Cartel Satanism, Occult Violence & the Discipline of Truth: A Forensic, Psychological, Historical & Biblical Analysis of a 4chan /x/ Thread
UPDATED BY VCG ON 8/20/2026 @ 20:20 EST
I want to share a heartfelt cause with my audience. Conner Blaisdell-Greene, a brave Airforce Sr. Airman, recently lost his battle with cancer, leaving his family in financial distress. Every donation, no matter how small, can help cover his funeral costs and ease their burden during this difficult time. Please consider clicking the link below to contribute or share Conner’s story with others. Your support truly matters.
Anyone can do this, but most won’t.
ChatGPT – Library of Rickandria
Soli Deo Gloria, brethren.
I’m going to treat this as a forensic review, not a debunk:
first reconstruct the thread faithfully, then separate factual claims, rhetorical/psychological moves, theological claims, and speculative inferences.
For each substantive line I’ll mark what is actually evidenced, what is unsupported or misleading, and then compare the theological assertions against the KJV text and relevant context.
/x/ – What kind of satanism do the cartels practice? Are – Paranormal – 4chan
I’ve recovered the live thread.
Its central mistake appears immediately:
it assumes a single coherent
“cartel Satanism”
and then tries to rank practitioners inside an occult hierarchy.
The replies then mix real phenomena—
- Santa Muerte devotion
- the Constanzo/Matamoros case
- U.S.-sourced firearms
- factional cartel violence
—with unsupported claims about:
- Freemasonry
- intelligence “handlers,”
- O9A influence
- demons inhabiting Aztlán
and racialized collective blame.
A useful correction is emerging from the criminology literature:
spectacular cartel violence often is symbolic, but “symbolic” does not mean “occult.”
Peer-reviewed work treats:
- public brutality
- narco-messages
- conspicuous killings
primarily as communication—
- intimidation
- reputation-building
- territorial control
- retaliation
and influence over public behavior.
That gives us a much stronger explanation for
“they stepped up their game”
than assuming ritual escalation from the visibility of a killing.
I reconstructed the live thread through post No. 42848631, posted August 20, 2026.
The thread begins by assuming that “the cartels” practice a common form of Satanism and then asks where they rank in a supposed Satanic hierarchy; later replies add:
- Santa Muerte
- Palo
- Santería
- Freemasonry
- O9A
- Aztlán
- intelligence agencies
- numerology
- racial theories
and the Adolfo Constanzo case into one explanatory bundle.
That bundle contains a few real facts, several distorted facts, and a large amount of speculation. (4chan)
My overall finding is:
There is real occult and folk-religious practice in some Mexican criminal milieus, and there have been exceptional cases of ritual murder connected with drug criminals.
That does not establish a universal “cartel Satanism,” an occult cartel hierarchy, O9A control, Freemasonic control, demonic geography in Aztlán, or CIA/DEA/NSA command-and-control.
Biblically, moreover, belief in genuine spiritual evil does not excuse false witness, racial contempt, victim-blaming, or unsupported attribution of particular crimes to demons.
That distinction is the key to the whole thread.
1. Methodology: how I fact-checked it
I used four separate evidentiary tracks rather than treating everything as the same kind of claim.
For contemporary events, I prioritized current reporting and official investigative statements.
César Gastélum’s August 4, 2026 killing is independently verified; Mexican authorities are investigating whether his social-media references to a criminal faction were relevant, but that remains a line of investigation, not a proven motive.
Mexican influencer Cesar Gastelum shot to death during livestream | Reuters
For religion and occult history, I prioritized academic religious-studies sources rather than police folklore or sensational journalism:
- Oxford scholarship on Santa Muerte
- Santería and Afro-Cuban traditions
- academic work on O9A
For psychology, I am analyzing mechanisms present in the text, not diagnosing anonymous posters.
An anonymous poster may sincerely believe something, be:
- exaggerating
- role-playing
- joking
or deliberately trolling.
For Scripture, I am making a second, distinct evaluation.
Historical evidence can tell us whether a cartel affiliation is documented; Scripture tells us how a Christian ought to reason about:
- idolatry
- demons
- truth
- witnesses
- enemies
- human beings
An empirical source cannot prove or disprove the existence of demons, and a Bible verse cannot by itself prove that a particular 2026 murder was an occult ritual.
