SATAN, ZEUS, BAAL, AND THE PRINCE OF ROME
by Douglas Van Dorn (May 24, 2019, slightly revised Feb 27, 2024)
Abstract:
Who is Satan?
The Origin of Satan – Library of Rickandria
It’s a question not asked a lot.
SATAN—HIS ORIGIN AND MISSION – Library of Rickandria
In this paper, we will look at several reasons for understanding that Satan is the same entity at Baal in the OT, who also happens to be Zeus, who became Jupiter and is therefore the Prince of Rome.
Miles Williams Mathis: ROME – Library of Rickandria
1. Stating the Question
Who is the chief supernatural opponent of Christians in the New Testament?
I think most people would say Satan, and this would be correct.
But how about the Old Testament?
Would you give the same answer?
This is tempting, given that the New Testament seems to call that creature in the Garden of Eden “Satan.”
Lucifer’s Flood & the Little Season – Two Gardens – Library of Rickandria
“And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,” Rev 20:2
But if you only had an Old Testament, as Jews and the earliest Christians had, it would be more difficult to make this connection since the creature in Eden is only called a “serpent,” and since the word “satan” does not seem to appear as a proper noun even a single time. [1]
[1]
There are a few instances where many English translations choose to render the word as a proper name:
While in some or all of these instances it may very well be the being called Satan that is in mind, the word actually appears with the definite article in front of it making it “the satan.”
THE BOOK OF JOB – Library of Rickandria
The single exception is 1Ch 21:1.
The problem is, just as in English (with the exception of “The Donald”), proper names never have the definite article in Hebrew.
It is better to render it The Adversary, as even a good being like the Angel of the LORD (Num 22:22) or even humans (1Sa 29:4) can be called “the satan.”
Given such difficulties and other possible candidates, here is my initial answer to the question:
Baal.
The Baal Cycle – Library of Rickandria
I say “initial answer” because as we will see, things may not be as they seem on the surface.
Most people would probably say that Baal is just a made-up god and would therefore equate him with an idol which has no actual existence.
But curiously, when it comes to Satan, most have no problem admitting that he is a real being.
At least two significant reasons for this may be one.
We are taught that “gods” are not real entities, except for our God.
2. We think that “gods” and “idols” are equivalent terms.
As for the latter, the ancient idea was that through ritual and incantation, idols were used to “locate” a spiritual entity in space and time.
They were thought to have become a place of residence for a truly existing spiritual being (be it angelic or demonic).
Augustine (among many others) explains this in the City of God.
As for the former, a couple of things can be said.
The way most people understand the English word “g-o d” is not exactly identical with the word it translates in the Hebrew:
elohim.
In Hebrew, there are various entities that are all called elohim:
- God (Gen 1:1)
- demons (Deu 32:17)
- dead people like Samuel (1Sa 28:13-14)
- heavenly beings called the “sons of God” (see Psalm 82:1, 6; cf. Job 38:7)
Now, virtually no one who believes that Satan is real would doubt the existence of demons!
The Power of Demons over Mortal Flesh – Library of Rickandria
Yet, they are called elohim.
The Demonic Craving for Flesh – Library of Rickandria
Furthermore, Satan is called a “god” in the NT.
He is the “god” of this world (2Co 4:4). [2]
[2]
A few scholars believe the “god” here is Yahweh and not Satan (cf. Donald E. Hartley, “2 Corinthians 4:4: A Case for Yahweh as the ‘God of this Age.’ 57th Annual Meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society [Valley Forge, PA: 2005],
But there are compelling reasons to stay with the traditional understanding that it is Satan (see Derek R. Brown, “The God of This Age: Satan in the Churches and Letters of the Apostle Paul,” Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh [2011], 149-59).
Paul the Gnostic Opponent of Peter, not an Apostle of Historic Christianity – Library of Rickandria
The point is not that Satan or demons are equivalent with God in every way.
Nothing could be more blasphemous than a teaching like that.
Yet, they share some communicable attribute(s) with him.
For instance, their proper place of residence is not the physical world, but the realm of spirits, and they are given authority to “rule” in some sense.
Hence, Satan is called the “ruler” (archon) “of this world” (John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11).
But they do not share incommunicable attributes such as:
- omnipotence
- omnipresence
- omniscience
or omnitemporality.
Nor are they:
- holy
- good
- righteous
- just
- wise
etc. as God is those things.
And fallen angels aren’t those things in much of any sense of those words.
Fallen Angels – Library of Rickandria
I’m going to use this word “ruler” (above) along with the phrase “of this world” to transition into answering our question about why Satan is not very prominent in the Old Testament.
