jews be unhappy under Roman rule?

They had all of the benefits with none of the setbacks.

They didn’t have to fight in wars.

They had protection from the Roman army when their swindled victims rioted against their larceny.

They had the money to bribe their way into high office if they wished, or to make a place for goyish allies to do the work for them in high office while they merely paid his price and pulled his strings.

They had limitless wealth skimmed from international dealings, loansharking and business cartels.

The Jews had achieved domination over the international trade channels and banking systems from India to Europe under the façade that the Jews were holy devotees to a mighty god who had chosen them especially to own the world and to enslave its people because – according to them – they deserved it.

With the vast wealth that the Sumerian Swindle and their monopoly over the import-export trade channels had given them, they had bribed their way into the most advantageous and profitable positions possible in every country including the Roman Empire.

With the incredible profits from their international frauds and larcenies and their war profiteering, the Jewish moneylenders had their puppet king Herod build them a sparkling new temple for Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop.

It was surrounded by massive walls and thick gates to show the world the power and wealth of the Jews.

The Jews were at the top of their game.

They had deceived the world.

But even among those whom they had not deceived, such as the Greeks, they had the might of Rome to protect them from assault and insult.

Yes, even the Monsters of Babylon needed protection.

Their cadaverous skin was too fragile to withstand the curious probing of their impoverished victims who wondered to where the wealth had vanished.

Their bones were too weak to withstand the indignant clamoring of the slaves who wondered how they had ended up in chains, toiling for monsters who were never satisfied.

Their feet were too tender to withstand the marching of boots going off to the wars that they had fomented for their own profit.

They needed protection from all of their outraged victims whose homes, wives and children, lifesavings and very lives these Monsters had destroyed for the satisfaction of their own fat bellies, which the greed in their evil hearts had made insatiable.

And so, the Monsters wrapped themselves in silks and finery and sat themselves upon high seats and announced to the world that they were not really monsters at all but were, in fact, godly saints.

Once the Monsters of Babylon had established their own religion, their greed could be concealed behind the high moral fraud and the embroidered catchphrases at the hem of their sleeves and written on parchment inside the little boxes that they tied to their heads.

Like gnarly spiders hidden in silken holes in the ground, the Monsters spun their schemes and attached their silken threads to all of Mankind, while hypocritically rolling their eyes toward heaven, gathering around in circles of ten, and loudly praying in the streets to show the non-Jews how holy they were.

The shiny, new Temple that Herod had built, allegedly to house a terrible phantom of a destructive god dwelling within, in fact, housed a hoard of gold and it was designed to gather in even more of that “sacred” metal.

No god promised the Jews that they would own the whole world while enslaving Mankind.

That promise came from the gnarly spiders who were concealed by Abraham’s First National Bank and Pawn Shop with main offices and vaults in Jerusalem and in synagogues scattered worldwide.

The gnarly bankers thought that they would never be found out.

But then Jesus arose and tore away their mask, exposing the Jews as the:

• liars
• deceivers
• hypocrites
• murderers

and the very children of the devil that they truly are.

And to prove that his accusations were entirely true, the Monsters of Babylon murdered him.

CONTINUE

BOOK: The Monsters of Babylon: How the Jews Betrayed Mankind (1200 BC to 1000 AD) – Volume II – Chapter 11: The Gospels According to G_d – Library of Rickandria

BOOK: The Monsters of Babylon: How the Jews Betrayed Mankind (1200 BC to 1000 AD) – Vol. II – Library of Rickandria

The Monsters of Babylon: How the Jews Betrayed Mankind (1200 BC to 1000 AD) – Volume II – Chapter 10: BEFORE JESUS – the Greeks, Persians, Romans & Jews