My verdict vocabulary is therefore:
verified, partly supported, misleading, unsupported, contradicted, or not empirically testable.
2. Post-by-post forensic audit
No. 42841108 — OP: “What kind of Satanism do the cartels practice?” / “lower or higher level?” / livestream murders mean escalation
Verdict: unsupported premise followed by an unsupported inference.
The first problem is grammatical but important:
“the cartels” are treated as one religious body.
They are not.
Mexican organized crime comprises rival:
- organizations
- factions
- families
- local cells
- individual participants
There is evidence that some traffickers venerate Santa Muerte or engage practitioners of folk religion.
That is drastically different from evidence that Mexican cartels collectively belong to one form of Satanism.
Oxford scholar R. Andrew Chesnut specifically stresses the heterogeneous character of Santa Muerte devotion.
Millions of devotees are neither drug traffickers nor violent criminals; even among participants in Mexico’s drug war, devotion occurs on multiple sides, including police, soldiers and prison personnel.
The
“higher/lower Satanic practitioner”
language also assumes a ranking system for which the OP supplies no evidence.
Nothing about the organizational rank of a trafficker demonstrates an occult initiation grade.
Finally, a murder occurring during a livestream does not establish ritual escalation.
César Gastélum really was shot during a livestream on August 4, 2026.
But Mexican authorities are examining his social-media activity because some posts reportedly alluded to a criminal faction.
Culiacán was already experiencing violent factional conflict.
Mexican influencer Cesar Gastelum shot to death during livestream | Reuters
Research on Mexican criminal organizations gives us a much more parsimonious mechanism for spectacular public violence:
criminal groups use visible violence and public messaging to:
- intimidate rivals and populations
- cultivate reputations
- contest territory
- communicate power
Publicity can therefore be symbolic without being occult.
Scripture correction:
biblical Christianity certainly allows the reality of spiritual evil, but Ephesians 6 does not tell Christians to convert every shocking crime into an occult taxonomy.
Paul says:
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers…” — Ephesians 6:12
Notice what surrounds that verse:
- truth
- righteousness
- faith
- the gospel of peace
- the word of God
- prayer
The passage is not permission to make unverified accusations.
No. 42841166 — victims “weren’t innocent”; American “mammon worship”; U.S. guns/profits; DEA/NSA/CIA “handlers”; racial blame
This post is a perfect example of epistemic bundling:
a demonstrably true fact is placed beside an inference, then beside an unsupported conspiracy, making the entire bundle feel equally established. (4chan)
“They weren’t innocent.”
— Unsupported and morally loaded.
Having known a criminal, dated someone connected to crime, made satire about organized crime, or posted about a faction does not make a homicide victim legally or morally deserving of assassination.
In Márquez’s case, current official reporting points in the opposite direction:
authorities say Francisco “N,” the son, not nephew, of alleged criminal leader “El R-1,” was her former romantic partner, had allegedly threatened her repeatedly, and is suspected of asking his father to have her killed.
Authorities still have to prove that alleged participation.
That makes
“she wasn’t innocent”
an especially poor substitution for evidence.
“They get their guns from America.”
— Directionally well supported, but needs precision.
ATF says that of 25,884 firearms recovered in Mexico and submitted to ATF for tracing for calendar year 2024, 18,249, or 70.5%, were classified as U.S.-sourced—either manufactured in the United States or legally imported into it.
That is a serious empirical connection.
But it does not mean 70.5% of every firearm possessed by every cartel came directly from a particular American civilian seller; tracing data are a selected law-enforcement dataset and source country is not identical to trafficking route.
Firearms Trace Data: Mexico – 2019-2024 | ATF
So, there is a valid point buried underneath the racial rhetoric.
“Most of their profits [come from America].”
— plausible in the broad drug-market sense, but too imprecise as written.
The United States is obviously a crucial destination market for major Mexican trafficking organizations.
But
“most of their profits”
requires organization-specific accounting that the poster provides none of.
Modern cartels also make money through:
- extortion
- fuel theft
- migrant smuggling
- local drug sales
- kidnapping
and other enterprises.
It should not be repeated as a quantified fact without a defined cartel and dataset.
“They obey DEA/NSA/CIA handlers.”
— unsupported.
There are documented:
- informants
- infiltrations
- controlled operations
- corrupt officials
and controversial law-enforcement techniques in the drug war.