The Fall of Satan – Library of Rickandria
Both the word and the phrase are quite important and fascinating to think through in getting a handle on our original question of why Satan does not play a significant role in the Old Testament like he does in the New Testament.
The answer I will suggest may both shock and surprise you.
The word “ruler” is often translated as “prince.”
Princes are subordinate rulers to the King.
We normally think of princes as simply human beings.
But ancient people understood that there were also heavenly princes.
Hence, Satan is called a prince and a ruler.
We see the idea in the Old Testament.
For example, an angel comes to Daniel after a three-week delay because the “prince of Persia” fought against him.
But Michael, the archangel helped this angel escape the clutches of this other heavenly being (Dan 10:13).
Later in the same chapter, this angel leaves to go fight against the prince of Persia while predicting that the prince of Greece was coming (Dan 10:20).
The worldview of the Old Testament (along with every other Ancient Near Eastern religion, along with most every other ancient religion, including the Greeks) believed that at some point in time, heavenly beings called the “sons of God” (translated as “angels” by the Greek Old Testament Septuagint) were given to the nations as allotted beings to rule over them (Deu 32:7-8; cf. Deu 4:19; 29:26; etc.).
The 2 Falls of the Angels – Library of Rickandria
Deuteronomy 32:7-9 says,
Remember the days of old, consider the years of many generations: ask thy father, and he will shew thee; thy elders, and they will tell thee.
When the most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel.
For the LORD’S portion is his people; Jacob is the lot of his inheritance.
Plato in his Critias, using language that sounds like it was lifted straight out of this text says:
In the days of old the gods had the whole earth distributed among them by allotment.
There was no quarrelling; for you cannot rightly suppose that the gods did not know what was proper for each of them to have, or, knowing this, that they would seek to procure for themselves by contention that which more properly belonged to others.
They all of them by just apportionment obtained what they wanted, and peopled their own districts; and when they had peopled them they tended us, their nurslings and possessions, as shepherds tend their flocks, excepting only that they did not use blows or bodily force, as shepherds do, but governed us like pilots from the stern of the vessel, which is an easy way of guiding animals, holding our souls by the rudder of persuasion according to their own pleasure;-thus did they guide all mortal creatures.
Now different gods had their allotments in different places which they set in order.
Hephaestus and Athene, who were brother and sister, and sprang from the same father, having a common nature, and being united also in the love of philosophy and art, both obtained as their common portion this land, which was naturally adapted for wisdom and virtue; and there they implanted brave children of the soil, and put into their minds the order of government; their names are preserved, but their actions have disappeared by reason of the destruction of those who received the tradition, and the lapse of ages.
This is a good example of how all the ancient people’s thought, and it is from this worldview that the origin of Satan as a proper name for some evil supernatural entity may have come.
2. Prince/Ruler of This World
This takes us to the second part of Jesus’ comments.
Satan is the ruler “of this world.”
Most of us today would take this phrase quite literally and globally.
This is because we live in a “world” where:
- communication
- travel
- commerce
and just about everything else is literally global.
This is how we think.
But in the time of the New Testament, the “world” was not understood to be:
- North or South America
- Australia
- China
- Antarctica
etc.
The world was the Roman world.
Israel was a vassal state of and subservient to Rome.
Rome was the “world,” even though its official territory only went from western Europe to northern Africa to the Middle East.
This is really quite important to wrap your mind around in what I’m about to explain.
3. Jupiter
Like almost all ancient religions, Roman religion had a pantheon.
Its origin myths are interesting and elaborate, but by the time of the NT, it was well established that there were twelve gods in its pantheon and that Jupiter was the most powerful of them all.
He was the
“fount of the auspices upon which the relationship of the city with the gods rested.” [3]
[3]
Mary Beard, John North, S. R. F. Price, Religions of Rome: Volume 1, A History (Cambridge University Press, 1998), 59.
Jupiter is the god of sky and thunder.
He is identified by his lightning bolt.
According to the Online Etymology Dictionary, “Jupiter” means “godfather.”
It is a combination of the Latin deiw-os (“god”) + peter (“father”).
4. Zeus
This can be compared with the “Greek Zeu pater, vocative of Zeus pater “Father Zeus.”
Hence, Jupiter is simply the same deity as Zeus.
In Greek mythology, Zeus was also the high God of the pantheon.
Consider Plato in a section just a little after the one previously quoted.
This is the very last thing said in the Critias before it abruptly ends without answering the puzzle posed.
“Zeus, the god of gods, who rules according to law, and is able to see into such things, perceiving that an honorable race was in a woeful plight, and wanting to inflict punishment on them, that they might be chastened and improve, collected all the gods into their most holy habitation, which, being placed in the center of the world, beholds all created things.
And when he had called them together, he spake as follows…”
The Greeks and Romans used to put statues of the “god of gods” in all of the main temples of other lands that they had taken over.
It was a sign of their superiority and to the utter humiliation of those conquered peoples.
The book of 2 Maccabees recalls one such instance.
“Not long after this, the king sent an Athenian senator to compel the Jews to forsake the laws of their fathers and cease to live by the laws of God, and also to pollute the temple in Jerusalem and call it the temple of Olympian Zeus, and to call the one in Gerizim the temple of Zeus the Friend of Strangers, as did the people who dwelt in that place” (2Ma 6:1-2 RSV).
Among the places where this was done was a glorious mountainous city called Pergamum, located in far western Asia Minor (today’s Turkey).
“In the 2nd cent. BC came one of the greatest centres of art and culture in the ancient world, reaching the height of its glory in the reign of Eumenes II (197–159).
This Eumenes erected the great altar of Zeus the Saviour [Zeus Soter] (now in the Pergamon Museum, Berlin).” [4]
[4]
F. L. Cross and Elizabeth A. Livingstone, eds., The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), 1264.
The altar was pillaged and put into the Pergamon Museum in Berlin where it resides to this day.
As can be seen in the pictures below,
“It is built on three sides of a square, to make a giant chair or throne,” [5]
[5]
Andrew Knowles, The Bible Guide, 1st Augsburg books ed. (Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg, 2001), 698.
with
“the temple dominating the city.” [6]
[6]
Walter C. Kaiser Jr. et al., Hard Sayings of the Bible (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1996), 758.
Now let’s add a new element to what I’ll call the Zeus mystery.
Revelation tells the Christians in this very city,
“I know thy works, and where thou dwellest, even where Satan’s seat is:
and thou holdest fast my name, and hast not denied my faith, even in those days wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth.” Rev 2:13
One author writes of:
“Satan’s destructive power in persecuting God’s people.
Christians who refused to acknowledge Caesar as Lord and God (dominus et deus) faced confiscation of their property, exile, or death.”
He adds that this was “a center of pagan religion.” [7]
[7]
Simon J. Kistemaker and William Hendriksen, Exposition of the Book of Revelation, vol. 20, New Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1953–2001), 129.
Hence, it is often noticed in commentaries that:
“the monument archaeology identifies as ‘Satan’s throne’” [8]
[8]
Bible and Spade (1977) 6, no. 4 (1977): 115. See also Robert G. Bratcher and Howard Hatton, A Handbook on the Revelation to John, UBS Handbook Series (New York: United Bible Societies, 1993), 52;
G. K. Beale, The Book of Revelation: A Commentary on the Greek Text, New International Greek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI; Carlisle, Cumbria: W.B. Eerdmans; Paternoster Press, 1999), 246.
is what is today called “The Great Altar of Zeus.”
There is a thought of progression here among scholars.
First, the throne of Satan and the throne-altar of Zeus in the same city is fairly obvious imagery to connect.
But then, connecting the dots we read things like this,
“To the extent that the ascendancy of Christianity prompted the ancient religions … to be regarded as pagan, … the gods came to be associated with the devil, especially within the monastic-ascetic controversy with paganism, or became concentrated in paganism, beginning with the altar of Zeus at Pergamum being called ‘Satan’s throne’ (Rev. 2:13).” [9]
[9]
Carsten Colpe, “Devil,” The Encyclopedia of Christianity (Grand Rapids, MI; Leiden, Netherlands: Wm. B. Eerdmans; Brill, 1999–2003), 823.
Or even this,
“The Book of Revelation designates pagan gods as δαιμόνια (9:20), just as Zeus is equated with Satan (2:13).” [10]
[10]
Horst Robert Balz and Gerhard Schneider, Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1990–), 273
A further biblical line of evidence may be Ephesians 2:2 and Paul’s:
“prince (archon) of the power of the air, the spirit that is now at work in the sons of disobedience.”
Most scholars see this person as Satan, and for good reasons.
The only personal supernatural entity mentioned in Ephesians is Satan.
In Eph 4:27 and 6:11 Paul specifically mentions “the devil” (diabolou).
Whole Armor of God – Library of Rickandria
In 6:16 he speaks of “the evil one” (ponerou, the same word we find of “The Evil One” in the Lord’s Prayer).
It is most likely Satan that is in view here too, not only for these reasons but because in John, Satan is the “ruler” (archon) of this world: [11]
[11]
An interesting discussion here is Raymond E. Brown, The Epistles of John: Translated, with Introduction, Notes, and Commentary, vol. 30, Anchor Yale Bible (New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 2008), 486-87.