None of that proves the sweeping claim that Mexican cartels generally “obey” U.S. intelligence or law-enforcement handlers.
That is a classic equivocation between contact and control.
The racial language adds no explanatory value.
Whether the blame is directed toward:
- Mexicans
- Americans
- whites
or any other ethnicity, collective ethnic guilt is not a substitute for identifying:
- individual traffickers
- corrupt officials
- arms smugglers
- financiers
or killers.
Scripture correction:
Exodus 23 is remarkably direct:
“Thou shalt not raise a false report…”
“Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil…”
“Keep thee far from a false matter…”
And James rebukes the very contradiction of using religious speech while degrading human beings:
“Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God.”
“My brethren, these things ought not so to be.” — James 3:9–10
That correction applies regardless of the ethnicity being insulted.
No. 42841205 — Márquez “wanted to marry the nephew of a crime lord”; Gastélum was pretending to be cartel for a skit
First claim: contradicted in an important detail.
Current reporting says Francisco “N” was the son of El R-1 and Márquez’s former partner, not his nephew.
Authorities also say he had allegedly threatened her and that their present hypothesis is that he asked his father to order the murder.
I did not find reliable evidence supporting the stronger
“wanted to marry him”
formulation in the authoritative current material reviewed here.
Second claim: partly grounded, but motive is being overstated.
Gastélum was known for comedy videos.
But after the murder, the Security Cabinet specifically stated that investigators were examining publications in which he alluded to a faction of a criminal group.
That makes a cartel-conflict hypothesis reasonable to investigate—but it does not establish that a particular comedy skit caused his murder.
Mexican influencer Cesar Gastelum shot to death during livestream | Reuters
This post is more reality-based than the occult replies, but it still slides too quickly from association to causal conclusion.
No. 42841346 — “Who decides which devil worshippers rise up the ranks?”
Verdict: category error.
A cartel’s criminal hierarchy and a proposed supernatural hierarchy are two different propositions.
Evidence that someone is:
- a plaza boss
- sicario
- trafficker
or financier tells us nothing about a spiritual “rank.”
Even within actual esoteric movements, hierarchies differ radically.
The thread has not first established that the relevant cartel members belong to the same religion, much less one possessing common occult grades.
Biblically:
Ephesians names “principalities” and “powers,” but Scripture nowhere says that a cartel member receives an occult promotion when he rises within a criminal organization.
That is something being added to Scripture, not extracted from it.
No. 42841445 — influencer events may not be real; maybe occult ritual; “cartels are Freemasons”
The skepticism is methodologically backwards.
The deaths themselves are not merely influencer theater.
Gastélum’s murder was independently reported by Reuters and confirmed by local authorities.
Márquez’s murder likewise became a formal homicide/femicide investigation.
Mexican influencer Cesar Gastelum shot to death during livestream | Reuters
“Maybe it was an occult ritual”
is logically possible in the trivial sense that countless things are possible, but no evidence is offered.
That reveals a common error:
possibility → suspicion → implied probability → assumed explanation.
Those steps are not equivalent.
“Cartels are Freemasons.”
— unsupported.
I found no credible evidence establishing Mexican cartels generally as Freemasonic organizations.
Some criminals anywhere in the world could conceivably be members of lodges; that would not make organized crime institutionally Masonic.
This is precisely where Proverbs 18:13 matters:
“He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him.”
And Proverbs 18:17:
“He that is first in his own cause seemeth just; but his neighbour cometh and searcheth him.”
Biblical discernment is not
“believe the strangest hidden explanation first.”
It includes examination.
No. 42841531 — “higher level”; Aztlán has always been demon-filled; murder/drugs ritually defile land for a demon overlord
Historical verdict: unsupported.
Aztlán belongs to Mexica/Aztec migration tradition as an ancestral homeland; scholarly treatments explicitly discuss it as the ancestral or mythic homeland from which migration toward Tenochtitlan was remembered. (OUP Academic)
Aztec Pictography and Painted Histories | The Oxford Handbook of the Aztecs | Oxford Academic
“Always filled with demons”
is not a historical conclusion from those sources.
It is an imposed theological narrative.
Likewise, no evidence in the thread demonstrates that cartel murder and drug trafficking constitute a coordinated ritual project to make geographical land into a “vessel” for a demon.