A possible explanation for Satan being the ruler of this world is because he was considered to be the Prince of Rome (see my article “Satan, Zeus, Baal, and the Prince of Rome,”
At that time, Rome was the world empire, and so as on earth, so in heaven.
This is solidified more when you go to the Dead Sea Scrolls and understand the parallels going on in Ephesians here with its “sons of disobedience” (2:2) and later the “sons of light” (Eph 5:6) with something like this,
“The first attack by the sons of light will be launched against the lot of the sons of darkness, against the army of Belial” (1Q33 Col. i:1). [12]
[12]
Florentino Garcıa Martınez and Eibert J. C. Tigchelaar, The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition (translations) (Leiden; New York: Brill, 1997–1998), 113.
5. Belial
Belial is a name for Satan.
Paul asks the Corinthians,
“Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?”
And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? (2Co 6:14-15)
The parallel is Acts 26:18,
“… so that they may turn from darkness to light and from the power of Satan to God.”
It is clear that Belial and Satan are viewed as the same person.
Extra-biblical Jewish literature is also helpful here, for they had a rich tradition of equating Belial with Satan.
Belial is parallel with the serpent in the Dead Sea Scrolls (1 QHa Col. XI, 17-18; XIII, 26-27).
He is the angel/prince of wickedness and ruler of this world (MartIs 2:4, 4:2; 1QM 1:5-6), the head of a legion of angels (TAsh 6:4), and the accuser (Jub 1:20).
Paul is clearly working with the same conceptual world here.
This even applies to the language of:
“the spirit now at work.”
Usually, spirits in the Bible are demons, but sometimes higher creatures than demons are called “spirits” too (Psa 104:4; 1En 15:8). [13]
[13]
Technically speaking, the earliest Church Fathers and Jews all distinguished between demons and angels.
Demons were not seen as fallen angels, as so many view them today.
They were universally considered to be the spirits of the dead giants mentioned in Genesis 6:4.
GIANTS – Library of Rickandria
Those giants had fathers and those fathers were the “angelic” beings called “sons of God” in that passage and sometimes Watchers in others.
WATCHERS – Library of Rickandria
Augustine, seemingly unaware of the tradition which had only recently passed out of knowledge (see Jacob Johannes Theodoor Doedens, “The Sons of God in Genesis 6:1-4” ([Ph.D. diss. Theologische Universiteit Kampen, 2013], esp. 89-180) nevertheless explains that even the Greeks had a similar conception to the Jews.
WHO ARE THE MODERN JEWS? – Library of Rickandria
He writes,
“Certain philosophers have declared that of all living beings possessed of rational souls there is a threefold division into gods, men, and demons.
The gods, who hold the highest place, reside in heaven; men, who hold the lowest, sojourn on earth; demons, in the middle, inhabit the air.
As the dignity of their abode is diverse, so, also, is that of their nature.
The gods are superior to both men and demons.
Men, both in the order of nature and the scale of values, are inferior to both gods and demons.
The demons, therefore, are in the middle.
As they are lower than the gods in place and dignity, so they are higher than men.
They have immortality of the body in common with the gods, but passions of the mind in common with men” (Augustine, City of God 8.14).
They viewed these creatures as the heroes of old, an idea that is conceptually identical to the early church’s understanding of the Nephilim, cross-breeds of heavenly and earthly beings.
Thus,
“Satan is [understood] to be the ruler of an army of evil spiritual powers who work at promoting disobedience to the purposes of God among humanity.” [14]
[14]
Clinton Arnold, Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament: Romans to Philemon (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2010), 313.
If the world is the extremely unsafe land of the zombies (taking Eph 2:1-3 metaphorically), Satan is the voodoo zombie-master who enslaves them to his will.
And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;
Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:
Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.
What a terrifying thought that is.
But at least one scholar makes a very good case that the being Paul has in mind in Eph 2:2 is actually Zeus, the patron god of Rome. [15]
[15]
Fredrick J. Long, “Roman Imperial Rule Under the Authority of Jupiter-Zeus: Political Religious Contexts and the Interpretation of ‘the Ruler of the Authority of the ?Air’ in Ephesians 2:2,” in The Language of the New Testament: Context, History and Development, Linguistic Biblical Studies 6, ed. S. E. Porter and A. W. Pitts (Boston: Brill, 2013): 113-54.
Religious_Contexts_and_the_Interpretation_of_the_Ruler_of_the_Authority_of_the_Air_in_Ep hesians_2_2.
Of course, if there were a connection between Satan, Zeus, and even Belial, then they’re all the same being anyway.
But what of Satan being the patron god of Rome?
Is there any evidence of that?
Indeed, there is and our scholar who sees Zeus in Ephesians 2:2 seems wholly unaware of it.
Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:
6. Samael
Samael (/ˈsæməˌɛl/; Hebrew: סַמָּאֵל, Sammāʾēl, “Venom of God”; Arabic: سمسمائيل, Samsama’il or سمائل, Samail; alternatively, Smal, Smil, Samil, or Samiel) is an archangel in Talmudic and post-Talmudic tradition; a figure who is the accuser or adversary (Satan in the Book of Job), seducer, and destroying angel (in the Book of Exodus).
If we are right about the Revelation connection between Zeus and Satan, then Satan would also be identified as Jupiter, the high God of Rome.
Miles Williams Mathis: ROME – Library of Rickandria
Curiously, there is an ancient belief among Jews and Christians that the “prince of Rome” was actually Satan.
And if this is true, then we do not need to choose between Zeus or Satan in Ephesians 2:2.
They gave him the name Samael.
The Jewish Encyclopedia begins its entry by calling Samael, “Prince of the demons.” [16]
[16]
Isidore Singer, ed., The Jewish Encyclopedia: A Descriptive Record of the History, Religion, Literature, and Customs of the Jewish People from the Earliest Times to the Present Day, 12 Volumes (New York; London: Funk & Wagnalls, 1901–1906), 665.
We can compare this with Matthew 9:34’s identical title “prince of demons” which becomes the proper name Beelzebub in 12:24.
Samael means:
“venom [think serpent] of God.”
Curiously, he is called in some places the “chief of the Satans” [17] (where “the satan” is a title or a job description of a heavenly courtroom “accuser” as discussed above).
[17]
Ibid. Cf. Deut. R. 11:9; Jellinek, “B. H.” 1:125. As Ginzberg says, “On the twenty angels enumerated in Hekalot 175, (Sammael, the head of all the Satans, is described as ‘the greatest of all the angels’; … comp., however, Seder Ruhot, 179 [also 3En 26:12], where Satan is distinguished from Sammael, ‘the prince of Rome’; see also DR 11.9, which reads:
Sammael, the head of all the Satans).” Louis Ginzberg, Henrietta Szold, and Paul Radin, Legends of the Jews, 2nd ed. (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 2003), 130, n. 61.
We can see this line of thinking for example in the Martyrdom of Isaiah 2:2 which says that Manasseh abandoned the service of the LORD of his father, and he served
“Satan, and his angels, and his powers.”
But later in the same book this becomes “Sammael and his hosts” and because of “the words of Satan” the angels were envying one another (7:9).
Or again,
“Because of these visions and prophecies Sammael Satan sawed Isaiah the son of Amoz, the prophet, in half by the hand of Manasseh” (11:41). [18]
[18]
James H. Charlesworth, The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha and the New Testament: Expansions of the “Old Testament” and Legends, Wisdom, and Philosophical Literature, Prayers, Psalms and Odes, Fragments of Lost Judeo-Hellenistic Works, vol. 2 (New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 1985), 166.
A note on 2:2 reads,
“The very common name for the devil; in the Ascension used synonymously with Beliar and Sammael and mentioned elsewhere in 2:7; 5:16; 7:9; 11:23, 41, 43.”
He is then identified as the prince of Rome:
Samael as prince of Rome.
We have already seen instances where the belief in the heavenly patrons of the Gentiles is combined with the belief in Satan as the archfiend.
Satan-Samael thus becomes the patron angel of Edom, that is, Rome. [19]
[19]
How does “Edom” become identified with “Rome?”
First, Samael was said by some to have been the patron angel of Esau, brother of Jacob (Bamberger, 139).
From here Mark Reasoner explains,
“While Jews of the first century might think of Idumaeans [Edomites] such as the Herod family as Esau or Edom, from at least the second century CE on, they also called the Roman Empire ‘Edom,’ the nation descended from Esau, because of Isaac’s words to Esau in Gen 27:40: ‘By your sword you shall live.’ …
In the rabbinic literature of the Tannaitic period, Esau or Edom is routinely used to designate Rome …
The connection between Edom, who lives by the sword, and Rome in Jewish thinking is significant for readers of the New Testament because Paul describes the sword as a threat in his Letter to the Romans (Rom 8:35; 13:4).”
Mark Reasoner, Roman Imperial Texts: A Sourcebook (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2013), 179-80.
Just as the Armilus legend suggests that the Roman power is the Antichrist, so this other fusion of originally independent myths makes Rome the earthly representative of all the powers of evil, and her sar [prince] their heavenly embodiment. [20]
[20]
Bernard J. Bamberger, Fallen Angels: Soldiers of Satan’s Realm (Philadelphia, PA: The Jewish Publication Society, 2006), 139.