This is an example of a totalizing theory:
ordinary motives such as:
- profit
- revenge
- coercion
- factional warfare
- social control
are absorbed into a hidden metaphysical master-plan.
Once constructed that way, virtually any violent event can be made to “confirm” it.
Biblical distinction:
Scripture allows a Christian to call idolatry spiritually dangerous.
It does not give us warrant to map undocumented demonic inhabitants onto ethnic territories and then claim knowledge of their current operational objectives.
The biblical posture toward uncertain factual claims remains:
“Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.” — 1 Thessalonians 5:21
No. 42841642 — current facts about Márquez and Gastélum
Verdict: probably the strongest factual post in the thread, but one phrase is too certain.
The claim that Márquez had been in a relationship with Francisco “N,” son of El R-1, and had allegedly received threats is consistent with current public statements by Security Secretary Omar García Harfuch.
Likewise, the claim that authorities are examining Gastélum’s posts referring to a criminal faction is accurate.
However, calling Márquez’s death definitively a “domestic dispute” or Gastélum’s death definitively cartel-faction retaliation outruns what has been adjudicated.
In both cases there are investigative hypotheses, not finished judicial findings.
That difference—suspected, charged/alleged, proved—matters enormously.
No. 42843326 — “23 … Hmm”
Verdict: insinuation, not evidence.
This is classic numerological pattern-seeking.
No theory is specified:
Why 23?
What predicted significance did 23 have before seeing it?
How frequently would 23 arise naturally in the relevant dataset?
What control numbers were considered?
What outcome would falsify the theory?
Without those questions, virtually any number can become “significant” after the fact.
Psychological research is directly relevant here.
Across five studies, van Prooijen and colleagues found that illusory pattern perception—detecting meaningful structure in random or chaotic stimuli—was associated with conspiracy and supernatural beliefs.
A later N=723 signal-detection study found a clearer relationship for paranormal belief than conspiracy belief and cautioned that the effects were smaller than other sources of variation.
So, this is a known cognitive tendency, not proof that this particular poster has some pathology.
That nuance matters: human beings are pattern detectors by design.
The error is not noticing a pattern; the error is promoting one to causation without testing it.
Nos. 42843346 and 42843502 — scatological “weapon” exchange
Verdict: obvious trolling/no evidentiary value.
It illustrates why 4chan cannot be read as if every anonymous statement is testimony.
Some posts are entertainment, derailment or provocation. (4chan)
Experimental work confirms that anonymity can increase trolling behavior, and broader research on online disinhibition identifies anonymity, reduced accountability and invisibility as mechanisms facilitating behavior users might restrain face-to-face.
The Disinhibiting Effects of Anonymity Increase Online Trolling – PubMed
That does not mean every anonymous poster is a troll.
It means source criticism must account for the environment.
No. 42843620 — “Santa Muerte + African black magic + Malleus Maleficarum Satanism + pre-Hispanic shamanism”
Verdict: mixes one relevant observation with three major category collapses.
Santa Muerte:
relevant.
Some traffickers really do venerate Santa Muerte, and criminal protection is one strand of the devotion.
But scholarship emphasizes that her roles also include:
- healing
- employment
- justice
- sobriety
- love
- ordinary protection
her devotees are highly heterogeneous. (OUP Academic)
“African black magic”:
historically and religiously imprecise.
Santería is an Afro-Cuban religion derived substantially from Yoruba/Lúkúmí traditions.
Palo is a distinct Congo-inspired Afro-Cuban religious complex.
Neither is accurately defined simply as “black magic.” (OUP Academic)
Santería | The Oxford Handbook of Caribbean Religions | Oxford Academic
This matters even for a Christian who rejects their theology.
Accurate description is not endorsement.
One can say,
“I believe Scripture forbids this worship or spiritual practice,”
without falsifying what practitioners historically believe.
Malleus Maleficarum:
simply misclassified.
It was a late-medieval Dominican/inquisitorial treatise concerned with identifying and prosecuting supposed witches.
It is not a school of Satanism.
“Pre-Hispanic shamanism”:
too broad.
Mesoamerica contained many:
- peoples
- priesthoods
- cults
- ritual systems
Compressing all of that into a single ingredient called “shamanism” obscures more than it explains.
No. 42844923 — advocating shooting people who make certain skits
Verdict: violent trolling/hostility, no factual contribution.