Another says,
“As the incarnation of evil, he is the celestial patron of the sinful empire of Rome, with which Edom and Esau are identified (Tan. on Gen. 32:33; Jellinek, l.c. 6:31, 109, etc.).” [21]
[21]
Isidore Singer, ed., The Jewish Encyclopedia: A Descriptive Record of the History, Religion, Literature, and Customs of the Jewish People from the Earliest Times to the Present Day, 12 Volumes (New York; London: Funk & Wagnalls, 1901–1906), 665.
Of course, it is not until around 27 B.C. that Rome was truly thought of as the Empire of the world.
And so it is into this context that the Satan “prince of the world,” and Samael/Satan “prince of Rome” would thus be considered as synonyms.
“His identification with the Prince of Rome, the great earthly adversary of Israel, is [thus] natural.” [22]
[22]
P. Alexander, “3 (Hebrew Apocalypse of) Enoch,” in James H. Charlesworth, The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, vol. 1 (New York; London: Yale University Press, 1983), n. b of 3En 14:2.
Finally, it is also probably worth mentioning here that Satanael (the name of Satan before he lost his “el” [son of “god”] title in the Garden and hence became simply “Satan”) is the Slavonic equivalent of Samael in Greek. [23]
But this Satanael/Samael becomes the name of the person who tempted our parents in some Jewish literature (cf. 3Bar 4:8).
I find it utterly fascinating that we have a scholarly trail connecting Jupiter/Zeus back to Satan through the lines of Scripture (for example Revelation 2:13) and the popular idea that Samael was the prince of Rome.
It is also very curious that Samael and Satan are said to be the creature that tempted our parents in the Garden in both Jewish and Christian traditions.
But how might this help us answer our original question about why Satan would be so prevalent in the New Testament, but not the Old?
[23]
“The name Satanael in the Slavonic is probably secondary to the name Samael in the Greek version.
Samael became a centralizing figure in the later rabbinic literature, incorporating the functions of several angels.
Yet Diabolos, or Satan, functioned in the same manner among Christians, and we find little record of Samael in Christian literature.
The first four archangels in the two lists are each paralleled in early Jewish and Christian sources (seen. to 4:7[S]).
The name Samael is very common as the chief of evil angels in rabbinic literature and some apocryphal works.”
H. E. JR. Gaylord, “3 Baruch: A New Translation and Introduction,” in The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, vol. 1 (New York; London: Yale University Press, 1983), 658.
7. Baal
The Baal Cycle – Library of Rickandria
We have already seen the answer for the NT.
As prince of Rome, Satan would become the great adversary of both Jews and Christians via his heavenly rule that mirrored that of his glorious city which became the Roman Empire.
But what about the OT?
What I propose now is that Satan is not actually missing at all from the OT.
Rather, he is simply known by another well-known name.
That name is Baal.
To understand this, we must go back to Zeus and Jupiter.
When the Romans conquered Greece, they simply took the Greek pantheon and Romanized it.
From the Romans’ point of view, this was as effective as the Greeks putting Zeus in the temple at Jerusalem.
It was utterly humiliating to the conquered nation to have their gods now be known by their conqueror’s names.
Yet, the gods remained.
And this is the key.
Jupiter is Zeus.
This practice was well known to the Greeks who did something similar, though not as an act of conquest.
The practice was called interpretatio graeca.
This is where deities and myths from one’s own religious background are used to understand those of other cultures.
One of the main enemies of Israel in the Old Testament were the Canaanites.
Miles Williams Mathis: Phoenicians – Where did they ALL Go? – Library of Rickandria
These people lived north of Israel along the coast of the Mediterranean.
About a century ago, archeologists were digging around in an ancient site called Ugarit, where they uncovered one of the great discoveries of the 20th century.
It was a whole series of texts written on clay tablets that had been buried for 3,000 years.
One of these has become known as the Baal Cycle.
This ancient story tells of the ascendency of Baal, one of 70 sons of El who defeated the sea god Yam to become lord.
He then made his palace on top of the spectacular Mt. Zaphon, which rises nearly a mile straight out of the Sea.
Thus, he became known as Baal Zaphon (lit. “the Lord of Mt. Zaphon”).
Baal was also known as the sky god or the storm god and was often called the “cloud-rider.”
His weapon was a spear that flashes lightning.
The Greeks knew well about gods living on mountains, as Zeus was the head of the pantheon on Mt. Olympus. Through interpretatio graeca, these Greeks would later rename Mt. Zaphon as Kasios.
And guess who became the god of Kasios?
Zeus.
“Zeus” is “derived from the root *diwu-, ‘day (as opposed to night)’ (Lat dies), ‘clear) sky’.
He is identified with local weather gods of Asia Minor, with great sky gods (Zeus Beelsêmên, →Baalshamem).” [24]
[24]
F. Graf, “Zeus,” ed. Karel van der Toorn, Bob Becking, and Pieter W. van der Horst, Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible (Leiden; Boston; Köln; Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge: Brill; Eerdmans, 1999), 934.
Not only was his weapon lightning, but the animal always attached to him is the eagle—for flight.
The equivalent at Ugarit may have been “Baal of the wing” (b’l knp).” [25]
[25]
W. C. Kaiser Jr., “Desolating Sacrilege,” ed. Geoffrey W. Bromiley, The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, Revised (Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1979–1988), 931.
Thus, “The Greek name for the Olympian Zeus when rendered into Semitic language becomes ‘baal shamem’ (2 Macc. 6:2).
Literally, this means ‘Lord of Heaven.’” [26]
[26]
Paul M. Lederach, Daniel, Believers Church Bible Commentary (Scottdale, PA: Herald Press, 1994), 276.
Thus, we find that “a temple at Umm el Amed is dedicated to Baal-Shamem (KAI 18).
In Greek inscriptions from this region he is called Zeus hypsistos, ‘Highest →Zeus’, Zeus megistos keraunios, ‘Magnific lightning Zeus.’” [27]
[27]
W. Röllig, “Baal-Shamem,” ed. Karel van der Toorn, Bob Becking, and Pieter W. van der Horst, Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible (Leiden; Boston; Köln; Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge: Brill; Eerdmans, 1999), 149.
The Baal who was worshiped on Mount Carmel in the Elijah vs. the prophets of Baal story, was probably the Phoenician deity Baal Shamem (“Lord of Heaven”). [28]
[28]
Jeremy D. Otten, “Mount Carmel,” ed. John D. Barry et al., The Lexham Bible Dictionary (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015).
Summing up all these relationships we find that Baal and Zeus both share the same position in the succession of kings in Heaven, both are the youngest son, both wield the lightning bolt at a weapon, both have a sister (Anat with Baal, Hera with Zeus) who is their principle consort, both are called the cloud-gatherer or cloud-rider, both are associated with the bull, both have a final battle against a foe (Baal with Yam, Typhon with Zeus) whereupon they ascend to Lord. [29]
[29]
See Carolina López-Ruiz, When the Gods Were Born: Greek Cosmogonies and The Near East (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010), 109-110.
They are, in fact, the same entity.
We may have already seen a hint of the relationship between Satan and Baal in the name Beelzebub.
This word can mean “Lord” (from Ba’al) “of the House” or “Lord of Flies.”
Curiously, the high God of Greece was called “Zeus Averter of Flies.” [30]
[30]
Clemens Alexandrinus, Protrepticus II,38, 4; Pausanias, Graeciae Descriptio V 14, 1. See W. Herrmann, “Baal Zebub,” ed. Karel van der Toorn, Bob Becking, and Pieter W. van der Horst, Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible (Leiden; Boston; Köln; Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge: Brill; Eerdmans, 1999), 154.
If this is all true, then suddenly, we have an explanation for the absence of Satan in the OT and the wide-spread presence of Baal in the same place.
The reality may very well be that Satan is Baal.
Baal is no mere idol.
He is a person who resides in heavenly places and is the ultimate usurper of all things that are said of Christ. Jesus, not Baal, is the Cloud-Rider (Dan 7:13; Matt 24:30). [31]
[31]
See Michael S. Heiser, “What’s Ugaritic God to Do with Anything?,” Faithlife/Logos,
What’s Ugaritic Got to Do with Anything?
Michael S. Heiser – A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?
To him belongs the power of the weather.
His is the throne of heaven.
He is the Christ.
Baal-Zeus-Jupiter, he who wishes to punish the nations (paraphrasing Plato), is the true antichrist who sits as prince over Rome pretending to be God until he is finally and thoroughly thrown into the lake of fire at the end of days.
Bibliography
Alexandrinus, Clemens. Protrepticus.
Alexander, P. “3 (Hebrew Apocalypse of) Enoch.” The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, vol. 1.
Ed. James H. Charlesworth. New York; London: Yale University Press, 1983.
Arnold, Clinton. Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament: Romans to
Philemon. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2010.
Augustine. City of God.
Balz, Horst Robert and Gerhard Schneider. Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament. Grand
Rapids, Mich.: Eerdmans, 1990–.
Bamberger, Bernard J. Fallen Angels: Soldiers of Satan’s Realm. Philadelphia, PA: The Jewish
Publication Society, 2006.
Beard, Mary; John North; S. R. F. Price. Religions of Rome: Volume 1, A History. Cambridge
University Press, 1998.