It changes nothing about the occult question and instead demonstrates the forum’s tendency toward performative cruelty. (4chan)
Biblically, treating murder as punchline material sits rather poorly beside
“Thou shalt not kill.”
No. 42845109 — “Santa Muerte worship”
Verdict: partly correct, but insufficient as an answer.
If the poster means some traffickers venerate Santa Muerte, yes.
Academic sources specifically document that association.
Devoted to Death: Santa Muerte, the Skeleton Saint | Oxford Academic
If the poster means Santa Muerte is the religion of Mexican cartels, no.
The evidence does not support that universalization.
And if
“Santa Muerte = Satanism”
is being assumed, that is also analytically sloppy.
Santa Muerte devotion is normally described by scholars as a Mexican folk-saint/new religious movement phenomenon with Catholic and other influences—not simply as self-identified Satanism.
A Christian can still judge the practice idolatrous without misnaming the historical religion.
That distinction is exactly what intellectual honesty requires.
No. 42845280 — “narcosatanism is a thing”
Verdict: true in a very limited historical sense; misleading if generalized.
Here the Adolfo Constanzo/Matamoros case is crucial.
In 1989, members of a drug-smuggling cult told authorities that ritual human sacrifices were intended to produce supernatural protection.
Contemporary reporting describes Constanzo as adapting Palo Mayombe to his own violent cultic purposes and persuading followers that human sacrifice gave greater magical power.
13th Victim of Drug, Murder Cult Unearthed – Los Angeles Times
That establishes something important:
Criminal occult ritualism involving drug traffickers and human sacrifice has genuinely existed.
But it does not establish:
all cartels → Santa Muerte → Palo → Satanism → human sacrifice.
Indeed, contemporary reporting on Constanzo specifically noted that he changed the religious system for his purposes and added human sacrifice. (Los Angeles Times)
Mexico Massacre : Potent Mix of Ritual and Charisma – Los Angeles Times
So, the Constanzo case should make us more precise, not less.
Extraordinary historical cases are evidence for extraordinary cases—not a blanket template for every later homicide.
No. 42845286 — “the devil decides” occult rank
Verdict: theological assertion, not demonstrated fact.
Within Christianity one can affirm Satan as an actual evil spiritual personality.
But Scripture does not reveal a procedure by which Satan supposedly assigns cartel ranks.
Ephesians 6 gives categories of spiritual opposition.
It does not give us an organizational chart connecting “lieutenant,” “plaza boss,” “capo,” “higher Satanist,” etc.
This is where biblical supernaturalism must be separated from occult fan-fiction.
No. 42845547 — misogynistic victim-blaming
Verdict: unsupported and psychologically revealing at the discourse level.
The line reframes murdered women as people who
“got themselves killed.”
But Márquez was shot by an attacker while working in her salon; current authorities allege she had previously been threatened by an ex-partner and are investigating his and his father’s role.
Psychology offers a relevant mechanism:
just-world reasoning.
Research has shown that when innocent victimization threatens the intuition that people generally receive outcomes they deserve, some observers resolve the discomfort by assigning blame back to the victim.
Experiments have documented this process.
Again, that is not a diagnosis of the poster.
It tells us why
“there must have been a reason”
is psychologically attractive: random or undeserved suffering is deeply unsettling.
Scriptural correction:
Jonah describes Nineveh’s evil specifically as
“the violence that is in their hands,”
placing moral responsibility on those doing violence, not inventing guilt in victims to make the world feel orderly.
No. 42845653
No meaningful factual claim to test.
No. 42846014 — fascination with “mixing different black magic practices”
Verdict: there really can be religious bricolage/syncretism; the terminology remains poor.
Religious systems can borrow:
- practices
- symbols
- vocabulary
O9A scholarship itself discusses religious bricolage in a different setting.
Afro-Caribbean religion also developed through complex processes of transplantation, creolization and interaction.
Full article: Occult Beliefs and the Far Right: The Case of the Order of Nine Angles
But “black magic” flattens distinctions between:
a folk saint,
Yoruba-derived Santería/Lúkúmí,
Congo-derived Palo,
modern Satanist/esoteric movements,
Aztec religion,
and criminal magic.
That would be like calling:
- Catholicism
- Pentecostalism
- Mormonism
- medieval alchemy
- Renaissance astrology
“European white religion”
and pretending that explains their differences.
No. 42846056 — Palo Mayombe / Santería / Santa Muerte / “O9A probably” / Adolfo Constanzo
Verdict: 3 real traditions + 1 unsupported attachment + 1 real historical case.
Palo, Santería and Santa Muerte all exist.
They are not interchangeable.
Constanzo is also real and highly relevant historically.
Mexico Massacre : Potent Mix of Ritual and Charisma – Los Angeles Times
“O9A probably,” however, is unsupported.
The Order of Nine Angles is a real transnational esoteric movement with violent-extremist overlaps.
Academic literature particularly places it in the context of Satanist/esoteric currents, far-right milieus and neo-Nazi appropriation.
I found no credible evidence in the material reviewed that O9A is a significant religious force among Mexican drug cartels.
That does not logically prove no Mexican trafficker has ever encountered O9A material.
It means “probably” is unjustified without evidence.
This is a good example of why merely naming four obscure things together is rhetorically powerful:
specificity creates an illusion of expertise even when the connective tissue is missing.
No. 42846058 — Santa Muerte is a “goddess,” everyone believes in her, Mary + Grim Reaper + Aztec death god, ordinary Mexicans terrified
Verdict: contains partial truth wrapped in overstatement.
“They 100% believe.”
False as a universal statement.
The devotion itself has millions of heterogeneous adherents; no evidence establishes universal cartel participation.
“Goddess.”
Not the safest neutral classification.
Scholarly literature usually calls her a folk saint, personification of death or new religious movement figure.
Devotees themselves can understand her differently.
“Mary + Grim Reaper + Aztec death god.”
This is an oversimplified shorthand for a genuinely complicated origins debate.
Scholarship recognizes European death imagery and argues for various Indigenous influences, while also debating precisely how direct that pre-Columbian continuity is.
Modern Santa Muerte is also a distinctly Mexican, largely modern formation. (OUP Academic)
Calling her simply
“Mary mixed with an Aztec god”
makes the genealogy sound far more settled than it is.
“Regular Mexicans are terrified.”
Anecdotal generalization.
There is certainly social stigma and institutional condemnation, but millions of Mexicans and Mexican-Americans venerate her.
“Mexicans are terrified”
treats an enormous population as psychologically uniform.
No. 42846626 — questioning O9A influence in Mexico
The post uses its own crude ethnic language, but the core epistemic question is correct:
What actual evidence connects O9A to Mexican cartels?
That is exactly the question the earlier “O9A probably” reply should have answered.
The academic sources reviewed establish O9A itself; they do not establish the proposed cartel connection.
The better rebuttal would simply remove the racial caricature and demand sourcing.
Nos. 42846631 / 42847494 — immigration/race argument
Verdict: non sequitur.
Whatever one’s views on immigration policy, a murdered Mexican influencer does not logically establish a proposition about whether Mexican men in general should immigrate to the United States.
The argument changes units from identified offenders to millions of people sharing nationality or sex. (4chan)
It is therefore both statistically invalid and irrelevant to the thread’s occult question.
There is a striking scriptural irony here.
Ephesians 6—the passage most often invoked for “spiritual warfare”—explicitly says:
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood…”
Turning spiritual warfare into ethnic warfare contradicts the verse being appealed to.
No. 42847710 — “Legalize it. Problem solved.”
The attached filename suggests prostitution, but the statement itself is too context-poor to fact-check seriously.
Legalization/decriminalization and organized crime are empirical policy questions requiring a defined activity, jurisdiction and outcome measure.
It contributes nothing to the Satanism claim.
No. 42848614 — “I worshipped Santa Muerte and nothing happened”
Verdict: anecdote, neither proof nor disproof.
One person’s report of no perceived supernatural response cannot establish that a spiritual entity exists or does not exist.
From a scientific perspective it is an uncontrolled personal observation; from a theological perspective a Christian should not determine truth by experimentally soliciting forbidden spiritual experiences.
The Bible’s instruction is not
“try competing gods and see which produces an effect.”
It repeatedly commands exclusive worship of the LORD:
“Thou shalt have no other gods before me.” — Exodus 20:3
No. 42848631 — “A god protected you”
Verdict: unfalsifiable post-hoc attribution.
If something happened: spiritual confirmation.
If nothing happened: another deity intervened.