Bible and Spade 6:4 (1977).
Bratcher, Robert G. and Howard Hatton. A Handbook on the Revelation to John. UBS Handbook
Series. New York: United Bible Societies, 1993.
Beale, G. K. The Book of Revelation: A Commentary on the Greek Text. New International Greek
Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI; Carlisle, Cumbria: W.B. Eerdmans;
Paternoster Press, 1999.
Brown, Derek R. “The God of This Age: Satan in the Churches and Letters of the Apostle Paul.”
Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh (2011).
Brown, Raymond E. The Epistles of John: Translated, with Introduction, Notes, and
Commentary, vol. 30. Anchor Yale Bible. New Haven; London: Yale University Press,
2008.
Charlesworth, James H. The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha and the New Testament: Expansions
of the “Old Testament” and Legends, Wisdom, and Philosophical Literature, Prayers,
Psalms and Odes, Fragments of Lost Judeo-Hellenistic Works, 2 Vols. New Haven;
London: Yale University Press, 1985.
Cross F. L. and Elizabeth A. Livingstone (eds). The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church.
Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Colpe, Carsten “Devil.” The Encyclopedia of Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI; Leiden,
Netherlands: Wm. B. Eerdmans; Brill, 1999–2003.
Doedens, Jacob Johannes Theodoor “The Sons of God in Genesis 6:1-4.” Ph.D. diss.
Theologische Universiteit Kampen, 2013.
Gaylord, H. E. JR. “3 Baruch: A New Translation and Introduction.” The Old Testament
Pseudepigrapha, vol. 1. Ed. James H. Charlesworth. New York; London: Yale University
Press, 1983.
Ginzberg, Louis. Henrietta Szold, and Paul Radin. Legends of the Jews, 2nd ed. Philadelphia:
Jewish Publication Society, 2003.
Graf, F. “Zeus.” Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible. Ed. Karel van der Toorn, Bob
Becking, and Pieter W. van der Horst. Leiden; Boston; Köln; Grand Rapids, MI;
Cambridge: Brill; Eerdmans, 1999.
Hartley, Donald E. “2 Corinthians 4:4: A Case for Yahweh as the ‘God of this Age.’” 57th Annual Meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society [Valley Forge, PA: 2005],
Heiser, Michael S. “What’s Ugaritic God to Do with Anything?” Faithlife/Logos..
Herrmann, W. “Baal Zebub.” Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible. Ed. Karel van der
Toorn, Bob Becking, and Pieter W. van der Horst. Leiden; Boston; Köln; Grand Rapids,
MI; Cambridge: Brill; Eerdmans, 1999.
Kaiser, Walter C. Jr. “Desolating Sacrilege,” The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia,
Revised. Ed. Geoffrey W. Bromiley. Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1979–1988.
Kaiser, Walter C. Jr, et al. Hard Sayings of the Bible. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1996.
Kistemaker Simon J., and William Hendriksen. Exposition of the Book of Revelation, vol. 20.
New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1953–2001.
Knowles, Andrew The Bible Guide, 1st Augsburg books ed. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg, 2001.
Lederach, Paul M. Daniel. Believers Church Bible Commentary. Scottdale, PA: Herald Press,
1994.
Long, Fredrick J. “Roman Imperial Rule Under the Authority of Jupiter-Zeus: Political-Religious
Contexts and the Interpretation of ‘the Ruler of the Authority of the Air’ in Ephesians 2:2.”
The Language of the New Testament: Context, History and Development. Linguistic
Biblical Studies 6. Ed. S. E. Porter and A. W. Pitts Boston: Brill, 2013).
López-Ruiz, Carolina. When the Gods Were Born: Greek Cosmogonies and The Near East.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.
Martınez, Florentino Garcıa and Eibert J. C. Tigchelaar, The Dead Sea Scrolls Study Edition
(translations). Leiden; New York: Brill, 1997–1998.
Otten, Jeremy D. “Mount Carmel.” The Lexham Bible Dictionary. Ed. John D. Barry et al.
Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015.
Pausanias, Graeciae Descriptio.
Reasoner, Mark Roman Imperial Texts: A Sourcebook. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2013.
Röllig, W. “Baal-Shamem,” Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible. Ed. Karel van der
Toorn, Bob Becking, and Pieter W. van der Horst. Leiden; Boston; Köln; Grand Rapids,
MI; Cambridge: Brill; Eerdmans, 1999.
Singer, Isidore (ed). The Jewish Encyclopedia: A Descriptive Record of the History, Religion,
Literature, and Customs of the Jewish People from the Earliest Times to the Present Day,
12 Volumes. New York; London: Funk & Wagnalls, 1901–1906.
Comments are closed.