A theory that explains every conceivable observation after the fact predicts nothing beforehand.
Even in Christian theology, we should distinguish belief in divine providence from confidently assigning a secret providential mechanism to an individual event when God has not revealed it.
That kind of restraint is biblical humility, not unbelief.
3. The biggest factual question: do cartels actually practice occult religion?
The answer is sometimes, in heterogeneous ways.
There is substantial documentation of Santa Muerte devotion among traffickers.
There is also an extraordinary historical case—the Constanzo cult—in which drug smugglers engaged in genuine ritual murders seeking magical protection.
But those facts do not justify a single category called
“cartel Satanism.”
Consider the actual distinctions:
| Phenomenon | What evidence supports | What the thread incorrectly turns it into |
|---|---|---|
| Santa Muerte | Mexican folk-saint devotion; traffickers among a much broader devotee population | Universal cartel Satanism |
| Santería / Lúkúmí | Afro-Cuban/Yoruba-derived religious complex | Generic “African black magic” |
| Palo | Congo-inspired Afro-Cuban religious complex | Synonym for Satanism/human sacrifice |
| Constanzo cult | Drug-linked occult cult committed ritual murders | Template for ordinary cartel operations |
| O9A | Real esoteric movement with far-right/extremist overlaps | “Probably” influential among Mexican cartels |
| Freemasonry | No credible cartel-wide linkage established here | Hidden cartel religion |
| Aztlán | Mexica ancestral/migration homeland in historical tradition | Geographically verified demonic territory |
| Livestream murders | Real killings with specific criminal/interpersonal investigative hypotheses | Evidence of occult “leveling up” |
That table captures almost the whole problem.
4. The psychology of the thread
There are seven mechanisms worth watching, without diagnosing any anonymous individual.
1. Illusory pattern perception.
The “23 … hmm,” the leap from two livestream killings to occult escalation, and the attempt to fuse Aztlán, cartels, O9A and intelligence agencies all involve searching for hidden coherence.
Experimental research shows that seeing meaningful patterns in random or ambiguous material is associated with paranormal and conspiratorial beliefs, although later work cautions that effect sizes and causal pathways are more nuanced than popular accounts imply.
2. Hyperactive agency attribution.
Large, frightening events psychologically invite large intentional causes:
somebody must have planned this at a deeper level.
Research on paranormal belief has found associations with false-positive agency detection under ambiguity.
Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics – PubMed
That does not mean hidden agency never exists.
Cartel conspiracies obviously exist.
The methodological safeguard is independent evidence.
3. Proportionality intuition.
A grotesque public murder feels as if it needs an equally grotesque hidden explanation.
But ordinary organized-crime incentives—
- reputation
- intimidation
- retaliation
- control
—can generate extraordinary violence. (Cambridge University Press)
4. Epistemic bundling.
“Santa Muerte is real”
+
“Constanzo was real”
+
“many traced guns are U.S.-sourced”
are genuine facts.
Place “CIA handlers,” O9A and Freemasonry in the same paragraph and the documented facts lend undeserved credibility to the undocumented ones.
This is one of the most important misinformation mechanisms in the thread because the story is not 100% nonsense.
Mixed truth is often more persuasive than pure fabrication.
5. Just-world/victim-blame reasoning.
“They weren’t innocent”
protects the intuition that terrible outcomes happen for understandable reasons.
Research shows that threats to just-world beliefs can increase blaming of innocent victims.
6. Dehumanization and group essentialism.
The racial and misogynistic language converts individuals into categories:
Mexican → cartel; American → handler; woman → foolish victim.
Once people are reduced to a group essence, contradictory individual evidence is easier to discard.
7. Anonymous disinhibition and trolling cascades.
The scatological joke, casually violent wishes and slurs fit well with research showing that anonymity can increase trolling and that exposure to trolling can itself increase subsequent trolling.
The Disinhibiting Effects of Anonymity Increase Online Trolling – PubMed
That is crucial when evaluating /x/:
a thread is not a panel of independent expert witnesses.
One anonymous joke can become another poster’s “evidence.”
5. The biblical correction is more nuanced than either skepticism or sensationalism
Here I think the thread goes wrong in both directions.
A strictly materialist rebuttal saying
“demons aren’t real, therefore stop talking about it”
would not represent the biblical text.
But neither does
“demons are real, therefore this cartel murder was demonic ritual activity.”
Scripture gives us something much more disciplined.
Scripture affirms genuine spiritual evil
Ephesians 6:11–12 explicitly speaks of
“the wiles of the devil,”
“principalities,”
“powers,”
and
“spiritual wickedness in high places.”
Mark records Christ confronting unclean spirits as real personal agencies.
So a Christian need not reduce all spiritual claims to psychology.
Scripture treats idolatry as spiritually serious
Paul gives an especially important distinction in 1 Corinthians 10.
He asks whether
“the idol is any thing”
in itself, then says Gentile sacrifices are sacrificed
“to devils, and not to God,”
warning Christians against fellowship with devils.
That produces a careful Christian position:
A Christian can reject Santa Muerte devotion, occult invocation and sacrifices as religiously incompatible with worship of the God of Scripture without pretending that every Santa Muerte devotee is a murderer or every cartel homicide is a ritual sacrifice.
Those are separate propositions.
Scripture also insists on ordinary human agency
James asks:
“From whence come wars and fightings among you?”
His immediate answer concerns:
human:
- lusts
- desires
- killing
- conflict
Biblical demonology therefore does not erase:
- greed
- hatred
- envy
- vengeance
- ambition
or human choice.
That matters enormously for cartel violence.
“The devil did it”
can become a strangely convenient way of obscuring the men who:
- ordered a murder
- supplied weapons
- accepted money
- threatened victims
and pulled triggers.
Scripture forbids occult practice—but also false accusation
Christianity does not become more faithful by attaching “demonic” to things for which evidence is absent.
Exodus says:
“Thou shalt not raise a false report…”
Paul says:
“Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.”
And the KJV translators themselves praise searching and studying Scripture rather than credulity.
The biblical pattern is discernment plus truthfulness, not sensationalism.
Spiritual warfare is not racial warfare
This is perhaps the thread’s greatest scriptural contradiction.
Paul says:
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood…”
The thread repeatedly turns:
- Mexican people
- Americans
- white people
- immigrants
- women
into collective spiritual enemies.
James gives the answer:
“Therewith bless we God… and therewith curse we men, which are made after the similitude of God.”
One cannot improve discernment by adding contempt.
6. What the OP could responsibly conclude
After stripping away the speculation, a defensible reconstruction looks like this:
Some Mexican traffickers and other people connected with organized crime participate in folk-religious or occult practices, including Santa Muerte devotion, and there are documented historical cases such as Adolfo Constanzo’s criminal cult in which drug trafficking and ritual human sacrifice genuinely intersected.
However, Mexican cartels have no demonstrated single Satanic religion or occult rank system.
Santa Muerte, Santería and Palo are distinct traditions, not synonyms for Satanism; O9A and Freemasonic cartel-control claims in this thread lack credible evidence.
The recent murders of César Gastélum and Valeria Márquez are real, but current investigative evidence points toward ordinary criminal/interpersonal motives—not proven ritual sacrifice.
And from a biblical Christian position I would add:
Scripture gives ample warrant to reject idolatry and occult involvement and to recognize real spiritual evil.
It gives no warrant to manufacture secret demonic hierarchies, assign demons to ethnic territories without revelation, bear false witness about murder victims, or curse whole peoples.
Christian discernment should be simultaneously more supernatural than secular reductionism and more evidence-disciplined than occult sensationalism.
That, I think, is the strongest correction to the thread.
Bottom line
The thread’s most effective misinformation move is that it starts with three things that really are true—cartel violence can be highly symbolic; some criminals do venerate Santa Muerte; and Constanzo’s horrific ritual-drug cult really existed—
and then quietly crosses a bridge for which it has supplied no evidence:
some criminals use occult religion → cartels practice Satanism → they have occult ranks → murders on livestream signal ritual escalation → ancient Mexican territory is demonically occupied → O9A/Freemasons/intelligence agencies sit behind it.
Every arrow after the first one needs its own evidence.
The thread mostly supplies none.
And the biblical safeguard against exactly that progression is beautifully simple:
“Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.” — 1 Thessalonians 5:21
That allows us to take spiritual evil seriously without becoming careless with truth.
4CHAN THREAD & POST BREAKDOWNS – Library of Rickandria
VCG PAPER PROJECTS – Library of Rickandria